STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy

Description:

STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy Karen Sanders STAMPEDE Trial Manager Sponsor number: MRC PR08 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:205
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: MS303

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy


1
STAMPEDESystemic Therapy in Advancing or
Metastatic Prostate cancer Evaluation of Drug
Efficacy
  • Karen Sanders
  • STAMPEDE Trial Manager

Sponsor number MRC PR08ISRCTN number
ISRCTN78818544EUDRACT number
2004-000193-31CTA number
00316/0026/001-0001
2
TRIAL DESIGN
3
Design rationale
  • STAMPEDE is 6-arm, 5-stage randomised controlled
    trial
  • 3 investigational drugs
  • Using Multi-Arm Multi-Stage methodology
  • MAMS design
  • MAMS design permits rapid comparison and
    concurrent testing of treatments

4
Trial Design
5
Trial Design Stages
  • Stage Outcome Measures
  • Primary Secondary
  • Pilot Safety Feasibility
  • Activity I-III Failure-free survival Overall
    survival
  • Toxicity
  • Skeletal-related events
  • Efficacy IV Overall survival Failure-free
    survival
  • Toxicity
  • Skeletal-related events
  • Quality of life

6
PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA
7
Main Inclusion Criteria
  • Newly diagnosed high risk patients with one of
  • Any 2 out of the following 3
  • Stage T3/4 N0 M0
  • PSA ? 40ng/ml
  • Gleason sum score 8-10
  • Stage Tany N M0 or Tany Nany M
  • Multiple sclerotic bone metastases with a PSA ?
    100ng/ml
  • Previously treated relapsing patients with either
  • PSA ? 4ng/ml and rising with doubling time less
    than 6 months
  • PSA ? 20ng/ml
  • N
  • M

8
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
  • Intention to treat with long term HT
  • WHO PS 0,1 or 2
  • Adequate cardiovascular history
  • No major dental extractions planned within next 2
    years

9
Hormone Therapy Before Randomisation
  • It is preferable that patients are not started on
    hormones prior to randomisation
  • No more than 12 weeks before
  • PSA measurement taken before HT treatment

10
Screening Procedures
  • Patients identified
  • CT or MRI of pelvis and abdomen
  • Bone Scan
  • Chest X-ray and ECG
  • PSA Test
  • Within 8 Weeks of Randomisation
  • Blood Tests

11
TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION
12
Hormone Therapy
  • Three acceptable approaches
  • Bilateral orchidectomy
  • Total or subcapsular
  • LHRH analogues
  • Used according to local practice
  • Prophylactic anti-androgens recommended
  • Anti-Androgens
  • M0 patients only
  • Monotherapy according to local practice

13
Zoledronic acid
  • Zoledronic acid 4mg 15min IV infusion
  • Every 3 weeks for 6 treatments
  • Then every 4 weeks
  • Patients should also receive
  • 500mg calcium oral supplement
  • 400IU vitamin D oral supplement
  • Available as a combination tablet
  • Continues until the soonest of
  • Maximum of 2 years
  • disease (including PSA) progression

14
Docetaxel
  • Docetaxel 75mg/m2
  • Day 1 as 1hr IV infusion
  • Max 160mg
  • Patients should also receive
  • Prednisolone 5mg bid daily for 21 days
  • Continues
  • Cycle repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

15
Celecoxib
  • Celecoxib 400mg
  • bid
  • Continues until the soonest of
  • Maximum of 1 year
  • Disease (including PSA) progression

16
Radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy permitted for suitable patients
  • Intention to use RT stated at randomisation
  • ensure no bias towards particular combinations of
    systemic therapy with radiotherapy
  • RT given 6 to 9 months after randomisation
  • and after any docetaxel toxicity settled

17
ASSESSMENTS FOLLOW-UP
18
Follow-up schedule
  • 6 weekly 0 to 24 weeks
  • 12 weekly up to 2 years
  • 6 monthly up to 5 years
  • Annually thereafter

19
Assessment of Treatment Failure
  • New lesions
  • CT scan
  • Increase in baseline lesions
  • CT scan
  • Biochemical
  • Rate of fall of PSA and the level of the PSA
    nadir
  • PSA nadir will be sent to responsible clinician
    confirming the PSA level which would be taken as
    progression.
  • Death from prostate cancer

20
Defining PSA Nadir PSA Failure
  • PSA Nadir
  • Lowest reported PSA level
  • Between randomisation and 24 weeks
  • PSA Failure
  • Depends on baseline PSA measurement and PSA nadir
  • 3 possible PSA failure categories, A, B and C

21
PSA Failure Categories
22
Defining PSA Relapse
  • For patients in group A Failed at time zero
  • For Patients in group B Relapse occurs when PSA
    increases by 50 above nadir
  • For Patients in group C Relapse occurs when PSA
    increases by 50 above nadir or goes above
    4ng/ml, whichever is greatest

23
DRUG SUPPLY
24
Drug Supply Support
  • Novartis
  • Supplying free Zoledronic Acid
  • Providing an educational grant to support some
    central work
  • Pfizer
  • Supplying free Celecoxib
  • Providing funds to distribute drug to centres
  • Sanofi-Aventis
  • Providing an educational grant
  • Supplying Docetaxel at a discounted price of buy
    1 get 2 free

25
Drug Supply Support
  • Department of Health
  • Central subvention provided
  • 1,787 per patient randomised to arms C and E of
    the trial and prescribed docetaxel.
  • Payable in respect of a hospital trust
    randomising more than 3 patients

26
Drug Ordering and Labelled
  • Celecoxib and Zoledronic Acid
  • Ordered by MRC CTU at accreditation and on
    subsequent request from centres
  • Docetaxel
  • Ordered by centre pharmacist
  • All drugs
  • To be labelled by the pharmacist using labels
    provided

27
CURRENT ACCRUAL
28
Current Recruitment Status
  • First patient
  • 17th October 2005
  • Accrual targets
  • Pilot Phase target was 210 patients
  • Pilot Phase target achieved in March 2007
  • Overall target approximately 3300 patients
  • (440 OS events on control arm)
  • Observed accrual
  • 1643 patients have been randomised
  • 17-June-2010

29
Accrual
30
Patient Characteristics
Age (years) at randomisation median (quartiles) 65 (60-70)
PSA (ng/ml) at randomisation median (quartiles) 66 (24-177)
WHO performance status (0 Vs 1 Vs 2) 1210 vs 338 vs 16
Bone mets at randomisation n () 789 (50)
RT planned n () 379 (24)
Type of HT (LHRH vs bicalutamide vs orchidectomy) 1535 vs 22 vs 8
High risk newly diagnosed pts n () 1460 (93)
Previously treated/relapsing pts n () 105 (7)
Data from 30-Apr-2010
31
TRIAL COMMITTEESAND CONTACTS
32
Trial Management Group
  • Nick James Oncologist CI, Chair, Birmingham, UK
  • Noel Clarke Urologist Vice-Chair Manchester, UK
  • Malcolm Mason Oncologist Vice-Chair Cardiff, UK
  • John Anderson Urologist Sheffield, UK
  • David Dearnaley Oncologist Sutton, UK
  • John Dwyer Patient representative Stockport, UK
  • John Masters Pathologist London, UK
  • Rick Popert Oncologist London, UK
  • Marc Schulper Health Economist York, UK
  • Andrew Stanley Pharmacist Birmingham, UK
  • George Thalmann Oncologist Bern, CH
  • Elizabeth Clark Data Manager MRC CTU, UK
  • Pierre Fustier Trial Coordinator SAKK, CH
  • Charlene Griffith Data Manager MRC CTU, UK
  • Gordana Jovic Statistician MRC CTU, UK
  • Max Parmar Statistician MRC CTU, UK
  • Karen Sanders Trial Manager MRC CTU, UK

33
Contact us
  • Karen Sanders
  • Trial Manager
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit
  • T 0207 670 4831
  • E stampede_at_ctu.mrc.ac.uk
  • Charlene Griffith Liz Clark
  • Data Managers
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit
  • T 0207 670 4882/4794
  • E stampede_at_ctu.mrc.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)