CS 406 Software Testing Fall 98Part II: Functional Testing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CS 406 Software Testing Fall 98Part II: Functional Testing

Description:

Two types of pre-conditions are considered: ... These pre-conditions on A, B, and C lead to the test requirement given above. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 106
Provided by: ValuedGate2215
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CS 406 Software Testing Fall 98Part II: Functional Testing


1
CS 406 Software Testing Fall 98 Part II
Functional Testing
  • Aditya P. Mathur
  • Purdue University

Last update July 19, 1998
2
Part II Functional testing
  • Learning objectives-
  • What is functional testing?
  • How to perform functional testing?
  • What are clues, test requirements, and test
    specifications?
  • How to generate test inputs?
  • What are equivalence partitioning, boundary value
    testing, domain testing, state testing, and
    decision table testing?

3
What is functional testing?
  • When test inputs are generated using program
    specifications, we say that we are doing
    functional testing.
  • Functional testing tests how well a program meets
    the functionality requirements.

4
The methodology
  • The derivation of test inputs is based on program
    specifications.
  • Clues are obtained from the specifications.
  • Clues lead to test requirements.
  • Test requirements lead to test specifications.
  • Test specifications are then used to actually
    execute the program under test.

5
Test methodology
Specifications
Clues
Expected behavior
Program output is correct
Test requirements
Oracle
or
Test specifications
Program has failed make a note and proceed with
testing or get into the debug mode.
Test driver
Until specs. Exhausted.
Actual behavior
Program
6
Specifications
  • Inputs and tasks
  • Given inputs
  • Perform tasks

7
Specifications-continued
  • Input properties
  • Input
  • must satisfy
  • Function f is a pre-condition on input

8
Specifications-continued
  • Two types of pre-conditions are considered
  • Validated those that are required to be
    validated by the program under test and an error
    action is required to be performed if the
    condition is not true.
  • Assumed those that are assumed to be true and
    not checked by the program under test.

9
Specification example
  • For the sort program
  • Inputs are
  • N
  • pointer to a sequence of length N
  • pointer to an area in memory where the output
    sequence is to be placed.

10
Specification example..continued
  • Tasks to be performed
  • Sort the sequence in ascending order
  • Return the sorted sequence in an area provided.
  • Return 1 if sorting is successful, -1 otherwise.

11
Preconditions for sort
  • Validated
  • Ngt0
  • On failure return -1 sorting considered
    unsuccessful.
  • Assumed
  • The input sequence contains N integers.
  • The output area has space for at least N integers.

12
Deriving pre-conditions
  • Pre-conditions result from properties of inputs.
  • Example
  • alpha_sequence(name)
  • alpha_sequence is the string obtained from name
    by removing all characters other then A-Z, and
    a-z. Thus, if name is A12C then alpha_name is
    AC.

13
Deriving pre-conditions-continued
  • This leads to the following pre-condition
  • Validated the string alpha_sequence(name) is
    shorter than name.
  • On failure print invalid name.
  • This property could also lead to the
    pre-condition
  • Assumed the string alpha_ sequence(name) is
    shorter than name.

14
Post-conditions
  • A post-condition specifies a property of the
    output of a program.
  • The general format of a post-condition is
  • if condition then effect-1 else effect-2
  • Example
  • For the sort program a post-condition is
  • if Ngt0 then the output sequence has the same
    elements as in the input sequence and in
    ascending order.

15
Post-condition-continued
  • This could be stated more formally as
  • if Ngt0 then
  • and each is a member
    of the input sequence and sort returns 1.
  • else
  • the output sequence is undefined and sort
    returns -1.

16
Post-condition-continued
  • Another example
  • if (AB) and (BC) then return equilateral
  • Can you complete the above post-condition for a
    program that is required to classify a triangle
    given the length of three sides?
  • Convention We will not nest if-then-else
    statements while specifying a post-condition.

17
Incompleteness of specifications
  • Specifications may be incomplete or ambiguous.
  • Example post-condition
  • if user places cursor on the name field then
    read a string
  • This post-condition does not specify any limit on
    the length of the input string hence is
    incomplete.

18
Ambiguous specifications
  • It also does not make it clear as to
  • whether a string should be input only after the
    user has placed the cursor on the name field and
    clicked the mouse or simply placed the cursor on
    the name field.
  • and hence is ambiguous.

19
Clues summary
  • Clues are
  • Pre-conditions
  • Post-conditions
  • Variables, e.g. A is a length implying thereby
    that its value cannot be negative.
  • Operations, e.g. search a list of names or
    find the average of total scores
  • Definitions, e.g. filename(name) is a name is no
    spaces.

20
Clues-continued
  • Ideally variables, operations and definitions
    should be a part of at least one pre- or
    post-condition.
  • However, this may not be the case as
    specifications are not always written formally.
  • Hence look out for variables, operations, and
    definitions within a specification!

21
Test requirements
  • A test requirement is a description of how to
    test the program that is under test.
  • Here is a sample test requirement for a program
    that classifies a triangle given the length of
    three sides.
  • A, B, C are non-zero and positive.
  • One of A, B, C is negative error condition.
  • One of A, B, C is zero error condition.

22
Test requirements-derivation
  • Test requirements are derived from clues.
  • For example, consider the following
    pre-conditions (clues)
  • Assumed A, B, and C are lengths
  • Validated Agt0, Bgt0, Cgt0
  • These pre-conditions on A, B, and C lead to the
    test requirement given above.

23
Test requirements-derivation
  • Note that we have clumped pre-condition for each
    input variable into one condition. This is being
    done only for inconvenience.
  • It is recommended that pre-conditions be
    separated for each variable.

24
Test requirements-derivation
  • Note also that each validated pre-condition
    results in at least two requirements one for the
    validated part and the other for the failure
    part.
  • In our example above we did not list all
    requirements. For example, we are content with
    testing one of A, B, C is negative error
    condition.

25
Test requirements-derivation
  • Post-conditions also lead to test requirements.
  • For example, the partial post-condition
  • if (AB) and (BC) then return equilateral
  • leads to the following test requirement
  • AB and BC.

26
Compound validated pre-conditions
  • Compound pre-conditions are ones that use the and
    or or connectors.
  • Examples validated compound pre-conditions
  • Pre-condition A and B
  • Pre-condition user places the mouse over the
    name field and clicks it.

27
Compound validated pre-conditions
  • The first of the above pre-conditions leads to
    four requirements
  • A true, B true (This is the validated part)
  • A false, B true (This and the rest are failures)
  • A true, B false
  • A false, B false
  • You may work out the requirements for compound
    pre-condition with the or connector.

28
Compound validated pre-conditions
  • Compound validated pre-conditions could become
    quite complex.
  • Example (A and (B or C))
  • Brute force method will lead to 8 test
    requirements.

29
Compound validated pre-conditions
  • In general this will lead to too many test
    requirements.
  • We can prune them by leaving out those
    requirements that are unlikely to reveal a
    program error.
  • For example, consider the validated
    pre-condition A or B.

30
Pruning test requirements
  • There are four possible test requirements
  • A true, B true
  • A false, B true
  • A true, B false
  • A false, B false
  • Consider a correct C implementation
  • if (!(A B))
  • exit_with_error(Error A is d, B is d, A,
    B)
  • else.. / the validated code comes here./

31
Possible errors
  • Programmer forgets to check for one of the two
    cases resulting in the code
  • if (!A)
  • exit_with_error(Error A is d, B is d, A,
    B)
  • or
  • if (!B)
  • exit_with_error(Error A is d, B is d, A,
    B)

32
Possible errors-continued
  • Or use a wrong logical operator as in
  • if (!(A B))
  • exit_with_error(Error A is d, B is d, A,
    B)
  • Let us analyze how the four different tests will
    perform in each of the four implementations one
    correct, and three incorrect ones.

33
Truth table or condition
  • A B !(A B) !(AB) !A !B
  • T F F T F T
  • F T F T T F
  • F F T T T T
  • T T F F F F

Inputs
Correct implementation
Incorrect implementations
Notice this one will it help find any of the
three possible errors?
34
Truth table analysis
  • Case 1
  • A test input with Atrue and Bfalse will cause
    the correct program to evaluate the condition to
    false.
  • The two incorrect implementations, !(AB) and
    (!B) will evaluate the condition to true.

35
Truth table analysis-continued
  • Both incorrect implementations will print the
    error message.
  • The oracle will observe that the correct and the
    incorrect implementations behave differently.
  • It will therefore announce failure for each
    incorrect implementation thereby pointing to an
    error.
  • End of Case 1.

36
Truth table analysis-continued
  • Case 2
  • Test input Afalse and Btrue will reveal the
    error in the two incorrect implementations,
    !(AB) and (!A).
  • Case 3
  • Test input Afalse and Bfalse might find a fault
    in the then branch of the if condition.

37
Truth table analysis-continued
  • Case 4
  • Test input Atrue and Btrue might find a fault
    in the else branch of the if condition.
  • Thus, all four test inputs are likely to be
    useful.

38
Truth table analysis-continued
  • However, if we were to check for the correct
    implementation of the condition A or B, then only
    the first two inputs are necessary.
  • In this example, reducing the number of test
    specifications from 4 to 2 does not lead to any
    significant savings. When will the savings be
    significant?

39
Assumed pre-conditions
  • Each assumed pre-condition is likely to result in
    a test requirement.
  • Example
  • Assumed MODE is on ground or flying
  • This leads to two requirements
  • MODE is on ground , MODE is not flying
  • MODE is not on ground , MODE is flying

40
Assumed pre-conditions
  • These can be simplified to
  • MODE is on ground
  • MODE is flying

41
Test requirements checklist
  • Obtaining clues and deriving test requirements
    can become a tedious task.
  • To keep it from overwhelming us it is a good idea
    to make a checklist of clues.
  • This checklist is then transformed into a
    checklist of test requirements by going through
    each clue and deriving test requirements from it.

42
Test specifications
  • A test requirements indicates how to test a
    program. But it does not provide exact values of
    inputs.
  • A test requirement is used to derive test
    specification, which is the exact specification
    of values of input and environment variables.

43
Test specifications-continued
  • There may not be a one-to-one correspondence
    between test requirements and test
    specifications.
  • A test requirement checklist might contain 50
    entries. These might result in only 22 test
    specifications.
  • The fewer the tests the better but only if these
    tests are of good quality!

44
Test specifications-continued
  • We will discuss test quality when discussing test
    assessment.
  • A test specification looks like this
  • Test 2
  • global variable all_files is initially false.
  • next_record is set to 1.
  • Upon return expect
  • all_files to be true
  • next_record is last_record1

45
Test specifications-continued
  • Notice the format of a test specification
  • Each test is given a number which serves as its
    identifier.
  • There is a set of input values.
  • There is a set of expected values upon return
    from execution. Any side effects on files or
    networks must also be specified here. In essence,
    all observable effects must be specified in the
    Expect part of a test specification.

46
Test specifications-continued
  • Any side effects on files or networks must also
    be specified. In essence, all observable effects
    must be specified in the Expect part of a test
    specification.
  • Similarly, values of all input variables, global
    or otherwise, must also be specified.

47
Test requirements to specifications
  • The test requirements checklist guides the
    process of deriving test specifications.
  • Initially all entries in the checklist are
    unmarked or set to 0.
  • Each time a test is generated from a requirement
    it is marked or the count incremented by 1.

48
Test requirements to specifications
  • Thus, at any point in time, one could assess the
    progress made towards the generation of test
    specifications.
  • One could also determine how many tests have been
    generated using any test requirement.

49
Test requirements to specifications
  • Once a test requirement has been marked or its
    count is more than 0 we say that it has been
    satisfied.
  • Some rules of thumb to use while designing tests
  • Try to satisfy multiple requirements using only
    one test.
  • Satisfy all test requirements.

50
Test requirements to specifications
  • Avoid reuse of same values of a variable in
    different tests. Generating new tests by varying
    an existing one is likely to lead to tests that
    test the same part of the code as the previous
    one.
  • In testing, variety helps!
  • Though we try to combine several test
    requirements to generate one test case, this is
    not advisable when considering error conditions.

51
Test requirements to specifications
  • For example, consider the following
  • speed_dial, an interval
  • speed_diallt0 ,error
  • speed_dialgt120, error
  • zones, an interval
  • zones lt5, error
  • zonesgt10, error

52
Test requirements to specifications
  • One test specification obtained by combining the
    two requirements above is
  • speed_dial-1
  • zone3
  • Now, if the code to handle these error conditions
    is

53
Test requirements to specifications
  • if (speed_diallt0 speed_dialgt120)
  • error_exit(Incorrect speed_dial)
  • if (zonelt6 zonegt10)
  • error_exit(Incorrect zone)
  • For our test, the program will exit before it
    reaches the second if statement. Thus, it will
    miss detecting the error in coding the test for
    zone.

error
54
Test requirements to specifications
  • Also, do not assume an error test to satisfy any
    other test requirement.
  • Example
  • Consider the function
  • myfunction(int X, int Y)
  • A test for the erroneous value of X might not
    test the code that uses Y.

55
Test requirements to specifications
  • Test specifications must not mention internal
    variables. Remember, a test specification aids
    in setting input variables to suitable values
    before the test begins. Values of internal
    variables are computed during program execution.
  • However, there are exceptions to the above rule.
    Can you think of one?

56
Equivalence partitioning
  • The input domain is usually too large for
    exhaustive testing.
  • It is therefore partitioned into a finite number
    of sub-domains for the selection of test inputs.
  • Each sub-domain is known as an equivalence class
    and serves as a source of at least one test
    input.

57
Equivalence partitioning
Input domain partitioned into four sub-domains.
Input domain
Four test inputs, one selected from each
sub-domain.
Too many test inputs.
58
How to partition?
  • Inputs to a program provide clues to
    partitioning.
  • Example 1
  • Suppose that program P takes an input X, X being
    an integer.
  • For Xlt0 the program is required to perform task
    T1 and for Xgt0 task T2.

59
How to partition?-continued
  • The input domain is prohibitively large because X
    can assume a large number of values.
  • However, we expect P to behave the same way for
    all Xlt0.
  • Similarly, we expect P to perform the same way
    for all values of Xgt0.
  • We therefore partition the input domain of P into
    two sub-domains.

60
Two sub-domains
One test case X-3
Equivalence class
Xlt0
Xgt0
Another test case X-15
Equivalence class
All test inputs in the Xlt0 sub-domain are
considered equivalent. The assumption is that if
one test input in this sub-domain reveals an
error in the program, so will the others. This
is true of the test inputs in the Xgt0 sub-domain
also.
61
Non-overlapping partitions
  • In the previous example, the two equivalence
    classes are non-overlapping. In other words the
    two sub-domains are disjoint.
  • When the sub-domains are disjoint, it is
    sufficient to pick one test input from each
    equivalence class to test the program.

62
Non-overlapping partitions
  • An equivalence class is considered covered when
    at least one test has been selected from it.
  • In partition testing our goal is to cover all
    equivalence classes.

63
Overlapping partitions
  • Example 2
  • Suppose that program P takes three integers X, Y
    and Z. It is known that
  • XltY
  • ZgtY

64
Overlapping partitions
XltY, ZltY X2, Y3, Z1
XgtY, ZltY X15, Y4, Z1
XltY
XgtY
XltY, ZgtY X3, Y4, Z7
ZgtY
ZltY
XgtY, ZgtY X15, Y4, Z7
65
Overlapping partition-test selection
  • In this example, we could select 4 test cases as
  • X4, Y7, Z1 satisfies XltY
  • X4, Y2, Z1 satisfies XgtY
  • X1, Y7, Z9 satisfies ZgtY
  • X1, Y7, Z2 satisfies ZltY
  • Thus, we have one test case from each equivalence
    class.

66
Overlapping partition-test selection
  • However, we may also select only 2 test inputs
    and satisfy all four equivalence classes
  • X4, Y7, Z1 satisfies XltY and ZltY
  • X4, Y2, Z3 satisfies XgtY and ZgtY
  • Thus, we have reduced the number of test cases
    from 4 to 2 while covering each equivalence class.

67
Partitioning using non-numeric data
  • In the previous two examples the inputs were
    integers. One can derive equivalence classes for
    other types of data also.
  • Example 3
  • Suppose that program P takes one character X and
    one string Y as inputs. P performs task T1 for
    all lower case characters and T2 for upper case
    characters. Also, it performs task T3 for the
    null string and T4 for all other strings.

68
Partitioning using non-numeric data
X LC, Y not null
X UC, Y not null
X LC
XUC
X LC, Y null
Y not null
Y null
LC Lower case character UC Upper case
character null null string.
X UC, Y null
69
Non-numeric data
  • Once again we have overlapping partitions.
  • We can select only 2 test inputs to cover all
    four equivalence classes. These are
  • X lower case, Y null string
  • X upper case, Y not a null string

70
Guidelines for equivalence partitioning
  • Input condition specifies a range create one for
    the valid case and two for the invalid cases.
  • e.g. for altXltb the classes are
  • altXltb (valid case)
  • Xlta and Xgtb (the invalid cases)

71
Guidelines-continued
  • Input condition specifies a value create one for
    the valid value and two for incorrect values
    (below and above the valid value). This may not
    be possible for certain data types, e.g. for
    boolean.
  • Input condition specifies a member of a set
    create one for the valid value and one for the
    invalid (not in the set) value.

72
Sufficiency of partitions
  • In the previous examples we derived equivalence
    classes based on the conditions satisfied by
    input data.
  • Then we selected just enough tests to cover each
    partition.
  • Think of the advantages and disadvantages of this
    approach!

73
Boundary value analysis (BVA)
  • Another way to generate test cases is to look for
    boundary values.
  • Suppose a program takes an integer X as input.
  • In the absence of any information, we assume that
    X0 is a boundary. Inputs to the program might
    lie on the boundary or on either side of the
    boundary.

74
BVA continued
  • This gives us 3 test inputs
  • X0, X-20, and X14.
  • Note that the values -20 and 14 are on either
    side of the boundary and are chosen arbitrarily.
  • Notice that using BVA we get 3 equivalence
    classes. One of these three classes contains only
    one value (X0), the other two are large!

75
BVA continued
  • Now suppose that a program takes two integers X
    and Y and that x1ltXltx2 and y1ltYlty2.

14
2
5
1
y2
10
11
6
9
8
13
12
y1
3
4
7
x1
x2
76
BVA-continued
  • In this case the four sides of the rectangle
    represent the boundary.
  • The heuristic for test selection in this case is
  • Select one test at each corner (1, 2, 3, 4).
  • Select one test just outside of each of the four
    sides of the boundary (5, 6, 7, 8)

77
BVA-continued
  • Select one test just inside of each of the four
    sides of the boundary (10, 11, 12, 13).
  • Select one test case inside of the bounded region
    (9).
  • Select one test case outside of the bounded
    region (14).
  • How many equivalence classes do we get?

78
BVA -continued
  • In the previous examples we considered only
    numeric data.
  • BVA can be done on any type of data.
  • For example, suppose that a program takes a
    string S and an integer X as inputs. The
    constraints on inputs are
  • length(S)lt100 and altXltb
  • Can you derive the test cases using BVA?

79
BVA applied to output variables
  • Just as we applied BVA to input data, we can
    apply it to output data.
  • Doing so gives us equivalence classes for the
    output domain.
  • We then try to find test inputs that will cover
    each output equivalence class.

80
BVA-continued
  • Example each student to construct one!

81
Finite State Machines (FSMs)
  • A state machine is an abstract representation of
    actions taken by a program or anything else that
    functions!
  • It is specified as a quintuple
  • A a finite input alphabet
  • Q a finite set of states
  • q0 initial state which is a member of Q.

82
FSMs-continued
  • T state transitions which is a mapping
  • Q x A--gt Q
  • F A finite set of final states, F is a subset of
    Q.
  • Example Here is a finite state machine that
    recognizes integers ending with a carriage return
    character.
  • A0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, CR
  • Qq0,q1,q2
  • q0 initial state

83
FSMs-continued
  • T ((q0,d),q1),(q1,d),q1), (q1,CR),q2)
  • F q2
  • A state diagram is an easier to understand
    specification of a state machine. For the above
    machine, the state diagram appears on the next
    page.

84
State diagram
State transitions indicated by labeled arrows
from one state the another (which could be the
same). Each label must be from the alphabet. It
is also known as an event.
d denotes a digit
85
State diagram-actions
x/y x is an element of the alphabet and y is an
action.
d/add 10d to i
d/set i to d
CR/output i
i is initialized to d when the machine moves from
state q0 to q1. i is incremented by 10d when the
machine moves from q1 to q1. The current value of
i is output when a CR is encountered. Can you
describe what this machine computes?Can you
construct a regular expression that describes
all strings recognized by this state machine?
86
State machine languages
  • Each state machine recognizes a language.
  • The language recognized by a state machine is the
    set S of all strings such that
  • when any string s in S is input to the state
    machine the machine goes through a sequence of
    transitions and ends up in the final state after
    having scanned all elements of s.

87
State diagram-errors
d/add 10d to I
d/set I to d
CR/output I
CR/output error
reset
q4
q4 has been added to the set of states. It
represents an error state. Notice that reset is a
new member added to the alphabet.
88
State diagram-program
  • A state diagram can be transformed into a program
    using case analysis. Here is a C program fragment
    that embodies logic represented by the previous
    state diagram.
  • There is one function for each action.
  • digit is assumed to be provided by the lexical
    analyzer.

89
Program for integer state machine
/ state is global, with values q0, q1, q2. i is
also global./
  • case q0
  • idigit / perform action. /
  • stateq1 / set next state. /
  • break / event digit is done. /
  • case q1
  • ii10digit / Add the next digit. /
  • stateq1
  • break
  • /complete the program. /

void event_digit()

switch (state)
90
Checking state diagrams
  • Unreachable state One that cannot be reached
    from q0 using any sequence of transitions.
  • Dead state One that cannot be left once it is
    reached.

91
Test requirements
  • Every state must be reached at least once, Obtain
    100 state coverage.
  • Every transition must be exercised at least
    once.Obtain 100 transition coverage.
  • The textbook talks about duplicate transitions.
    No transitions are duplicate if the state machine
    definition we have given is used.

92
Example test requirements
  • For the integer state machine
  • state machine transitions
  • event digit in state q0
  • event CR in state q0
  • event digit in state q1
  • event CR in state q1
  • event reset in state q4

93
More testing of state machines?
  • Yes, it is possible!
  • When we learn about path coverage we will discuss
    how more test requirements can be derived from a
    state diagram.

94
Test specifications
  • As before, test specifications are derived from
    test requirements.
  • In the absence of dead states, all states and
    transitions can be reached by one test.
  • It is advisable not to test the entire machine
    with one test case.
  • Develop test specifications for our integer
    state machine.

95
Decision tables
  • Requirements of certain programs are specified by
    decision tables.
  • Such tables can be used for deriving test
    requirements and specifications.
  • A decision table is useful when specifying
    complex decision logic

96
Decision tables
  • A decision table has two parts
  • condition part
  • action part
  • The two together specify under what condition
    will an action be performed.

97
Decision table-nomenclature
  • C denotes a condition
  • A denotes an action
  • Y denotes true
  • Ndenotes false
  • X denotes action to be taken.
  • Blank in condition denotes dont care
  • Blank in action denotes do not take the action

98
Bank example
  • Consider a bank software responsible for debiting
    from an account. The relevant conditions and
    actions are
  • C1 The account number is correct
  • C2 The signature matches
  • C3 There is enough money in the account
  • A1 Give money
  • A2 Give statement indicating insufficient funds
  • A3 Call vigilance to check for fraud!

99
Decision tables
100
Example-continued
  • A1 is to be performed when C1, C2, and C3 are
    true.
  • A2 is to be performed when C1 is true and C2 and
    C3 are false or when C1 and C2 are true and C3 is
    false.
  • A3 is to be performed when C2 and C3 are false.

101
Default rules
  • Are all possible combinations of conditions
    covered?
  • No! Which ones are not covered?
  • We need a default action for the uncovered
    combinations. A default action could be an error
    report or a reset.

102
Example-test requirements
  • Each column is a rule and corresponds to at
    least one test requirement.
  • If there are n columns then there are at least n
    test requirements.
  • What is the maximum number of test requirements?

103
Example-test specifications
  • For each test requirement find a set of input
    values of variables such that the selected rule
    is satisfied.
  • When this test is input to the program the output
    must correspond to the action specified in the
    decision table.
  • Should the testing depend on the order in which
    the conditions are evaluated?

104
Summary
  • Specifications, pre-conditions, and
    post-conditions.
  • Clues, test requirements, and test
    specifications.
  • Clues from code.
  • Test requirements catalog.
  • Equivalence partitioning and boundary value
    analysis.

105
Summary-continued
  • Finite state machine
  • State diagram
  • Events and actions
  • Unreachable and dead states
  • Test requirements and specifications for state
    machines
  • Decision tables, rules, actions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com