A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining the Proton Energy of a Medical Cyclotron - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining the Proton Energy of a Medical Cyclotron

Description:

IAEA-DCRP/2006 Directory of Cyclotrons Used for Radionuclide Production in Member States ... A tool already located in many hospitals! Current measurement Activity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: katieg8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining the Proton Energy of a Medical Cyclotron


1
  • A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining
    the Proton Energy of a Medical Cyclotron

July 31, 2007 TRIUMF Student Symposium Katie
Gagnon Supervisor Tom Ruth
2
Outline
  • PET/Medical Cyclotrons
  • Proton Energy from Production Yields
  • The Simple and Inexpensive Method
  • Results
  • Conclusions

2
3
PET A Review
  • Utilizes Coincidence Detection of Positron Decay
  • Cyclotron Produced Positron Emitters

Z
Others 18O(p,n)18F 16O(p,a)13N 15N(p,n)15O
Example 14N(p,a)11C
University of Washington, 1999 University of
Pennsylvania, 2000 KAERI, 2000
N
3
4
Medical Cyclotron
To Consider Production Cross Section
Why is an On-Site Cyclotron Preferred?
  • IAEA Cyclotron Summary

Question
How is the proton energy verified?
IAEA-DCRP/2006 Directory of Cyclotrons Used for
Radionuclide Production in Member States
4
5
Energy (Direct) Method 1
  • Production Yields

A Activity n Number of target nuclei per
cm2 I Proton flux s Cross section ? Decay
constant t Irradiation time
  • Drawbacks

Beam flux is not constant s ? A is not one-to-one
Diagnostic Radioisotopes and Monitor Reactions,
IAEATECDOC1211, 2001
5
6
Energy (Ratio) Method 2
  • Method 1
  • Method 2
  • Benefits

Eliminates dependence on beam current
  • Drawbacks

Expensive
Diagnostic Radioisotopes and Monitor Reactions,
IAEATECDOC1211, 2001
6
7
Method 2 made less expensive?
  • Make us of an ionization chamber
  • A tool already located in many hospitals!
  • Current measurement ? Activity
  • Measures ALL isotopes (non-specific)
  • Must correct for isotope dependence

New Korea Industrial Co. LTD.,www.nekoind.co.kr
7
8
Choosing a Target Material
  • For ratio method, must choose target material
    carefully
  • Goal Determine EOB A1 and A2 activities
  • Category I
  • Only two short-lived isotopes
  • Long lived contaminants OK
  • Category II
  • Only one short-lived isotope
  • Only one long-lived isotope

8
9
Target Material Choice natCu
  • Cross Sections
  • natCu(p,x) Products

IAEATECDOC1211, 2001 Meadows, J, PR, 91,
885, 1953 Ghoshal, J, PR, 80, 939, 1950
9
10
Results TR-13 (TRIUMF)
10
11
Conclusions
  • Need for medical cyclotrons on-site is important
  • Characterization of proton energy guides
    understanding of yields
  • Ionization chamber ratio method consistent with
    HPGe measurements
  • Careful choice of target material necessary

11
12
Acknowledgements
  • Edmonton PET Center
  • John Wilson
  • Miguel Avila-Rodriguez
  • Steve Mcquarrie
  • TRIUMF
  • Tom Ruth
  • Suzy Lapi
  • Ken Buckley
  • Wade English
  • PET Members

12
13
  • Questions?

14
(No Transcript)
15
Correction Factors
  • Isotope dependence of ionization chamber
  • Copper Foil
  • Finite foil size
  • Utilize TRIM (Transport and Range of Ions in
    Matter)

t 25µm
20 MeV
19.64 MeV
10 MeV
9.38 MeV
1.29 MeV
3 MeV
SRIM (Stopping Ranges of Ions in Matter), 2006
www.srim.org
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Results TR-13 (TRIUMF)
10
20
Results TR-19 (Edmonton)
11
21
BNL Threshold Surpassed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com