NUCLEAR POWER: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NUCLEAR POWER:

Description:

NUCLEAR POWER: SECURE ENERGY for the 21st CENTURY Mike Corradini Nuclear Engineering & Engineering Physics Nuclear Power:Villain or Victim; M.Carbon, Pebble Beach ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: firePpplG
Learn more at: https://fire.pppl.gov
Category:
Tags: nuclear | power

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NUCLEAR POWER:


1
NUCLEAR POWER
  • SECURE ENERGY
  • for the
  • 21st CENTURY
  • Mike Corradini
  • Nuclear Engineering Engineering Physics

Nuclear PowerVillain or Victim M.Carbon, Pebble
Beach Publishers (2002) Decision-Makers Forum
A Unified Strategy for Nuclear Energy (2004)
2
Need for a Unified Energy Strategy
  • Internationally
  • Population continues to increase worldwide
  • Energy usage growing at similar rates (1-2/yr)
  • Electrical energy usage increasing faster
    (gt3/yr)
  • Nationally
  • Abundant secure energy is critical to our
    future
  • Continued growing concern of fossil fuel
    emission
  • Alternative energy technologies must be
    considered
  • Need to ensure energy security with
    bipartisan
  • initiatives and executive priority for
    nuclear energy
  • EIA (2002)

3
SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES
  • Conditions for Sustainability
  • Acceptable area usage
  • Minimal by-product streams
  • Economically feasible technology
  • Large supply of the energy resource
  • Neither the power source itself nor the
    technology to exploit it can be controlled by a
    few nations/regions (people/countries/regions)

4
Power Plant Land Use Required (km2 / MW) Source
J. Davidson (2000)
Nuclear 0.001/0.01
Coal 0.01/0.04
1000 MW POWER PLANTS RUNNING AT 100 CAPACITY
(8766 GWh/year)
Biomass 5.2
Geothermal 0.003
5
1000 MWe-yr Power Plant Emission
  • Coal
    Gas Nuclear
  • Sulfur-oxide 1000 mt
  • Nitrous-oxide 5000 mt 400 mt
  • Particulates 1400 mt
  • Trace elements 50 mt lt1 mt
  • Ash 1million mt
  • CO2 gt 7million mt 3.5mill.
    mt
  • TRACE e.g., Mercury, Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic
  • Spent Fuel 20-30 mt
  • Fission Products 1-2 mt
  • Source EIA (2002)

6
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
Construction/Operation/Fuel Preparation
(kg CO
/ kWh)
Source J. Davidson (2000)
2
1.4
/kWh)
1.2
1.04
2
Natural Gas
1
0.8
0.79
Emissions (kg CO
0.58
0.6
Geothermal
Solar-PV
Coal
Nuclear
0.47
0.4
Wind
0.38
Hydro
2
CO
0.2
0.1
0.06
0.025
0.004
0.022
0.025
0
7
Cost of Electricity (Global Average) (/kWh)
Source J. Davidson (2000)
8
Top 10 Nuclear Countries (1999)
  • U.S. nuclear electricity generation is
  • as large as France and Japan (2
    and 3) combined and
  • larger than the other 7 nations in the top 10
    combined

billion kilowatt-hours
Source IAEA
9
Record U.S.Nuclear Electricity Production
(Billions of Kilowatt-hours)
Source EIA
10
Industry Capacity FactorContinues at Record Level
86.8 in 1999 89.6 in 2000 90.7 in 2001 91.7
in 2002
11
License RenewalExtends Value
Already filed North Anna 1,2 Surry 1,2 Catawba
1,2 McGuire 1,2 Peach Bottom 2,3 St. Lucie
1,2 Fort Calhoun Robinson 2 Summer Ginna
Approved Calvert Cliffs 1,2 Oconee 1,2,3 Arkansas
Nuclear One Unit 1 Hatch 1,2 Turkey Point 3,4
12
Safety of Current Nuclear Plants
  • There has not been a loss of life in the US due
    to commercial nuclear plants (TMI released a
    small amount of radiation)
  • Chernobyl accident - a terrible accident with a
    bad design
  • These plants are now closed or redesigned for
    operation
  • Russian nuclear plant operations are being
    assisted by IAEA
  • Regional deregulation of the electricity industry
    introduces challenges to continue enhance the
    safety of nuclear plants.
  • - Upgrades of power plant equipment and reliable
    replacement schedule
  • - Risk-informed decision making by the industry
    should be cost-effective
  • US nuclear plants are now self-insured via
    Price-Anderson Act
  • and we should renew Price-Anderson legislation
    for long-term

13
Nuclear Power High Level Waste (HLW)
  • All nuclear fuel cycle waste (except HLW) has
    been safely and reliably disposed through DoE and
    NRC regulations milling, enrichment, fabrication
    by-products as LLW
  • Since 1982, US law defines spent nuclear fuel
    as a HLW, since reprocessing has not occurred
    since 1976 (Japan Europe currently reprocess
    spent nuclear fuel for recycle)
  • Spent fuel is currently stored at 105 nuclear
    power plant sites ( 2000 mt/yr total 50,000
    mt) is planned to be stored/buried at one site
    in the US (Yucca Mtn)
  • All nuclear electricity is taxed at 1mill/kwhre
    for a HLW fund (0.8 billion/yr total fund
    20 billion)
  • Reassert criteria, achieve licensing begin
    operation of Yucca

14
Evolution of Nuclear Power Systems
  • Enhanced Safety
  • Improved Economics
  • Minimized Wastes
  • Proliferation Resistance

15
Nuclear Energy Defense-in-Depth
  • Reliable Operation
  • Safety is foremost
  • Doing it right
  • Credible Regulation
  • Risk-based stds.
  • Public access
  • Improving Engr.
  • System Designs
  • Instrumentation
  • Materials

- New plants (GenIII) require predictable plant
licensing processes - Enhance and reestablish a
vibrant human infrastructure
16
Nuclear Safety Enhanced
  • Current nuclear power plants have high levels of
    safety i.e., reliable operation, low
    occupational radioactivity dose to workers and
    with minimal risk and health effects from severe
    accidents.
  • Future nuclear reactor systems will meet and
    exceed safety performance of current reactors.
  • Decay heat removal, minimize transients and allow
    time for operator actions are the keys to
    successful safety performance.
  • Advanced LWRs will be simplified, thus more
    economic and continue to minimize emissions
  • Deploy advanced light-water reactor systems
    (GenIII)

17
Advanced LWR AP-1000
18
Advanced LWR ESBWR
19
Generation IV Reactor Systems
  • Safety must meet and exceed current nuclear
    power plant reliability, occupational radiation
    exposure and risk of accident consequences
  • Sustainability minimize waste streams during
    spent fuel disposal or reprocessing and recycle
  • Proliferation and Physical Protection of
    facilities
  • Economics continue to reduce the total cost of
    electricity (/Mwhr-e) to remain competitive with
    leading technologies (e.g., gas, coal and wind)
  • Develop and demo advanced reactors fuel cycles
    (GenerationIV)

20
Very-High-Temperature Reactor (VHTR)
  • Characteristics
  • High temperature coolant
  • 900 - 1000C outlet temp.
  • 600 MWth
  • Water-cracking cycle
  • Key Benefit
  • High thermal efficiency
  • Hydrogen production by water-cracking by
    High-Temp Electrolysis or Thermo-chemical
    decomposition

21
Process Heat for Hydrogen Production
200 C
1000 C
Aqueous-phase Carbohydrate Reforming (ACR)
Thermochemical Processes
Hydrogen
Carbon Recycle
H2, CO2
CATALYST
AQUEOUS CARBOHYDRATE
CxHy
LM Condensed Phase Reforming (pyrolysis)
22
Hi-Temp. Electrolysis Process
23
GAS-COOLED REACTOR
24
Nuclear Power Fuel Cycle1000 MWe-yr (A) Once
Thru (B) U-Pu recycle IAEA-1997
U3O8 daughters (A)10 mt (B) 6mt
Mining/Milling
Milling waste stream
(A) 205mt (B)120mt
UF6 daughters (A) 167mt(B) 0.5mt
Convert/Enrichment
Conv/Enrich Waste Tails
(A) 37mt (B)11.5mt
UO2 daughters (A) 0.2mt (B) 0.16mt
Fuel Fabrication
Fuel Fabrication Waste
(A) 36.8mt (B) 36.4mt (U-Pu)
Reactor (1000MWe)
Spent Fuel as Waste
(A) 35.7 mt U, 0.32mt Pu
(B) 36mt U, 0.5mt Pu
Reprocessing Plant
Reprocessing Waste (FP)
(B) 1.1 mt U, 5kg Pu
25
Liquid-Metal Cooled Fast Reactor (LFR)
  • Characteristics
  • Na, Pb or Pb/Bi coolant
  • 550C to 800C outlet temperature
  • 120400 MWe
  • Key Benefit
  • Waste minimization and efficient use of uranium
    resources

26
To Advance the Use of Nuclear Energy
  • Ensure energy security with bipartisan
    initiatives and an
  • executive branch priority on nuclear energy
  • Enact long-term Price-Anderson legislation
  • Demonstrate predictable nuclear plant licensing
    processes
  • Reassert criteria, achieve licensing begin
    operation of
  • Yucca Mountain Repository
  • Deploy current light-water reactors in the U.S.
    (Gen-III)
  • Develop/demonstrate advanced reactors fuel
    cycles (GenIV)
  • Reestablish a vibrant educational infrastructure
  • gtBuild public confidence and support for
    nuclear energy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com