Title: Public Choice and Government Failure Public choice theory
1Public Choice and Government Failure
- Public choice theory applies economic principles
to public sector decision making. - Government failure occurs when government
action results in a less efficient allocation of
resources. - The primary motivation in the public sector is
assumed to be self-interest.
2Voters
- Voters cannot vote for the exact political
policies that they favor. - People are likely to be more satisfied with the
choices they can make as consumers than with the
choices they can make as voters. - See Example 2 on page 28-2.
3Low Voter Turnout
- One of the characteristics of elections in the
U.S. is low voter turnout. - See Example 3 on page 28-2.
- Low voter turnout occurs because many potential
voters see the costs of voting as greater than
the benefits of voting.
4Low Voter Turnout
- It is very unlikely that one persons vote will
decide the outcome of a major election. - See Example 4 on page 28-3.
5Rational Ignorance
- It is rational to remain ignorant if the cost of
gaining information is greater than the benefit
of having the information. - Most voters will not be well-informed due to
rational voter ignorance.
6The Median Voter Model
- The median voter model suggests that the median
voter must be captured to achieve a majority
vote. Thus, a candidate will - 1. Aim for a middle-of-the-road position.
- 2. Label his or her opponents as extremists.
- 3. Adjust his or her positions in response to
polls. - 4. Speak in general rather than specific terms.
7Elected Officials and Short Run Focus
- An elected official will tend to support policies
that yield benefits in the short run and impose
costs in the long run. - This will be true even if the long run costs of
the policies exceed the short run benefits.
8Elected Officials and Short Run Focus
- An elected official will tend to oppose policies
that impose costs in the short run and yield
benefits in the long run. - This will be true even if the long run benefits
of the policies exceed the short run costs.
9Special-Interest Groups
- A special-interest group is a group of people who
are especially interested in a particular
government policy. - A special-interest group will support policies
that yield a concentrated benefit for the members
of the interest group, and impose a cost that is
usually dispersed over a large number of other
people.
10Special-Interest Group Influence
- The influence of special-interest groups is
increased by - 1. Low voter turnout.
- Low voter turnout increases the influence of
those who do vote. Special-interest group
members are likely to have a high voter turnout. - See Example 6 on page 28-6.
11Special-Interest Group Influence
- 2. Rational ignorance.
- Special-interest group members will be
well-informed about their issue. Other people
will likely be ill-informed. - See Example 7 on page 28-6.
12Special-Interest Group Influence
- 3. Lobbying.
- Special-interest group members are likely to
contribute money to hire lobbyists to try to
persuade elected officials to vote a specific way
on their issue. - See Example 8 on page 28-6.
13Elected Officials and Special-Interest Groups
- Because of special-interest group influence,
elected officials will tend to favor policies
that yield concentrated benefits and impose
dispersed costs. - This will be true even if the dispersed costs
exceed the concentrated benefits (e.g. farm
subsidies).
14Elected Officials and Special-Interest Groups
- Because of special-interest group influence,
elected officials will tend to oppose policies
that yield dispersed benefits and impose
concentrated costs. - This will be true even if the dispersed benefits
exceed the concentrated costs (e.g. free trade
agreements).
15A Congressional District
- A congressional district can be a
special-interest group. - Legislators often trade votes (logrolling) in
order to pass legislation beneficial to their own
districts. - Logrolling often leads to pork barrel
legislation. - Pork barrel legislation is an example of
concentrated benefits and dispersed costs.
16Government Bureaus
- Government bureaus are likely to be very
inefficient because - 1. They have no profit motive.
- 2. They have no owner.
- 3. They usually face no competition.
- 4. They seek to grow.
17Other Sources of Government Failure
- 1. Difficulty in measuring the marginal social
benefit and the marginal social cost of
government spending. - With government spending, benefits and costs
usually have to be estimated by government
officials. - See Example 10 on page 28-9.
18Other Sources of Government Failure
- 2. Taxes collected do not reflect the full cost
of a government program. - Two types of costs are incurred when the
government collects taxes and uses resources to
provide goods and services - a. The opportunity cost of the resources
used. - b. The excess burden of the tax.
19Other Sources of Government Failure
- 3. The inefficiencies caused by income
redistribution. Income redistribution - a. Reduces the reward for productive
behavior and reduces the punishment for
unproductive behavior. - b. Encourages socially wasteful rent
seeking. - c. Leads to higher tax rates, which increase
the excess burden of taxation.
20Other Sources of Government Failure
- 4. Unintended consequences of government
policies. - Policies intended to accomplish a desirable goal
may have unintended consequences that are
undesirable. - See Example 12 on page 28-10.
21Other Sources of Government Failure
- 5. Majority voting may be economically
inefficient. - The loss imposed on the minority may exceed the
benefit to the majority. - See Example 13 on page 28-10.
22Other Sources of Government Failure
- 6. Government may stand in the way of creative
destruction. - Creative destruction describes the short run
upheaval caused by the development of new
technology. - Standing in the way of creative destruction will
yield concentrated benefits (to the producers
using outdated technology) and will impose
dispersed costs (on all of society).
23Other Sources of Government Failure
- 7. Government suffers from the principal-agent
problem. - Elected officials and other government employees
are agents of the people. - Government employees may pursue their own
interests at the expense of the best interest of
the people.
24 The Myth of the Rational Voter
- In 2007, economist Bryan Caplan published The
Myth of the Rational Voter Why Democracies
Choose Bad Policies. - Caplan asserts that voters are not just
rationally ignorant, but are systematically
biased in favor of mistaken views.
25 The Myth of the Rational Voter
- According to Caplan, noneconomists are biased
toward four common misconceptions - 1. Antimarket bias. This is a tendency to
underestimate the economic benefits of the market
mechanism. - 2. Antiforeign bias. This is the tendency to
underestimate the economic benefits of
interaction with foreigners.
26 The Myth of the Rational Voter
- 3. Make-work bias. This is the tendency to
underestimate the economic benefits of conserving
labor. - 4. Pessimistic bias. This is the tendency to
overestimate the severity of economic problems
and underestimate the (recent) past, present, and
future performance of the economy. - See Examples 15A and 15B in the textbook.
27 The Myth of the Rational Voter
- Caplan asserts that noneconomists are more
rational when they make choices as consumers than
when they make choices as voters. - Caplan suggests that more economic decisions
should be left to the market instead of the
political process.