Increasing production of chickpea & pigeonpea through Intensive application of Integrated Pest Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Increasing production of chickpea & pigeonpea through Intensive application of Integrated Pest Management

Description:

Fixing of Pheromone traps for monitoring Physical shaking of plants to dislodge grownup pod borer larvae. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:707
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: nfsmGovIn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Increasing production of chickpea & pigeonpea through Intensive application of Integrated Pest Management


1
Increasing production of chickpea pigeonpea
through Intensive application of Integrated Pest
Management
Project Proposal 2010-12 Under Accelerated Pulses
Production Programme
NATIONAL CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED PEST
MANAGEMENT LBS Building IARI Campus, NEW DELHI
2
Chickpea - Area 7.63 Mh
Production 5.47 MT Source DAC Govt. of India
(2006-07) Pigeonpea - Area 3.53 Mh
Production 2.35 MT
In rainfed ecology realizing yield potential of
promising varieties depends upon management of
biotic and abiotic stresses
Edaphic
Abiotic
Biotic
Plant Diseases
Insects
Nematodes
3
Yield Gap in Pulses
Source Expert Committee Report on Pulses (TMOP)
/ MOA
4
Estimated loss () due to specific pests in
Chickpea and Pigeonpea
Chickpea Pigeonpea Pod borer 10-90 Pod borer
complex 40-60 Cutworm 5-30 Phytophthora
blight 5-10 Termites 5-15 Wilt 10-15 Semi
looper 0-10 Sterlity mosaic 10-15 Wilt/rootro
t 20-25 Alternaria blight 10-15 Ascochyta
5-10 Podfly complex 10-50 Botrytis 5-10

Experimental results
5
(No Transcript)
6
Insects
No resistance gene for podborer, hence gt30 yield
losses in Chickpea
The IPM has reduced use of chemical pesticides
from 4 to 1 with benefit ratio of 4.79 against
2.37 in Non-IPM
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Status of Major Pests of Pigeonpea in India
Pest Moderate damage areas High damage
areas Wilt UP, Bihar, Jharkh, Guj, T N, WB M
S, Karnat, AP MP PB M S, W B U
P SMV Guj, A P U P, Bihar,
M.S., Karnat T N Pod borer U P, Bihar, W B,
Jharkhand M S, Guj, Karnat, A P,
T N (H armigera) Pod fly U P, Bihar, Jhark,
Pun, Hary, U P, Bihar, Jhark, W
B M P Root knot M
S U P, Bihar, Gujarat Cyst Nematode
M S, A P, T N
18
Contribution of plant protection in increasing
yield of pulses
Crop Percentage Increase Pigeon
pea 44.57 Moog bean 42.20 Urd bean
48.50 Chickpea 23.64 Lentil 25.00
Based on field experiments
19
(No Transcript)
20
Outline of the project
21
OBJECTIVES
  • To develop Nuclear Model Villages in selective
    districts for demonstrating IPM modules in
    farmers participatory mode to suit their
    cropping systems.
  • Capacity building of technical assistants of
    different blocks, district/block level officers
    and farmers to enhance their capabilities towards
    healthy crop production through IPM strategies.
  • To develop and carryout awareness campaigns
    through conventional (print) and electronic
    media, to reach areas not covered under this
    programme.
  • To establish centralized National Pest Reporting
    and Alert System through networking of pulse
    growers, in addition to strengthening of pest
    diagnostic laboratory.

22
Pigeonpea IPM Module
  • Seed treatment with Trichoderma spp. To reduced
    wilt incidence. Antagonists strains have
    potential (T. harzianum, T. viride)
  • Intercropping with sorghum efficiently reduces
    wilt and pod borer.
  • Fixing of Pheromone traps for monitoring
  • Physical shaking of plants to dislodge grownup
    pod borer larvae.
  • Spray of HaNPV for pod borer management
  • Crude neem extract 5 (NSKE) against pod borer
    and pod fly.
  • Chemical pesticides (Emamectin benzoate) under
    high pest load

23
Chickpea IPM Module
  • Field sanitation
  • Seed treatment with Trichoderma and Rhizobium
  • Bird perches
  • Growing of Coriander/Linseed as 10th row
    intercrop for build up of natural enemies
  • Pheromone traps for H. armigera monitoring
  • Spray of NSKE 5 at flowering / pod formation
    stage
  • Spray of HaNPV if necessary
  • Endosulfan spray / Emamectin (if epidemic
    situation)

24
Area of operation by NCIPM under A3P
25
Pigeonpea area under IPM in 2010
26
Chickpea area under IPM in 2010
27
Horizontal spread of IPM
Selection of village SDA SAU to cover
whole village covering maximum of allocated
unit.
28
Capacity Building
29
e - Pest Surveillance System
30
Village Katangi, Jabalpur (MP)
Cercospora indica
  • Reduction in green area (50)
  • Severe defoliation
  • Drop of flowers (gt 75) and buds

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Data collection by Tech Asst
35
Networking
Project outlay for 2009-10 Rs 12.79 crore
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
GIS Based Mapping System
39
Advisory Search Advisory View
40
Seedling mortality is a key constraint in and
around Jabalpur
Recommended seed rate 70-100 kg/ha Seed rate
in use 120-150 kg/ha
3 days 7 days
Strains of bioagents used as seed dresser are
effective against Fusarium wilt, however not
effective against Sclerotium rolfsii
41
Screening of some isolates of Trichoderma against
F. ciceri
42
Soils from disease conducive as well as
suppressive fields will be collected for analysis
and identification of pathogen biotypes.
Associated pathogens will be isolated for
identification and their effective management
and mapping of their occurrence at country level.
43
Likely Outputs
Quantitative
  • Increase in Pulse production - reduction in
    pest incidence / intensity and saved yields.
  • Farmers - decision makers of their own fields.
  • economic upliftment through better CB ratio
  • e.g., Chickpea IPM 14.79 FP
    12.37
  • Pigeonpea IPM 12.96 FP 11.87
  • Reduced dependence on chemical pesticides
  • e.g., Chickpea IPM 1 FP 4
  • Pigeonpea IPM 2 FP 6
  • Increase in IPM coverage - healthy environment
    for human being as well as for pest defenders.
  • Establishing and strengthening - quality
    control laboratory, critical IPM inputs producing
    units at SAUs / KVK will serve as a local source
    of critical IPM inputs.
  • Improvement of soil health in terms of
    conservation of soil inhabiting beneficial flora
    and fauna

Qualitative
44
Thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com