Trends and Tea Leaves - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Trends and Tea Leaves

Description:

Informing Practice, Informing Policy. Trends and Tea Leaves. News from Washington ... Informing Practice, Informing Policy. Medical versus Public Health framework ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: nac4
Category:
Tags: leaves | practice | tea | trends

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trends and Tea Leaves


1
  • Trends and Tea Leaves
  • News from Washington

2
(No Transcript)
3
  • Medical versus Public Health framework
  • Clarity, Consolidation, Control
  • Goals, Guidance, Grants
  • All response is Federal versus all response is
    local

4
  • Medical versus Public Health Framework
  • Mass casualty planning surge capacity
  • Facility or site-based programs
  • Disaster and emergency medicine versus disaster
    and emergency population health
  • Need for frontline public health experience

5
  • Medical versus Public Health Framework
  • Specify the public health agency role in a mass
    casualty event
  • Describe public health based response versus
    clinical response
  • Talk about consequence management
  • Share local stories, host visits

6
  • Clarity, Consolidation, Control
  • Major consolidation of DHS grant programs
  • Same sheet of music now includes HHS
  • Lets be careful what we ask for!

7
(No Transcript)
8
Former FEMA grants DOJ/Office of Domestic
Programs State-based training Programs EMI
Public Health Preparedness C/A (CDC HRSA)
Stockpile
9
  • Same Sheet of Music
  • HSPD 8 A Unified National Approach
  • Requires a national preparedness goal
  • Establish mechanism to coordinate
  • Develop response capacities
  • Sets Federal priorities

10
From Interim National Preparedness Goal. March
31, 2005, p. 2
11
  • Same Sheet of Music
  • Capabilities Based Planning
  • 15 scenarios
  • Universal Task List (UTL)
  • Target capabilities listing (TCL)
  • Measurable outcomes or metrics

12
Not just public health
From Interim National Preparedness Goal. March
31, 2005, p. 5
13
From Interim National Preparedness Goal. March
31, 2005, p. 7
14
  • 36 Targeted Capabilities
  • Health Related Targeted Capabilities
  • Fatalities management
  • Isolation and quarantine
  • Mass prophylaxis
  • Medical supplies management distribution
  • Medical surge
  • Public health epidemiological investigation and
    laboratory testing
  • Triage pre-hospital treatment
  • Worker health and safety

15
15 Scenarios
  • Blister agent, toxic industrial chemicals, nerve
    agent, and chlorine tank explosion
  • Plague, aerosolized anthrax, food contamination,
    and foot and mouth disease
  • Pandemic influenza
  • Earthquake and hurricane
  • Dirty bomb"
  • Improvised nuclear device
  • Improvised explosive device scenario
  • Cyber scenario

16
  • Same Sheet of Music
  • National Incident Management System (NIMS)
  • National Response Plan (NRP)
  • Limited opportunities for comment, extreme
    pressure to produce

17
  • Centralization
  • One stop shop for grants
  • Performance measures and capabilities
  • Reduction in redundancy

18
  • Centralization
  • 1500 organizations commented on NPG
  • Public Health continues to be seen as medical
    surge (MMRS or NDMS model)
  • Training programs not public health specific

19
  • National Preparedness Priorities
  • Implement NIMS and NRP
  • Expand regional collaboration
  • Implement NIPP
  • Strengthen information sharing and collaboration
  • Strengthen interoperable communications
  • Strengthen CBRNE detection, response and
    decontamination
  • Strengthen medical surge mass prophylaxis

20
  • National Preparedness Priorities
  • Implement NIMS and NRP
  • Expand regional collaboration
  • Implement NIPP
  • Strengthen information sharing and collaboration
  • Strengthen interoperable communications
  • Strengthen CBRNE detection, response and
    decontamination
  • Strengthen medical surge mass prophylaxis

21
  • Goals, Guidance, Grants
  • New CDC Guidance includes DHS language
  • What is NIMS compliance for public health?
  • Local Priority Area Designation
  • Specifics on this are mostly, if not all, TO BE
    DETERMINED

22
NIMS Compliance Department
23
  • Local initiatives will continue
  • Increased focus on Stockpile
  • Increased focus on surge capacity planning
  • Perception that we arent doing anything because
    we cant measure it nationally

24
(No Transcript)
25
  • All Response is Federal versus All Response is
    Local
  • Note how programs are building Federal capacity
  • Watch programs to coordinate Federal, state,
    local tribal activities take pieces of local
    response (and who coordinates what)
  • More assets placed regionally, less local
  • More DHS guidance, more DHS oversight

26
  • All Response is Federal versus All Response is
    Local
  • How to maximize Federal investment
  • How to coordinate Federal assistance
  • Local response is not just first 24-48 operation
    period. It is sustained response.

27
Flu Vaccine
SARS
?
State Local Funding ()
Anthrax
Funding
9/11/01
Demand for Public Health Services
28
Whats next???
29
  • Medical versus Public Health framework
  • Clarity, Consolidation, Control
  • Goals, Guidance, Grants
  • All response is Federal versus all response is
    local
  • Have you observed these trends in your practice?
  • Do the programs we are going to discuss
    contribute to any of these trends?
  • What should NACCHO do in response to these
    trends? What should the metro forum do?

30
  • Trends and Tea Leaves
  • News from Washington
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com