Kevin Johnson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Kevin Johnson

Description:

Medarex/Genmab. Rheumatoid Arthritis. Phase II. J695. CAT/Abbott/GI. Autoimmune disorders ... Medarex/Centocor. Inflammation. Phase I. N/A. Abgenix/Pfizer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: anii6
Category:
Tags: johnson | kevin | medarex

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kevin Johnson


1
Building Life Science Companies in Europe
Kevin Johnson
2
Synopsis
  • Technology-based business Cambridge Antibody
  • Venture Capital perspective Index Ventures
  • Product-based business PanGenetics
  • Summary

3
(No Transcript)
4
Monoclonal Abs become more human
1970s
1980s
2000
1990s
Chimaeric
Mouse
Human
CDR-grafted (Humanised)
5
Human Antibodies in a Test Tube
Antibody Display
Selection and design
Human antibody genes
Human mAb
Infection / Vaccination
6
1990 The First Year
  • 750k cash available (Peptech)
  • office in David Chiswells house
  • lab is John McCaffertys tray in Greg Winters
    lab
  • Moved to 600sq ft at Babraham in May
  • 4 people
  • Filed key patent application July 1990
  • Published in Nature December 1990

7
Deals
Pharmacia 1991 validation, short term
cash BASF 1993 drug development, validation,
cash Drug Royalty 1994 cash Genentech 1995 short
term cash, validation Pfizer 1995 short term
cash, validation Lilly 1996 short term cash,
validation Telios Integra 1996 rights to targets
8
Equity Raised
  • Year Amount Share Price
  • 1990 0.75m 0.12
  • 1993 3.0m 3.00 (notional)
  • 1995/6 12.75m 2.50 - 3.00
  • 1997 41.0m (IPO) 5.00
  • 2000 93m 18.50

9
Stock Market Listing
  • London Stock Exchange - main market
  • 25 March 1997
  • Net raised - 41 million
  • Explicitly to build a therapeutic product
    pipeline
  • Market cap 100M (_at_ 5 per share, March 1997)

10
Outside Influences
  • London Stock Exchange open to Biotech in 1997
  • LSE closed to biotech from May 1997- early 2000
  • Antibodies beginning comeback in late 90s
  • Genomics revolution gt unprecedented number of
    targets
  • Significant US competition
  • Shift in potential partner perception (antibodies
    started to make money as drugs from 1995)

11
Human mAbs in Clinical Development 2003
N/A
N/A
N/A
Abgenix/Amgen
Phase I
12
Human mAbs in Clinical Development 2008
N/A
13
Lessons learned
  • A focus on technology does work
  • Be ahead of the herd, but not too far ahead
  • Greatest value from technology platforms comes
    from therapeutic products
  • 1-2 products monetises the platform
  • Strength of science and scientists in company
  • Cash is a strategic issue

14
(No Transcript)
15
Supporting Pioneering Companies
Numerical Technologies
92-98
98-00
00-02
02-04
04-06
06-08
16
Investing in Life Science
  • Invest 1 to generate 3-4 value
  • Very capital intensive (cf software)
  • Most biotechs fail to do this
  • Attrition in small/early companies high

17
How a VC works
  • Investors (LLPs) subscribe to a fund
  • Fund life 10-12 years
  • VC invests money, gets management fee
  • Return fund, retain ca. 20 of balance (carried
    interest)
  • VC partners get of carried interest

18
Company A
  • Unique angle for creating Mabs
  • POP in oncology
  • A management team
  • 60 people, cash burn 8m pa
  • Raising 30m on 50m valuation
  • Money will fund phase II POC for lead, develop
    others

19
Company B
  • 3 humanised antibodies
  • POP in inflammation
  • No management team, no people, no cash burn
  • Raising 7m on 1m valuation
  • Money will fund phase IIa for lead, mfr 1 other

20
Company A versus Company B
Company A
Company B
  • Post money 80m
  • 3yrs ve phII- 80-150m
  • 3yrs -ve phII- 10-20m
  • Cash burn 8m pa
  • 30m buys 30-60m
  • Post money 8m
  • 3yrs ve phII- 70-140m
  • 3yrs -ve phII- 1-2m
  • Cash burn lt1m
  • 7m buys 58-116m

great looking companies great investments
21
VC perspective
  • Big VCs see 1000 business plans per year
  • No shortage of ideas
  • No shortage of money (access strings another
    matter..)
  • Good quality assets in short supply
  • Main bottleneck is management teams
  • Its the hot companies that get funded

22
(No Transcript)
23
Does the world need another Mab company?
  • Fastest growing pharmaceutical sector (CAGR 14)
  • Big transactions around Mab and Mab-like
    companies
  • Need for pipeline products amongst bigger
    companies
  • Supply of antibody candidates exceeds expertise
  • Huge opportunity to build a pipeline
  • Antibody development the definitive outsourcing
    model

24
Pangenetics BV- Business/investment Model
100
Arbitrage
10
Program Value m
1
Discovery (Buyers market)
Clinical POC (Sellers market)
10 -12m direct costs/program ? 2-3 years
25
Corporate Summary
26
Financial Progress
  • Series A in 2005 1.3m
  • Series B in March 2006 13m
  • Series C 2008 23m

27
Summary
  • Capital is the fuel of the industry
  • Innovation without execution is hot air
  • Entrepreneurs need to understand investors
  • Holy trinity is management team, products cash

28
Building Life Science Companies in Europe
Kevin Johnson
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com