Of Coase and cattle: Dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 4
About This Presentation
Title:

Of Coase and cattle: Dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County

Description:

When loose cattle cause property damage, what does Coase say should happen? ... this, as there are two property rights regimes in effect, in a spatial patchwork: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:329
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: jbu1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Of Coase and cattle: Dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County


1
Of Coase and cattle Dispute resolution among
neighbors in Shasta County
  • Robert C. Ellickson, Stanford Law Review, 1986
  • -The farmer and the rancher is the canonical
    example given for the Coase theorem
  • When loose cattle cause property damage, what
    does Coase say should happen? What actually
    happens?
  • Shasta County is uniquely ideal for testing this,
    as there are two property rights regimes in
    effect, in a spatial patchwork fence out, in
    which cattle ranchers have right to let cattle
    roam free and landowners bear the cost of fencing
    them out, and closed range in which landowners
    have the right to cattle-free property and
    ranchers bear the cost of keeping their cattle
    out.

2
Coase prediction
  • -Disputing parties have or can costlessly obtain
    full knowledge of the law (property rights)
  • -Parties treat these laws as exogenous
  • -Based on these property rights, parties bargain
    to a compensatory settlement
  • -The assignment of property rights determines who
    pays whom (though not the efficient allocation of
    resources)

3
What actually happens?
  • -Societal norms determine dispute resolution,
    regardless of the property rights regime that is
    legally in effect
  • -The norms are, in escalating order
  • 1) lump ita minor infraction here or there is
    no big deal
  • 2) call owner of cattle to have them retrieve
    stock
  • 3) gossip
  • 4) threaten to hide/kill/castrate cattle
  • 5) complain to county officials
  • 6) threaten or petition to change applicable law
  • -Good neighbors avoid costly litigation or
    insurance claims as a matter of pride those very
    few that took legal measures were regarded as
    outsiders/odd ducks/Texans
  • -Those who offered monetary compensation for
    damages were rebuked for starting a bad precedent!

4
Why does the system work?
  • -Reciprocity what goes around comes around
  • -neighbors interact on many levels repeated game
  • -small number of participants can keep mental
    account of who owes whom
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com