Title: Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological Environmental Services of Forests
1Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological
Environmental Services of Forests
Carlos Muñoz Piña Instituto Nacional de Ecología
260 million hectares of temperate and tropical
forests in Mexico
3A country experiencing very fast deforestation
4Overexploited Aquifers
5Market failures
Less silting and better water quality in
watershed and recharge areas in aquifers.
The market does not pay for the environmental
services of forests
Biodiversity Conservation
Carbon sequestration
63 Types of Hydrological Services
- Aquifer Recharge
- Improved surface water quality, less suspended
particles and lower costs. - Reduce frequency and damage from flooding in
short steep watersheds
7Deforestation and market forces
Market signals (inputs and output prices)
Decisions to change land use respond to
Costly cooperation in common property forestry
Short term horizon induced by poverty
8Localities with high or very high marginality
960 million hectares of temperate and tropical
forests in Mexico
10Land use changesControl vs. Incentives
- In Mexico, governments control of land use
changes is costly, not effective and potentially
poverty increasing. - So, necessarily
- conservation profitable forests
- for communal owners taking land use decisions
Otherwise regulatory taking on the poor
11A public policy niche
12Programs Objective
- Stop the deforestation that threatens those
forests critical for watershed-related
environmental services in Mexico - By
- Paying land owners to preserve forest land and
avoid its transformation for other uses, such as
agriculture and cattle raising.
13Eligibility Areas for PSAH
Forests important for water
With potential future clients
Forests owned by the poor
or
or
Overexploited acquifers
Cities gt 5K
Deep poverty municipalities
or
or
High water scarcity zones
Priority Mountains
Providing other environmental services?
or
or
H related natural disasters
Natural protected areas
14Linking providers with those who benefit
- Federal Fees Law reformed to introduce an
earmarking of a portion of the water fee. - Negotiations
- Initial proposal 2.5
- Finance Ministry National Water Commission
want to exclude municipalities from payment, so
fix amount to US20 million.
15How much?
- Two ways of approaching the problem
-
- Value of the service What would society loose if
the forests were not there? - Opportunity Cost What landowners would sacrifice
if they kept the forest. - Between those 2 values is the relevant space of
the transaction.
16OPORTUNITY COSTS
Corn
Beans
Sheep Goats
Cattle
Source Luis Jaramillo (2003) www.ine.gob.mx
17Differentiated payment
- A political economy mix, recommendation based on
opp cost, combined with value of service
forestry lobby - Cloudforests 400 pesos (US37) per hectare
per year - Rest of temperate and tropical forests 300
pesos (US28) per hectare per year
18Forest area incorporated into PSAH
19PSAH 2003-2008 gt1.2 million hectares
20Durango a watershed supplying cities and
irrigation districts
21Challenges for PES
- Unexpected success Three times as many
applications as funds. (Excess demand) - Possibility of generating greater value to
customers. - Who received the payments?
- Lets look at the actual targeting
22Targetting
- By value of environmental service
- By level of poverty
- By risk of deforestation
- Important voluntary program implies
- self-selection.
23Overexploited Aquifers
24Overexploited aquifers
25Overexploited aquifers
26Targeting the poor
27Poverty and PSAH
79 - 83
28Targetting poverty
29Targetting poverty
30SEEKING EFFICIENCY
- Objetive Maximize protection of environmental
services through avoiding deforestation
- Efficiency Maximize value to fee-payers
through avoiding maximum hectares deforested at
minimum cost, within budget constraint.
31How to measure real risk of deforestation?
- Main driving force land use changes.
- More profitable agricultural and cattle ranching
activities. - Short term horizon caused by poverty
(Guevara2002). - Specific patterns identified through
econometrics transport cost, slope, potential
ag yields.
32All models are wrong, but some are
useful.(George Box, quoted by Kennedy 1992
73 quoted by Kaimowitz Angelsen 1998 and
here).
33 Una rejilla para puntos de muestreo
34(No Transcript)
35ANÁLISIS ECONOMÉTRICO
18k obs
Significativo a niveles mayores a 90
Significativo a niveles mayores a 99,
36Results for 2000 forests in Oaxaca
37Targetting Risk of Deforestation
38Targetting Risk of Deforestation
39(No Transcript)
402008 Incorporating Watershed Targeting
41Topographical Zones and Watersheds
42Deforestation Risk and Topographical
Zones(millions of hectares of forests)
A significant amount of key watershed areas has a
high and very high deforestation risk
43Modifying rules to incorporate new criteria for
selection location within a watershed and
relative water scarcity of the watershed
44(No Transcript)
45Looking ahead
- We need tests to compare areas with payment and
areas without payment, to see if there is a
difference (control by deforestation risk,
obviously ) - The problem of the sixth year. Need to see
what they do after the contract ends - They can re-apply but no certainty that they are
chosen - They had money and time to build a sustainable
forestry operation or move into other markets for
environmental services. It is an empirical
question.
46Modifying behaviour, really (1)
- Combinación de imágenes Spot y Landsat. Método
que sobreestima la deforestación, por lo tanto
tomar en cuenta sólo el valor relativo.
- Muestra aleatoria, 160 predios.
-
- La diferencia está entre el polígono pagado y las
zonas (polígono o predio) no pagado.
47Modifying behaviour, really (2)
- Imágenes Spot y Landsat. Umbral alto, método
que subestima la deforestación, por lo tanto
tomar en cuenta sólo el valor relativo.
- Muestra aleatoria, 115 predios.
-
- La diferencia está entre el polígono pagado y las
zonas (polígono o predio) no pagado.
48Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological
Environmental Services of Forests
Carlos Muñoz Piña carmunoz_at_ine.gob.mx