CoJava: Optimization Modeling by Nondeterministic Simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

CoJava: Optimization Modeling by Nondeterministic Simulation

Description:

Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling. CoJava by Example: A Simple Supply Chain ... process models in PL, DB QL, CAD/CAM, workflow systems, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: classw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CoJava: Optimization Modeling by Nondeterministic Simulation


1
CoJava Optimization Modeling by Nondeterministic
Simulation
  • Alex Brodsky
  • George Mason University and
  • Adaptive Decisions, Inc.
  • Joint work with
  • Hadon Nash
  • Google

2
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax and Restrictions
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

3
Optimization vs. Simulation Models
 
4
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

5
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

6
CoJava Syntax
public class Nd public double choice(double
min, double max) ... public double
checkMinObjective(double objective) ...
public double checkMaxObjective(double objective)
...
CoJava program can compile and run in Java!
7
CoJava Syntax Restrictions
  • Non-deterministic value
  • The output of a choice method is a ND-value
  • A variable is a ND-value, if it appears on the
    left-hand side of an assignment with a ND-value
    on the right-hand side.
  • A variable is a ND-value, if it appears on
    the left-hand side of an assignment that
    appears in the THEN or ELSE part of a conditional
    statement, where the Boolean condition is a
    ND-value.
  • The result of an arithmetic or Boolean
    operation on one or more ND- values is a
    ND-value.
  • Syntactic restrictions
  • No ND loops
  • No ND recursive method calls
  • No ND calls for checkObjective.

8
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

9
CoJava Semantics Optimal Execution Path
Given P - CoJava program I - input to
P v - variable in checkMin/MaxObjective(v),
which appears once in P We denote by EP -
the set of all feasible execution paths e, i.e.,
execution paths that reach the
statement checkMin/MaxObjective(v) when P is run
on input I v(e) - the value of program
variable v at checkMin/MaxObjective(v) on
feasible execution path e in
EP We define optimal execution path OP as a
solution to the problem
min/max v(e) subject to e in EP
10
CoJava Semantics 2 step process
  • Case 1 A single checkMin/MaxObjective in program
    P
  • Step 1 Find an optimal execution path OP for P
    on input I
  • Step 2 Execute OP deterministically as a
    regular Java program
  • Case 2 No checkMin/MaxObjective in program P
  • Step 1 Find a feasible execution path e for P
    on input I
  • Step 2 Execute e deterministically as a
    regular Java program

11
CoJava Semantics
  • Case 3 Multiple checkMin/MaxObjective in
    program P
  • Apply Case 1 iteratively

12
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

13
Reduction to Constraint Optimization
FormulationSmall Example
CS prices0_1 gt 100.0 /\ prices0_1 lt
200.0 /\ prices1_1 gt 105.0 /\ prices0_2 lt
205.0 .. ... ... revenue_1 0 /\ revenue_2
revenue_1 revenues0_2 /\ . revenue_3
revenue_2 revenues1_2 /\ . cost_3 cost_1
cost_2 /\ . profit_1 revenue_3 - cost_3 /\
Maximize profit_1 subject to CS
prices0 Nd.choice(100, 200) prices1
Nd.choice(105, 205) Demand demand new
Demand(prices) Manufacturer manufacturer new
Manufacturer(demand.quantities) Supplier
supplier new Supplier(manufacturer.materials)
double revenue 0 for (int i 0 i lt
2 i i 1) revenue
demand.revenuesi double cost
manufacturer.cost supplier.cost double profit
revenue - cost Nd.checkMaxObjective(profit)
14
Reduction to Constraint Optimization
FormulationAnother Small Example
CS . prices0_1 gt 100 /\ prices_1 lt
200 /\ quantities0_1 1000 /\ revenues0_1
prices0_1 1000 /\ (prices0_1 lt 150) ---gt
(quantities0_2 4000 /\ revenues0_2
prices_1 4000) (prices_1 lt 150)
---gt (quantities0_2 quantities0_1 /\
revenues0_2 revenues0_1) . / Similar
for second iteration /
final double pLow 100, 105 final
double pMid 150, 185 final double
pHigh 200, 205 final double qLow
4000, 6000 final double qHigh 1000,
1800 for (int i 0 i lt 2 i i 1)
assert(pricesi gt pLowi)
assert(pricesi lt pHighi)
quantitiesi qHighi revenuesi
pricesi qHighi if (pricesi
lt pMidi) quantitiesi
qLowi revenuesi pricesi
qLowi
15
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions and Future Work

16
Presentation Outline
  • Optimization vs. Simulation Modeling
  • CoJava by Example A Simple Supply Chain
  • CoJava Syntax
  • Semantics Optimal Execution Path
  • Reduction to Constraint Optimization Formulation
  • Implementation
  • Related Work See Paper for Details
  • Conclusions and Future Work

17
Conclusions and Future Work
  • Unified language for process simulation and
    optimization
  • Java was used, but this is a general framework
    for Optimization extensions of
  • process models in PL, DB QL, CAD/CAM, workflow
    systems,
  • This allows to push MP and CP to other
    communities of users without them realizing
    they are using it, because they would continue to
    use their native methodologies/tools/systems
  • Future research questions
  • how to generalize CoJava to serve as a general
    computational paradigm
  • how to extend it with intelligent debugging
    capability (including testing whether
    generated constraints fall into specific classes
    supported by external solvers)
  • how to extend CoJava with CP facilities and
    extend underlying constraint solvers
  • how to apply CoJava principle to optimize
    processes in diverse domain, such as a variety of
    CAD/CAM methodologies and tools
  • how to extend CoJava for specifying
    templates for machine learning (regression and
    classification models)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com