Title: ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 19
1ECON 100 Tutorial Week 19
- www.lancaster.ac.uk/postgrad/murphys4/
- s.murphy5_at_lancaster.ac.uk
- office hours 300PM to 445PM tuesdays LUMS C85
2Question 1
- Use AD-AS analysis to show how each of the events
below will affect the equilibrium price level and
real output in an economy in the short run when
the aggregate supply curve is i) upward-sloping
to the right and - ii) a crude Keynesian curve.
- In each case, draw the appropriate diagram.
- a) Government spending increases
- b) The nominal money supply increases
- c) Workers expect inflation to rise and negotiate
higher money wages today - d) New technology increases the productivity of
workers - e) Consumers expect the economy to go into
recession.
3(No Transcript)
4Question 1(a) Government spending increases
- Use AD-AS analysis to show how this will affect
the equilibrium price level and real output in an
economy in the short run when the aggregate
supply curve is i) upward-sloping to the right
and ii) a crude Keynesian curve. Draw the
appropriate diagram. - Increased government spending shifts the AD curve
to the right. The Keynesian AS curve is an L on
its back - For i) both real output and the price level
rise. See diagram below. For ii), the answer
depends on the position of the AD curve relative
to potential (full employment) output. Where the
AS curve is horizontal (AD1) , real output rises
and the price level is unchanged at AD2. Where AS
is vertical at potential output (AD3) then real
output is unchanged but the price level rises at
AD4.
5Question 1(b) The nominal money supply increases
- Use AD-AS analysis to show how this will affect
the equilibrium price level and real output in an
economy in the short run when the aggregate
supply curve is i) upward-sloping to the right
and ii) a crude Keynesian curve. Draw the
appropriate diagram. - The outcomes are as in a) for both i) and ii).
Expansionary fiscal and monetary policies have
the same effects in the AD-AS framework.
6Question 1(c) Workers expect inflation to
rise and negotiate higher money wages today
- Use AD-AS analysis to show how this will affect
the equilibrium price level and real output in an
economy in the short run when the aggregate
supply curve is i) upward-sloping to the right
and ii) a crude Keynesian curve. Draw the
appropriate diagram. - For i), higher wages raise costs for firms and so
the SRAS curve in i) shifts upwards. The price
level is then higher and real output is lower.
The economy is experiencing stagflation. - For ii), the AS curve shifts upwards along the
horizontal section. The price level therefore
rises and real output falls. Along the vertical
section of the curve the price level rises and
real output is unaffected if aggregate demand is
at AD3. At AD2 the price level rises and real
output falls as at AD1
7Question 1(d) New technology increases the
productivity of workers
- Use AD-AS analysis to show how this will affect
the equilibrium price level and real output in an
economy in the short run when the aggregate
supply curve is i) upward-sloping to the right
and ii) a crude Keynesian curve. Draw the
appropriate diagram. - For i), technical progress shifts the SRAS
downwards as costs fall. The price level in the
economy falls and real output rises. -
- For ii), if the AS curve shifts down along its
horizontal section and the AD curve cuts this
part of the AS curve, the price level falls and
real output rises. -
- Potential output also rises with technical
progress so the vertical section of the curve
would shift to the right in the long run. If the
AD curve cuts this part of the AS curve, in the
long run the price level will fall and output
would rise. In the short run, however, neither
the price level nor real output would change with
this AD curve.
8Question 1(e) Consumers expect the economy to go
into recession.
- Use AD-AS analysis to show how this will affect
the equilibrium price level and real output in an
economy in the short run when the aggregate
supply curve is i) upward-sloping to the right
and ii) a crude Keynesian curve. Draw the
appropriate diagram. - The AD curve shifts to the left as consumers
reduce consumption. The effects are the reverse
of those in a) and b) for i) both the price
level and real output fall. -
- For ii), along the horizontal section of the AS
curve - real output falls but the price level is
unchanged - (AD2 falls to AD1). Along the vertical section,
- the price level falls (AD4 falls to AD3).
-
- It is possible that if AD falls far enough, real
output will fall as well. For example if AD fell
from AD3 to AD2 in the diagram below. If the AD
curve is still on the vertical part of the AS
curve, however, real output is unaffected.
9Question 2
- Show the effect on the slope of the aggregate
demand curve of the following changes -
- a) A fall in the interest elasticity of demand
for money - b) A fall in the marginal propensity to consume
- c) An increase in the interest elasticity of
demand for investment. -
- Hint Bear in mind how the AD curve can be
derived from changes in the money market caused
by changes in the price level and the IS-LM
model.
10Question 2(a)
- Show the effect on the slope of the aggregate
demand curve of A fall in the interest elasticity
of demand for money - Hint Bear in mind how the AD curve can be
derived from changes in the money market caused
by changes in the price level and the IS-LM
model. - A lower interest elasticity of demand for money
means a steeper liquidity preference (demand for
money) curve. -
- If the price level now rises, the change in the
real money supply that this brings about causes
interest rates to increase more in the money
market given the steeper liquidity preference
curve. This means a bigger fall in investment and
so a bigger fall in AD and real output. For this
reason, the AD curve is now flatter. -
- It is possible to show the same effect with a
price fall.
11Question 2(b)
- Show the effect on the slope of the aggregate
demand curve of A fall in the marginal propensity
to consume - If the marginal propensity to consume falls, the
slope of the AD curve in the Keynesian cross
diagram is flatter. This means that when interest
rates changes following a change in the price
level, the change in investment that results does
not affect the AD curve as much. The AD curve is
therefore steeper. -
12Question 2(c)
- Show the effect on the slope of the aggregate
demand curve of An increase in the interest
elasticity of demand for investment -
- Hint Bear in mind how the AD curve can be
derived from changes in the money market caused
by changes in the price level and the IS-LM
model. - Investment responds more to changes in interest
rates caused by a change in the price level as
the marginal efficiency of investment curve is
flatter. AD therefore responds more to the
associated change in price level and so the AD
curve is flatter. -
- Taken together, the three concepts in a), b) and
c) are key determinants of the slope of the AD
curve.
13Question 3
- In the United States, the collapse of a housing
market bubble and the ensuing financial crisis
led to the steepest drop in real GDP and the
largest increase in the unemployment rate since
the Great Depression. The fallout from these
events on credit availability, balance sheets,
and confidence continues to weigh on aggregate
demand, restraining the pace of recovery in the
housing market, firms willingness to hire and
invest, and spending by consumers and state and
local governments. In addition, these demand
effects have probably diminished the productive
capacity of the economy. -
- Reifschneider D, Wascher W and Wilcox D (2013),
Aggregate Supply in the United States Recent
Developments and Implications for the Conduct of
Monetary Policy, Paper presented at the 14th
Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, Hosted
by the International Monetary Fund, Washington,
DC-November 78, 2013 -
- a) Show using AD-AS analysis how the authors
think the US economy responded to the financial
crisis of 2008. - b) How did demand effects diminish the
productive capacity of the economy?
14Question 3(a)
- In the United States, the collapse of a housing
market bubble and the ensuing financial crisis
led to the steepest drop in real GDP and the
largest increase in the unemployment rate since
the Great Depression. The fallout from these
events on credit availability, balance sheets,
and confidence continues to weigh on aggregate
demand, restraining the pace of recovery in the
housing market, firms willingness to hire and
invest, and spending by consumers and state and
local governments. In addition, these demand
effects have probably diminished the productive
capacity of the economy. - Show using AD-AS analysis how the authors think
the US economy responded to the financial crisis
of 2008. - The paper shows how the concepts of aggregate
demand, aggregate supply and potential output are
used by economists to think about the effect of
events on the economy. -
- What happened in 2008 in the US (and other
economies worldwide) was that aggregate demand
fell markedly as a result of the global financial
crisis. In AD-AS analysis this is represented by
a shift to the left of the AD curve. AD-AS
analysis suggests, therefore, that this shock to
the economy would reduce real output and the
price level in the short run. And that is what
happened in the US. Similar effects took place in
other economies that included negative inflation
rates for a short while at least. In the US,
inflation on some measures was negative in most
months throughout the period from March to
December 2009 just as AD-AS analysis suggests
would happen. -
- The response of the US economy at the time also
suggests that the short run aggregate supply
curve in the US is upward-sloping to the right
and not vertical as in the New Classical School.
That said, there is something called the Lucas
short run aggregate supply curve that allows for
the possibility of unanticipated demand shocks to
the economy causing the aggregate supply curve to
slope upwards in the short run. The financial
crisis would be, of course, a very good example
of such a shock as very few actually saw it
coming.
15Question 3(b)
- In the United States, the collapse of a housing
market bubble and the ensuing financial crisis
led to the steepest drop in real GDP and the
largest increase in the unemployment rate since
the Great Depression. The fallout from these
events on credit availability, balance sheets,
and confidence continues to weigh on aggregate
demand, restraining the pace of recovery in the
housing market, firms willingness to hire and
invest, and spending by consumers and state and
local governments. In addition, these demand
effects have probably diminished the productive
capacity of the economy. -
- How did demand effects diminish the productive
capacity of the economy? - It has been suggested (not just by these authors)
that potential output was affected by the demand
shock the economy experienced in late 2008 and
into 2009. -
- Faced with the huge (and in modern times
unprecedented) falls in demand at the time, firms
cut back markedly on investment. (This would, by
the way, suggest an accelerator effect at work.)
The capital stock, a key determinant of an
economy's potential output, therefore fell. Given
the continuing nature of the crisis over the
years since 2009, and its effect on demand and
government spending, the curb on investment has
arguably reduced the quality of the capital stock
over time as the latest capital goods are not
brought into use. These would have incorporated
incremental technical improvements as well as new
technology that maintain trend growth in
potential output over time. In addition, a
declining quality of capital stock could reduce
worker productivity through having to use older
capital. -
- A shift to the left of the LRAS curve (or at
least a smaller shift to the right) resulting
from these effects puts further downward pressure
on output and raises the prospect of higher
inflation as demand recovers. Draw the diagram to
show this effect at work. In total, there would
be long term as well as short-term consequences
for the economy as future economic growth, and so
real output, are reduced.
16Question 4
- Which of the curves show that supply is perfectly
elastic up to potential output YN? -
- a) I only
- b) I and II only
- c) I and III only
- d) None of them
17Question 5
- Which of the curves show that there is a ratchet
effect? -
- a) I only
- b) I and II
- c) II only
- d) III only
18Question 6
- Which of the curves show that when output is at
YN an increase in aggregate demand will raise
both the price level and income in the economy? -
- a) II only
- b) II and III only
- c) I and III only
- d) None of them
19Question 7
- Which of the curves show that curing an
inflationary gap will always reduce prices? -
- a) II only
- b) III only
- c) I and II only
- d) All of them
20Question 1a)
- Using the concept of the circular flow of income,
show why national income in an economy must equal
both national spending and national output. - National income is the income received by
households from firms in the circular flow. This
equals the amount of spending that households
undertake, so National Income is equivalent to
National Expenditure. - The value of what firms produce (National Output)
is the same as the cost of the goods. These costs
are the costs of the factor of production that
households provide to the firms for which they
receive income. And so National Output and
National Income are equivalent to one another. - Through these equalities, National Expenditure
and National Output must also be the same. - The identity is used in the National Income
statistics.
21Question 1b)
- Explain, with the help of a suitable diagram,
what is meant by an inflationary gap. - Inflationary gap is the difference in expenditure
due to a level of output greater than full output
22Question 1c)
- The marginal propensity to consume in an economy
is 0.6. What is the value of the multiplier? - If full employment income in this economy is
1500 billion and current equilibrium income
1300 billion, by how much would the government
in this economy need to raise its own spending to
achieve full employment? - The multiplier is 2.5 (1/1 0.6).
-
- Change in spending required is 200/2.5 80
billion.
23Question 1d i and ii)
- Households in an economy have a constant income
over their working life of 30,000. Working lives
start at the age of 20 and last 40 years. After
that, retirement lasts 20 years. Households also
have an initial endowment of wealth from
inheritance of 100,000, which they receive at
the age of 20. Assuming the interest rate is
zero, what does the life cycle hypothesis suggest
are - i) the current consumption of households
throughout their expected lives? - Total income is 1,200,000. They also have
100,000 inherited wealth. This gives total
wealth as 1,300,000. Consumption per year will
be 1,300,000/60 21,666.67. - ii) household savings throughout their working
lives? - Savings will be 30,000 minus consumption of
21,666.67 8,333.33
24Question 1d iii)
- the difficulties for governments in conducting
fiscal and monetary policy? Illustrate your
answer to this question with reference to your
answers to i) and ii). - The problems for the government are that in
applying these policies they will not get the
same effect on consumption and therefore
aggregate demand from temporary changes in G, T,
the money supply or interest rates. Households
will simply spread the benefit over the remaining
years of expected life. The marginal propensity
to consume is therefore much lower in the short
run for temporary changes in income as is the
value of the multiplier which depends upon the
size of the MPC. To close a deflationary gap, for
example, would require bigger adjustments in
government spending. -
- In referring to the earlier answers students
could use a change in income due to a change in
government policy giving, say, a one-off rise in
income of 1,000. They would then recalculate the
new permanent income and consumption. From this
they can show the marginal propensity to consume
out of the change in income, which will be
relatively low.
25Question 1e)
- Briefly explain, using appropriate economic
analysis, whether or not you think the marginal
propensity to consume of rich households is the
same as that of poor households. -
- In the simple Keynesian consumption function, the
marginal propensity to consume is often presented
as constant. In this case, the marginal
propensity to consume of all households is the
same. This does not have to be the case, however. -
- As income rises the marginal utility of
consumption of rich households could be expected
to fall, a lesson learned from microeconomics.
Rich households might as a result be less likely
to consume changes in income than poor
households. Poor households, in contrast, would
have many more consumption possibilities when
income increased and so a higher marginal
propensity to consume. -
- Also, rich households might be more prepared to
save when income increases. Under the permanent
income hypothesis where transitory shocks to
income are thought to be positive for this group
and lead to current income exceeding permanent
income, the marginal propensity to save out of
income from these positive transitory shocks is
like to be high. -
- Poor households on the other hand face the
opposite situation of negative transitory shocks
and would therefore be more likely to consume in
the face of a transitory fall in income. Their
marginal propensity to consume would, therefore,
be higher. -
- On the other hand, the permanent income
hypothesis suggests that the average propensity
to consume of all households tends in the long
run to be the same. It does not decline with
income as the Keynesian consumption function
suggests. This result was the basis for the
Lorenz paradox, which could be mentioned here. A
constant average propensity to consume would
imply the same marginal propensity to consume for
all households.
26Question 2a)
- Show, using appropriate diagrams, what would you
expect to be the effect of a rise in interest
rates on - i) the level of investment by firms in an economy
- identify the marginal efficiency of capital or
investment schedule.
27Question 2a)
- Show, using appropriate diagrams, what would you
expect to be the effect of a rise in interest
rates on - ii) the demand for bank loans
- provide the demand curve for bank loans
28Question 2a)
- Show, using appropriate diagrams, what would you
expect to be the effect of a rise in interest
rates on - iii) the demand for money?
- the liquidity preference curve is required.
29Question 2b)
- A firm expects the revenues each year from
investing in a new machine to be as follows - Year 1 2 3 4
- 20,000 25,000 25,000 15,000
- At the end of year 4 the machine will be
scrapped. - The cost of the machine today is 78,000. The
firm uses a discount rate of 4. Explain why you
think the firm should or should not buy the
machine. - At a discount rate of 4 the present values are
- Year Present Value
- 1 20,000/1.04 19,230.77
- 2 25,000/1.042 23,113.91
- 3 25,000/1.043 22,224.91
- 4 15,000/1.044 12,882.06
- The sum of these present values is 77,391.65.
- This means that on a cost-benefit basis the firm
would not buy the machine.
30Question 2b)
- A firm expects the revenues each year from
investing in a new machine to be as follows - Year 1 2 3 4
- 20,000 25,000 25,000 15,000
- At the end of year 4 the machine will be
scrapped. - Does your decision change if interest rates fall
and the discount rate is now 3? - At a discount rate of 3 the present values
become -
- Year Present Value
- 1 20,000/1.03 19,417.48
- 2 25,000/1.032 23,564.90
- 3 25,000/1.033 22,878.54
- 4 15,000/1.034 13,327.31
-
- The sum of these present values is 79,188.22.
- This means that the firm would now buy the
machine.
31Question 2c)
- Briefly explain why debit cards are not money.
- Debit cards are used by consumers to assure a
seller of a good that the customer has the funds
in her or his bank account to settle the debt
with the seller. Without the funds in the bank, a
debit card is worthless. It is the bank account
(deposit) therefore that is the money which
settles the debt and not the card. - As with cheques, debit cards are the way a
customer instructs their bank to transfer funds
from their bank account to that of the seller.
32Question 2d)
- Suppose there is an increase in autonomous
investment in an economy. What does IS-LM
analysis suggest might happen to interest rates
and income in this economy if the economy is in a
liquidity trap? Illustrate your answer with an
appropriate diagram. -
- If the economy is in a liquidity trap then it is
possible that the increase in investment by
shifting the IS curve to the right will increase
income while leaving interest rates unchanged
(IS1 to IS2 below). It is also possible, however,
that if the shift to the right is large enough
(to IS3 below) then the IS curve moves to the
upward-sloping part of the LM curve. Interest
rates then rise along with income as a result of
investment rising. - Both these points can be illustrated on a diagram
like the one below showing IS curves and an LM
curve illustrating a liquidity trap at a low
interest rate r.
33Question 2d)
- If the economy is in a liquidity trap then it is
possible that the increase in investment by
shifting the IS curve to the right will increase
income while leaving interest rates unchanged
(IS1 to IS2 below). It is also possible, however,
that if the shift to the right is large enough
(to IS3 below) then the IS curve moves to the
upward-sloping part of the LM curve. Interest
rates then rise along with income as a result of
investment rising.
34Question 2 e i)
- An aggregate supply curve is perfectly elastic up
to the full-employment level of output (Yf) and
then perfectly inelastic at Yf. Aggregate demand
is currently equal to Yf. - Illustrate this situation on a suitable diagram.
- This is situation AD1 or AD2
35Question 2 e ii)
- Using relevant diagrams show the effect of an
increase in autonomous consumption on the price
level, income, and the interest rate in this
economy. - If autonomous consumption rises the AD curve
shifts to the right from, for example, AD2 to
AD1. On the AS-AD diagram, the price level will
rise and income will remain at Yf. -
On an IS-LM diagram, with the normally-sloped
curves, the rise in autonomous consumption will
cause the IS curve to shift to the right. At the
same time, the LM curve will shift to the left as
the rise in price level identified on the AD-AS
diagram causes the real money supply to fall. The
interest rate will therefore rise while leaving
income unchanged, as on the AD-AS diagram. The
IS-LM diagram should show both curves shifting
and the new intersection at the same level of Y
but with a higher r.
36Question 2 e ii)
- Using relevant diagrams show the effect of an
increase in autonomous consumption on the price
level, income, and the interest rate in this
economy. - If autonomous consumption rises the AD curve
shifts to the right from, for example, AD2 to
AD1. On the AS-AD diagram, the price level will
rise and income will remain at Yf. -
On an IS-LM diagram, with the normally-sloped
curves, the rise in autonomous consumption will
cause the IS curve to shift to the right. At the
same time, the LM curve will shift to the left as
the rise in price level identified on the AD-AS
diagram causes the real money supply to fall. The
interest rate will therefore rise while leaving
income unchanged, as on the AD-AS diagram. The
IS-LM diagram should show both curves shifting
and the new intersection at the same level of Y
but with a higher r.
37Question 3
- a)i) 23/2 23 8
- ii) X2/X-1 X3
- iii) (X3)2/X6 X6 /X6 X0 1
- iv) Log101 0
- b) Y 6 X2
- dy/dx 2x
- c) C100.8Y
- i) dC/dY mpc 0.8
- ii) C/Y apc (100/Y) 0.8
- iii) impact of Y on APC using derivative is
- d(C/Y)/dy -100/Y2, so the impact is negative
38Question
39Next Week (week 19)
- Well go over these worksheet questions in the
tutorial. - Also, we can address any questions from the exam
that you might have.