Condition Variables and Transactional Memory: Problem or Opportunity? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Condition Variables and Transactional Memory: Problem or Opportunity?

Description:

Condition Variables and Transactional Memory: Problem or Opportunity? ... TM-compatible condition variables. Implementation independent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Pol9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Condition Variables and Transactional Memory: Problem or Opportunity?


1
Condition Variables and Transactional Memory
Problem or Opportunity?
  • Polina Dudnik and Michael Swift
  • University of Wisconsin, Madison

2
Executive Summary
  • Problem thread synchronization in TM
  • Goal robust synchronization primitive
  • State of the art Retry/orelse
  • Main point Condition Variables CVs still
    relevant
  • Our contributions
  • TM-compatible condition variables
  • Implementation independent
  • Performance comparable to original CVs

3
Outline
  • Lessons from the past
  • New ideas for TM
  • Transaction/Condition Variable Interactions
  • Design of TM-safe Condition Variables
  • Evaluation

4
What is the problem?
  • How should threads coordinate?
  • How should threads wait for an event or state
    change?
  • How does this problem change with transactions?

5
On the Road to CVs
  • Semaphores Dijkstra 65
  • Condition Critical Regions (CCRs) Hoare 72

6
Hoare on CCR
  • I feel this proposal condition critical regions
    is not suitable for operating system
    implementation. My proposed method encourages the
    programmer to ignore the question of which of
    several outstanding requests for a resource
    should be granted.
  • Sir Anthony Hoare Belfast 71

7
Limitations of CCR
  • Atomicity
  • Excessive Context Switching
  • Restrictive Scheduling

8
Solution Condition Variables
  • Condition variable queue of waiters
  • Associated lock maintains mutual exclusion
  • Signaling a CV hint that state has changed
    Mesa semantics Lampson 79
  • Multiple CVs provide prioritized wakeup

9
Problem Solved
  • CCR
  • Atomicity Concerns
  • Performance Issues
  • Restrictive Scheduling
  • Condition Variables
  • Monitors
  • Precise Wakeup
  • Explicit Signaling/Multiple CVs

10
CVs Limitations
  • Nested monitor problem
  • How about nested function calls?
  • Or waiting on two event queues?
  • Retry/orelse solves these problems!

11
TM Synchronization Today
  • Retry/orelse Harris et al. 2005

12
Why not retry?
  • Nesting
  • Composability
  • Restrictive scheduling
  • Potentially poor scalability
  • Other proposals have the same problems
  • atomic CCRs Harris 2003, atomic Wait
    Smaragdakis 2007, X10 conditional atomic blocks
    Charles 2005
  • It is too early to give up on condition
    variables!

13
Outline
  • Lessons from the past
  • New ideas
  • Transaction/Condition Variable Interactions
  • Design of TM-safe Condition Variables
  • Evaluation

14
TM Condition Variables
  • Original condition variables
  • int get()
  • lock(l)
  • getters
  • while (!available)
  • wait(cv, l)
  • getters--
  • available false
  • unlock(l)
  • return contents

15
TM Condition Variables
  • Convert locks to transactions
  • int get()
  • begin_tx
  • getters
  • while (!available)
  • wait(cv)
  • getters--
  • available false
  • end_tx
  • return contents

16
TM Condition Variables
  • Wait outside the transaction
  • int get()
  • begin_tx
  • getters
  • while (!available)
  • end_tx
  • wait(cv)
  • begin_tx
  • getters--
  • available false
  • end_tx
  • return contents

17
Lost Wakeup
  • Waiting Thread
  • begin_tx
  • read_state
  • prepare_wait()
  • end_tx
  • wait()
  • Signaling Thread
  • begin_tx
  • update_state
  • signal()
  • end_tx

TIME
18
TM Condition Variables
  • Split wait
  • prepare wait within transaction
  • commit
  • complete wait
  • restart transaction
  • int get()
  • begin_tx
  • getters
  • while (!available)
  • prepare_wait(cv)
  • end_tx
  • complete_wait(cv)
  • begin_tx
  • getters--
  • available false
  • end_tx
  • return contents

19
TM Condition Variables
  • What happens with concurrent signalers?
  • int get()
  • begin_tx
  • getters
  • while (!available)
  • prepare_wait(cv)
  • end_tx
  • complete_wait(cv)
  • begin_tx
  • getters--
  • available false
  • end_tx
  • return contents

20
Update-Signal Order
  • Waiting Thread
  • begin_tx
  • while (!state)
  • prepare_wait()
  • end_tx
  • wait()
  • begin_tx
  • end_tx
  • Signaling Thread
  • begin_tx
  • update_state
  • signal()
  • end_tx

TIME
21
TM-CV Implementations
22
Outline
  • Lessons from the past
  • New ideas for TM
  • Transaction/Condition Variable Interactions
  • Design of TM-safe Condition Variables
  • Evaluation

23
Workloads
  • libMicro
  • Stress-test of conditional synchronization
  • FluidAnimate PARSEC
  • Many critical sections, few condition variables
    ops
  • StreamCluster PARSEC
  • Few critical sections, few condition variable ops
  • Platform Solaris GEMS/LogTM-SE, 16 threads

24
Evaluation
  • Questions to answer
  • Does it work?
  • How two versions compare in performance?
  • How does performance compare to locks?

25
Results
26
Evaluation
  • Answers to questions
  • Does it work?
  • YES
  • How two versions compare in performance?
  • Differ under stress
  • How does performance compare to locks?
  • Comparable performace

27
Conclusions
  • Condition Variables are still relevant with TM
  • Two implementations of TM-CV
  • Different requirements on TM system
  • Performance difference subject to potential
    overlap
  • Read the paper for
  • Implementation independence

28
QUESTIONS?
29
Backup Slides
30
Different Colors
31
Example CV usage
  • void BeginWrite()
  • pthread_mutex_lock(mutex)
  • while (NWriters 1 NReaders gt 0)
  • WaitingWriters
  • pthread_cond_wait(CanWrite,mutex)
  • --WaitingWriters
  • NWriters 1
  • pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex

32
Lost Wakeup
  • Waiting Thread
  • BEGIN_TX
  • while (!state)
  • prepare_wait()
  • COMMIT_TX
  • wait()
  • BEGIN_TX
  • COMMIT_TX
  • Signaling Thread
  • BEGIN_TX
  • update_state
  • BEGIN_ESCAPE
  • signal()
  • END_ESCAPE
  • COMMIT_TX
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com