Title: The Population and Luminosity Function of AGNs in the SDSS
1The Population and Luminosity Function of AGNs in
the SDSS
- Lei Hao
- Cornell University
Hao et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1783 Hao et al. 2005,
AJ, 129, 1795
2Low-Luminosity AGN
- Color selected AGN sample biased against the
low-luminosity AGNs. - Select from their spectroscopic characters,
especially emission-line properties.
3Low-Luminosity AGN
4Narrow-line AGN selection
5Stellar Subtraction
- The emission lines of AGN are often contaminated
by the host galaxy absorption lines. - Apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to pure
absorption-line galaxies and use the eigenspectra
as stellar templates.
6 Data Sample
- 100,000 galaxy and quasar spectra complete in
1151 sq degrees. - Main galaxy sample rlt17.77
- Low redshift (zlt0.33)
7AGN Selections
8AGN Selections
FWHM(Ha)gt1,200 km/s 1,317 are
identified
9AGN Selections
FWHM(Ha)gt1,200 km/s 1,543 are
identified
10AGN Selections
11AGN Selections
FWHM(Ha)gt1,200 km/s 1,317 are
identified
3,074 are identified based on kewleys
criteria
10,700 are identified based on kauffmanns
criteria
12The Luminosity Function of Seyferts
- We measure the luminosity function as a function
of emission line luminosities. - Assumption
- The luminosity of the nuclei is independent of
the luminosity of its host galaxy. - We measure the detection probability function for
each AGN spectra in the sample using the
Monte-Carlo simulation.
13Luminosity Function Result
14Luminosity Function Result
- AGN Number density
- 0.018/Mpc3, 19 of all galaxies
- Luminosity density
- 1.5 ?104 L?/Mpc3 in H? luminosity
- 1.11?106 L?/Mpc3 in r-band luminosity
- Nuclear activity contributes about 6 ? 10-3 of
the total light of galaxies in r-band.
15Ha luminosity to B band magnitude
16LF compare With Previous Work
17Luminosity Function Seyferts and QSOs
Croom et al. 2004
0.4ltzlt0.68
18Luminosity Function of Type I vs. Type II
19Luminosity Function of Type I vs. Type II
20Host galaxy luminosity vs. Nuclear luminosity
- Galaxy Magnitude vs. Ha Luminosity plot
21LF Assumption Check
- Imagine Lnu? Lhost
- Detection probability function underestimate
(low L) - overestimate (high L)
- LF will be flatter than it should be
- For a random chosen subgroup, the expected
luminosity distribution will be biased compare
with the observed luminosity distribution
(low-redshift group shift to high luminosity) - Divide the AGN sample into subgroups by their
redshifts or host galaxy magnitudes.
22LF Assumption Check
23LF Assumption Check
24Host galaxy luminosity vs. Nuclear luminosity
- Correlation test (Kendalls ?-statistic) study to
check the independency.
- ? is close to 0 for all the LFs.
- The principal quantity that determines the AGN
luminosity is the Eddington ratio, not the black
hole mass.
25Conclusion
- A complete optical spectroscopically selected AGN
catalog - The LF probes a much lower-luminosity range.
- The number density of AGNs 20 of all galaxies,
contribute 6 ? 10-3 of the total light of
galaxies in r-band. - The ratio of Seyfert1s vs. Seyfert 2s is a
function of luminosity about one at low
luminosity while at high luminosity Seyfert 1s
outnumber Seyfert 2s by 2-4. - The nuclear luminosity is not strongly correlated
with the host galaxy luminosity. The principal
quantity that determines the AGN luminosity is
the Eddington ratio, not the black hole mass.
26The mid-IR spectra of AGNs
- Low resolution modules (SL,LL)
- 5-40?m wavelength coverage
- Resolution 64-128
- High resolution modules (SH, LH)
- 9-38?m wavelength coverage
- Resolution 600
27Unification model
Type I Seyfert1s, QSO, etc.
Type II Seyfert2s, QSO2s etc.
28Quasars silicate emission
29AGN mid-IR spectra
30AGN mid-IR spectra
Seyfert1
Seyfert2
31AGN mid-IR spectra
32Expected
Type I
Silicate emission
Type II
Silicate absorption
Observed
AGN dusty structure is very complicated
33Ongoing Work
- Spitzer mid-IR spectra of the AGNs selected from
the SDSS sample - Detailed study of the torus structure of the
optical selected AGNs.