Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Expanding the ContinuumImprov - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Expanding the ContinuumImprov

Description:

Project Director Georgia BASICS. Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental ... The American Medical Association. The American College of Surgeons ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: stephen485
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Substance Use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Expanding the ContinuumImprov


1
Substance UseScreening, Brief Intervention, and
Referral to TreatmentExpanding the
Continuum-Improving Care
Stephen H. ONeil, MA Project Director Georgia
BASICS Department of Behavioral Health and
Developmental Disabilities Division of Addictive
Diseases
2
A New Initiative
  • Substance use screening, brief intervention,
    referral, and treatment is a systems change
    initiative requiring us to re-conceptualize, how
    we understand substance use problems,
  • re-define how we identify substance use
    problems, and re-design how we treat substance
    use problems.

3
Historically
  • Substance use services have been focused in two
    areas
  • Primary Prevention Delaying onset of substance
    use.
  • Treatment Providing time, cost, and labor
    intensive services to patients who are acutely or
    chronically ill.

4
Historically
  • Substance use has been seen as
  • A moral problem
  • An individual problem
  • A family problem
  • A social problem
  • A criminal justice problem
  • A combination of one or more

5
Substance Use Is
A Public Health Problem
6
Learning from Health Care
  • The health care system routinely screens for
    potential medical problems (cancer, diabetes,
    hypertension), provides preventative services
    prior to the onset of acute symptoms, and delays
    or precludes the development of chronic
    conditions.

7
Why Not Substance Use
  • ???????

8
Support for SBIRT
  • SBIRT is an evidenced based practice that is
    supported by
  • The World Health Organization
  • The American Preventative Task Force
  • The American Trauma Nurses Association
  • The American Medical Association
  • The American College of Surgeons
  • The Office of National Drug Control Policy

9
The SBIRT Concept
  • SBIRT uses a public health approach to universal
    screening for substance use problems.
  • SBIRT provides
  • Immediate rule out of non-problem users
  • Identification of levels of risk
  • Identification of patients who would benefit from
    brief advise, and
  • Identification of patients who would benefit from
    higher levels of care.

10
What Can SBIRT Accomplish?
  • Prior studies have shown that substance use
    screenings and brief interventions can
  • Reduce alcohol and/or other drug use for those
    making moderate or high-risk choices
  • Prevent re-injury in trauma patients and,
  • Help patients with more severe problems access
    intensive, community based chemical dependency
    services.

11
National Drug Control Strategy
  • There will never be enough funding to serve all
    those who need treatment.
  • 100,000 new patients will receive treatment every
    year.
  • There is a paradigm shift towards intervention
    among patients with substance use problems which
    can minimize psycho-social or health related
    problems and/or interrupt the progression of the
    disease and help reduce long-term adverse
    outcomes.

12
Primary Goal
  • The primary goal of SBIRT is not to identify
    those who are dependent and need higher levels of
    care.
  • The primary goal of SBIRT is to identify those
    who are at moderate or high risk for
    psycho-social or health care problems related to
    their substance use choices.

13
(No Transcript)
14
SBIRT Provides
  • Identification of substance use problems using a
    public health approach and universal screening.
  • Progressive levels of clinical interventions
    based on level of need and motivation for change
    (FB, BI, BT, and traditional treatment).

15
The Moving Parts
  • Pre-screening (universal).
  • Full screening (for those with a positive
    pre-screen).
  • Brief Intervention (for those scoring over the
    cut off point).

16
The Moving Parts
  • Brief Treatment (for those who have moderate
    risk, high risk, abuse, or dependence, would
    benefit from ongoing, targeted interventions, and
    are willing to engage).
  • Traditional Treatment (for those who are
    dependent and are willing to engage).

17
Georgia BASICS
  • The Georgia BASICS (Brief Assessment, Screening,
    Intervention, and Continuum of Services) Project
    is a 5 year cooperative agreement between the
    state of Georgia and the Substance Abuse and
    Mental Health Services Administration, Center for
    Substance Abuse Treatment.

18
(No Transcript)
19
Washington StateSBIRT
  • Original Six-Month
  • Follow-up Results

20
Binge drinking in the past 30 days declined
significantly
The number of recent days of binge drinking
declined 46 for those who received only a brief
intervention and 51 for those who received a
brief intervention and were referred for further
therapy but did not go. Recent days of bingeing
declined 88 among high-risk users who sought out
brief therapy or CD treatment. plt.05
21
Average days of alcohol use in the past 30 days
declined significantly
Recent use of alcohol declined significantly for
all three groups who received brief intervention
or therapy. Days of alcohol used dropped 26 for
those who received only a brief intervention, 40
for those who received a brief intervention and a
referral but did not seek any additional therapy,
and 77 the greatest decline for those
high-risk users who obtained brief therapy or CD
treatment. plt.05
22
Illegal drug use in the past 30 days declined
significantly
23
Abstinence from both alcohol and other drugs
increased for all interventions
The percent of WASBIRT participants who did not
use either alcohol or other drugs in the past 30
days increased six months after the receipt of an
intervention. Using chi-square analyses, the
change in abstinence for the moderate-risk
patients who received only a brief intervention
was found to be statistically significant.
Similar tests of significance could not be
performed in the two higher risk groups due to
their smaller sample sizes. Therefore, the
increases in abstinence for those two groups
should be interpreted with caution until tests of
significance are possible in later analyses.
plt.05
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com