Title: A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining the Proton Energy of a Medical Cyclotron
1- A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining
the Proton Energy of a Medical Cyclotron
July 31, 2007 TRIUMF Student Symposium Katie
Gagnon Supervisor Tom Ruth
2Outline
- PET/Medical Cyclotrons
- Proton Energy from Production Yields
- The Simple and Inexpensive Method
- Results
- Conclusions
2
3PET A Review
- Utilizes Coincidence Detection of Positron Decay
- Cyclotron Produced Positron Emitters
Z
Others 18O(p,n)18F 16O(p,a)13N 15N(p,n)15O
Example 14N(p,a)11C
University of Washington, 1999 University of
Pennsylvania, 2000 KAERI, 2000
N
3
4Medical Cyclotron
To Consider Production Cross Section
Why is an On-Site Cyclotron Preferred?
Question
How is the proton energy verified?
IAEA-DCRP/2006 Directory of Cyclotrons Used for
Radionuclide Production in Member States
4
5Energy (Direct) Method 1
A Activity n Number of target nuclei per
cm2 I Proton flux s Cross section ? Decay
constant t Irradiation time
Beam flux is not constant s ? A is not one-to-one
Diagnostic Radioisotopes and Monitor Reactions,
IAEATECDOC1211, 2001
5
6Energy (Ratio) Method 2
Eliminates dependence on beam current
Expensive
Diagnostic Radioisotopes and Monitor Reactions,
IAEATECDOC1211, 2001
6
7Method 2 made less expensive?
- Make us of an ionization chamber
- A tool already located in many hospitals!
- Current measurement ? Activity
- Measures ALL isotopes (non-specific)
- Must correct for isotope dependence
New Korea Industrial Co. LTD.,www.nekoind.co.kr
7
8Choosing a Target Material
- For ratio method, must choose target material
carefully - Goal Determine EOB A1 and A2 activities
- Category I
- Only two short-lived isotopes
- Long lived contaminants OK
- Category II
- Only one short-lived isotope
- Only one long-lived isotope
8
9Target Material Choice natCu
IAEATECDOC1211, 2001 Meadows, J, PR, 91,
885, 1953 Ghoshal, J, PR, 80, 939, 1950
9
10Results TR-13 (TRIUMF)
10
11Conclusions
- Need for medical cyclotrons on-site is important
- Characterization of proton energy guides
understanding of yields - Ionization chamber ratio method consistent with
HPGe measurements - Careful choice of target material necessary
11
12Acknowledgements
- Edmonton PET Center
- John Wilson
- Miguel Avila-Rodriguez
- Steve Mcquarrie
- TRIUMF
- Tom Ruth
- Suzy Lapi
- Ken Buckley
- Wade English
- PET Members
12
13 14(No Transcript)
15Correction Factors
- Isotope dependence of ionization chamber
- Finite foil size
- Utilize TRIM (Transport and Range of Ions in
Matter)
t 25µm
20 MeV
19.64 MeV
10 MeV
9.38 MeV
1.29 MeV
3 MeV
SRIM (Stopping Ranges of Ions in Matter), 2006
www.srim.org
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Results TR-13 (TRIUMF)
10
20Results TR-19 (Edmonton)
11
21BNL Threshold Surpassed