Open Source in Higher Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Open Source in Higher Education

Description:

The emerging learning environment. Georgetown University. Accommodating ... Move process control from faculty to learning designers (and learning systems) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: jimfa9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Open Source in Higher Education


1
Learning Environment 2015
Justin E. Tilton and Jim Farmer As presented at
thee-Learning 2006 Conference February 12, 2006
Savannah, Georgia USA
2
Publishers note
  • This presentation at the ITC eLearning 2006 was
    abbreviated so a presentation of LAMS could be
    made as an implementation example of learning
    design.
  • The presentation has been returned to its
    original form.

3
Predictions
  • Students will select what they want to learn, how
    they want to learn and when they want to learn.
  • Jason Cole at MoodleMoot Savannah
  • Colleges and universities will certify
    competencies expressed as mastery of courses.
  • Students will evaluate the quality of learning
    content and sequence.
  • Cost of instruction will matter

4
Predictions
  • The learning systems in 2015 will be a few from
    those available today.
  • All learning systems will be based on learning
    design.
  • Course content with be engineered
  • Continuous assessment of effectiveness of
    learning systems.

5
Perspectivesothers view of higher education
6
The public perception
7
The students perspective
The explosion of knowledge
8
The governments view
9
The new reality
10
Government response
  • Dual enrollment
  • Early admissions
  • International Baccalaureate
  • Credit for Advanced Placement examinations
  • Distance Learning
  • Credit by examination (CLEP College Level
    Examination Program)
  • Improved articulation and advising
  • Study on Acceleration Mechanisms in Florida,
    Dec 2003

11
Expenditures per FTE student
For 2001, Digest of Education Statistics 2003,
Dec 2004
12
Use of eLearning
  • We did not hear that colleges looked to distance
    learning as a common strategy to help accommodate
    students and minimize loss of access. We do want
    to point out that one college that serves a large
    portion of its students through distance learning
    did find it economical to increase this portion.
    with the infrastructures already in place, they
    could accommodate additional students in these
    programs more easily than in classrooms.

Ensuring Access with Quality to Californias
Community Colleges, May 2004
13
Presidents on e-Learning
  • Based on his work with the University of South
    Australia and his conversations with presidents
    and financial officers, Bill Becker said there
    is a general belief that eLearning increases the
    cost of education. He said the cost of the
    distance learning courses at the University of
    South Australia exceed those offered in the
    classroom because of the amount of time that
    faculty spend responding to students.
  • Access and Persistence Symposium, September 8,
    2005, Washington, DC

14
But we predict in a few years
  • The colleges and universities will begin efforts
    focused on improving productivity
  • Education technology will be viewed as necessary
    to improve productivity
  • Major investments will be made in the learning
    environment based on the experience of the
    current distance learning programs
  • Leadership in teaching and learning will move
    from the research universities to the teaching
    universities and community colleges.

15
Future 3-unit course costs
Costs based on percentages from Arizona community
colleges distance learning program in 2001
adjusted to current average undergraduate course
costs and projections of change.
16
The emerging learning environment
17
Accommodating student needs
  • Early work by Pat Suppes has demonstrated that
    students have different learning styles, which he
    represented as trajectories of learning based
    on when different students mastered course
    content.
  • The flexibility of eLearning suggest
    opportunities to transform classical term-based
    learning.

18
Learning trajectories
Based on the work of Pat Suppes at Stanford
University
19
Quick learner
Boredom vs. supplementary course content?
ABCDF
Content Mastery
Course Grade
End of Scheduled Term
Time
20
Early intervention
Monitoring tools can quickly identify students
that are at risk
ABCDF
Content Mastery
Course Grade
End of Scheduled Term
Time
21
Unexpected externality
Unforeseen events resulting in inactivity
ABCDF
Content Mastery
Course Grade
End of Scheduled Term
Time
22
Success or failure?
Immutable time constraints limit a capable student
ABCDF
Content Mastery
Course Grade
End of Scheduled Term
Time
23
Observations
  • Based on observations by Bryan Williams,
    remote-learning.net, in supporting Moodle
    services.
  • Students will continue learning if the eLearning
    resources are available.
  • Quick learners will go beyond the scope of a
    course if materials are available.
  • Those slow to learn or interruptions to their
    learning will succeed if given additional time.

24
Types of e-Learning
Seizing the Opportunity The Quality and Extent
of Online Education in the United States, 2002
and 2003, Sloan Consortium, Sep 2003
25
Student effort
12
9
Hours per week to achieve content mastery
6
3
0
Lecture/Discussion 3h 2h 1h
Blended Collaboration Tutorial
Method of instruction
26
Basis for projections
  • Twenty minutes of eLearning drill and practice
    time is equivalent to sixty minutes in a
    traditional classroom.
  • Students are expected to spend three hours in
    study for each hour in lecture.
  • Collaboration time differs sharply depending upon
    the characteristics of the group.
  • Tutorials take additional time because of the
    interest and focus of the student (and achieve
    more than expected course mastery.

27
The emerging market for eLearning
28
Proposed open /closed courseware
Proposed, Open University of the Netherlands, Feb
2006
29
Expected results
  • Learning on demand in chunks (at no cost to the
    student)
  • Incentive to either
  • Subscribe to tutorial support
  • Participate as a student
  • Seek certification by examination
  • paying current tuition
  • Increase value of brand and gain course
    enrollments

30
The emerging learning environment
31
Investing in courseware
32
Engineered courses
  • Lübeck University of Applied Sciences
  • Learning objectives (using EU transfer course
    objectives)
  • Contract author only for draft text and media
    suggestions
  • Development Manager
  • Instructional design
  • Media development
  • Assessment authoring

In separate units
33
Academic services
  • Lübeck University of Applied Sciences
  • Technical support (separate from faculty)
  • Tutor
  • Domain competence
  • Native language of the student regardless of the
    language of the course
  • Selected for ability to communicate
  • Academic Services Support System
  • (see also University of Oxford and Open
    University UK)

34
The technology
35
Information technology
  • SUNY Learning Initiative
  • Industry standards higher education standards
    and practices
  • Platform and tools
  • Tools and interface appropriate for multiple
    levels of faculty competencies from simple text
    through multi-media to learning design
  • Focus on long tail of specialized learning
    tools
  • Integrated with administration, library and
    external information sources

36
Learning technology
37
Summary of trends
  • Professional specialists
  • Move process control from faculty to learning
    designers (and learning systems)
  • Mergers or consortia to achieve economies of
    scale
  • Public pressures to improve cost/benefit
  • More granular content, more flexibility in
    schedule, multi-format learning materials

38
Barriers to success
  • Change in culture from faculty-centered
    instruction to student learning
  • Change in organization form functional
    organization
  • Acceptance of increased automation
  • Development of feedback to achieve adaptive
    leaving activities
  • Adoption of standard learning objectives for many
    undergraduate courses.

39
To be successful
  • Content interoperability is imperative
  • New consortium-developed or commercial software
    with new functions and new architecture
  • Open standards are required to reduce IT
    maintenance costs
  • Specialization will require retraining current
    staff
  • Collaboration is key to lower unit costs

40
Transformation is feasible
  • eLearning has produced an experienced and
    knowledgeable cadre (many attending eLearning
    2006).
  • Increased effectiveness and reduced costs have
    been broadly demonstrated.
  • All needed information and education technologies
    have been developed and are being used somewhere.

41
The endjxf_at_immagic.comjxf_at_Georgetown.edujet_at_i
mmagic.comjet_at_nuerasoft.cz
42
Learning Activities Matter
Ernie Ghiglione LAMS Project Manager Macquarie
University
1993
2001
43
The LAMS System
  • Learning Activities Management System
  • Both while working at the Open University UK and
    then as head of the e-Learning Strategy Unit of
    the UK Department for Education and Skills
    (DfES), Diana Laurillard has called for the
    widespread adoption of learning design. On
    February 17th she will keynote the LAMS Workshop
    at the University of London.

44
Credits
  • This presentation is based on a presentation
    made by Justin Tilton at the Open Source in
    Government Conference, March 16, 2004, at George
    Washington University and his subsequent research
    at the University of Marylands Robert H. Smith
    School of Business.
  • imms Jon Allen provided graphical design and
    graphics, and suggestions on presentation.

45
Permissions
  • JA-SIG and imm publications are in the public
    domain and can be freely reproduced. Information
    in this presentation was taken from public
    sources or with permission and can be
    redistributed.
  • The presentation itself can be reproduced and
    redistributed provided there are no changes made
    to the content and it is reproduced in its
    entirety.

46
Supplementary material
47
Student Perspectives
48
The higher education web world
Research
Library
Administration
Instruction
Actual screen shots of production applications,
Justin E. Tilton, 2003
49
Students expectations shaped by...
  • In the U.S. Their experience applying for
    admissions and financial aid
  • Their use of financial services portals
  • Their use of the Internet
  • Their life in a real-time, information rich
    environment.
  • Be prepared
  • 94 of Internet-using (78) youths age 12-17 use
    the Internet for school research, 71 say it is
    the major source for their school projects and
    reports, 58 use a school or class Website, 17
    have created a Webpage for school, 74 use
    Instant Messaging.
  • Pew Internet, August 2002

50
Students now expect...
  • Customer service 24 hours a day,7 days a week
  • Complete information froma single source
  • Information by Web, e-mail, telephone, facsimile,
    and wireless devices
  • response time of 15 seconds for telephone, 10
    seconds for Web, and 2 hours for e-mail and
    facsimile
  • access to a complete customer history

51
Students prefer
  • A portal
  • Single sign-on even if that means revealing
    personal logons and passwords aggregation/credent
    ial caching
  • Selection of content portlets and layout user
    profile
  • Common portlet navigation and icons consistent
    look feel

52
Serving students
Gartner/Avaya, CFO Jan 2005
53
eLearning some results
54
Types of e-Learning
Seizing the Opportunity The Quality and Extent
of Online Education in the United States, 2002
and 2003, Sloan Consortium, Sep 2003
55
Rio Salado College and Plato Math
  • Using commercially developed Interactive
    Mathematics Rio Salado offered four courses with
    one instructor.
  • The number of students in a section increased
    from 35 to 100.
  • A course assistant was added to help with course
    management, freeing the instructor to focus on
    student learning.
  • Academic Systems Inc. Profile, October 2002

56
Northern Oklahoma College
  • Using Interactive Mathematics, the pass rate for
    Elementary Algebra increased from 45 to more
    than 70.
  • Sixty percent of the incoming students at
    Northern Oklahoma College are deficient in
    mathematics.
  • Students are passing math and staying in
    school, Debbie Quirey said. 75 percent of our
    students who take one or more developmental math
    classes go on to pass college algebra.
  • Plato Implementation Story, April 2004

57
Student motivation to learn
  • Quirey and others in the department attribute
    the success to students being able to review the
    Interactive Mathematics instructional module over
    and over again until they understand it.
  • Plato Implementation Story, April 2004
  • According to instructors, students using
    Interactive Mathematics reported that they tended
    to go back and review the softwares instruction
    more often than ask questions of the instructor
    or ask for help from tutors.
  • Thomas Coe, Mathematics Department Chair, Rio
    Salado College
  • Academic Systems Profile, October 2002

58
Student willingness to learn
  • Students can accelerate their learning and finish
    more than one course level per term.
  • I have had up to 10 percent of my students
    complete two courses in a single semester. A few
    have even completed three courses.
  • Kim Brown, Mathematics Department Chair, Tarrant
    County College
  • Plato Implementation Story, April 2004

59
Students learn at different rates
Sillinger and Suppes, 1999
60
Students work differently
61
Expected changes
62
Content and teaching
63
Learning support
64
Content development
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com