Title: ECO 2021 Intermediate Macroeconomic Theory Professor C. K. Yip
1A Two Period ModelConsumption-Savings Decision
Ricardian Equivalence
2Two-Period Model of the Economy
- Focus on the consumers and governments
behavior. - A consumers consumption-savings decision
(intertemporal choice) involves a trade-off
between current and future consumption. - By saving, a consumer gives up consumption in
exchange for assets in the present, in order to
consume more in the future. - The governments decision concerning the
financing of government expenditure, involves a
trade-off between current and future taxes. - Policy Implication Ricardian equivalence theorem
3Consumers
- Assumptions
- N consumers, where N is a large number
- Each consumer lives for two periods, current and
future period. - Each consumer receives exogenous income in both
periods. - Put aside the work-leisure decision.
- Income can differ across consumers.
- Zero wealth endowment (no assets) in the current
period. - Each consumer pays lump-sum taxes in both periods.
4Consumers
- Assumptions
- Only bond is traded in financial market.
- Consumers can lend and borrow at the same real
interest rate, r (Perfect credit market). - No risk for holding bonds.
- Define bonds
- A bond issued (by the government) in the current
period is a promise to pay a certain amount, say
1 r units, of consumption good in the future
period. - ? 1 unit of c can be exchanged for 1 r units
of c' in the credit market. - r is the real interest rate on each bond.
5Consumers
- Notations
- y and t denote real income and tax in first
period. - y' and t' denote real income and tax in second
period. - Current period budget constraint
- c s y t (1)
- Consumers after-tax income can either be saved
(s) or consumed (c). - Saving gt 0 (lt 0)
- ? Buys (sells) a bond with part of his income.
- ? The consumer is a lender (borrower).
6Consumers
- Future period budget constraint
- c' y' t' (1 r)s (2)
- Apart from the after-tax income, the consumer
receives the interest and principal on savings. - For only two periods, no incentive to save in the
second period. - ? Consumer will consume everything he has in the
second period. - Next, to combine the two constraints into one
lifetime budget constraint - From (2), we have
7Consumers
- Substitute (3) into (1), we have
- RHS The present value of lifetime disposable
income or lifetime wealth (we). - LHS The present value of lifetime consumption.
- Note We can think of (1 r )1 as relative
price of c' in terms of c, while the price of c
is normalized to one. - Plot this in a (c , c') graph c' (we c)(1
r)
8Consumers Lifetime Budget Constraint
- The slope of the lifetime budget constraint is
(1 r). - E is the endowment point (i.e. where s 0).
- Points on BE ? s ? 0 ?consumer is a lender.
- Points on EA ? s ? 0 ?consumer is a borrower.
c' Future Consumption
B
we(1 r)
E
y' t'
A
we
y t
c Current Consumption
9Consumers Preferences
- Consumers utility function is given by U(c , c')
- Properties of Preferences
- 1) More is preferred to less
- U(. , .) is increasing in both arguments.
- 2) The consumer likes diversity in consumption
bundle. - To smooth consumption over time.
- i.e. consumer dislikes consuming a lot in a
single period but very few in another.
10Consumers Preferences
- 3) Current and future consumption are normal
goods. - Let A be the original optimal choice.
- Suppose income increases, the budget constraint
shifts upwards in parallel. - The new optimal choice must lie on BD.
- Also implies consumption smoothing.
c'
B
D
A
c
11Indifference Curves
- Slope of indifference curve MRSc,c'
- The following are equivalent
- A preference for diversity
- Diminishing MRSc,c'
- Convexity of indifference curve
- Consumption smoothing
c' Future Consumption
Slope MRSc,c'
A
c Current Consumption
12Consumers Problem
- The consumers optimal consumption bundle is the
point at which an indifference curve is tangent
to the budget constraint. - This implies the following condition
- 1 r MRSc,c'
c' Future Consumption
B
we(1 r)
A
c'
E
y' t'
A
y t
we
c
c Current Consumption
13Consumers Problem
- The consumer chooses c and c' to maximize U(c ,
c') subject to the lifetime budget constraint. - max U(c , c')
- subject to
- Lagrangian
14Consumers Problem
- First-order conditions
- From the first two conditions, we obtain
15Comparative Statics
- To determine the effects of changes in y, y' and
r on c, c' and s. - Totally differentiate the following system
- Assuming dt dt' 0, then in matrix form, we
have
16Comparative Statics
- Consider the bordered Hessian matrix
- The determinant of A is
- ? Ucc 2(1 r)Ucc (1 r)2Ucc
- Given that U(. , .) is strictly quasiconcave, ? gt
0.
17Graphical IllustrationsLenders and Borrowers
- Consumers as lenders
- ?Endowment point E1
- ?Consumption bundle A
- ?Consume only c at current period and save the
amount cF - Consumers as borrowers
- ?Endowment point E2
- ?Consumption bundle A
- ?Consume at c currently by borrowing the amount
Dc
c' Future Consumption
B
we(1 r)
E2
H
A
c'
E1
J
we
c
F
D
c Current Consumption
181) Increase in Current-Period Income
- By Cramers rule,
- c and c' are normal goods
- ? Ucc (1 r)Ucc gt 0 and Ucc (1 r)Ucc
gt 0 - ?
191) Increase in Current Income for
lendersGraphical Illustration
- Suppose y ?. Then the budget constraint shifts to
the right. - The slope of budget constraint remains unchanged,
as r remains the same. - New endowment point E2
- New optimal choice B (the consumer is a lender).
- ?y AD gt ?c AF
- ? ?s gt 0.
c' Future Consumption
we2(1 r)
we1(1 r)
B
c2'
A
c1'
D
F
I2
E2
E1
I1
c2
c1
we2
we1
c Current Consumption
20Consumption smoothing
- When current income ?, consumer will consume more
during the current period, but will also save
some of the increase so as to consume more in the
future as well. - Prediction Real aggregate consumption should be
less variable than real GDP. - This is consistent with the data.
212) Increase in Future Income
- By Cramers rule,
- Qualitatively, the effects of a change in y' is
identical to those of a change in y. - Since s y c t,
222) Increase in Future Income Graphical
Illustration
- Suppose y' ?. Again the budget constraint shifts
to the right. - New optimal choice B (the consumer is a
borrower). - Rather than spending all the increase in the
future, the consumer saves less in the current
period so that c ?. - ?c FB and ?y 0
- ? ?s lt 0.
c' Future Consumption
we2(1 r)
D
we1(1 r)
B
F
c2'
A
c1'
I2
I1
c1
c2
we2
we1
c Current Consumption
23Temporary vs. Permanent Changes in Income
- Permanent income hypothesis (Milton Friedman)
- A primary determinant of a consumers current
consumption is his/her permanent income (lifetime
wealth). - Temporary changes in income
- ? Yield small changes in permanent income
- ? Small effects on current consumption
- Permanent changes in income
- ? Large effects on permanent income and current
consumption - In our model,
- Temporary changes ? Only y ?
- Permanent changes ? Both y ? and y' ? (to the
same extent)
243) Increase in Real Interest Rate
- By Cramers rule,
- The signs of both derivatives cannot be
determined due to the presence of opposing income
and substitution effects. - Since (1 r)1 is the relative price of c' in
terms c, a change in r effectively change this
intertemporal relative price.
253) Increase in Real Interest RateGraphical
Illustrations
c' Future Consumption
- Suppose r ?. The budget constraint becomes
steeper. - Assume y' t' gt 0, then r ? ? we ? and we(1
r) ? - Since it is always possible to have c y
and c' y', the budget constraint must pivot
around point E. - r ? ? Return on saving ?
- ? More c' can be obtained for a given sacrifice
of c - ? Intertemporal substitution effect
we2(1 r2)
we1(1 r1)
E
we1
we2
c Current Consumption
263) Increase in Real Interest RateGraphical
Illustrations
c' Future Consumption
- For lenders
- Initial optimal choice A.
- Suppose the consumer chooses B after r ?.
- Draw an artificial budget constraint FG.
- Pure substitution effect A ? D (c ? and c' ?).
- Pure income effectD ? B (c ? and c' ?).
- Conclusion c' ? but c (?), s (?).
we2(1 r)
I2
I1
F
B
D
we1(1 r)
A
E
we2
we1
G
c Current Consumption
273) Increase in Real Interest RateGraphical
Illustrations
c' Future Consumption
- For borrowers
- Initial optimal choice A.
- Suppose the consumer chooses B after r ?.
- Draw an artificial budget constraint FG.
- Pure substitution effectA ? D (c ? and c' ?).
- Pure income effectD ? B (c ? and c' ?).
- Conclusion c ?, s ? but c' (?).
F
we2(1 r)
I1
I2
we1(1 r)
D
E
B
A
we1
we2
G
c Current Consumption
28Example Perfect Complements
- Assume that the utility function is of the form
- U(c , c') minac , c'
- where a gt 0 is a constant.
- This is an extreme case of a desire for
consumption smoothing. - The consumer will always choose
- c' ac.
c'
I2
I1
A
c' ac
D
B
c
29Example Perfect Complements
- Using this and the budget constraint, we get
- Since there are no substitution effects in this
case, the effects of r ? depends only on whether
the consumer is a lender or a borrower.
c'
I2
I1
A
c' ac
D
B
c
30Government
- Notations
- G and G' denote current and future government
purchases of consumption goods. - T and T' denote current and future aggregate
quantity of taxes. - T Nt and T' Nt'.
- B denote the quantity of government bonds issued
in the current period. - B lt 0
- ? Government was a lender to the private sector.
31Government
- Governments budget constraints
- G T B
- G' (1 r)B T'
- Combining the two into a single government
present-value budget constraint - which states that the present value of
government purchases must equal the present value
of taxes.
32Competitive Equilibrium
- In a competitive equilibrium, the following must
hold - 1) Each consumer chooses c, c' and s optimally
given r. - 2) The governments present-value budget
constraint holds. - 3) The credit market clears,
- i.e. Sp B where Sp is the aggregate quantity
of private saving. - This means the aggregate quantity of private
savings is equal to the quantity of debt issued
by the government. - Since Sp Y T C and B G T, so we have
- Y C T G T or Y C G
- so that the goods market also clears.
33Ricardian Equivalence Theorem
- Definitions
- The Ricardian Equivalence theorem states that
changes in current taxes by the government that
leave the present value of taxes constant have no
effect on consumers consumption choices or on
the equilibrium real interest rate. - Key message A tax cut is not a free lunch
because the costs of a tax cut (future tax ?)
exactly offset the benefits.
34Ricardian Equivalence Theorem
- Suppose the economy is initially in a competitive
equilibrium with a consumer facing the budget
constraint - and the government facing
-
35Ricardian Equivalence Theorem
- Since government spending is constant, the full
amount of the tax cut must be financed by higher
future taxes. - With full information, then the consumers will
save the full amount of the tax cut in order to
pay for high future taxes. - Government and private savings have to change by
equal and opposite amount, so that national
saving is unaffected.
36Ricardian Equivalence Theorem
c' Future Consumption
- Suppose t ? (tax cut).
- As we is unaffected, the budget constraint
remains unchanged. - The optimal choice A is unaffected.
- The endowment point moves from E1 to E2.
- (i.e. the consumer has more disposable income in
the current period and less disposable income in
the future period.)
B
we(1 r)
I
E1
E2
A
we
c Current Consumption
37Burden of Government Debt
- In the above discussion, we have made the
following assumptions - 1) Taxes change by the same amount for all
consumers. - 2) Debt issued by the government is paid off
during the lifetimes of the people alive when the
debt was issued. - 3) Taxes are lump sum.
- 4) Credit markets are perfect.
- If any of the above assumptions are violated,
Ricardian Equivalence may not hold. - e.g., credit markets are imperfect in the sense
that - There are limits on how much a consumer can
borrow - Consumers usually borrow at higher interest rates
than they can lend at
38Credit Market Imperfections
c' Future Consumption
- Consider a consumer who lends at a rate r1 and
borrows at r2, where r2 gt r1. - The budget constraint is AEF, where E is the
endowment point. - The slope of AE is (1 r1)
- The slope of EF is (1 r2)
we2(1 r2)
we1(1 r1)
A
E
y' t'
F
we1
we2
y t
c Current Consumption
39Credit Market Imperfections
c' Future Consumption
- Suppose now the period 1 tax change by ?t lt 0
with a corresponding change of t(1 r1) in
future tax. - Assume that the government pays on its debt at a
rate r1. - Effect of tax change
- Shift in endowment point from E1 to E2.
A
I2
we1(1r1)
I1
E1
E2
B
we2
c Current Consumption
40Credit Market Imperfections
c' Future Consumption
- Optimal choice before the tax cut E1
- Optimal choice after the cut E2
- c increases by ?t
- Reason
- The government is effectively making a low
interest loan available to the consumer via the
tax cut scheme.
A
I2
we1(1 r1)
I1
I3
E1
E2
G
B
we2
c Current Consumption