2 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

2 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges

Description:

2 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges By Lyle Culver Rolando Garcia Marta Menendez Anouchka Rachelson Does Community College vs. 4 year College Attendance Influence Students ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: facultyMd70
Learn more at: http://faculty.mdc.edu
Category:
Tags: colleges | year

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges


1
2 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges
  • By
  • Lyle Culver
  • Rolando Garcia
  • Marta Menendez
  • Anouchka Rachelson

2
Does Community College vs. 4 year College
Attendance Influence Students Educational Plans?
  • ByPascarella, Hagedorn, Edison, Terenzini, Nora

3
Background
  • 2 years students make same gains in standardized
    measures as 4 year
  • 2 year 4 year students of similar educational
    attainment background have parity in job
    prestige, earnings, job stability, unemployment
    rate, job satisfaction

4
Background (cont)
  • 2 year college students are significantly
    disadvantaged in comparison to 4 year students in
    terms of educational attainments
  • 2 year college students are 15 less likely to
    complete a degree in the same amount of time as
    students in a 4 year college

5
Possible Reasons
  • Difficulty in transferring from a 2 year to a 4
    year
  • Acceptance into Institution
  • Financial Aid
  • Acceptance of credits
  • Difficulty in adjusting to academic demands
  • 2 year colleges lower students educational
    aspirations goals
  • Cooling Out

6
Purpose
  • Test the Cooling Off hypothesis that CC lower
    students precollege plans to obtain a BA degree.

7
Methods
  • 1,645 students from 18 4-year and 5 2-year
    colleges from 16 states throughout the country
    participated
  • Subjects were randomly sampled from incoming
    first year class and given an NSSL-designed
    precollege survey gathering data on
  • Student demographic characteristics and
    background
  • Student lifetime educational plans
  • Student expectations of college
  • Students orientations toward learning

8
Methods
  • Participants completed reading comprehension,
    mathematics, and critical thinking modules of the
    CAAP
  • Follow up testing was conducted after 1st year
    and 2nd year
  • Final sample was 1,645 students
  • (119 attended 2-year and 1,526 attend 4-year)
  • Drop out rates for 2-year students was 69.68
    compared to 54.25 for 4-year students
  • Dependent variables
  • End of 1st year and 2nd year lifetime educational
    plans
  • Independent variable
  • Student attended a 2-year or 4-year institution

9
Results
  • Cross Tabs (Institutional Populations)
  • 1st year 11.8 of 2-year students lowered
    lifetime educational plans vs. 5.2 of 4-year
    students
  • 2nd year - 22.8 of 2-year students lowered
    lifetime educational plans vs. 4.2 of 4-year
    students

10
Results (cont)
  • Cross Tabs (National Populations)
  • 1st year 15.97 of 2-year students lowered
    lifetime educational plans vs. 4.9 of 4-year
    students
  • 2nd year 21.0 of 2-year students lowered
    lifetime educational plans vs. 4.3 of 4-year
    students

11
Results (cont)
  • Regression (Institutional Populations)
  • 1st year Controlling for confounding influences
    there was no significant effect of 2-year vs.
    4-year attendance on changing educational plans
  • 2nd year Controlling for confounding influences
    there was a significant effect of 2-year vs.
    4-year attendance on changing educational plans
  • The magnitude of this influence was
  • 1st year 2-year students are 2.3 more likely
    to change plans that 4-year students
  • 2nd year - 2-year students are 31 more likely to
    change plans that 4-year students

12
Results (cont)
  • Regression (National Populations)
  • 1st year Controlling for confounding influences
    there was no significant effect of 2-year vs.
    4-year attendance on changing educational plans
  • 2nd year Controlling for confounding influences
    there was a significant effect of 2-year vs.
    4-year attendance on changing educational plans
  • The magnitude of this influence was
  • 1st year 2-year students are 3.4 more likely
    to change plans that 4-year students
  • 2nd year - 2-year students are 19.8 more likely
    to change plans that 4-year students

13
Results (cont)
  • Conditional Effects (Institutional Populations)
  • Controlling for confounding influences, attending
    a 2-year college had a modest (nonsignificant)
    negative effect on end of first-year educational
    plans for students with different levels of
    precollege plans
  • For students who planned to obtain a graduate or
    advanced professional degree, attending a 2-year
    college had a small positive (nonsignificant)
    effect.
  • For students with relatively low levels of
    precollege plans, attending a 2-year college had
    a significant negative effect.

14
Results (cont)
  • Conditional Effects (National Populations)
  • Controlling for confounding influences, attending
    a 2-year college had a significant negative
    effect on end of first-year educational plans for
    students with different levels of precollege
    plans
  • For students who planned to obtain a graduate or
    advanced professional degree, attending a 2-year
    college had a small positive (nonsignificant)
    effect.
  • For students with relatively low levels of
    precollege plans, attending a 2-year college had
    a substantial significant negative effect.

15
Conclusions
  • This study supports Clarks cooling out hypothesis

CC student 20 31 more likely to lower plans
by end of second year
16
Conclusions (cont)
  • Findings were based on correlational data
  • Data did not allow researchers to identify
    specific environmental factors in the 2-year
    institutions that would cause students to lower
    educational plans

17
Policy Implication
  • 2-year schools must provide support/mentoring to
    students who enroll for the purpose of
    transferring and obtaining a BA
  • Administrators must focus on removing the second
    class status/aura attached to 2-year institutions
  • Advisors and counselors should not demonstrate
    behaviors or attitudes that discourage students
    from pursuing educational goals

18
Rethinking Cooling Out at Public Community
Colleges
An Examination of Fiscal and Demographic Trends
in Higher Education and the Rise of Statewide
Articulation Agreements
19
Article
  • Anderson, Gregory M., Alfonso, Mariana, Sun,
    Jefferey C. (2006). Rethinking Cooling Out at
    Public Community Colleges An Examination of
    Fiscal and Demographic Trends in Higher Education
    and the Rise of Statewide Articulation
    Agreements. Teachers College Record. 108, 422-451.

20
  • Large number of students entering community
    colleges and identifying terminal certificates or
    occupational associate degrees instead of A.As or
    transfer credits
  • 1980s to 1990s major drive by community colleges
    to form articulation agreements

21
Purpose of community college ?
  • Social Mobility
  • Reducing racial-ethnic, gender, and class
    inequalities
  • Cooling out diverting students from transfer
    degrees to vocational degree and certificates

22
Contradictory nature of community colleges
  • Basis of study by Dougherty (1994)
  • Reproduces of inequity
  • Promoters of social mobility

23
Basis of research question
  • What fiscal, political and demographic forces
    account for articulation agreements?
  • What role does the cooling out process play
    when trying to account for the impact of
    statewide articulation agreements?

24
Research Hypothesis
  • Interests of state politicians the cause for
    increase in articulation agreements
  • Controlling costs of higher education in light of
    other statewide expenditures

25
Theoretical Frameworks to address research
questions
  • Functionalists view community colleges as
    integral to enhance educational opportunities for
    underrepresented groups such as women and
    minorities
  • Neo- Marxists - view community colleges as a
    cooling out place offering vocational degrees
    subject to the demands of industry
  • Institutionalists- state universities supported
    development of community colleges so as not to
    devalue the baccalaureate degrees.
  • Statists local, state, and federal government
    support of community colleges as a means to serve
    multiple interests - to create jobs and job
    training

26
Applicability of Theories
  • Neo-Marxists do not take into account the fact
    that corporations like Microsoft have their own
    certification programs
  • Institutionalists delay of 2 years would not
    stop the increase in the number of baccalaureate
    degrees awards
  • Functionalists does not take into account the
    special interests of state government and
    conflicting roles
  • Statists articulation agreements seen as a
    means for governments top stay in power by
    diverting resources to areas other than education
    as a response to the demands of a predominately
    white and aging electorate

27
Fiscal Trends in Higher Education
  • From 1985 to 1995 financial decline for public
    higher education relative to other state
    expenditures
  • Sharp increases in state expenditure as a share
    of gross state product
  • Significant disparities in FTE expenditures
    between 2 and 4 yr institutions

28
Articulation Agreements were a response to Fiscal
Woes
  • Legislators viewed community colleges as a
    cheaper alternative to 4 year degree institutions
  • Articulation agreements seen as policy to divert
    students to community colleges for the first two
    years
  • Lower FTE spending for the state

29
Challenges and Tensions
  • Electorate is predominately white and from 35 to
    65
  • Minorities and disadvantages groups still grossly
    underrepresented despite growth in numbers of
    students attending higher education
  • Tuition costs continue to escalate and family
    income disparities continue to grow by 1025
    only half of all eligible college bound seniors
    will be able to attend higher education

30
Impact to the middle class
  • Important constituency
  • State government trying to balance fiscal demands
    with the demands of their consistency to provide
    higher education
  • Community colleges seen as a cost effective means
    of controlling the flow of incoming students to 4
    year institutions enhancing cooling out process
  • Middle class students seeing community colleges
    as an affordable alternative facilitated by
    articulation agreements

31
Long Term Impacts
  • Minority representation in community colleges
    disproportionately high are most prone to
    cooling out
  • Middle Class take over of community colleges

32
Community College Effects on StudentsA Review
of Recent Evidence
33
WHAT?
  • 2 year community colleges
  • - Diverse
  • - Popular
  • BUT---largely ignored


34
WHY?
  • Research Liberal Arts Colleges
  • - set academic public standard Americans
    follow
  • More deviation from standards
  • less prestige
  • lower academic excellence
  • Viewpoint
  • a catch basin for those few students unable or
    unwilling to enter regular colleges

35
Reason?
  • Study by - American Council on Education
  • Relatively Lower Cost
  • community college vs. 4yr institution
  • Tuition - community colleges vs. universities
  • 44 of the average costs of 4 yr public
    university
  • 10 of average costs of private university

36
Developmental Impacts of Community Colleges
  • Relatively new studies
  • compared cognitive gains between CCs and 4-year
    institutions
  • Small Samples
  • 6 community colleges ? 6 states
  • 4-year institutions ? 15 states

37
Developmental Impacts of Community Colleges
  • Instruments used
  • Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency
    (CAAP)
  • Tested in
  • Reading Comprehension
  • Quantitative Reasoning
  • Critical Thinking
  • Science Reasoning
  • Writing Skills
  • Measured
  • intellectual skills capabilities acquired
    during 1st 2 years in college

38
Results
  • Cognitive growth
  • all students developed at about same level of
    proficiency
  • CC students make significantly more progress in
    1st year than 4-yr students.

39
Conclusions
  • CC students are 15 less likely to complete
    degrees in same amount of time
  • CC attendance may grant selectivity to transfer
    student
  • Economic advantages
  • CCs foster cognitive growth at same degree of
    proficiency as 4-year
  • Transfer students so as well in labor market as
    4-year

40
Conclusions
  • Labor Market
  • - Economic returns vary by field
  • Largest payoffs for men
  • Technical degrees (computers and engineering)
  • Business
  • Largest payoffs for women
  • Business Health
  • NOTE economic returns for women gt men for both
    associates and vocational credentials

41
References
  • Pascarella, E. T. (1999). New studies track
    community college effects on students. Community
    College Journal, 69, 8-14.

42
Impacts of Two-Year and Four-Year College
Attendance on Learning Orientations
  • Pierson, Wolniak, Pascarella, Flowers (2003)
    Review of Higher Education

43
Question
  • Aside from academic achievement, what other
    factors can researchers test to compare and
    contrast the impact of attending a two-year
    college versus a four-year college during the
    first two years of study?

44
Background
  • Students who begin at 2-year colleges and aspire
    a bachelors degree are 15 less likely to
    complete than their 4-year peers.
  • There is evidence that 2-year college attendance
    lowers students educational plans.

45
Background (cont)
  • However, if students from 2-year colleges
    complete their bachelors degree, they enjoy
    equal job stability, income, and job satisfaction.

46
Background (cont)
  • Students who transfer from 2-year
    colleges
  • often can get accepted to more selective
    4-year colleges.
  • - generally experience a drop in grades
    after transferring to 4-year schools.

47
National Study of Student Learning
  • Longitudinal study
  • Statistically controlled competing influences
    (age, sex, ethnicity, ability, etc.)
  • Result 2-year college students made equal gains
    as 4-year students regarding reading
    comprehension, math, critical thinking, writing
    skills, scientific reasoning.

48
This study Effects on Students Learning
Orientations
  • Method
  • The team of researchers studied
  • 18 four-year and 5 two-year colleges
  • variety of institutions
  • from 16 states
  • using IPEDS data

49
Student Sample and Instrument
  • 1992- Initial data collection (pre-college)
  • Random sample of incoming freshmen
  • 3,840 students from 23 schools participated
  • 1993- Follow-up (after 1st year)
  • 2,685 students
  • 1994 - Final data collection (after 2nd year)
  • 1,761 students
  • Response rate 2-year schools 53.2
  • 4-year schools 65.6

50
Variables
  • Four measures of learning orientations with
    sample survey items (Likert scale)
  • Openness to Diversity/Challenge
  • I enjoy having discussions with people whose
    ideas and values are different.
  • 2. Learning for Self-Understanding
  • I prefer courses in which the material helps me
    understand something about myself.

51
Variables cont
  • 3. Internal Locus of Attribution for Success
  • The grade I get depends on how hard the
    instructor grades, not how carefully I study.
  • 4. Preference for Higher-Order Cognitive
    Activities
  • I prefer to do assignments in which I have to
    analyze and interpret what Ive read rather then
    just summarize and report.

52
2 Sets of Control Variables
  • 1. Pre-college Characteristics
  • Pre-college scores on all four learning
    orientations from 1992
  • Sex
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Socio-economic status
  • Pre-college academic motivation
  • Age
  • High school grades
  • ESL or not
  • Previous volunteer work
  • Academic ability (based on standardized composite
    score)

53
Control Variables cont
  • 2. Measures of students experiences in college
  • Cumulative credit hours completed
  • Hours per week spent studying and working
  • Self-reported college grades
  • Perception of teaching received
  • Course-related interaction with peers
  • Extracurricular involvement
  • College volunteer work

54
Results
  • Effects of attending a 2-year (versus 4-year)
    college
  • Statistically significant growth in 1st and 2nd
    year of study for Item 1 Openness to
    Diversity/Challenge
  • Significant positive effect on 2nd year for Item
    2 Learning for Self-understanding
  • Significant positive effect on end of 1st year
    for Item 3 Internal Locus of Attribution for
    Academic Success
  • No significant effects for Item 4 Preference for
    Higher-Order Cognitive Activities

55
Conditional Effects
  • In both 1st and 2nd year of study, male students
    benefited more from attending a community college
    regarding Item 1 (Openness to Diversity)
  • Also males benefited from 1st year attendance at
    CC regarding Item 4 (Learning for
    Self-Understanding)
  • White students showed the largest positive
    effects for Items 1 and 4

56
Conditional Effects (cont)
  • Students of color showed greater end of 2nd year
    growth than Whites in Item 2
    Preference for Higher-Order Cognitive
    Activities
  • Overall, ESL students benefited from attending a
    2-year college however, for end of 2nd year ESL
    students attending a CC had a significant
    negative effect regarding Item 2 (the effect on
    native speakers was positive, but not significant
    at alpha.05)

57
Conclusions
  • These results counter the common perception
    that attending a 2-year college to a less
    developmentally influential undergraduate
    experience (p.315).
  • This study found that 2-year college students
    showed equal or modestly larger positive changes
    in learning orientations than their peers at
    4-year institutions.

58
Conclusions (cont)
  • Despite adjusting the survey results for 25
    different academic and non-academic factors, the
    study could not find one factor that
    significantly contributed to the greater gains
    made by 2-year students.
  • It is possible that the demographic
    characteristics at the chosen 2-year colleges
    contributed to gains in Item 1 (Openness to
    Diversity/Challenge)

59
Conclusions (cont)
  • Impacts of 2-year colleges tended to be mainly
    conditional, not general.
  • There was also evidence that students from the
    lower half of socio-economic distribution
    benefited more from attending a 2-year school on
    Items 2 and 4. For the upper half, however, the
    opposite was true.

60
Conclusions (cont)
  • Finally, the positive effect of attending a
    community college on two-year gains in Openness
    to Diversity/Challenge was 16 times larger for
    students who tested in the upper 50 of
    pre-college academic ability.

61
Questions Answers
  • Questionnaire Discussion
  • Q A
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com