Gender differences in the norms of the Minimental State Examination in Arabic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Gender differences in the norms of the Minimental State Examination in Arabic

Description:

Gender differences in the norms of the Minimental State Examination in Arabic Amin Abuful, Rivka Inzelberg, Magda Masarwa, Aziz Mazarib, Edna Schechtman Rosa ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: inzel
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gender differences in the norms of the Minimental State Examination in Arabic


1
Gender differences in the norms of the Minimental
State Examination in Arabic
  • Amin Abuful, Rivka Inzelberg, Magda Masarwa, Aziz
    Mazarib, Edna Schechtman Rosa Strugatsky
    Robert P. Friedland
  • Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Technion Rappaport
    Faculty of Medicine, Ben Gurion University,
    Israel
  • Case Western University School of Medicine,
    Cleveland, Ohio, USA

2
Background
  • The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease is
    increasing.
  • There is a need for accurate and easily
    administered screening instruments.
  • The Minimental State Examination (MMSE) is widely
    used.
  • It has been validated in North America, Europe
    and Asia , but not in Arabic populations.

3
Aim
  • To present gender differences in the normative
    data of an Arabic translation of the MMSE.

4
Methods
  • The present work is part of our epidemiological
    study of brain aging related disorders carried
    out in Wadi Ara villages in northern Israel.

5
Methods Study population
  • Wadi Ara houses a population of 81,400 Arab
    inhabitants (51 men) in Northern Israel.
  • Most of the population is younger than 45 years.
  • Only 9,831 residents (12 ) are older than 45
    years.
  • The population gt65 years counts 2067 residents
    (2.5 ) on prevalence day (January 1st 2003),
    according to the Israel Central Statistics
    Bureau.

6
Methods Study population
  • We systematically approached consecutive houses
    in the villages.
  • We examined all residents who agreed to
    participate in the study.
  • Elderly subjects in Wadi Ara live with their
    family. None were in an institution.

7
Study team
  • All participants were examined in their homes by
    a fluently Arabic speaking native team
  • The team comprised an academic nurse, a social
    worker and neurologists.

8
Methods Study procedures
  • Participants systematically evaluated for
  • Cardiovascular risk factors
  • Questionnaires concerning activities of daily
    living
  • Life style
  • Cognitive function

9
Methods Study proceduresClinical assessment
  • First visit All subjects were approached by
    nurse
  • Interview medical and family history,
    medications
  • History of changes in behavior, cognitive
    abilities, ADL, occupational and recreational
    activities
  • Second visit Neurologist performed complete
    neurological examination.
  • Consensus conference Four neurologists reviewed
    all subjects files.

10
Definition of cognitively normal
  • No complaints about memory impairment
  • Or any other cognitive domain
  • No evidence of such disturbance according to
    surrogates
  • No evidence of impairment in ADL stemming from
    cognitive disturbances

11
Methods Cognitive evaluation
  • An Arabic translation of the MMSE (maximum
    score30)
  • Brookdale Cognitive Screening Test (BCST, maximum
    score24)
  • The BCST test developed in the Brookdale
    Institute of Gerontology, Jerusalem

12
Methods Cognitive evaluation BCST
  • Orientation in time and place
  • Memory
  • Praxis
  • Naming
  • Stimulus selection
  • Abstraction
  • Calculation
  • Attention
  • Left-right orientation
  • Visuo-spatial orientation
  • No items related to reading and writing

13
Methods Occupation
  • Questionnaires about occupation (present and
    past)
  • Categorized for statistical analysis
  • 1never worked outside the house, or housewife
  • 2handy work (trader in shop, cook, carpenter,
    builder, etc),
  • 3agriculture
  • 4office.

14
Methods Statistical analysis
  • Education was stratified
  • 10-4 years, 25-8 years, 3gt8 years
  • Comparison of proportions by chi-square
  • The comparison of means of MMSE and BCST by
    gender and levels of education by Analysis of
    Covariance, using age as a covariate

15
Results
  • 442 subjects approached
  • 438 agreed (refusal rate 0.9 )
  • Four were excluded severe systemic
    non-neurological disease

16
Cognitively normal
  • The study population consisted of 266 subjects
    (158 males)
  • Mean age (SD) was 72.4 (5.5) years
  • Range 65 -91 years
  • Mean age
    Males 72.8 (5.6) females
    71.6 (5.4) years (pgt0.1)

17
Results
  • Mean MMSE entire population 25 (4)
  • Mean BCST entire population 19 (4) points
  • Highly significant correlation between MMSE and
    Brookdale scores in the entire group (r0.852,
    plt0.0001)
  • Males r0.8223, Females r0.854, plt0.0001 both

18
Education levels
within gender
plt0.001
Education years
19
MMSE by gender education
MMSE
plt0.05
plt0.0001
Education years
20
BCST by gender education
BCST
plt0.05
plt0.0001
Education years
21
Occupation categories
within gender
plt0.05
Occupation category
22
Occupation and education within genders
  • For males MMSE and BCST scores were significantly
    higher for higher education (plt0.05). Occupation
    category had no significant effect.
  • For females MMSE and BCST scores were
    significantly higher for higher education
    (plt0.0001). Occupation category had no
    significant effect.
  • The main effect was due to education and not
    occupation.

23
Conclusions
  • We described normative data for an Arabic
    translation of the MMSE by gender.

24
Conclusions
  • Mean values of the MMSE scores were comparable to
    population-based norms described in English in
    the USA at all correspondent education levels
    (Crum et al. JAMA, 1993).

25
Conclusions
  • We found a divergent effect of gender in
    different education levels.
  • Females with low-schooling (lt4 years) perform
    significantly worse than males.
  • However, females with higher schooling (gt5
    years) perform significantly better than males.

26
Discussion
  • We verified whether working in the community
    might contribute to the performance.
  • We found that scores are influenced by education
    and not by occupation within genders, when these
    two factors are analyzed.
  • Influence of social exposure and life-style ?

27
Brookdale Cognitive Screening
  • We found a highly significant correlation between
    MMSE and BCST scores in both genders.
  • Despite the fact that BCST does not include
    reading or writing items, it is still influenced
    by education as much as the MMSE.

28
Conclusions
  • Different cut-off scores should be used in
    different education strata.
  • Scores of females at low education levels should
    be considered cautiously to prevent false
    positive interpretation.
  • Information on education is mandatory.
  • Still, MMSE may serve for measuring change over
    time.

29
Thank you
  • Rob P. Friedland, Case Western Reserve
    University- Lab of Neurogenetics , USA
  • Lindsay Farrer, Boston University- Genetics
    Program, USA
  • Edna Schechtman, Ben Gurion University- Dept.
    Industrial Engineering, Beer Sheva, Israel
  • Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
  • Rivka Inzelberg
  • Aziz Mazarib
  • Magda Masarwa
  • Saif Abo-Mouch
  • Rosa Strugatsky
  • Gital Gamliel

30
Occupation categories by education levels
within gender
Education 0-4 years
Education 5-8 years
within gender
31
Occupation categorieseducation 0-4 years
within gender
Occupation category
plt0.05
32
Occupation categorieseducation 5-8 years
within gender
Occupation category
plt0.05
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com