Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor SystemA Demonstration Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor SystemA Demonstration Study

Description:

Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor System A Demonstration Study ... pH conditions are key in optimizing Phosphorus removal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:217
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: johno2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor SystemA Demonstration Study


1
Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor SystemA
Demonstration Study
  • Wayne Lorenz, P.E. and Matthew J. GavinWright
    Water Engineers, Inc.
  • and
  • Newell Wright, P.E.Arapahoe County Water and
    Wastewater Authority

2
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR)
SAMPLE POINT 3PERMEATE
SAMPLE POINT 1INFLUENT
FERRIC CHLORIDE
INFLUENT
UV DISINFECT
ANOXIC BASIN
AEROBIC BASIN
MEMBRANES
DISCHARGE
MEMBRANE VACUUM/PERMEATE PUMPS
INFLUENT PUMP STATION
MECHANICALLY CLEANED BAR SCREEN
RECYCLE
SOLIDS
SAMPLE POINT 2MBR
PROCESS SCHEMATIC LONE TREE CREEK WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
3
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR)
ANOXIC BASIN
AEROBIC BASIN
MEMBRANES
RECYCLE
SOLIDS
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
ZeeWeed Membrane
Immersible, Ultra Low Pressure, Oxidant
Resistant, High Strength
Process Tank (Influent)
Inner reinforcing structure covered with a
composite polymer outer layer
Filtered Water
Membrane Layer
Pore Size 0.085 micron (nominal) 0.1 micron
(absolute)
Inner Reinforcing Structure
Operates at -2 psi to -6 psi when filtering and 3
psi on backpulse
X-Section
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
3
3
FePO4(S)
AlPO4(S)
4
4
Fe(PO4)(X-3)/3 (OH)X(S)
Al(PO4)(X-3)/3 (OH)X(S)
Log Molar Soluble Phosphorus
5
5
Fe(OH)3(S)
6
6
Al(OH)3(S)
7
7
2
4
6
8
3
5
7
9
pH Value
pH Value
13
FERRIC CHLORIDEFe3 HnPO4n-3 ? FePO4
nHFeCl3 3H2O ? Fe(OH)3 3H 3Cl-
14
(No Transcript)
15
SODIUM ALUMINATEAl3 HnPO4n-3 ? AlPO4
nHNa2Al2O4 4 H2O ? 2 Na Al2(OH)4 4
(OH-)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Note Samples filtered through a 0.45-micron
filter.
18
Notes 1. Samples filtered through 0.45 micron
filter. 2. pH adjusted to 6.5 using sulfuric
acid.
19
Phase 1 Conditions
  • Conducted over 15 weeksDecember through March
  • Average Daily Inflow 0.98 mgd
  • Membrane Filtration Area - 96,000 ft2
  • Average Filtration Rate 10.2 gpd/ft2
  • Ferric Chloride Dosage 80 to 100 mg/L
  • No pH Adjustment

20
Note Phosphorus analyses performed by Chadwick
Ecological Consultants.
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
MBR Average Effluent Quality
  • Total Phosphorus 0.035 mg/L
  • BOD5 2.8 mg/L
  • Ammonia 1.3 mg/L
  • Nitrate 5.8 mg/L
  • pH 7.0

25
CONCLUSIONS
  • Phosphorus Goal of 0.05 mg/L was met using ferric
    chloride at a dosage of 80 to 100 mg/L
  • Average Phosphorus Concentration was 0.035 mg/L
  • Phosphorus removed to 0.05 mg/L regardless of
    temperature

26
CONCLUSIONS
  • Addition of chemical to precipitate Phosphorus
    impacts pH and alkalinity
  • pH conditions are key in optimizing Phosphorus
    removal
  • Activated sludge was not affected by dosages in
    study

27
Phase 2 Testing
  • Demonstrate 0.02 mg/L P removal, or less
  • Different chemicals
  • Limit of biomass viability
  • Membrane maintenance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com