Broadband Industry Structure: Policy, Pricing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Broadband Industry Structure: Policy, Pricing

Description:

Broadband Industry Structure: Policy, Pricing – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: yalembra
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Broadband Industry Structure: Policy, Pricing


1
Broadband Industry Structure Policy, Pricing
Penetration
  • Yale M. Braunstein
  • 2002

2
My Approach - 1
  • Industry structure ? firm conduct (pricing) ?
    broadband penetration
  • Policies and regulation can affect outcomes
  • Therefore, we need to consider more than just the
    technology solutions if we want widespread
    broadband access
  • Underlying economics
  • Business models
  • Role of government regulators

3
My Approach - 2
  • Outline
  • Current business models
  • Quick review
  • Data (a few examples)
  • Problems issues
  • Current challenges
  • Context parallels with other media
  • Universality
  • Digital divide
  • Content (vertical control)

4
Business Models - DSL
 
Key T Local telco/Baby Bell/ILEC C CLEC
(equipment may be collocated at CO)          I
Non-Bell ISP IXC Backbone provider Notes
(1) ILECs are seeking permission to enter (e)
business                   (2) Billing may be
by either Telco or ISP
5
Business Models Cable Modems
 
Local loop, trunk or star
CMTS
Key C Cable system operator M Modem
service provider          I Independent ISP
IXC Backbone provider Notes (3) Who provides
the line between the cable company and _at_Home,
Roadrunner, or whomever?           (4) Who does
the billing? Cable company or ISP?
6
Business Models Cellular Mobile
 
Key M Mobile operator A Applications
provider          I Independent ISP IXC
Backbone provider Notes (5) Who provides the
link between the mobile company and the ISP,
even if it is owned by the mobile op.?
                  (6)  (7) Do any of these
exist?
7
Business Models Wireless LANs (802.11x)
 
Key P Physical network V Venue (property
owner)          I "Captured" ISP IXC
Backbone provider Notes (8) 2-way revenue
split between P V          (9) 3-way revenue
split among P, V, and operator of virtual network
(e.g., provider of authentication,
billing, marketing roaming)
8
Others
  • Satellite-based systems
  • Latency problems, some uni-directional
  • Starband bankruptcy
  • Wireless, other than 802.11x
  • MMDS (fixed wireless)
  • Ricochet (bankruptcy re-organization)
  • lt128 kbps
  • Nokia rooftop
  • About 1 Mbps
  • Hybrids miscellaneous others

9
Ruby Ranch Internet Cooperative Association
  • Local DSL with microwave link to ISP
  • Interesting history battle for local loops
  • www.rric.net

10
Broadband Data are Difficult to Analyze
Predictions Vary
Broadband Booming in Europe
11
Price Affects DSL Penetration - 1
U.S. drops from 5th to 10th in one year
12
Price Affects DSL Penetration - 2
USA (SBC)
Korea Tel
13
Broadband Penetration in Korea
South Korea's broadband Internet market, where
more than 15 out of 100 people have access to
service, still has room to grow if prices fall,
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) said. But Takayuki Matsuo, of
the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and
Industry, said South Korea could not rest on its
laurels as the world's most wired society. "We
are still in the transitional period," he
said. "Trust building is still very weak, not
only in South Korea but also in the world.
Consumers are still afraid of putting their
credit card number in their PCs," said
Matsuo. South Korea ranked first in terms of
penetration rates for Internet access, with twice
the rate of second place Canada, he said. Matsu
said the fast growth in South Korea of broadband
service came thanks to harsh competition amid
huge demand from South Korean users for faster
Internet access and games.
14
Factors Contributing to High Broadband
Penetration in Korea
  • Key factors include population density, pricing,
    education, availability
  • Significant government investment
  • 1.5 billion to construct infrastructure
  • 1 billion in soft loans
  • 700 million for RD
  • Subsidies for low-income households
  • Free IT training

Source http//www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/275
87.html
15
Problems - DSL
  • Price going up in U.S.
  • Despite economies of scale
  • Despite decreasing cost industry
  • Economies of scale for suppliers ? decreasing
    cost of inputs
  • Cause Increasing concentration (?)

16
DSL Concentration Price
17
Problems - Cable Modem
  • Shared service
  • Price going up in U.S.
  • Introduction of tiered services
  • Lack of universal coverage
  • Recent change in business model
  • Death of _at_Home

18
Problems Cellular Mobile
  • Limited bandwidth slow speed
  • Batteries can not support always on
  • 3G / UMTS will not solve all the problems
  • Q Will 3G effectively compete for broadband
    customers? A "Absolutely not. Not enough
    bandwidth.-- CEO Keiji Tachikawa of NTT DoCoMo
    (March 2002)
  • Spectrum auctions ? high license fees ? high
    prices for services (?)

19
3G Cash Flows Spectrum Fees
  • Assumptions
  • Incumbent operator in European country with 50
    million population
  • Hybrid IP-circuit switched architecture
  • 15-year license
  • Source Kalba International, Inc., 2000

20
Problems Wireless LANs
  • For 802.11x systems
  • Has anyone seen a viable business model?
  • For public venues owners of properties want
    share of the revenue
  • Interference
  • Lack of roaming
  • Despite 802.11x family of standards
  • (Not to mention authentication, billing, etc.)
  • For others (fixed wireless, etc.)
  • Bandwidth, line-of-sight, other technical issues
  • Plus all of the above

21
Problems - Others
  • Current or recent bankruptcies
  • _at_Home (cable modem business model)
  • Covad (CLEC DSL business model)
  • Ricochet/Metricom (wireless)
  • Starband (satellite)
  • Sprint Broadband Direct (as an example)

22
Context
  • Discussions of policies to promote access (both
    in North America and in Europe) often seem to
    ignore questions related to which entity provides
    the access.
  • In other telecom and media discussions this area
    is known as ownership or concentration or
    industry structure. Example Ben Compaine, Who
    owns the media? competition and concentration
    in the mass media industry (3rd ed., 2000)
  • Furthermore, also ignored is the question of
    access to what?
  • In other telecom and media discussions this area
    is known as content.
  • And, issues related to ownership of the
    Internetboth of carriers and of contentare
    often completely ignored even though they may
    affect access and use.

23
Two Major Points
  • Discussions of the Digital Divide and other
    access/penetration issues should include
    ownership/industry structure and content
    components as well as access.
  • Even if you do not accept (1), it is important to
    realize that industry structure affects
    (broadband) access.
  • I look at trends in telecom and broadcasting for
    lessons that may be applicable to the Internet.

24
Preview of the Remainder
  • Policies to promote access to traditional telecom
    services and electronic media
  • Broadband pricing and access recent findings
    hinted at above
  • U.S. policies to promote ownership by small
    businesses, minorities, women
  • Diversity of ownership
  • Ownership of what? (Remember the various blocks
    on the business model slides)
  • Discussion of the links between ownership of
    access and content
  • Summary comments

25
Policies to Promote Access
  • Telecom universal service (regulation)
  • Broadcasting licensing
  • Internet
  • initial funding of the backbone and regional
    networks (subsidy)
  • transfer from government/military/academic use to
    public/commercial use (regulatory forbearance)

26
Are Access Universal Service Related?
  • Changing definitions of universal service in
    telecom
  • Historical Milton Mueller (1993)
  • Old interconnection of local networks
  • Later a telephone line for every (90 )
    household
  • Now ?
  • Role of convergence Schement, Pressman Povich
  • Changes in universal service with the death of
    common carriage

27
Broadcast Licensing
  • Localism as U.S. policy
  • Ownership caps Limits on numbers of stations
    owned by one corporate entity
  • Recent changes
  • Broadcast spectrum and digital TV
  • High value for spectrum in cellular auctions but
    free to existing broadcasters
  • Broadband and digital TV compete for spectrum
  • See Alan Murrays column on Failed HDTV Policy
    (WSJ, June 4, 2002, page A4)

28
Does Any of This Apply to An Interactive World?
  • It is necessary to ask a few basic questions
  • How interactive is web browsing?
  • If it is not very interactive, maybe the old
    approaches are sufficient.
  • How many of those online create content?
  • Is this an important concern or is the ability to
    create content the issue?
  • In either case, do we then need to focus on
  • Content-creation skills?
  • Access to web servers resources?

29
Broadband Industry Structure Affects Access
Prices
Regardless of whether interactivity changes the
dimensions of access, there is evidence that
industry structure plays an important role.
(Remember these charts?)
USA
30
Policies to Promote Ownership Diversity
  • (An inconsistent) Mix of policies in U.S. across
    media types
  • Telecomm
  • Wireless
  • Broadcasting
  • Internet

31
Ownership Wireless - 1
  • Auctions led to high prices, limiting the role of
    small and minority-owned businesses
  • Designated entities authorized by the Omnibus
    Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 47 U.S.C.
    309(j)(3)
  • The objective of promoting economic opportunity
    and competition and ensuring that new and
    innovative technologies are readily accessible to
    the American people by avoiding excessive
    concentration of licenses and by disseminating
    licenses among a wide variety of applicants,
    including small businesses, rural telephone
    companies, and businesses owned by members of
    minority groups and women

32
Ownership Wireless - 2
  • Munsons analysis of the intent
  • The House Report explained the second objective
    in further detail. First, the committee intended
    the FCC to use a common sense approach to avoid
    concentration of licenses, not any particular
    test.Finally, the House committee included
    minority groups and women in order to ensure that
    such individuals would not be excluded by the
    competitive bidding system.-- M.W.Munson, A
    Legacy of Lost Opportunity, 7 Mich. Telecomm.
    Tech. L. Rev. 217 (2001)
  • which led to the NextWave/Chase Tel/Clear
    Comm/GWI/Kansas PCS debacles (1996 auction)

33
Ownership Wireless - 3
  • The compromise solution of re-auctioning the
    NextWave spectrum to large carriers and splitting
    the proceeds between NextWave, which is in
    bankruptcy, and the Treasury fails to get
    Congressional approval (2001).
  • The debate ignored the parallel situation of
    minority-owned successful bidders.

34
Ownership Wireless - 4
  • European experience not much better
  • Legal challenges to licenses in Ireland
  • Selection of Meteor over Orange upheld by Supreme
    Court but results in several year delay
  • Post-auction renegotiations in France for 3G
    licenses
  • Does this meet transparency requirements?
  • Investigation of Italys 3G auction
  • Etc.

35
Ownership Broadcasting - 1
  • Competing trends in U.S. minority ownership
    policy
  • Pro
  • Nondiscrimination Employment Practices (1968)
  • Minority Tax Certificates (1978-1995)
  • Distress Sale Policy (1978)
  • Declared unconstitutional 1989
  • Metro Broadcasting (1990)
  • Con
  • Financial Qualification Requirements following
    Ultravision (1965)
  • Adarand (1995)
  • Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (1998)
  • Auctions (raising the price of spectrum)
  • Spectrum grants to existing TV broadcasters

36
Ownership Broadcasting - 2
  • Effects of ownership may be in several areas
  • Programming / Content
  • Employment
  • Ownership of licenses and facilities
  • Legal to give preferences to small businesses but
    not minorities or women(?)

37
Broadcasting - 3
  • Ownership One can quantify the costs to the
    minority community of U.S. policies such as the
    Financial Qualification Requirements and the loss
    of the Minority Tax Certificates
  • From increased cost of L-T Debt 0.44 mil
  • From (strong) barriers to entry 4.37 mil
  • From no minority tax certificates 1.5 mil
  • (All are per station, in current dollars, and
    depend on a number of specific assumptions)

38
Internet - 1
  • A (changing?) mix of ownership models
  • Conversion to a hierarchical structure with
    backbones internet exchange points owned by
    very large carriers
  • Tier-1 ISPs generally have access to the global
    Internet Routing Table and do not buy network
    capacity from other providers. Examples Cable
    Wireless (CW), Sprint, Qwest, ATT, Worldcom.
  • Tier-2 ISPs lease part or all of their network.
    Examples AOL, _at_Home (gone)
  • Tier-3 ISPs are regional, with no national
    backbone.

39
Internet - 2
  • Discussion points
  • These definitions are not quite so clear in
    practice.
  • See Rob Friedens Revenge of the Bellheads How
    the Netheads Lost Control of the Internet
  • ILEC control of DSL and possible entry into Level
    1 may drive out smaller ISPs
  • Why might there be a relationship between the
    number of (independent) ISPs and content?
  • Tying arrangements bottlenecks (more on next
    slides)
  • Diversity in ownership yields diversity in
    content
  • Does this apply to the Internet?
  • Possible examples on next slides

40
The Essential Facilities Doctrine
  • The notion of an essential facility is familiar
    to the antitrust bar, but difficult to assess.
    The grandaddy of all essential facilities cases
    involved the Terminal Railway Association, which
    first assembled in the 1890's the sole river
    bridge and related yards and tracks at St. Louis
    and which subsequently purchased a second,
    competing bridge. Although ordinary monopoly
    analysis or modern merger analysis might have
    disposed of the matter, the Supreme Court left us
    the legacy of the essential facility. It has been
    suggested that a 1990's equivalent of owning both
    Mississippi bridges is to own the software used
    on a very large installed base of computers, and
    various other modern day analogies have been
    suggested. I am not sure whether a century of
    practice has perfected our ability to analyze the
    elements of an essential facility case. Some
    aspects of the doctrine are still subject to
    serious debate. For example, how essential is
    essential?-- Commissioner Mary L. Azcuenaga
    (FTC, Jan. 1996)

41
Essential Facilities and the Web
  • Should DSL or Cable Modem users be able to choose
    their ISP?
  • Should cellular users be able to choose their
    home page or portal?
  • The next big fight could well break out in the
    world of wireless. So far, the issue has not been
    big in Washington. But in Europe, where wireless
    services are widespread, there have already been
    two skirmishes. On June 21, Britain's BT CellNet
    Ltd. bowed to pressure to allow its wireless
    customers to choose rival Internet portals as the
    home page on their cell phones rather than its
    own default home page. In May, France Telecom was
    forced to take similar action. ''It's valuable
    real estate for the carriers, and they're going
    to have a hard time letting it go,'' says IDC
    wireless analyst Callie Nelson.-- Business
    Week Online, July 31, 2000

42
Internet Content - 1
This may be a very different mix of broadband
content from a small ISP than what you might see
from ATTBI or SBC/Prodigy.
43
Internet Content - 2
For example, after ATT, Cox, and other cable
modem operators replaced _at_Home as their ISP, they
also took direct control of the content on their
home pages.
44
Summary
  • Ownership industry structure ? broadband
    prices ? access
  • Ownership industry structure may affect content
  • Industry structure ? ownership and the
    distribution of wealth across business sizes and
    ownership types
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com