Integrating theories of social justice into public health intervention planning PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 17
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrating theories of social justice into public health intervention planning


1
Integrating theories of social justice into
public health intervention planning
  • Eric Breton MA, PhD, Zayed University, United
    Arab Emirates
  • Evelyne De Leeuw, MSc, MPH, PhD, Deakin
    University, Australia
  • 12th World Congress on Public Health, Istanbul,
    Turkey
  • 29 April, 2009

2
Abstract
  • Public health practice is typically guided by
    epidemiological explanations of the causes the
    causes being act upon through behaviour or
    environmental change strategies. This approach
    has been repeatedly criticized on practical and
    ethical grounds. For one thing, the causes, i.e.
    risk factors, identified are often oblivious of
    enduring socio-economic determinants of health
    and entrenched inequalities.
  • Consequently, there is a need to move from a
    strict bio-medical approach to public health
    problem resolution to one that would also account
    for and be integrative of dimensions of fairness
    and justice. We propose the first elements of an
    approach to public health intervention guided by
    a theory of social justice. Our claims are based
    on the seminal work of Amartya Sen whose
    capability approach has generated a growing body
    of works on welfare and public health programs.
    The approach rests on two central pillars. One
    is the acknowledgement of the differing needs,
    entitlements and capacity to convert resources
    that transcend populations. The other is that
    interventions should increase the freedom to
    achieve of individuals (their capabilities).
  • Using examples from disease prevention programs,
    we demonstrate that the capability perspective to
    public health program planning calls for 1) a
    conceptualization of public health problems as
    instances of capability deprivation (i.e.
    individuals enjoying few options on what they can
    achieve), 2) a shift of the program focus on the
    achievements in health and well-being to one
    looking at the expansion of the freedom to
    achieve and, 3) a renewed participation of the
    public in the identification of the relevant
    capabilities.
  • We conclude that by taking into account the
    differing capacity of individuals to convert
    resources into freedom, the approach inherently
    addresses health inequalities. However, its
    implementation raises a number of difficulties as
    it calls for complex multi-agency interventions
    and for a consensus on relevant capabilities.

3
Introduction
  • Rising health inequalities/inequities
  • Public health interventions and policies
    contributing to inequities
  • No theory of justice to guide public health
    programming and policy development
  • We present some thoughts on the application of
    one such theory to chronic disease prevention
    programs

4
The capability approach
5
Main contributors to the capability approach
  • Amartya Sen
  • 1980 paper Equality of What
  • Also contributions from
  • Nussbaum
  • Alkire
  • Robeyns
  • Walker

6
Capability approach rests on two main pillars
  • Acknowledgement of the diversity that transcends
    any groups or populations (e.g. genetics, life
    goals, sexual orientation, political preference
    and wealth)
  • Well-being is a function of the degree of freedom
    to do or be what one values
  • To improve well-being should be about increasing
    the options of the individuals

7
What should be equalized?
8
Two possible spaces of equalization
  • Functionings (i.e. doings and beings?achievements)
  • to live long life,
  • to be fit/physically active,
  • to have friends,
  • to eat to ones content.
  • Capabilities (potential functionings?potential
    achievements )
  • To be able to live long life if one wants to,
  • To be able to be fit/physically active if one
    wish it
  • To be able to make friends if one wish to
  • Etc.

9
Capabilities freedom to achieve
  • The question is no longer whether the population
    is achieving what it wants to do or be but rather
    do all individuals have the freedom to achieve
    (capabilities) what they have reason to value.
  • Societys focus ? capabilities

10
An infinite set of capabilities
  • Hence the need to identify the most significant
    ones
  • Two perspectives
  • The relativist one (i.e. Sen)
  • The universalist one (e.g. Nussbaum)

11
Applying The capability approach to public health
practice
12
The case of tobacco control
  • Public health perspective (i.e. functioning
    centered)
  • to live a smoke-free life
  • to not be exposed to ETS
  • Capability approach
  • to be able to achieve a smoke-free life (or quit
    smoking) if one wishes to
  • to be able to avoid exposure to ETS if one wishes
    that

13
Locus of intervention
  • Capability (freedom) to live a smoke-free life.
  • Factual knowledge (on harms and cessation)
  • Communicative environment (e.g. misleading
    information advertisement, smoking in movies,
    tobacco sponsorship, price of cigarettes)

14
Locus of intervention (ETS)
  • Capability (freedom) to live free of exposure to
    ETS
  • Measures to prevent smoking in the public space
  • Measures to prevent smoking in the
    private/domestic spaces (e.g. in cars)

15
Beyond knowledge and legislative measures
  • Applying a capability approach to public health
    programming and policy development requires to
    reflect on
  • the exercise of free choice ? Critical thinking
    and autonomy
  • The capabilities valued by the population
    (relativist perspective calls for a democratic
    process)

16
Conclusion
  • Public health problems as instances of capability
    deprivation (i.e. individuals enjoying few
    options on what they can achieve)
  • Health or freedom?
  • A renewed participation of the public in the
    identification of the relevant capabilities.
  • The approach is largely inequity proof
  • Implementation calls for complex multi-agency
    interventions.

17
ÇOK TESEKKÜRLER!THANK YOU ???? ??MERCI!
18
Questions?
  • Please contact
  • Eric Breton, PhD
  • Assistant Professor
  • Department of Natural Science Public Health
  • College of Arts and Sciences
  • Zayed University
  • P.O. Box 4783
  • Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Office 971 2 407 9674
  • Fax 971 2 443 4847
  • Email Eric.Breton_at_zu.ac.ae
  • http//www.zu.ac.ae
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com