Evaluating Sources of Information - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating Sources of Information

Description:

aol.com. geocities.com. Is it somebody's personal page? ... in a reliably annotated subject directory, such as Librarians' Index, Infomine, About.com ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2294
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: davidandli
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating Sources of Information


1
Evaluating Sources of Information

2
Sources of Information
  • Books
  • Newspapers
  • Periodicals
  • Websites
  • Webpages

3
Written Sources of Information
  • Books
  • Newspapers
  • Periodicals

4
Criteria to Evaluate Sources
  • Credibility of Author
  • Date of Publication
  • Edition
  • Publisher
  • Title
  • Content Analysis
  • Intended Audience
  • Coverage
  • Writing Style
  • Overall Impression

5
Credibility of Author
  • Education?
  • MS, PhD, MD, RD, DO
  • Discipline
  • Credentials?
  • Licenses, Certifications
  • Background?
  • Has your instructor, textbook, or other scholars
    in this area mentioned this author?

6
Date of Publication
  • When was the source published?
  • Is current information important for your topic?

7
Edition
  • Is this a first edition?
  • Further editions demonstrate that a source has
    been updated to reflect new information
  • Further editions suggest it may be a standard
    sources in the field.

8
Publisher
  • Who published the resource?
  • Is it a popular publisher or a university press?
    This would reflect a more scholarly content
  • Is it published or distributed by a for-profit
    company?

9
Title of Periodical
  • Periodicals are publications which are issued at
    regular intervals
  • Such as newspapers, periodicals, magazines
    journals
  • Popular VS Scholarly

10
Popular Periodicals
  • Cover news, current events or interests
  • Targeted at general public
  • Written by editorial staff or free lance writers
  • Lay person language
  • Illustrations for a pleasing appearance
  • No peer review process
  • Sources are sometimes cited, but usually no full
    citations or bibliography

11
Examples of Popular Periodicals
12
Scholarly Periodicals
  • Also called Scholarly Journals
  • Report original research or experiments
  • Targeted at researchers, faculty students
  • Written by experts in the field
  • Use specialized language of the discipline
  • Illustrations are few. (charts graphs only)
  • Peer reviewed
  • Include citations in a standardized format

13
Examples of Scholarly Periodicals
14
Advantages of Periodicals
  • published frequently
  • best sources for current information
  • current information presented long before a book
    can be published
  • contain info on the latest research theories
  • exist for every field
  • shorter in length than a book

15
Content Analysis
  • Examine the source
  • Read the Preface
  • Scan the Table of Contents and the Index
  • Note whether bibliographies are included

16
Who is the Intended Audience?
  • Should be targeted at specialized audience such
    as researchers, faculty students
  • Should use specialized language or jargon
  • You may need a dictionary or health encyclopedia
    to look up words and/or concepts

17
Objective Reasoning
  • Is the information fact or opinion?
  • Does the author attempt to remain objective?
  • Does the information appear valid?
  • Is there use of good research design?
  • Is the information supported by evidence?
  • Do the conclusions make sense?

18
Coverage
  • Primary VS Secondary
  • Primary sources the original source that first
    reports the research or ideas
  • Secondary sources analyze, describe, and
    synthesize the primary or original source. These
    include review articles, reference books such as
    encyclopedias, and textbooks.

19
Writing Style
  • Is the source logically organized?
  • Are the ideas clearly presented?
  • Does it flow? Or is it choppy?
  • Does the author make a clear and concise
    argument?

20
Overall Impression
Follow your instincts!
21
Task - Independent Review
  • Summarize your article in one paragraph
  • Credibility of the Author
  • Date of Publication
  • Edition
  • Publisher
  • Title Type of Journal
  • Content Analysis
  • Intended Audience
  • Objective Reasoning
  • Coverage
  • Writing Style
  • Overall Impression

22
Task Group Review
  • Break into groups of 4
  • Each member will share article summary
  • Each member will share overall impression of
    source. Be sure to explain how you developed your
    overall impression by using the criteria
    discussed
  • Decide on best/most credible article in group
  • Decide on worst/least credible article in group
  • Share best and worst with class. Be sure to
    explain how you developed your overall impression

23
Internet Sources of Information
  • Websites
  • Webpages

24
Evaluating Internet Sources
  • The internet can provide you with a wealth of
    information (and misinformation)
  • If you know what to look for (and look out for)
    you can find great information!

(Adapted from UC Berkeley - Teaching Library
Internet Workshops)
25
What can the URL tell you?
  • What type of domain does it come from?
  • Government sites .gov, .mil, .us, or other
    country code
  • Educational sites .edu or another country code
  • Nonprofit organizations .org or some other
    country code
  • Commercial .com

26
Who published the site?
  • What "server" issued the document?
  • The server is usually named in the first portion
    of the URL (http// _______ /)
  • http//www.laspositascollege.edu/
  • Is the server a commercial ISP?
  • aol.com
  • geocities.com
  • Is it somebody's personal page? Look for a
    personal name following a tilde () or "users" or
    "people
  • http//home.earthlink.net/jesmith/

27
Who wrote the page or article?
  • Look for a name and e-mail
  • Top or bottom of article
  • Sometimes in a section called "About us" or
    "Contact us"
  • It is usually not the same person as the
    "webmaster
  • Are the author's credentials provided? Does this
    person seem to be a reliable authority on the
    subject?

28
Is it dated, current, and timely?
  • When was the page last updated?
  • Look at several pages from the site
  • Date should be at top or bottom of page
  • In Netscape you can right click and View Info

29
Is information authentic?
  • If the page claims to be from an established
    source, is it?
  • Is it a Primary or Secondary source?
  • Find original source!
  • Is information well documented?
  • CAUTION Standards for footnoting and citing are
    often very lax on the Web

30
Is the page reliable?
  • Whats the purpose?
  • Why was it created?
  • Inform? Explain? Facts? Persuade? Promote? Sell?
    Share? Rant? Entice?
  • Who else links to the page?
  • In Google or AltaVista precede the URL by the
    term link In search box enter
    linkwww.whitehouse.net
  • In Google Advance Search put the URL in the box
    labeled "Find pages that link to the page."
  • Look for the page in a reliably annotated subject
    directory, such as Librarians' Index, Infomine,
    About.com

31
Whats the bias?
  • Who sponsors the page?
  • Look for links to Sponsors" "About Us"
    "Philosophy"
  • Advertisers can also be sponsors
  • Are there links to other viewpoints?
  • Look for your own bias
  • Are you being fair? Too harsh? Totally objective?
  • Are you requiring the same degree of "proof" you
    would from a print publication?

32
Is it a satire or spoof?
  • Think about the tone
  • There are many satiric pages on the Web
  • Take a look at these sites
  • US Whitehouse
  • Whitehouse

33
If you have questions, ask!
  • E-mail the author or publisher and ask for more
    background
  • Consult a print publication, perhaps in the
    Library
  • Ask for advice at a library reference desk or
    talk to your instructor
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com