Modeling land use effects in Hydrology: Nam Ken - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling land use effects in Hydrology: Nam Ken

Description:

Modeling land use effects in Hydrology: Nam Ken – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Mai79
Category:
Tags: effects | hen | hydrology | ken | land | modeling | nam | use

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling land use effects in Hydrology: Nam Ken


1
Modeling land use effects in Hydrology Nam Ken
Mae Sa
  • Hawaii, 8th October 2007

2
Past and new objective
  • BEFORE
  • Apply DHSVM to basins
  • How land use change affects hydrology?
  • NOW
  • Study how land use change affects hydrology, but
    different approach
  • Understanding vegetation dynamics
  • Simplifying parameters, based with observations
  • Semi-distributed hydrologic modeling
  • Based on hillslope partitioning of the landscape
    as hydrologic units

3
Outline
  • Recent study on Rubber root water uptake
    (Guardiola et al. 2008)
  • Semi-distributed Modeling
  • New approach based on Hillslopes discretization
  • Bousinesq equation
  • Hydrologic Units
  • Future work

4
How land use change affects hydrology?
Distributed Model
Root-zone loss function
Fractional Coverage Hemi Fraction Coverage Truck
Space Aerodynamic Attenuation Clumping
Factor LAI Leaf Angle A B Scattering
Parameters Mass Release Drip Ratio Height Maximum
and Minimum Resistance Moisture Threshold Number
of Root Zones Root Zone Depth Overstory /
Understory Root fraction Overstory/Understory LAI
and Albedo
Soil Vegetation parameters
5
Setting Rubber extension in China
Native in the Amazon (10S 10N) T 24 28oC
P 1500 2000 mm Extended to Non-native
environments Marginal growth conditions
Rubber 8 ? 30 Forest 36 ? 24 Grassland 26
? 14
6
Experimental basin
INSTRUMENTS - STATIONS Tea Rubber Radiation,
Wind speed, Temp, RH, P,
Soil moisture Grassland Forest Soil moisture
and P
Monsoon climate (P 1100 to 1700 mm) - Rainy
season May to October - Dry season November to
April
Forest /2ary Forest 53 Paddy
6 Grassland/Bush 2 Swidden 23 Rubber 16
7
Experimental basin
Soil Characteristics Undisturbed soil samples
(SM desorption curves) In situ Ksat
measurements (Borehole permeameter)
8
Root-zone water balance
9
Results Discussion SM trends analysis
Evaporation Fraction -
?(?)
2005 Negligible precipitation
Emax Priestley-Taylor
10
Results Discussion SM trends analysis
E ? at the surface E from deeper layers
?
E ? at the surface E constant deeper layers
Emax Priestley-Taylor
11
(No Transcript)
12
Why Root-water uptake during shedding?
NOV DEC JAN FEB
MAR APR MAY
13
Spring flushing paradox
What triggers shedding/flushing?
  • Leaf flushing during the dry season the paradox
    of Asian monsoon forest
  • New leaves during hottest driest season
  • Trees rely on subsurface water
  • Climate is not the primary control of the
    phenology? Increase in DAY LENGTH

Leaf flushing during the dry season the paradox
of Asian monsoon forest
  • Leaf flushing during the dry season the paradox
    of Asian monsoon forest
  • New leaves during hottest driest season
  • Trees rely on subsurface water
  • Climate is not the primary control of the
    phenology? Increase in DAY LENGTH
    or INSOLATION


Is rubber a spring flushing tree?
Elliott et al. (2006) Global Ecology and
Biogeography 15, 248-257
14
Results Discussion
15

Results Discussion SM trends analysis
16
Conclusions
  • Data analysis approach
  • RZ loss function applies to native vegetation.
  • Non-native, loss function depends also on
    day-length
  • Reduction of water storage observed
  • Increase in water demand during water deficit
    periods
  • Now the intention is to translate this into a
    model

17
Semi-Distributed Modeling
  • Using hillslopes as basic building blocks for
    catchment modeling.
  • Subsurface flow controlled by their geometry and
    characteristics such as depth, porosity, Ksat
  • Each hillslope has a homogeneous characteristics,
    i.e. vegetation type, soil type, and energy and
    water inputs. (Semi-Distributed model)

18
Semi-Distributed Modeling
Divided in 887 hillslopes
Divided in 815 hillslopes
19
Semi-Distributed Modeling
Boussinesq equation
20
Geomorphometric analysis
Slope 12o
lt 12o is the gradient required for saturation
to occur
Trucker Bras (1998) Water Resources Research
34(10)2751-2764
21
(No Transcript)
22
Semi-Distributed Modeling Namken
23
Semi-Distributed Modeling Mae Sa
24
Semi-Distributed Modeling SHU
  • Different Root zone models on top of hsB
  • Pervious
  • Rubber
  • Forest
  • Grassland / crops
  • Rice Paddies
  • Impervious
  • Roads
  • Green Houses

ROUTING TO THE GAUGE
25
Semi-Distributed Modeling SHU
Pervious Land Uses forest, crops, grassland,
rubber
Transpiration f(?, day-length, temp)
Canopy storage
Soil evap.
Runoff
Infiltration saturation excess (return flow)
L
K(?)
Percolation (N) INPUT FOR hsB
? gt ?fc ? Percolation (N) and/or Runoff
L and Transpiration depends on land use
26
Simple Distributed Modeling SHU
27
Semi-Distributed Modeling SHU
  • Rice Paddies (6 in NK)
  • Different vegetative phases
  • Seedling flooding fields (15 days)
  • Vegetative (different length variety)
  • Reproductive (25 35 days) complete growth
  • Ripening (25 - 35 days) (irrigation stop)
  • Each phase
  • Ponding depth
  • Crop factor (depends of vegetation growth)
  • There are 1 to 2 harvest/year (upper and lower
    basin)
  • January and April/May, or only April/May

28
Semi-Distributed Modeling SHU
  • Flooded P(t) No flooded P0
  • When flooded? Saturated soils
  • Starting day random
  • P(t) Rainfall ? determines irrigation
  • Darcy law to calculate percolation
  • When dry ? Unsaturated soils
  • K(?) using Van Genuchten
  • Darcy law to calculate percolation

Irrigation
Precipitation
P(t)
K(?)1
L1
L2
K(?)2
K(?)1 ltlt K(?)2
Percolation (N)
10 days average Kc 1 1/0.87 1.02 1.08 1.06
1.17 1.24 1.28 1.35 1.32 1.29 1.15 0.92 Ponding
200 150 125 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 75 50
0 (mm)
29
Semi-Distributed Modeling SHU
  • Impervious
  • Very low Ksat, for roads and GH roofs
  • Mainly Infiltration excess
  • Green Houses ? deeper study about water uses

OL evaporation
L
K(?)
30
Future work
  • Finish Rubber root water uptake paper
  • Couple the root zone models with hsB
  • Route the outflow to compute streamflow
  • Paper about Semi-distributed hydrological
    modeling in SEA using hsB and HSU. Impacts on
    land use change

31
Rice Paddy
Modified Penman Monteith
Priestler a 1.26
32
Agriculture
33
Simple Distributed Modeling Hillslopes
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Soil moisture trends analysis
2006 80 mm precipitation
37
Discussion
38
  • Rubber drier with depth
  • dampening with depth
  • delay in response

39
The effects of introducing non-native vegetation
on hydrological partitioning in a tropical
catchment
  • Hawaii, 8th October 2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com