Prospective evaluation of Innovance D-dimer in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism [VTE]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Prospective evaluation of Innovance D-dimer in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism [VTE].

Description:

Prospective evaluation of Innovance D-dimer in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism [VTE]. Robert Gosselin, CLS Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: globalhea6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prospective evaluation of Innovance D-dimer in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism [VTE].


1
Prospective evaluation of Innovance D-dimer in
the exclusion of venous thromboembolism VTE.
  • Robert Gosselin, CLS
  • Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory
    Medicine
  • University of California, Davis Health System
  • Sacramento, CA

2
  • D-dimer
  • Indicates clot formation
  • Indicates clot degradation
  • D-dimer test commonly used for exclusion
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Consumptive coagulopathy
  • Aortic dissection

3
  • Innovance D-dimer and Stratus CS
  • D-dimer new test from Siemen Healthcare
  • Prospective study in the US to validate cut-off
    for excluding PE and DVT

4
  • 3 sites in US
  • Duke University
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • UC Davis
  • Total enrollment all sites
  • 550 PE
  • 480 DVT

5
  • Inclusion criteria
  • First clinically suspected PE and/or DVT
  • Objective testing
  • Diagnostic algorithms
  • Radiographic studies
  • Capable of giving informed consent
  • Agree to 3 month follow-up for patients with
    negative imaging studies.

6
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant
  • Previous Hx of PE or DVT
  • Resolved symptoms gt72 hours before presenting to
    ED
  • Oral anticoagulation
  • 3 month f/u not available
  • Inpatient
  • Prisoners

7
Clinical Probability for DVT
  • Active cancer 1
  • Paralysis, paresis, recent casting of leg 1
  • Bedridden (gt3 days) or major (gt12 weeks) 1
  • Entire leg swollen 1
  • Calf swelling (gt3cm) compared to other leg 1
  • Pitting edema greater in symptomatic leg 1
  • Collateral nonvaricose superficial veins 1
  • Localized tenderness along deep venous system 1
  • Previously documented DVT 1
  • Alternative Dx as or more likely than DVT -2
  • Score DVT unlikely lt2 DVT likely gt2

Wells PS, et al Lancet 1997 3501795-98 N Engl
J Med 2003349 1227-35
8
Clinical Probability for PE
  • Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT 3
  • Heart rate gt100/min 1.5
  • Hemoptysis 1
  • Active cancer 1
  • Bedridden (gt3 days) or major (gt12 weeks) 1.5
  • Previously history of DVT or PE 1.5
  • PE most likely diagnosis 3

Score Low lt2 Moderate 2-6 High gt6
Wells PS, et al Thromb Haemost 2000 83416-20.
9
DVT Algorithm
Compression US
Positive
Negative
Low prob
Serial CUS (5-8 days)
Mod or High Prob
3 month f/u
Positive
Negative
Positive VTE
Negative VTE
DVT Positive
DVT Negative
10
PE Algorithm
Spiral CT or Angiogram
Positive
Negative
3 month f/u
Positive VTE
Negative VTE
PE Positive
PE Negative
11
  • After informed consent
  • Blood collected
  • 3.2 sodium citrate
  • Lithium heparin (Stratus only)
  • If testing within 4 hours of collection
  • Whole blood heparin on Stratus
  • Plasma testing on other analyzers
  • If testing not completed within 4 hours of
    collection
  • Samples processed and refrigerated
  • Testing completed within 24 hours of collection

12
Testing performed on Sysmex analyzers CA560
CA1500 CA7000 BCS Stratus (heparin and
citrate testing) Delayed testing---CS2000i
13
  • As of May 11, 2009
  • 381 patients enrolled
  • 353 with demographics complete
  • 284 with 3 mo f/u
  • 2 withdrawn
  • One patient declined participation after testing
    completed 1 month later
  • One patient had imaging studies canceled after
    enrollment
  • 4 pending 3 month f/u
  • 8 patients expired
  • 0/8 with normal D-dimer levels

14
  • 37 males 91/248
  • Median age 51.5 years range 19-81 years
  • Patients with PE studies
  • Probability scores
  • Low probability 62 154/248
  • Moderate probability 33 82/248
  • High probability 3 7/248
  • No score performed 2 5/248
  • Patients with DVT studies
  • Probability scores
  • Unlikely 64.4 94/146
  • Likely 30.8 45/146
  • No score performed 4.7 7/146

15
  • Of the 353 patients with demographics
  • 70.2 248/353 tested for PE
  • 238 with spiral CT
  • 12 with V/Q scan
  • 25 with PE 10.5
  • 41.4 146/353 CUS for DVT
  • 13 with DVT 9.6
  • 37 patients evaluated for PE and DVT
  • 30 with CT and CUS
  • 6 with VQ and CUS
  • 1 with CUS, CT and VQ
  • 3 patients with both DVT and PE

16
3.7
Innovance D-dimer mg/L
0.8
No VTE
VTE
17
PE Probability
DVT Probability
Innovance D-dimer, mg/L
Low
Mod
High
Unlikely
Likely
18
Data for all patients enrolled
SCS-H Heparin sample on Stratus SCS-C Citrate
sample on Stratus
19
Innovance D-dimer in all VTE
SCS-H Heparin sample on Stratus SCS-C Citrate
sample on Stratus
20
Patients evaluated for PE N248
SCS-H Heparin sample on Stratus SCS-C Citrate
sample on Stratus
21
Innovance D-dimer in PE
SCS-H Heparin sample on Stratus SCS-C Citrate
sample on Stratus
22
Patients evaluated for DVT N146
SCS-H Heparin sample on Stratus SCS-C Citrate
sample on Stratus
23
Innovance D-dimer in DVT
SCS-H Heparin sample on Stratus SCS-C Citrate
sample on Stratus
24
  • Summary
  • Poor positive predictive value of D-dimer with
    VTE
  • Acceptable negative predictive value for
    Innovance D-dimer in excluding VTE in outpatients
  • Need more data for PE sensitivity
  • Weakness
  • Few positive samples in subset analysis

25
  • Fellow collaborators at UC Davis
  • Edward Panacek, MD, MPH
  • Abhi Gorhi, MS, CCRP
  • Shari Nichols, CCRP
  • Allyson Sage, RN
  • Leslie Freeman, CLS
  • Andrea Picazo, CCRP
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com