Pipelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Pipelines

Description:

Condemnation, Trespass, Construction, Rupture. CITGO v Mastec - Background. CASA ... Cut on multiple occasions. Only Duke crossing admissible. One Call Statute ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: CR99
Category:
Tags: pipelines

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pipelines


1
Pipelines One Call
  • Dan Richards
  • Hilgers Bell Richards LLP
  • Austin Bar Association Luncheon
  • December 12, 2007

2
Personal Introduction
  • Partner Hilgers, Bell Richards
  • General Litigation
  • Construction
  • Commercial
  • Personal Injury
  • Fiduciary
  • Pipeline Experience
  • Condemnation, Trespass, Construction, Rupture

3
CITGO v Mastec - Background
  • CASA Pipeline
  • 8 Petroleum Products
  • Corpus Christi Arlington
  • May 1999
  • Ruptured by excavator
  • 389 Barrel spill
  • Surface and ground water contaminated

4
CITGO v Mastec - Background
  • Fiber Optic Race to Houston
  • Enron Broadband installation near Luling
  • Contracted to Bechtel
  • Subcontracted to Mastec North America
  • Poorly coordinated subsidiaries
  • CS Directional Boring making One Calls
  • Wilde Construction trenching

5
CITGO v Mastec - Background
  • Other Improper Crossings
  • Duke Energy
  • Agreed to meet on site
  • Bored under pipeline before scheduled meeting
  • Telephone Electrical Lines
  • Cut on multiple occasions
  • Only Duke crossing admissible

6
One Call Statute
  • Utility Code Chapter 251
  • 251.151(a) excavator notification bracket
  • 14th day prior through 48 hours prior
  • 251.151(c) Operator may have rep present
  • 251.151(c) may set a mutually agreed-to time to
    begin the excavation.
  • 251.157 (c) An excavator who has fully complied
    may not be liable for damage to facility not
    marked in accordance with this chapter.

7
Multiple One Calls Faxed
8
Prior To Rupture
  • CITGO Rep contacts CS
  • Meetings on site
  • Could not locate line
  • Staked general area
  • Agreed to meet and uncover with backhoe before
    excavation

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Trial Issues
  • No written confirmation of agreement
  • Only testimony by CITGO rep
  • Several hand drawings of stake locations
  • Mastec Contended they complied with statute

13
(No Transcript)
14
Avoiding Litigation
  • Better documentation of agreement
  • Fax confirmation to excavator
  • Consistent documentation of One Call responses
  • Consistent documentation of onsite meetings
  • Better photographic onsite evidence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com