Our purpose today is to share Preliminary Planning Scoping and Grouping approaches, lessons learned, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Our purpose today is to share Preliminary Planning Scoping and Grouping approaches, lessons learned,

Description:

Multiple dimensions need to be addressed in preliminary planning to ... agreement (MOA), and memorandums of understanding (MOU) to determine their most ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: BA264
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Our purpose today is to share Preliminary Planning Scoping and Grouping approaches, lessons learned,


1
Our purpose today is to share Preliminary
Planning Scoping and Grouping approaches, lessons
learned, and critical success attributes
  • Multiple dimensions need to be addressed in
    preliminary planning to
  • As OMB/OSD accountability pressures mount, DLAs
    Competitive Sourcing Competitions must be planned
    to achieve high Service Provider performance
  • Despite acknowledgement of the required need for
    Preliminary Planning, most do not know where to
    begin
  • DLA utilizes a Thorough 14 Step Methodology to
    support each Competitive Sourcing Study decision
    prior to public announcement of an A-76
    Competition

Strategic Mission Priorities
Leadership Support
Structure/Process and Financial Planning
Assessment
Information Integration Reporting
Performance Measures Definition Application
Data, Tools Technology
2
DLA Preliminary Planning Process
Execution Phase Implementing the project plan
including Scoping, Grouping, Workload Assessment,
Baseline Cost, Study Type, Officials, and
Notifications
The Transition Phase Transitioning out of the
preliminary planning phase, handoff the
deliverables developed during the phase, and
position the organization to execute the
preliminary planning decision
Project Management and Planning Phase
Developing the management structure and
approaches recommended for managing the
preliminary planning including a sound project
plan that will enable successful preliminary
planning.
Teams and Managers must focus their attention on
the process interfaces or potential fail points
in the process.
3
Preliminary Planning is a project plan roadmap
to successful Competitive Sourcing Competition
execution
  • The purpose of the project plan is to
  • Ensure requirements are met
  • Eliminate reinventing the wheel by
    standardizing routine project work
  • Reduce the number of tasks that could be
    overlooked
  • Eliminate duplication of effort
  • Ensure the project is kept in control
  • Maximize the use of resources

4
Project Plan Components
  • The Initial Project Scope includes a review of
    both the Inherently Governmental/Commercial
    Activities and current contracts within those
    activities.
  • Preliminary Planning Milestone Schedule provides
    team members with a means to coordinate their
    activities to meet deadlines.
  • Responsibility Assignment Matrix shows the level
    of responsibility for groups or individuals in
    executing the major tasks on the milestone
    schedule.
  • Resource-Staffing Plan schedules the time
    required to complete the project allows
    participants to assess their time required over
    the course of the project, and is useful for
    tracking expenditures.
  • External/Internal Communications Plan establishes
    a coordinated plan to effectively help inform
    both affected personnel and outside audiences of
    efforts associated with the initiative.

5
Step 1 Scope - Selecting Activities for
Competition
Since the Circular has specific timeframes for
completing the PWS and MEO, preliminary planning
is an important step for DLA in preparing for
competition
  • Preliminary Planning Assessment
  • Initial assessment/baseline at the beginning
    of the preliminary planning period and monthly
    updates discussed during regularly scheduled
    video teleconference).
  • Completed before public announcement and
    submitted for tracking purposes and to determine
    the readiness and ensures accomplished correctly
    and within a reasonable timeframe (120-180 days).

6
Scoping is a detailed analysis to determine the
best candidates for a competitive sourcing study
  • Detailed analysis of the FAIR Act Inventory.
    This ensures the FAIR Act categorizations are
    accurate and up-to-date and validated using
    on-site focus group interviews. These interviews
    will provide a clear and descriptive view into
    the functions considered for competition.
  • In addition to these interviews, a review of
    positions under study should also occur. This
    analysis requires the collection and review of
    position descriptions of the functions under
    study to validate whether they are commercial or
    inherently governmental.

Preliminary planning research encompasses all
requirements performed by in-house and contract
resources for the activities under
review. Scoping ensures impacted authorizations
are properly coded and any questions about study
inclusion are investigated. Study inclusion may
involve the resolution of inherently governmental
workload and possible realignment.
7
Additional Scoping Issues
  • In considering whether an activity should be
    competed, consider the following factors
  • Planned competition costs vs. potential savings
  • Timing of the competition in relation to other
    organizational activities
  • Potential efficiencies to be realized through
    competition and possible mission degradation
  • Research whether the activity is currently being
    performed by the private sector and probe level
    of industry interest
  • Human Resource involvement

8
Scoping Best Practices
9
Additional Scoping Best Practices
10
Step 2 Group Activities
Goal To group functions so that the product or
service produced by that activity is adequately
maintained (can be maintained by a service
provider) In this phase, the activities
identified as eligible for a competition are
subdivided into groups, which will be separately
competed.
  • Subdivide activities into groups
  • Geographic location
  • Function/department
  • Discuss with Activity Under Study (AUS), RA,
    Program Manager, KO, and affected organizations
    senior management
  • Determine which, if any, service contracts to
    include
  • Review appropriate placement of inherently
    governmental responsibilities (performance
    assessments, contract administration)
  • Functions should be grouped in such a way that
    the product or service produced by the activity
    is adequately maintained and can be performed by
    any service provider.

Consider potential effects on internal and
external customers impact of consolidating
service contracts into new acquisition
11
Grouping Functions as Business Units
  • Consider the requirements of nonappropriated
    fund employees, interservice support agreements
    (ISSA), memorandums of agreement (MOA), and
    memorandums of understanding (MOU) to determine
    their most appropriate placement (inside or
    outside the business unit) and to develop a
    rationale for inclusion of the particular group
    of functions for competition.
  • Identify work units mandatory and advisory
    directives, hours of operation, certification
    requirements, security issues, definitions, and
    publications/forms associated with the outputs
    during this phase.
  • Public reimbursable source agreements provided by
    a host command or another reimbursable activity
    should be included in the scope of work,
    particularly when the service has a major impact
    on the performance of the function.
  • Requirements that are outside the business unit
    must also be considered. Review and appropriate
    placement of inherently governmental
    responsibilities (performance assessment,
    contract administration, etc.) as well as
    civilian bump and retreat impact.

12
Market Research
  • Market research is required to obtain
    information relevant to the grouping of functions
    (consistent with market and industry structures
    and the needs/requirements of the potential
    acquisition).
  • Obtain information relevant to grouping
  • Have similar acquisitions been issued?
  • How were functions grouped?
  • Did they offers did they receive?
  • What are the needs and requirements of potential
    acquisition?
  • How does industry do this function?
  • In-house or outsourced
  • What are their costs/compare as-is costs
  • What are their lessons learned
  • What has been the response to previous
    competitions
  • Complete with input from the KO as not to
    duplicate efforts

The extent of the market research will vary
depending on the complexity, past experience, and
the amount of information already available
  • The following are examples of MR techniques
  • Identify commercial sources/practices/standards
  • Collect MR information from government and
    non-government sources
  • Develop questionnaire for industry and government
    agencies
  • Review recent market research from similar
    acquisitions
  • Query government and commercial databases
  • Conduct exchanges with industry
  • Review marketing literature/brochures
  • Identify new technology in the market place
  • Issue RFI or presolicitation notices for planning
  • Industry panel
  • Meet one-on-one with commercial sources

13
Is a Business Case Analysis Needed?
  • What is the impact of competing this function?
  • Cost savings
  • Are the savings significant enough?
  • FTE vs. Cost
  • Mission accomplishment/degradation
  • Mission Impact
  • Customer Impact
  • Operational Risk
  • Organizational Impacts
  • Operational risks
  • Environmental/Cultural Impacts
  • Qualitative/Quantitative Benefits

If serious concerns surface during preliminary
planning, notify the CSD for further direction
before proceeding
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com