Enhancing Housing Security of Domestic Violence Survivors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Enhancing Housing Security of Domestic Violence Survivors

Description:

Kris Billhardt, VOA Oregon - Home Free. 3. NAEH Annual Conference 7/10/07 ... Kris Billhardt, VOA Oregon - Home Free. 5. The Link ... Multnomah County, Oregon ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Kris1162
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Enhancing Housing Security of Domestic Violence Survivors


1
Enhancing Housing Security of Domestic Violence
Survivors
  • Kris Billhardt
  • Volunteers of America, Oregon - Home Free
  • kbillhardt_at_voaor.org

2
VOA Home Free
Emergency Services
Out-stationed Services
Childrens Services
Housing First and Transitional Services
3
Domestic Violence and Homelessness
  • Families comprise 40 of homeless population and
    is fastest growing segment
  • 60 of homeless women have children
  • Nine of ten homeless mothers been victims of
    violence, often domestic
  • 2/3 of homeless women have been assaulted by an
    adult partner
  • 38 of all DV survivors become homeless at some
    point

4
The Link Between DV and Housing Insecurity
  • 22-57 of homeless women identify DV as the main
    cause of their homelessness
  • 46 of homeless women report having stayed in an
    abusive relationship because they had nowhere
    else to go
  • Housing insecurity strongly implicated in return
    to an abuser
  • Poor women experience DV at higher rates and have
    fewer resources with which to seek/maintain safe
    and stable housing
  • DV has significant effects on many areas of
    survivors lives that can increase risk of
    poverty and homelessness ( physical mental
    health, employment, education, social supports)

5
DV and Housing Insecurity
  • Homelessness is only one end of a continuum of
    housing problems faced by women experiencing DV
  • Missed or late payments for rent/utilities
  • Compromises selling belongings or skipping food
    to make payments
  • Ineligibility for housing services due to credit,
    landlord, or criminal justice problems
  • Some families face barriers to using emergency
    shelters
  • Racism results in disproportionate number of
    survivors of color among the homeless

6
The Need for Specialized Services
  • Denials, evictions, ruined credit, lease
    terminations often based on violence/abuser
    interference
  • Survivors experience discrimination based on
    status as victims
  • High density/high violence in public housing
    complexes may place women at continued risk,
    trigger trauma

7
The Need for Specialized Services
  • Women who move to housing where the abuser cant
    find them are more likely to be re-assaulted by
    the most dangerous abusers
  • Stalking, harassment, on-going violence and
    threats by the perpetrator may occur even after
    survivor is housed
  • When obstacles to affordable housing seem
    insurmountable, this may mean a return to a
    dangerous home

8
The Need for Specialized Services
  • More than ½ of domestic violence survivors live
    in households with children under 12
  • 47 of homeless school-aged children and 29 of
    homeless children under 5 have witnessed domestic
    violence in their families
  • Witnessing violence has significant negative
    impact on development, behavior, education,
    health, mental health, and increased risk- taking
    behaviors as adolescents and adults

9
SHARE Study
  • Effectiveness of a Housing Intervention for
    Battered WomenCo-PI Chiquita Rollins,
    PhDNancy Glass, PhD, MPH, RNMultnomah County,
    Oregon U49CE000520-01 Centers for Disease
    Control and Prevention, National Center for
    Injury Prevention and Control

10
SHARE Study Design
  • Participants Women domestic violence victims,
    age 18-64
  • Study begins at post-crisis stage of service
    delivery
  • Data collected
  • Outcomes for women and their children
  • Cost of domestic violence and cost effectiveness
    of the housing models
  • Interviews at 6-month intervals for 18 months,
    with reimbursement
  • Qualitative interviews focusing on
    inter-relationships between housing and
    victimization
  • Cost effectiveness study

11
SHARE Results Baseline Preliminary (89
participants)
  • Almost one-quarter (24.7) of participants
    reported it was very unlikely to unlikely that
    they would be able to pay for housing this month
    (month of the interview).
  • An additional 21.5 reported that it was somewhat
    likely that they would be able to pay for housing.

12
SHARE Results Baseline Preliminary
  • The vast majority (88.8) of women reported
    difficulty in meeting basic needs (e.g. food,
    transportation, health care visits).
  • Over one-third (37.2) of women reported often to
    sometimes not having enough food to eat.
  • Almost half (49.4) of women reported their
    general health as poor or fair in the past 6
    months

13
SHARE Results Risk Factors for Housing
Instability
14
SHARE Results Risk of Lethal Violence
  • Danger Assessment (20 item measure of risk for
    lethal violence in abusive relationships)
  • Mean score 11.4 (extreme danger for lethal
    violence)
  • Examined the correlation between risk of housing
    instability and risk of lethal violence
  • Increased housing instability was significantly
    associated with increased risk of lethal
    violence.

15
DV/Housing Link Requires An Integrated Approach
  • Finding and keeping housing is one of the
    greatest barriers faced by women who leave
    abusers
  • Mothers with less stable financial, social, and
    living situations reported their children to have
    intervened more during past violent incidents
  • Women who secure housing reduce their chances of
    re-victimization, but housing vouchers not paired
    with special interventions may not be effective
  • Women linked with advocates during post-crisis
    period report higher quality of life, more social
    supports and less re-victimization

16
What Can Be Done DV Providers
  • In addition to continued focus on immediate
    safety, incorporate services that respond to
    survivors critical need for housing as part of
    DV advocacy
  • Expand ability to provide long-term advocacy
    involvement with survivors
  • Identify ways for some staff to provide mobile
    services
  • Intervene with landlords to help overcome
    barriers based on credit or rental history
  • Develop relationship with local housing authority

  • Form partnerships with homeless services
    providers
  • Be a voice in your communitys Ten-Year Plan

17
What Can Be Done Homeless Service Providers
  • Form partnerships with your local DV agencies
  • Screen for and be prepared to address domestic
    violence
  • Develop safety planning protocol (for use with
    victims and in housing facilities)
  • Incorporate awareness of batterers on-going
    stalking, harassment and assaults into policy and
    practice
  • Training for staff that includes strong focus on
    countering victim-blaming
  • Link to other community resources vital for
    safety (law enforcement, civil legal, courts,
    protection orders)
  • Screen for and respond to needs of children
    exposed to batterers

18
What Can Be Done DV and Homeless Service
Providers
  • Cooperative - not competitive!- advocacy for more
    funding
  • Advocate for change in federal housing policy
    (ex. HUD definition of chronic homelessness and
    special needs that limits federal housing
    support)
  • Training, training, training!
  • Partnerships galore
  • Survivor-driven approaches
  • Trauma-informed services
  • Be willing to create new models

19
Home Frees Housing First Program
  • Eligibility Immediate DV crisis somewhat
    stabilized, housing stabilization a primary
    need, financial resourcefulness compromised by
    DV/other barriers
  • Staffed by mobile advocates
  • Earmarked funds for direct client assistance
  • 8-12 participants per advocate
  • Duration of services Up to two years
  • Scattered-site model (private market or public
    housing)

20
Advocacy Services Include
  • Danger Assessment and ongoing safety planning
  • Accompaniment to appointments, court hearings
  • Housing search, job search, job training
    referrals
  • Home visits
  • Rental subsidy and other direct financial
    assistance
  • Systems navigation/coordinate with other
    providers
  • Advocacy with landlords, Housing Authority
  • Linkages to civil legal and immigration law
    services
  • Direct services to children
  • Help with budgeting, goal planning
  • DV and parenting support groups

21
Who We Are Serving
22
Early Results
89 Obtained Housing 92
remain in housing Avg. time in
housing TD 13 mo. (range 1 30
mo.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com