RFC 3039 bis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RFC 3039 bis

Description:

Key usage settings SHALL be set in accordance with RFC 3280 definitions. Further conventions for key usage setting MAY be defined by certificate policies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: stefansa
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: rfc | bis

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RFC 3039 bis


1
RFC 3039 bis
  • Qualified Certificates Profile
  • Changes from RFC 3039

2
Issues
  • References and other minor editorial
  • Subject DN attributes
  • Scope
  • Key usage
  • qcStataments - mandatory use for QC and
    criticality

3
Subject attributes
  • RFC 3039 text
  • The subject field SHALL contain an appropriate
    subset of the following attributes
  • Other attributes may be present but MUST NOT be
    necessary to distinguish the subject name from
    other subject names within the issuer domain.
  • Attributes under consideration
  • postalAddress (not supported by RFC 3280)
  • Title (function/position within an organization)

4
Scope The two ways
  • RFC 3039 way
  • Profile for Qualified Certificates but scope is
    not limited to that.
  • RFC 3039 bis way?
  • Profile for ID certificates that also defines
    specific tools for QC

5
Scope RFC 3039
  • Abstract This document forms a certificate
    profile for Qualified Certificates, based on RFC
    2459, for use in the Internet. The term Qualified
    Certificate is used to describe a certificate
    with a certain qualified status within applicable
    governing law.
  • Section 2 The term "Qualified Certificate" has
    been used by the European Commission to describe
    a certain type of certificates with specific
    relevance for European legislation. This
    specification is intended to support this class
    of certificates, but its scope is not limited to
    this application.
  • Section 2 Within this standard the term
    "Qualified Certificate" is used more generally,
    describing the format for a certificate whose
    primary purpose is identifying a person with high
    level of assurance in public non-repudiation
    services. The actual mechanisms that will decide
    whether a certificate should or should not be
    considered to be a "Qualified Certificate" in
    regard to any legislation are outside the scope
    of this standard.

6
Scope Reasons for change
  • Some functions of RFC 3039 are not specific to QC
    or public non-repudiations services
  • biometricInfo Extension
  • Issuer and Subject DN attribute set
  • Attribute semantics definitions (PI definition)
  • SubjectDirectory attributes
  • dateOfBirth placeOfBirth gender
    countryOfCitizenship and countryOfResidence.

7
Scope RFC3039 bis 00.txt
  • Abstract This document forms a certificate
    profile, based on RFC 3280, for identity
    certificates issued to physical persons.
  • Abstract The profile defines specific
    conventions for certificates that are qualified
    within a defined legal framework, named Qualified
    Certificates. The profile does however not define
    any legal requirements for such Qualified
    Certificates.
  • Section 2 Within this standard the term
    "Qualified Certificate" is used generally,
    describing a certificate whose primary purpose is
    to identify a person with high level of
    assurance, where the certificate meet some
    qualification requirements defined by an
    applicable legal framework.

8
Key usage
  • RFC 3039
  • If the key usage nonRepudiation bit is asserted
    then it SHOULD NOT be combined with any other key
    usage , i.e., if set, the key usage
    non-repudiation SHOULD be set exclusively.
  • RFC 3039bis 00.txt
  • Key usage settings SHALL be set in accordance
    with RFC 3280 definitions. Further conventions
    for key usage setting MAY be defined by
    certificate policies and/or local legal
    regulations.
  • Motivation for change is highly dependent on scope

9
qcStatement Extension mandatory use and
criticality
  • ETSI TS 101 862
  • Based on clear definition of QC as context for
    the standard
  • QC declaration through policy or qcStatement
  • RFC 3039
  • No stipulation
  • Proposal
  • RFC 3039 bis no stripulation
  • TS 101862 bis Mandatory use of qcStatament, May
    be critical
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com