Accounting for Culture and Language Building Appropriate Standards, Assessment and Evaluation Practi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 78
About This Presentation
Title:

Accounting for Culture and Language Building Appropriate Standards, Assessment and Evaluation Practi

Description:

Jana Martella, Council of Chief State School Officers (DC) ... Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Syria, Yemen ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 79
Provided by: janama
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accounting for Culture and Language Building Appropriate Standards, Assessment and Evaluation Practi


1
(No Transcript)
2
Accounting for Culture and Language Building
Appropriate Standards, Assessment and Evaluation
Practices for Diverse Populations of Young
Children
  • ECEA SCASS at NAEYC PDI
  • 800 AM 1000 AM
  • June 6, 2005

3
Presentation Objectives
  • Review current practice in accountability systems
    for early childhood education
  • Consider the impact of accountability on children
    of cultural and linguistic diversity
  • Reflect on the lessons and challenges presented
    by the implementation of the accountability and
    data disaggregation requirements of No Child Left
    Behind for early childhood education

4
Panelists
  • Susan Andersen, Iowa State Department of
    Education (IA)
  • Lindy Buch, Michigan Department of Education (MI)
  • Harriet Egertson, Independent Consultant (CA)
  • Mary Louise Jones, Louisiana Department of
    Education (LA)
  • Jana Martella, Council of Chief State School
    Officers (DC)
  • Tracy Runfola, Council of Chief State School
    Officers (MD)

5
Driving with Data
  • Who are we and what do we look like?
  • Can you fill in the blanks for the nation and for
    your state?

6
Characteristics of School Children Nation-wide
NAEP 4th Grade Reading NAEP 4th Grade Math
  • White
  • Black
  • Hispanic
  • Asian/Pacific Islander
  • Native American
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • English Language Learners
  • Students with disabilities
  • Migrant

7
Characteristics of Children aged 0-5 In Your
State
NAEP 4th Grade Reading NAEP 4th Grade Math
  • White
  • Black
  • Hispanic
  • Asian/Pacific Islander
  • Native American
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • English Language Learners
  • Students with disabilities
  • Migrant

Languages Spoken
8
Characteristics of School Children Nation-wide
NAEP 4th Grade Reading 30 NAEP 4th Grade Math
31
  • White 58.7
  • Black 17
  • Hispanic 18
  • Asian/Pacific Islander 4.3
  • Native American 1.2
  • Economically Disadvantaged 38.5
  • English Language Learners 8.4
  • Students with disabilities 14.4
  • Migrant 1.2

9
Driving with Data
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Questions to Consider
  • What are the key considerations in building a
    system of standards and assessment that support
    early learners?
  • What are the implications of diverse culture,
    language and economic backgrounds for those
    considerations?

14
Work of the ECEA SCASS
  • Building a System of Standards to Support
    Successful Early Learners  The Relationship
    Between Early Learning Standards, Program
    Standards, Program Quality Measures and
    Accountability
  • Building an Assessment System to Support
    Successful Early Learners

15
Building a SYSTEM OF STANDARDS to Support
Successful Early Learners
  • Looking at the relationship between
  • Early Learning Standards
  • Program Standards
  • Program Quality Measures
  • Accountability

16
Building an ASSESSMENT SYSTEM to Support
Successful Early Learners
  • Overview 
  • The Role of Child Assessment in Program
    Evaluation and Improvement
  • Assessing Child Learning and Developmental
    Outcomes
  • The Role of Child Assessment in System
    Accountability and Improvement

17
Ask the right questions--
  • Is there a clear statement of purpose to guide
    the design of the system?
  • Does the assessment system match the purpose?
  • Does the system avoid punitive processes and
    consequences?

18
Test the assessment system first--
  • Is there support for research-based programs,
    services, and curriculum based on agreed upon
    outcomes WHICH LEAD TO ?
  • Processes to assure continuous improvement WHICH
    ARE INFORMED BY ?
  • Assessment systems that provide the right data
    for the right reasons SO THAT ?
  • HIGH QUALITY PROGRAMS LEAD TO SUCCESS FOR ALL
    CHILDREN

19
  • The more any quantitative social indicator is
    used for social decision-making, the more subject
    it will be to corruption pressures and the more
    apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social
    processes it is intended to monitor.
  • (Donald Campbell, 1975)

20
How to find these resources
  • Key Considerations Fact Sheets
  • A PowerPoint for Presenters and Policymakers
  • A Bibliography of Resources for the Development
    of Early Childhood Standards and Assessment
    Systems
  • Glossary of Terms
  • PDF of Goal 1 Assessment Booklet
  • Chart of program and early learning standards for
    the states
  • http//www.ccsso.org/projects/SCASS/Projects/Earl
    y_Childhood_Education_Assessment_Consortium/

21
Before the test
  • The learning and development of young children

22
Multiple factors
  • Family Well Being
  • Socio-Economic Status
  • Parent Health
  • Parent Education
  • Physical Health
  • Pediatric Health Care
  • Child Care
  • Community and Neighborhood Resources

23
Percent of People 5 Years and Over Who Speak a
Language Other Than English At Home
24
(No Transcript)
25
Family Well Being
  • Children living in poverty
  • 10 of white children
  • 37 of Hispanic children
  • 42 of black children
  • One in four poor children have at least one
    foreign-born parent.
  • Children in single parent homes
  • 15 of white children
  • 54 of black children
  • 27 of Hispanic children

26
What Do the Data Show?
  • Percent of children under 6 whose parents have
    attained less than a high school diploma
  • 36 of Hispanic children
  • 17 of black children
  • 14 of Native American children
  • 6 of Asian children
  • 5 of White children
  • Early Child Development in Social Context- Child
    Trends Child Health Research, 2004

27
  • Latino teenagers are more likely than black and
    white teenagers to become pregnant.
  • Twice as many Latino youth attempt suicide than
    blacks and whites.
  • 300,000 Hispanic children have a parent in
    prison.
  • Latino youth have one of the highest drop out
    rates of any other population group--four times
    greater than whites and two times greater than
    blacks.
  • Nearly 40 of Hispanic students who drop out do
    so before the 8th grade.
  • High school graduation rates have increased with
    each immigrant generation, yet rates of college
    graduation have not.

28
Health Care
  • In 1996, 13.9 percent of white children had no
    health coverage.
  • African-American children 18.8 percent
  • For Hispanics, the percentage was 28.9 percent
  • Fact Hispanic children are the least likely to
    have health-insurance coverage.
  • 73 have no dental insurance.
  • Fact A youngster under age 18 is far more likely
    to be without health insurance coverage than a
    person 65 years old or older.

29
Child Care
  • 61 of all children under age 6 are in some form
    of non parental care
  • 23 are in home care provided by a relative
  • 6 are in home care provided by a non-relative
  • 24 are in center based care
  • By Contrast
  • 53 of Hispanic children (of any race) ages six
    and under are in parental care exclusively
  • 12 of Hispanic children are cared for by a
    non-relative (12)
  • 20 of Hispanic children are in a center-based
    program ( 20)

30
Preschool
  • Head Start Enrollment 30 Hispanic
  • 23 of Head Start staff speak a language other
    than English
  • Of 822,000 children aged 3-5 enrolled in public
    prek-
  • 25 are Hispanic (public elementary school 17)
  • 23 Black
  • 3 Asian
  • 2 American Indian/ Alaska Native
  • Of the funds for Prek 80 state or local ed.
    Supplemented with other/federal funds.

31
Linguistic Isolation
  • 7.4 of all children under 6 live in a household
    where no one over age 14 speaks English very well
    or speaks only English. (Child Trends)
  • Asian and Hispanic children are more likely to
    live in linguistically isolated household
  • 30 of Asian children under age 6
  • 28.4 of Hispanic children under 6
  • 1 for non Hispanic white and black children
  • According to NCES Hispanic children are less
    likely to be read to or to visit a library
  • Only 15 of Hispanic children are read to daily

32
Best Practice
  • We should expand our awareness about the children
    we assess.
  • What inequalities face children before they
    enter?
  • If Social background factors do influence school
    success then we must acknowledge them
    particularly in relationship to young children.
  • We should become informed about what works and
    what isnt working in culturally and
    linguistically diverse families.

33
CALIFORNIA
Migrant 3.6 NAEP 4th Gr. Reading 21 NAEP
4th Gr. Math 25
34
Los Angeles Unified School District
35
IOWA
Migrant 0.9 NAEP 4th Gr. Reading 35 NAEP
4th Gr. Math 36
36
Storm Lake Community School District
37
THE MICHIGAN STORY
  • The Michigan School Readiness Program
  • (MSRP)
  • Targeted Prekindergarten Program
  • for
  • Four-Year-Old Children
  • At-Risk of School Failure

38
Michigans Services forFour Year Olds
  • Approximately 131,000 children
  • 60 (79,000) considered at-risk
  • 18 (23,000) served by Head Start
  • 20 (26,000) served by MSRP
  • 7 (9,000) served by ECSE
  • 45 /- (58,000) total served
  • by public programs 73 of total at-risk children
    are served

39
Selected MSRP Risk FactorsSix-Year Average
Percentages1996-2002
  • MSRP US
  • Low Family Income 63.0
    38.5
  • Single Parent Family 39.1
  • Lack of Community Resources 28.6
  • Family Academic Failure/drop out 28.6
  • Unemployed Parent(s) 22.2
  • Teen Parent 21.7
  • Children with Disabilities/Illness 17.4
    14.4
  • Limited English Household (ELL) 10.4
    8.4

40
MSRP Students
  • 60 White
  • 25 Black
  • 7 Hispanic
  • 2 Asian/Pacific Islander
  • 1 American Indian/Alaska Native
  • 5 Multiracial/other

41
MSRP Languages
  • Spanish (with dialects, mostly Mexican)
  • Arabic (with dialects)
  • Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, United Arab Emirates,
    Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Syria, Yemen
  • Central/Eastern Europe
  • Albania, Romania, Macedonia, Bosnia, Poland,
    Bulgaria
  • Africa
  • Kenya, Ethiopia, Liberia
  • Asia
  • India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, China, Japan, Sri
    Lanka, Vietnam

42
Language and Cultural Issues
  • Translations possible when there is a single
    other dominant language
  • Dialects and cultural differences within language
    groups
  • Multi-language classrooms teachers report 10
    home languages in a single classroom
  • Outreach children who enter K or Grade 1 with
    no previous classroom experience and no English
    familiarity

43
Issues Reported by MSRP StaffCommunication with
Families
  • Meeting the needs of child and familyfinding
    interpreters in the various languages.
  • Immigrant parents have trouble communicating with
    school personnel.
  • We have access to the Human Services Department
    Language Bank to help with interpreters if know
    ahead of time that we will need someone.
  • When a child becomes ill at school or there is a
    need for immediate communication, we are
    challenged
  • Since we have families from so many different
    countries, it is difficult to have resources and
    resource people available in the native
    languages.
  • Some parents cannot read in their native
    language, let alone English it becomes very
    difficult to communicate.
  • We can translate and even film videos in Spanish
    and Arabic, but we have at least 20 more
    languages represented.

44
More MSRP Staff ReportsWorking with Children
  • Cant find staff who are bilingual or ESL
    endorsed and have early childhood training.
  • Need a solid foundation in the home language AND
    support in English learning.
  • Its hard to differentiate a developmental delay
    in a non-English speaking child. Is it a
    language problem, or a need for a special
    education referral?
  • Sometimes there are health issues and children
    are not eligible for health insurance.
  • This is a new situation for us!

45
And MoreCultural Issues
  • Food preferences Children wont eat a standard
    American diet, but preferences vary even in the
    Hispanic group.
  • Some children are so respectful of adults, they
    do not speak up as expected in our classes.
  • It has been wonderful to have the other children
    exposed to another cultureour program is much
    richer.
  • A family from Iraqlack of respect for women by
    the male children was difficult for staff to deal
    with.
  • Children are kept up late for a late family
    dinner and come to school late or are tired all
    day.
  • Parents are afraid the INS will deport them if
    children are enrolled in school, so they may not
    enroll
  • A new family from Mexicoand both parents were
    deaf and mute they had a house fireWe were able
    to build bridges with community agencies to get a
    variety of services.
  • The immunization record was in Chinese!

46
MSRP Evaluation Results
47
LA 4 Prekindergarten Program
THE LOUISIANA STORY
  • Helping to Close the Educational Gap Between Our
    Children

48
Louisianas Students2002-2003 Data
49
Early Childhood Facts2003-2004 School Year
  • Approximately 67,000 four-year-old children
  • Approximately 42,500 of these children are
    at-risk for school failure
  • Approximately 27,000 at-risk children are served
    in public school programs, and 7,000 are served
    in Head Start programs
  • Approximately 1,400 at-risk children were served
    in the nonpublic ECD program
  • Approximately 7,000 at-risk children are not
    served in public programs

50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
Closing the Gap
65
Closing the Gap
66
NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress
  • Schools must show adequate yearly progress (AYP)
    in making sure that all students achieve academic
    proficiency in order to close the achievement gap
  • NCLB requires states to include the academic
    achievement results of all students, including
    ELL students, in AYP calculations
  • NCLB requires annual testing in certain grades
    and the disaggregation of data by race,
    socioeconomic status, and other subgroups.

67
NCLB Challenges
  • ELL students who are new to the U.S. often have a
    difficult time participating in state assessments
    due to language barriers or a lack of schooling
    prior to their arrival.
  • Some states have students representing more than
    100 languages, which makes it difficult to
    provide native language assessments for all
    students.

68
NCLB Challenges
  • Limited English proficient subgroup is a
    classification that changes as a student gains
    language proficiency. Its membership can change
    from year to year with language proficient
    students exiting and new LEP students entering
    each year. Since LEP students exit the subgroup
    once they attain English language proficiency,
    states may have difficulty demonstrating
    improvements on state assessments for this
    student subgroup.

69
NCLB Flexibility
  • For AYP calculations, states are allowed up to
    two years to include ELL subgroup students who
    have attained English proficiency

70
Title III Requirements
  • Purpose The major goals of Title III are to help
    ensure that limited-English-proficient (LEP)
    children attain English proficiency and meet the
    same challenging academic content and achievement
    standards that other students are expected to
    meet.

71
Title III Requirements cont.
  • Local Education Agencies (LEAs) must use Title
    III funds to implement language instruction
    educational programs designed to help LEP
    students achieve standards. The state educational
    agency (SEA), LEAs, and schools are accountable
    for increasing the English proficiency and core
    academic content knowledge of LEP students.

72
Title III Requirements cont.
  • Title III requires SEAs to hold LEAs accountable
    for meeting annual measurable achievement
    objectives that relate to LEP childrens
    development and attainment of English proficiency
    and academic achievement.

73
Title III Requirements cont.
  • In addition, Title III requires LEAs to report on
    the progress made by LEP children in meeting
    state academic content and achievement standards
    for each of the two years after these children no
    longer receive services under Title III.

74
English language Assessments
  • The English Language Development Assessment
    (ELDA)
  • Developed by the Council of Chief State School
    Officers (CCSSO), Measurement Incorporated (MI)
    and the LEP State Collaborative on Assessment and
    Student Standards (LEP SCASS) is one example of
    an assessment that will meet the requirements of
    NCLB.

75
English language Assessments continued
  • The ELDA will be available to member states by
    spring 2006
  • The ELDA was recently piloted in six member
    states
  • The ELDA is comprised of Inventories in the four
    domains (reading, writing, listening and
    speaking) plus a few multiple choice and
    constructed response items (verbal and written)
    which serve as a link to the ELDA 3-12
    assessments

76
RESOURCES
  • Center for Disease Control 1990-1991 Youth Risk
    Behavior Surveillance, Morbidity and Mortality
    Weekly
  • The Commonwealth Fun Child Trends and Center for
    Child Health Research. Early Child Development in
    Social Context. Child Trends and Center for Child
    Health Research , Earlay Child Development in
    Social Context A Chartbook.2004.
  • CDC National Center for Health Statistics
    Advance Data, No.23, May 31, 2001 NSFG, 1995
  • National Child Care Information Center Hispanics
    and Child Care The Changing Landscape September
    2004
  • Massey, Douglas S., Ruth E. Zambrana and Sally
    Alonzo Bell. 1995. Contemporary Issues in
    Latino Families. in Understanding Latino
    Families, editor. Ruth E. Zambrana. California
    Sage Publications, Inc. pp.190-204.
  • National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol 51, No 12,
    Aug 4, 2003
  • Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation.
    2004. The 2004 National Survey of Latinos
    Politics and Participation
  • U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Summary File
  • Sikkink, David and Edwin I. Hernandez. 2003.
    Religion Matters Predicting Schooling Success
    among Latino Youth. Interim Reports. 2003.1.
    University of Notre Dame, Institute for Latino
    Studies.
  • Lee, Valerie and David T. Burkam, University of
    Michigan. Inequality at the Starting Gate.
    September 2002

77
RESOURCES
  • http//www.ccsso.org/projects/SCASS/Projects/
  • Early_Childhood_Education_Assessment_Consortium/
  • http//www.schoolmatters.com
  • http//nccic.org/statedata/statepro/index.html

78
Panelist Contact Information
  • Susan Andersen, Iowa State Department of
    Education
  • susan.andersen_at_iowa.gov 515-281-4747 (Phone)
  • Lindy Buch, Michigan Department of Education
  • buchl_at_michigan.gov 517-373-9962 (Phone)
  • Harriet Egertson, Independent Consultant
  • haegertson_at_hotmail.com 951-834-3986 (Phone)
  • Mary Louise Jones, Louisiana Department of
    Education
  • marylouise.jones_at_la.gov 225-342-3366 (Phone)
  • Jana Martella, Council of Chief State School
    Officers
  • janam_at_ccsso.org 202-336-7057 (Phone)
  • Tracy Runfola, Council of Chief State School
    Officers
  • tracyr_at_ccsso.org 202-326-8699 (Phone)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com