Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System PRAMS, 19931999 PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 28
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System PRAMS, 19931999


1
Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment
Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1993-1999
  • Laurie F. Beck, Christopher H. Johnson, Brian
    Morrow, Leslie E. Lipscomb, Brenda Colley
    Gilbert, Mary E. Gaffield, Mary Rogers, Nedra
    Whitehead

2
Acknowledgments -The PRAMS Working Group
  • AL - Rhonda Stephens AK - Kathy Perham-Hester
    AR - Gina Redford CO - Darci Cherry DE - Tony
    Ruggiero FL - Curt Miller
  • GA - Tonya Johnson HI - Althea Momi Kamau IL -
    Bruce Steiner LA - Jean Wightkin ME - Martha
    Henson MD - Diana Cheng MI - Yasmina Bouraoui
    MN - Cynthia Turnure MS - Linda Pendleton MT -
    Jo Ann Walsh NE - Debbi Barnes-Josiah NJ -
    Lakota Kruse NM - Ssu Weng

3
The PRAMS Working Group(cont)
  • NY - Ann Radigan-Garcia NYC - Fabienne Laraque
    NC - Paul Buescher ND - Sandra Anseth OH -
    Adriana Pust OK - Dick Lorenz OR - Ken
    Rosenberg RI - Sam Viner-Brown SC - Kristen
    Helms
  • TX - Kamila Bajwa-Mistry UT - Lois Bloebaum VT
    - Peggy Brozicevic
  • WA - Linda Lohdefinck WV - Melissa Baker CDC
    PRAMS Team, Program Services and Development
    Branch, Division of Reproductive Health

4
What is PRAMS?
  • Ongoing, population-based, state-based
    surveillance of women delivering live infants
  • Self-reported data on maternal behaviors and
    experiences before, during, and after pregnancy

5
PRAMS Methodology
  • Stratified sample drawn from birth certificate
    records 2-6 months after delivery
  • Standardized data collection protocol
  • Mixed-mode data collection (mail and telephone)

6
States Participating in PRAMS, 2001
7
CDC and PRAMS Data
  • PRAMS Surveillance Reports
  • 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998
  • Over 20 indicators reported in each
  • Current year prevalence data by state and
    sociodemographic characteristics
  • Trend data reported by state

8
CDC and PRAMS Data
  • PRAMS MMWR Surveillance Summary
  • 1997, 1999 (in progress)
  • 6-7 indicators reported in each
  • Current year prevalence data by state and
    sociodemographic characteristics
  • Trend data reported by state

9
States With 1999 Data
WA
ME
NY
OH
IL
UT
WV
CO
NC
OK
NM
AR
SC
AL
LA
AK
FL
10
Data Analysis
  • 1999 prevalence estimates by state
  • Trend data from 1993-1999 for those states with
    at least three years of data

11
Unintended Pregnancy Among Women Delivering a
Live Infant
  • Mistimed or unwanted at the time of conception
  • Mistimed wanted pregnancy later
  • Unwanted did not want pregnancy then or at any
    time in the future

12
Unintended Pregnancy Among Women Delivering a
Live Infant, PRAMS 1999
Range 33.7 - 52.0
13
Unintended Pregnancy Among Women Delivering a
Live Infant, PRAMS 1993-1999
  • No statistically significant change over time
  • Statistically significant decrease over time NC

14
Smoking During Last 3Months of Pregnancy
  • Any cigarette smoking during the last 3 months of
    pregnancy

15
Smoking During Last 3 Monthsof Pregnancy, PRAMS
1999
Range 6.2 - 27.2
16
Smoking During Last 3 Monthsof Pregnancy, PRAMS
1993-1999
  • No statistically significant change over time
  • Statistically significant decrease over time
    AK, FL, NY, OK, WA

17
Physical Abuse During Pregnancy
  • Pushing, hitting, slapping, kicking, or any other
    way of physically hurting
  • By husband or partner
  • At any time during pregnancy

18
Physical Abuse During Pregnancy,PRAMS 1999
Range 2.1 - 6.3
19
Physical Abuse During Pregnancy,PRAMS 1996-1999
  • No statistically significant change over time
  • Not statistically significant, but decreases are
    observed AL, AK, OK

20
Breastfeeding Initiation
  • Any breastfeeding after delivery

21
Breastfeeding Initiation, PRAMS 1999
Range 48.0 - 89.0
22
Breastfeeding Initiation,PRAMS 1993-1999
  • No statistically significant change over time
  • Statistically significant increase AL, AK, AR,
    FL, ME, NY, OK, SC, WA, WV

23
Back Sleep Position
  • Placing the infant down to sleep on its back most
    of the time

24
Back Sleep Position, PRAMS 1999
Range 35.1 - 74.6
25
Back Sleep Position, PRAMS 1996-1999
  • Statistically significant increase over time
    ALL 12 STATES

26
Summary
  • Prevalence varies by state
  • Little or no progress
  • Unintended pregnancy
  • Physical abuse by husband or partner during
    pregnancy

27
Summary
  • Mixed results
  • Smoking during last 3 months of pregnancy
  • Positive trends
  • Breastfeeding initiation
  • Back sleep position

28
Conclusions
  • Value of state-based data
  • Progress toward Healthy People objectives and
    Title V performance measures
  • Program planning
  • Policy decisions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com