Training Program Standardization Role of the ABP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Training Program Standardization Role of the ABP

Description:

Of the 263 residents from these programs, 182 (69%) had seen 1500 cytopathology specimens ... Review of Applications - Cytopathology. How common is this issue ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: bdben
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Training Program Standardization Role of the ABP


1
Training Program Standardization Role of the ABP
  • Betsy D.
    Bennett, M.D., Ph.D.
  • Executive Vice
    President
  • American Board
    of Pathology

2
American Board of Pathology
  • Mission - To promote the health of the public by
    advancing the science and practice of pathology

3
American Board of Pathology
  • Principal activities
  • establish certification standards
  • assess qualifications of those seeking to
    practice pathology
  • conduct voluntary primary and subspecialty
    examinations and award certificates to successful
    candidates

4
American Board of Pathology
  • Principal activities (cont)
  • encourage the maintenance of certification of
    those practicing pathology
  • participate in review of pathology training
    programs and support directors and trainees of
    these programs
  • maintain a registry of diplomates

5
Training Program Standardization
  • Assess qualifications of those seeking to
    practice pathology
  • Review of applications
  • Exam exit surveys
  • Participate in review of pathology training
    programs and support directors and trainees of
    these programs
  • Program Director Reports
  • Transmission of other appropriate information to
    RRC and Program Directors

6
Review of Applications
  • Program Requirement for Anatomic Pathology
  • While the quality of an educational program is
    not based upon volume of teaching material alone,
    programs should have sufficient volume and
    variety of material available for educational
    purposes to ensure that all residents . . .
    examine at least 1,500 cytologic specimens during
    the program

7
Review of Applications
  • For the June, 2005 exam
  • 82 programs had candidates taking the exam who
    had seen lt1500 cytopathology specimens
  • Of the 263 residents from these programs, 182
    (69) had seen lt1500 cytopathology specimens

8
Review of Applications
  • Of the 82 programs, 33 programs had 4 or more
    candidates taking the exam
  • 7 programs had only 1 resident with lt1500
    cytologies
  • 26 programs had 2 or more residents with lt1500
    cytologies

9
Review of Applications - Cytopathology
  • How common is this issue in these 26 programs?
  • 6/7, 2/6, 3/5, 7/8, 4/4, 3/4, 3/4,
  • 9/10, 2/7, 5/6, 6/8,4/4, 4/5, 2/4,
  • 3/6, 2/6, 5/6, 4/7, 3/4, 2/4, 5/5, 7/7, 2/5,
    3/5, 3/4, 3/4

10
Review of Applications - Cytopathology
11
Review of Applications - Cytopathology
  • of Cytologies
  • 440
  • 1600
  • 600
  • 460
  • 750
  • 600
  • of Surgicals
  • 7,200
  • 15,300
  • 14,000
  • 17,200
  • 9100
  • 14,000

12
Review of Applications
  • Program Requirement for Anatomic Pathology
  • While the quality of an educational program is
    not based upon volume of teaching material alone,
    programs should have sufficient volume and
    variety of material available for educational
    purposes to ensure that all residents . . .
    examine at least 1,500 cytologic specimens during
    the program

13
Exam Exit Surveys
  • Did your pathology training adequately prepare
    you for this examination?
  • First time takers
  • Anatomic Pathology
  • Yes 330
  • No 57
  • Clinical Pathology
  • Yes 171
  • No - 163

14
Exam Exit Surveys
  • Did your pathology training adequately prepare
    you for this examination?
  • All Examinees
  • Anatomic Pathology
  • Yes 421
  • No 113
  • Clinical Pathology
  • Yes 225
  • No - 226

15
Exam Exit Surveys
  • I was not prepared for the exam. Although the
    program was a poor program to make me ready for
    this test.
  • Preparation for practical was inadequate.
    Background training for practical was adequate
    but needs strengthening.

16
Exam Exit Surveys
  • I believe my pathology program trained me very
    well for real life situations of clinical
    pathology but I have to say that the exam is far
    from what you need to know to practice pathology
    effectively.

17
Exam Exit Surveys
  • My program is a good AP/CP program. The CP test
    is unfair and irrelevant and is more stressing
    than positively evaluating for qualification of
    certificate.

18
Exam Exit Surveys
  • We are pathologists, not lab techs. The
    difficulty level and focus of the questions is
    absurd and has almost no relevance to pathology
    in the modern era.

19
Exam Exit Surveys
  • What was the practical exam about? Was that a
    pathology test? No correlation there with
    residency!

20
Exit Exam Surveys AP
  • I never saw cases by myself until I was out in
    private practice. The first prostatectomy
    specimen I handled was in my first year of
    private practice.
  • My program stressed work (i.e. grossing and
    autopsies) and put less emphasis on teaching
    basic path. The only time you could get
    additional info was to (1) go to Osler, (2) get
    one of the few pathologists that would go through
    stuff with you, or (3) try to get it from Robbins.

21
Exit Exam Surveys AP
  • My program makes PAs not pathologists.
  • We are deficient in exfoliative cytology
    (non-gyn) experience also dont get much primary
    lymph node or spleen and no electron microscopy
    outside of renal work-ups
  • Our program has only one month of cytology.

22
Exit Exam Surveys AP
  • We dont train for blind pattern recognition nor
    for demographic information (most common tumors
    of specific groups, etc) which makes the exam
    more difficult than I think it actually is.
  • Most programs want you to gross if you learn
    anything it is because you trained yourself.

23
Exit Exam Surveys AP
  • Not a lot of basic path taught in my training and
    not very good prep for cytology whatsoever.
  • Very few staff are good/skilled in teaching,
    especially with the pressure to decrease
    turn-around-time, etc.
  • Generally good but key areas left out such as lab
    administration and molecular path

24
Exit Exam Surveys CP
  • I came from a residency where AP was stressed and
    CP minimally emphasized.
  • This is the worst part of our training. The
    department knows and has not done anything about
    it.
  • Spending a few weeks in a lab ( micro, blood bank
    etc) and reading from standard texts does not
    prepare one for material covered in this exam.

25
Exit Exam Surveys CP
  • My training program was an AP/CP program but too
    heavy on AP without enough CP. Many of the CP
    instructors had no real interest in resident
    education. We were also short staffed
    (residents) which meant we had to cover more AP
    months.
  • Only do AP. CP Covering Pathologist

26
Exit Exam Surveys CP
  • Lacks management and statistics
  • Microbiology and chemistry were highly deficient
    in the training program.
  • CP in my program is quite poor. Basically go
    read. It didnt prepare me well.
  • No training in lab management. Little emphasis
    on lab testing in chemistry. Molecular
    diagnostics training weak

27
Exit Exam Surveys CP
  • How many of us are going to be practicing in an
    environment where we need to interpret daily
    multiple difficult Southern blot,
    electrophoresis, and obscure tests? Almost never
    is the answer and when we do we go read about it.
    Your ability to determine what is relevant and
    practical has somehow been obscured. Get back to
    reality folks! You are wasting money and our
    precious time.

28
Exit Exam Surveys CP
  • Our program only focuses on product approval
    (tests or blood products). We do not learn about
    the instrumentation, chemical reactions, etc. We
    never interpret molecular studies, in fact
    molecular is probably non-existent.
  • Management and FDA/CAP/AABB etc is not covered in
    residency. A guideline book made available to
    all residents would be nice.
  • Most of what we do on clinical rotations is scut
    paperwork.

29
Training Program Standardization
  • Participate in review of pathology training
    programs and support directors and trainees of
    these programs
  • Program Director Report

30
Program Director Report
  • Reports for 157 AP/CP programs in US for
    2000-2004
  • Number of programs with failure rates gt50
  • AP and CP 18
  • AP only 10
  • CP only 8

31
Exit Exam Surveys
  • If I pass you can change my answer to yes.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com