Oligopoly: Strategic Decision Making and Interdependence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Oligopoly: Strategic Decision Making and Interdependence

Description:

Firms can benefit by agreeing to coordinate their output levels - output ... collusive agreement has an incentive to cheat and produce more output than the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:657
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: walter88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oligopoly: Strategic Decision Making and Interdependence


1
Oligopoly Strategic Decision Making and
Interdependence
2
Objectives of Discussion
  • Discuss the managerial decision making process
    under Oligopoly
  • Investigate possible strategies for oligopoly
    firms in different situations
  • Discuss strategies and outcomes when oligopoly
    firms can compete and when they can cooperate
  • Consider strategies to influence entry and exit
    in oligopoly markets

3
Oligopoly
  • Small number of sellers, each with large capacity
    relative to total market demand
  • Oligopolies may produce standardized (e.g. steel,
    aluminum, gasoline) or differentiated products
    (autos, cereals)
  • Firms recognize interdependence between each
    others product, output and pricing decisions
  • Barriers to entry in oligopolies
  • economies of scale
  • control of input markets

4
Strategic Decisions in Oligopoly
  • Firms may decide on strategy without consulting
    with the other firms or by cooperating
  • The outcome in the market is the result of the
    strategies chosen by all the firms
  • The payoff to each firm is dependent on not
    just its strategy, but also the strategies chosen
    by competitors
  • Two basic types of competition
  • 1) Pricing ? Sweezy and Bertrand
  • 2) Output ? Cournot and Stackelberg

5
Pricing Strategies in Oligopoly
  • Since firms can compete on different levels and
    with respect to many choice variables no one
    model can fully capture oligopoly behavior. A
    common way for firms to compete is through
    pricing.
  • Main difference between pricing strategy models
    is assumptions about type of product and
    cooperation between firms.

6
Sweezy Oligopoly and Rivals Reaction
  • In a Sweezy oligopoly, a firms demand curve
    depends on how rivals match price changes for
    differentiated products.
  • If rivals match, the demand curve is more
    inelastic (D1) because prices of substitutes are
    changing in same directions as firms prices
  • If firms match price decreases but not increases,
    the demand curve is kinked ABD1 May lead to
    price rigidity because price increases penalize
    the firm and decreases are matched.
  • Illustrates the importance of anticipating
    rivals reaction

7
Bertrand Oligopoly
  • In a Bertrand oligopoly, firms set prices
    depending on the prices of their rivals for a
    homogeneous product. If firms cannot cooperate,
    would expect price cutting (price wars).
  • Firms will cut prices so that P MC (same
    outcome as perfect competition).
  • With pricing competition, output will be higher
    and profits lower than in any other type of
    oligopoly.
  • With cooperation, firms could collude to set
    prices at monopoly level but face problems of
    maintaining agreement.

8
Output Competition and Reaction Functions
  • A reaction function indicates the decision a
    firm would make based on the expected,
    simultaneous response from a rival no
    cooperation
  • Reaction functions provide a schedule of actions
    that yield profit-maximizing decisions based on a
    rivals actions.
  • In a Cournot oligopoly, changes in one firms
    output changes the marginal revenue for other
    firms. Increase in output by 1 firm lowers the
    profit maximizing level of others output
  • QM1 monopoly profits for firm 1
  • QM2 monopoly profits for firm 2
  • Q1 and Q2 profit maximizing output assuming
    neither firm will change its output level
  • E is a Cournot equilibrium neither firm expects
    to benefit from changing output

9
Cooperation and Collusion in Cournot Oligopoly
  • Firms can benefit by agreeing to coordinate their
    output levels - output combinations along dotted
    line AB. Key issue is how to determine joint
    output and divide profits. Isoprofit lines
    indicate levels of profit (higher profits closer
    to monopoly output level)
  • Output combinations E, D and F all yield higher
    levels of profits for both firms than at C. If
    they collude, both are better off. (In a duopoly
    with equal costs of production, firms split the
    market)
  • Costs of collusion include organizational and
    bargaining costs as well as monitoring and
    enforcement (retaliation) costs.

10
Collusion and Cheating
  • Every firm in a collusive agreement has an
    incentive to cheat and produce more output than
    the agreed level.
  • If firm 1 produces at G rather than D, firm 1
    earns higher profits but firm 2 is worse off than
    at D (with collusion) or C (no cooperation).
  • Cheating is easier if
  • more firms
  • detection and retaliation are difficult
  • external sources of price fluctuations

11
A Dominant Firm with Followers (Stackelberg
Oligopoly)
  • With a single firm that is a leader, the
    dominant firm selects its output level (makes a
    commitment) and other firms adjust based on their
    reaction functions.
  • If the leader produces at S, the leader will earn
    higher profits than at the Cournot equilibrium C.
    Followers earn lower profits.

12
Other Strategies in Oligopoly (from Ch. 13, pp.
475 490)
  • Other types of oligopoly strategies may be
    designed to deter entry and/or reduce
    competition.
  • Limit Pricing Incumbent(s) prevents new
    entrants by committing to a price lower than the
    profit-maximizing (myopic) price. The residual
    demand for the entrant at the limit price would
    yield no profits.
  • Expect same result if incumbent has cost
    advantage over rivals.
  • Could also achieve same result with a
    credible threat to lower price.

13
Other Strategies in Oligopoly
  • Predatory Pricing a firm commits to a price
    lower than its marginal cost to drive-out a rival
    or deter entry (e.g. grocery store chains). A
    similar result could occur with a credible threat
    to lower price. Illegal under Sherman Antitrust
    Act.
  • Penetration Pricing entrant charges an initial
    price that is lower than incumbent(s) to gain
    market share effective in overcoming network
    effects (e.g. Yahoo! and eBay)
  • Capacity Expansion incumbent firm increases
    production capacity to lower its own costs,
    reduce prices and increase market share.
  • Raising Rivals Costs actions that raise the
    fixed and/or marginal costs of rivals through
    control or influence over input markets higher
    cost lowers rivals output. Strategy often
    occurs through regulations that benefit some
    firms over others (e.g. pollution controls for
    new firms Wal-Marts concern about the minimum
    wage).

14
Examples of Oligopoly Behavior
  • National Football League McMillan, Ch. 6
  • Japanese dango McMillan, Ch. 11

15
Summary
  • Oligopoly
  • Products can be homogeneous, or differentiated
  • Interdependence and choice of decision variables
    make it difficult to capture behavior
  • Manager must consider strategies of other firms
  • Consider actions of firms (managers) in
    non-cooperative and cooperative settings
  • In a non-cooperative setting, firms cannot fully
    exercise market power. Firms will compete and
    zero economic profits could result in the long
    run.
  • Potential for economic profits suggests that
    firms will seek cooperative solutions but
    cheating always limits extent of cooperation.
  • Different output and pricing strategies can be
    used to influence entry and exit of rivals

16
  • Selected Problems
  • Ch. 9, 1, 5, 6, 13 and 14
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com