Title: Integrating theories of social justice into public health intervention planning
1Integrating theories of social justice into
public health intervention planning
- Eric Breton MA, PhD, Zayed University, United
Arab Emirates - Evelyne De Leeuw, MSc, MPH, PhD, Deakin
University, Australia - 12th World Congress on Public Health, Istanbul,
Turkey - 29 April, 2009
2Abstract
- Public health practice is typically guided by
epidemiological explanations of the causes the
causes being act upon through behaviour or
environmental change strategies. This approach
has been repeatedly criticized on practical and
ethical grounds. For one thing, the causes, i.e.
risk factors, identified are often oblivious of
enduring socio-economic determinants of health
and entrenched inequalities. - Consequently, there is a need to move from a
strict bio-medical approach to public health
problem resolution to one that would also account
for and be integrative of dimensions of fairness
and justice. We propose the first elements of an
approach to public health intervention guided by
a theory of social justice. Our claims are based
on the seminal work of Amartya Sen whose
capability approach has generated a growing body
of works on welfare and public health programs.
The approach rests on two central pillars. One
is the acknowledgement of the differing needs,
entitlements and capacity to convert resources
that transcend populations. The other is that
interventions should increase the freedom to
achieve of individuals (their capabilities). - Using examples from disease prevention programs,
we demonstrate that the capability perspective to
public health program planning calls for 1) a
conceptualization of public health problems as
instances of capability deprivation (i.e.
individuals enjoying few options on what they can
achieve), 2) a shift of the program focus on the
achievements in health and well-being to one
looking at the expansion of the freedom to
achieve and, 3) a renewed participation of the
public in the identification of the relevant
capabilities. - We conclude that by taking into account the
differing capacity of individuals to convert
resources into freedom, the approach inherently
addresses health inequalities. However, its
implementation raises a number of difficulties as
it calls for complex multi-agency interventions
and for a consensus on relevant capabilities.
3Introduction
- Rising health inequalities/inequities
- Public health interventions and policies
contributing to inequities - No theory of justice to guide public health
programming and policy development - We present some thoughts on the application of
one such theory to chronic disease prevention
programs
4The capability approach
5Main contributors to the capability approach
- Amartya Sen
- 1980 paper Equality of What
- Also contributions from
- Nussbaum
- Alkire
- Robeyns
- Walker
6Capability approach rests on two main pillars
- Acknowledgement of the diversity that transcends
any groups or populations (e.g. genetics, life
goals, sexual orientation, political preference
and wealth) - Well-being is a function of the degree of freedom
to do or be what one values - To improve well-being should be about increasing
the options of the individuals
7What should be equalized?
8Two possible spaces of equalization
- Functionings (i.e. doings and beings?achievements)
- to live long life,
- to be fit/physically active,
- to have friends,
- to eat to ones content.
- Capabilities (potential functionings?potential
achievements ) - To be able to live long life if one wants to,
- To be able to be fit/physically active if one
wish it - To be able to make friends if one wish to
- Etc.
9Capabilities freedom to achieve
- The question is no longer whether the population
is achieving what it wants to do or be but rather
do all individuals have the freedom to achieve
(capabilities) what they have reason to value. - Societys focus ? capabilities
10An infinite set of capabilities
- Hence the need to identify the most significant
ones - Two perspectives
- The relativist one (i.e. Sen)
- The universalist one (e.g. Nussbaum)
11Applying The capability approach to public health
practice
12The case of tobacco control
- Public health perspective (i.e. functioning
centered) - to live a smoke-free life
- to not be exposed to ETS
- Capability approach
- to be able to achieve a smoke-free life (or quit
smoking) if one wishes to - to be able to avoid exposure to ETS if one wishes
that
13Locus of intervention
- Capability (freedom) to live a smoke-free life.
- Factual knowledge (on harms and cessation)
- Communicative environment (e.g. misleading
information advertisement, smoking in movies,
tobacco sponsorship, price of cigarettes)
14Locus of intervention (ETS)
- Capability (freedom) to live free of exposure to
ETS - Measures to prevent smoking in the public space
- Measures to prevent smoking in the
private/domestic spaces (e.g. in cars)
15Beyond knowledge and legislative measures
- Applying a capability approach to public health
programming and policy development requires to
reflect on - the exercise of free choice ? Critical thinking
and autonomy - The capabilities valued by the population
(relativist perspective calls for a democratic
process)
16Conclusion
- Public health problems as instances of capability
deprivation (i.e. individuals enjoying few
options on what they can achieve) - Health or freedom?
- A renewed participation of the public in the
identification of the relevant capabilities. - The approach is largely inequity proof
- Implementation calls for complex multi-agency
interventions.
17ÇOK TESEKKÜRLER!THANK YOU ???? ??MERCI!
18Questions?
- Please contact
- Eric Breton, PhD
- Assistant Professor
- Department of Natural Science Public Health
- College of Arts and Sciences
- Zayed University
- P.O. Box 4783
- Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Office 971 2 407 9674
- Fax 971 2 443 4847
- Email Eric.Breton_at_zu.ac.ae
- http//www.zu.ac.ae