Vulnerability in the use of city territory by tourists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Vulnerability in the use of city territory by tourists

Description:

Residents, hotel entrepreneurs, travel agents, local governments and also ... rational totalitarianism, which is an adventure excluded to the rich and middle ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: SDRO
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vulnerability in the use of city territory by tourists


1
Vulnerability in the use of city territory by
tourists
  • Marília Steinberger and Neio Campos
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia e Centro
    de Excelência em Turismo
  • (Graduate Program in Geography and Center of
    Excellence in Tourism)
  • Universidade de Brasília
  • University of Brasília

2
  • The objective of this study is to discuss
    vulnerability in the use of city territory by
    tourists, taking small cities in Central Brazil
    Region, still little known as tourist objects, as
    empirical reference.

2
3
  • The understanding of tourism as territorial use
    differs from the traditional approaches that
    consider it a phenomenon, system or empirical
    practice.
  • Therefore, the analysis of tourism as the use of
    city territory leads to the adoption of the
    Brazilian geographer Milton Santoss contribution
    about the relationship between geographic space
    and used territory as the basic theoretical axis,
    which allows for the reflection on who uses the
    territory and how they use it.

3
4
  • Residents, hotel entrepreneurs, travel agents,
    local governments and also tourists, who have
    special emphasis in this paper, form the set of
    main social agents responsible for the
    appropriation of the city for tourist use.
  • The way these agents experience tourism in the
    city generates greater or smaller vulnerability.
    Thus, vulnerability will be adopted in this study
    as a complementary theoretical axis.

4
5
  • Such understanding allows for the consideration
    of vulnerability of tourist use of city territory
    both in its negative and its positive aspects,
    since it does not represent only the recognition
    of threats and risks, but also the capability of
    responding to them.

5
6
  • A short time ago discussions about tourism in
    Brazil were limited to the coast.
  • In the present paper we are referring to tourism
    in the countryside, specifically in the Central
    Brazil Region, which encompasses the Federal
    District and the states of Goiás and Tocantins,
    bringing three examples of small cities.

6
7
  • This paper is organized in three sections
  • Brief review of spatial theory in order to base
    the idea that tourism is a territorial use and
    understand the vulnerability associated with it.
  • The way Geography can contribute to the
    understanding of the notion of vulnerability
    applied to tourism.
  • Examples of cities where incipient tourism can
    bring both threats/risks and opportunities/respons
    es.

7
8
1. TOURISM AS TERRITORIAL USE
  • Milton Santoss theory not only allows for basing
    the idea that tourism is a use of city territory,
    but mainly to emphasize that city territory used
    by tourism needs to be taking into account that
    space and territory cannot be dissociated.
  • The author clearly demonstrates the relationship
    between space and territory
  • ... geographic space is defined as the union of
    object systems and action systems that cannot be
    dissociated, and their hybrid forms, the
    techniques which indicate how the territory is
    used how, where, by whom, why, what for ... to
    apprehend territorial constitution, according to
    its uses ... enables one to think the territory
    as an actor and not only as a stage, that is, the
    territory in its active role (Santos Silveira,
    200111).

8
9
  • When it is proposed that tourism should be
    understood as territorial use, it is not enough
    to realize that tourism takes place in the
    territory. Experiencing tourism means an
    appropriation of territory, which results from
    the intention to use the territory for tourist
    purposes.
  • This territorial use does not take place over a
    tabula rasa, but over a historical taking place
    which represents the building up of diverse
    temporalities, appropriated by tourist use.
  • In other words, we could ask ourselves what the
    social agents are doing when they promote
    tourism. They are appropriating natural and
    artificial geographic objects and giving them a
    new meaning a tourist meaning.

9
10
  • Such agents, responsible for effecting tourist
    use, interfere in socio-spatial dynamics. Each
    one of them has a specific share of participation
    in this process.
  • Among them, tourists are the ones who consolidate
    such dynamic because their actions, singularized
    by their movements, engender a new spatial and
    demographic mobility which does not take place in
    the used territory as a whole.
  • Tourist actions are selective and take place in
    certain fractions of territory. The city is a
    fraction of used territory that has extensively
    been encompassing tourism. The way tourists
    appropriate it generates greater or smaller
    vulnerability.

10
11
2. TOURISM VULNERABILITY AND TOURISTS
VULNERABILITY
  • Milton Santoss spatial theory, when working with
    the ideas of superior and inferior circuits,
    citizenship and slow men, makes it possible to
    deepen the geographic dimension of the notion of
    vulnerability as well as to relate it to tourism
    and tourists.

11
12
  • Tourism as the citys territorial use tackles
    both circuits.
  • It tackles the superior circuit when tourists
    appropriate technological modernization of hotel
    complexes and international airways, as well as
    online-sold tourist packages.
  • The inferior circuit is evident in the
    relationships with the local receiver communities
    which, on the one hand, benefit from the creation
    of job and income opportunities and, on the other
    hand, see their culture and values being
    threatened by the relatively expressive presence
    of tourists from different parts of the world,
    which demonstrates the vulnerability intrinsic to
    tourism.

12
13
  • In general, tourists are considered active
    agents, who appropriate city territory and its
    surroundings in a predatory way, whereas
    residents are considered passive agents.
  • In fact, it is important to argue that none of
    the two ways of thinking is correct.
  • Residents should not be seen only as passive
    agents of tourist activity since their capacity
    to respond to risks does not take place in
    individual terms, but in organized groups,
    exercising citizenship which becomes concrete in
    the territory.

13
14
  • Concerning the idea of slow men, Milton Santos
    states that cities are the place where the weak
    may exist because, as the stage of all capital
    and work activities, the city may attract and
    host multitudes of poor people expelled from
    other places.
  • According to him, the presence of poor people
    enhances and enriches socio-spatial diversity.
  • He asserts that this is the citys future and
    concludes that in the cities, the time that
    rules, or will rule, is the time of slow men,
    that is, the power belongs to the slow because
    they escape rational totalitarianism, which is
    an adventure excluded to the rich and middle
    classes (Santos, 1996).

14
15
  • There is room, then, to question how slow men
    take part in tourism, speculating about what they
    win or lose with tourism and what their
    relationship with tourists is.
  • Even though tourism has become more and more a
    mass activity, slow men have always been present
    as workers in this sector, winning jobs and
    income.
  • The losses, however, are mainly related to
    prejudice against these mens visibility in the
    city territory.
  • In general, tourists are shown only the richest
    and most beautiful parts of the city, whereas the
    territory occupied by slow men is hidden.

15
16
3. THREATS AND RESPONSES TO VULNERABILITY
RESULTING FROM TOURISM IN CENTRAL BRAZIL REGION
  • The choice of the cities of Colinas do Sul,
    Cavalcante and Alto Paraíso is justified by the
    incipient presence of tourist activity and by the
    pressure that these cities have been going under
    on the part of tourists.
  • It is assumed that a probable increase in this
    activity will make it possible to simultaneously
    analyze risks and opportunities in a moment which
    is still propitious to intervention that may
    trigger future responses.
  • We understand that risks are related to the
    decisions to promote the intensification of
    tourist activity in these cities, while
    opportunities are related to the decisions to
    prioritize actions capable of minimizing these
    risks.

16
17
  • Tourism in Colinas do Sul, after the lake at the
    Usina Hidrelétrica de Serra da Mesa (Serra da
    Mesa Hydroelectric Plant) was created, takes
    place spontaneously.
  • In this sense, it is fundamental to raise
    awareness of the need for articulation between
    the community, entrepreneurs and public powers so
    as to hamper three manifestations of
    vulnerability that have been observed by the
    increase in the number of tourists pressure of
    some land owners to delimit lots in the
    expectation of estate valuing, demographic
    pressure over sanitation infrastructure and
    environmental pressure.
  • As examples of the capability of responding in
    order to minimize such vulnerability are
    campaigns of environmental education and the
    construction of a Tourists Care Center.

17
18
  • Cavalcante is peculiar for the presence of
    Quilombo of Kalungas, who descend from slaves who
    lived in isolation until the beginning of the
    1980s and, nowadays, are officially owners of an
    area of over 237,000 hectares, 70 to 80 per cent
    of which have been invaded by land grabbers,
    which reveals strong pressure over land
    occupation, configuring vulnerability.
  • Kalungas start to accept tourism as an
    alternative economic activity, more specifically
    ecotourism, due to the concentration of natural
    attractions (waterfalls) in their territory, and
    cultural tourism due to the preservation of
    secular religious traditions.
  • There is a disproportion between tourist
    potential and load capacity of natural and
    cultural attractions, another manifestation of
    vulnerability.
  • In order to minimize such vulnerabilities, the
    following are suggested the adoption of a
    participative tourist plan the implementation of
    guided tours so as to avoid aggressions to
    nature the definition of environmental
    protection areas and ecological parks.

18
19
  • The third and final empirical reference of
    tourist cities in Central Brazil Region is Alto
    Paraíso, São Jorge village specifically, located
    at the entrance of Parque Nacional da Chapada dos
    Veadeiros (Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park),
    the destination of esoteric people attracted by
    the mysticism in the place.
  • The analysis of the environmental transformations
    generated by rapid and intense implementation of
    tourism brings along the following risks
    devaluation of local culture degradation and
    segregation of public areas invaded by tourists
    exclusion of the native population in the process
    of economic growth real estate speculation and
    increase in the cost of living.
  • Responses to the risks mentioned above are the
    foundation of ASJOR (Associação de Moradores de
    São Jorge São Jorge Residents Association) and
    of a community radio station.

19
20
IN THE GUISE OF CONCLUSION
  • This paper defended the idea that only actions
    shared by social agents may minimize
    vulnerability of tourism over city territory.
  • Based on a global paradox, by John Naisbitt,
    whose text says minor protagonists, contrary to
    what has been thought, are the ones who make
    decisions, in the case of tourism, tourists and
    residents are considered minor protagonists that
    are active agents. Such consideration which does
    not imply dispensing with the fundamental
    presence of the State and enterprises as major
    protagonists.

20
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com