Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological Environmental Services of Forests - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological Environmental Services of Forests

Description:

Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological Environmental Services of Forests – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: joeldom
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological Environmental Services of Forests


1
Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological
Environmental Services of Forests
Carlos Muñoz Piña Instituto Nacional de Ecología
2
60 million hectares of temperate and tropical
forests in Mexico
3
A country experiencing very fast deforestation
4
Overexploited Aquifers
5
Market failures

Less silting and better water quality in
watershed and recharge areas in aquifers.
The market does not pay for the environmental
services of forests
Biodiversity Conservation
Carbon sequestration
6
3 Types of Hydrological Services
  • Aquifer Recharge
  • Improved surface water quality, less suspended
    particles and lower costs.
  • Reduce frequency and damage from flooding in
    short steep watersheds

7
Deforestation and market forces

Market signals (inputs and output prices)
Decisions to change land use respond to
Costly cooperation in common property forestry
Short term horizon induced by poverty
8
Localities with high or very high marginality
9
60 million hectares of temperate and tropical
forests in Mexico
10
Land use changesControl vs. Incentives
  • In Mexico, governments control of land use
    changes is costly, not effective and potentially
    poverty increasing.
  • So, necessarily
  • conservation profitable forests
  • for communal owners taking land use decisions

Otherwise regulatory taking on the poor
11
A public policy niche
12
Programs Objective
  • Stop the deforestation that threatens those
    forests critical for watershed-related
    environmental services in Mexico
  • By
  • Paying land owners to preserve forest land and
    avoid its transformation for other uses, such as
    agriculture and cattle raising.

13
Eligibility Areas for PSAH
Forests important for water
With potential future clients
Forests owned by the poor
or
or
Overexploited acquifers
Cities gt 5K
Deep poverty municipalities
or
or
High water scarcity zones
Priority Mountains
Providing other environmental services?
or
or
H related natural disasters
Natural protected areas
14
Linking providers with those who benefit
  • Federal Fees Law reformed to introduce an
    earmarking of a portion of the water fee.
  • Negotiations
  • Initial proposal 2.5
  • Finance Ministry National Water Commission
    want to exclude municipalities from payment, so
    fix amount to US20 million.

15
How much?
  • Two ways of approaching the problem
  • Value of the service What would society loose if
    the forests were not there?
  • Opportunity Cost What landowners would sacrifice
    if they kept the forest.
  • Between those 2 values is the relevant space of
    the transaction.

16
OPORTUNITY COSTS
Corn
Beans
Sheep Goats
Cattle
Source Luis Jaramillo (2003) www.ine.gob.mx
17
Differentiated payment
  • A political economy mix, recommendation based on
    opp cost, combined with value of service
    forestry lobby
  • Cloudforests 400 pesos (US37) per hectare
    per year
  • Rest of temperate and tropical forests 300
    pesos (US28) per hectare per year

18
Forest area incorporated into PSAH
19
PSAH 2003-2008 gt1.2 million hectares
20
Durango a watershed supplying cities and
irrigation districts
21
Challenges for PES
  • Unexpected success Three times as many
    applications as funds. (Excess demand)
  • Possibility of generating greater value to
    customers.
  • Who received the payments?
  • Lets look at the actual targeting

22
Targetting
  • By value of environmental service
  • By level of poverty
  • By risk of deforestation
  • Important voluntary program implies
  • self-selection.

23
Overexploited Aquifers
24
Overexploited aquifers
25
Overexploited aquifers
26
Targeting the poor
27
Poverty and PSAH
79 - 83
28
Targetting poverty
29
Targetting poverty
30
SEEKING EFFICIENCY
  • Objetive Maximize protection of environmental
    services through avoiding deforestation
  • Efficiency Maximize value to fee-payers
    through avoiding maximum hectares deforested at
    minimum cost, within budget constraint.

31
How to measure real risk of deforestation?
  • Main driving force land use changes.
  • More profitable agricultural and cattle ranching
    activities.
  • Short term horizon caused by poverty
    (Guevara2002).
  • Specific patterns identified through
    econometrics transport cost, slope, potential
    ag yields.

32
All models are wrong, but some are
useful.(George Box, quoted by Kennedy 1992
73 quoted by Kaimowitz Angelsen 1998 and
here).
33
Una rejilla para puntos de muestreo
34
(No Transcript)
35
ANÁLISIS ECONOMÉTRICO
18k obs
Significativo a niveles mayores a 90
Significativo a niveles mayores a 99,
36
Results for 2000 forests in Oaxaca
37
Targetting Risk of Deforestation
38
Targetting Risk of Deforestation
39
(No Transcript)
40
2008 Incorporating Watershed Targeting
41
Topographical Zones and Watersheds
42
Deforestation Risk and Topographical
Zones(millions of hectares of forests)
A significant amount of key watershed areas has a
high and very high deforestation risk
43
Modifying rules to incorporate new criteria for
selection location within a watershed and
relative water scarcity of the watershed
44
(No Transcript)
45
Looking ahead
  • We need tests to compare areas with payment and
    areas without payment, to see if there is a
    difference (control by deforestation risk,
    obviously )
  • The problem of the sixth year. Need to see
    what they do after the contract ends
  • They can re-apply but no certainty that they are
    chosen
  • They had money and time to build a sustainable
    forestry operation or move into other markets for
    environmental services. It is an empirical
    question.

46
Modifying behaviour, really (1)
  • Combinación de imágenes Spot y Landsat. Método
    que sobreestima la deforestación, por lo tanto
    tomar en cuenta sólo el valor relativo.
  • Muestra aleatoria, 160 predios.
  • La diferencia está entre el polígono pagado y las
    zonas (polígono o predio) no pagado.

47
Modifying behaviour, really (2)
  • Imágenes Spot y Landsat. Umbral alto, método
    que subestima la deforestación, por lo tanto
    tomar en cuenta sólo el valor relativo.
  • Muestra aleatoria, 115 predios.
  • La diferencia está entre el polígono pagado y las
    zonas (polígono o predio) no pagado.

48
Mexicos Program for the Payment of Hydrological
Environmental Services of Forests
Carlos Muñoz Piña carmunoz_at_ine.gob.mx
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com