Electrical Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Function - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Electrical Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Function

Description:

More recent work focuses on wrist and hand function and positive ES benefit ... Question: Does addition of wrist extension ES improve UE functional outcomes? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:201
Avg rating:2.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: sahs9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electrical Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Function


1
Electrical Stimulation for Motor Recovery and
Function
  • Barbara M. Doucet, PhD, OTR
  • Assistant Professor, K12 Scholar
  • Department of Occupational Therapy
  • University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

2
Education Training
  • Bachelor of Science, Occupational Therapy
  • Louisiana State University Medical Center, New
    Orleans, LA
  • Master of Health Science, Allied Health Education
  • Louisiana State University Medical Center, New
    Orleans, LA
  • PhD, Kinesiology
  • University of Texas at Austin

3
Education Training
  • Clinical practice 20 years serving adult
    neurological population in various rehabilitation
    settings
  • University of Texas Human Movement Science
    Neuromuscular Physiology Laboratory, 2002-2007
  • Assistant Professor, UTMB, August 2007
  • K12 Award, September 2008

4
Career Goals
  • Independent federally-funded researcher
  • Integral part of a transdisciplinary team of
    researchers driven to explore questions in
    rehabilitation research
  • Successful scientific contributor to a
    nationally-recognized institutional program that
    supports faculty in their research efforts

5
Career Goals
  • Specific Research Interests
  • Explore the effects of electrical stimulation
    (ES) on motor recovery in the upper extremity
    (UE) of persons with neurological impairment,
    specifically, stroke
  • Explore the effects of intensive, focused
    intervention for UE motor recovery in chronic
    stroke.

6
Research Career Development Activities
Electrical Stimulation and Neuromuscular Fatigue
PROJECT 2 Electrical Stimulation for UE
Motor Recovery in Brain Injury Stroke, Galveston
PROJECT 1 Electrical Stimulation
Nutritional Support in Hospitalized Elders, UTMB
PROJECT 3 Electrical Stimulation in Skilled
Nursing Settings, Galveston
Initial Pilot Project Unfunded Pending
American Heart Assn.
Funding Pending Moody Endowment of Galveston
Claude D. Pepper Older Americans/ UTMB Sealy
Center on Aging Award, 2008
7
Presentation Objectives
  • Background
  • Overview of Previous Research
  • Current Data
  • Future Directions

8
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (ES)
  • Commonly used modality in rehabilitation
  • Assists in recovery of motor control
  • Rapid fatigue
  • Goal maximize force output minimize fatigue
  • Constant vs. variable patterns

9
Variable Patterns of ES
  • Constant pattern for 90s followed by variable
    pattern for 90s
  • Variable patterns maximizes force time integral
    (FTI)
  • Doublet pattern most effective
  • Young older

Collected from thenar muscle in young healthy
n10 avg. age 23.25
yrs.
(Doucet Griffin, Muscle Nerve, June 2008)
10
Variable ES and Stroke
  • Force decline with constant pattern
  • Variable (doublet) pattern more effective in
    maximizing force time integral

Collected from thenar muscle in chronic stroke
n10 avg.
age 63.80 yrs. avg. time post stroke 5
5.52 years
(Doucet Griffin, Muscle Nerve, January 2009)
11
Intensive ES for Chronic Stroke
  • Higher vs. lower frequency?
  • ES 1Xdaily 4X/week X4 weeks
  • High freq group Increased pinch and thumb
    adductor strength pre-post
  • Lower frequency group trended toward greater
    gain in endurance



Pre Post
Individuals with chronic stroke, n16 avg. age
65 9.60 yrs. time post stroke 5 4.14 years
(Doucet Griffin, in submission to Stroke, 2009)
12
ES for Motor Recovery in Stroke
  • Previous work confirms effectiveness of ES with
    shoulder
  • (Paci, Nanetti, Rinaldi, 2005 Ada
    Foongchomcheay, 2002)
  • More recent work focuses on wrist and hand
    function and positive ES benefit
  • (deKroon, Ijzerman, Chae, Lankhorst, Zilvold,
    2005)
  • Advances in ES technology for stroke
    rehabilitation

13
ES in Brain Injury Stroke
  • Pilot study
  • Standard therapies only, n5
  • Standard therapies ES, n5
  • Question Does addition of wrist extension ES
    improve UE functional outcomes?
  • Device Portable ES unit, Empi 300PV
  • 15 session protocol
  • ES 2X/day X 35 minutes targeting wrist extension
  • Currently 2 clients completed 1 enrolled
  • Outcome measures Sensation, Arm/Hand Recovery,
    Coordination, Strength, Function, EMG

14
ES in Action
15
Results Function
7 Ind 6 Mod I 5 Sup A 4 Min A 3 Mod A 2
Max A 1 Dep
16
Results Strength
17
Results EMG
18
Career Development Needs
  • Further develop and refine
  • Data collection and analysis skills
  • Grant writing skills for federal funding
  • Rehabilitation research knowledge

19
Future Directions
  • Continue work on current projects to establish a
    line of chronic stroke research at UTMB
  • Brain Injury/Stroke Pilot Project
  • Expect completion this year
  • UTMB Hospitalized Elders Project
  • Data collection to begin this month
  • Skilled Nursing Project
  • Pending funding announcement June 2009
  • Preliminary data for K23 submission
  • Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career
    Development Award

20
Research Team
  • Douglas Paddon-Jones, PhD, Lead Mentor
  • Kenneth Ottenbacher, PhD
  • Beatriz Abreu, PhD, OTR
  • Gretchen Stone, PhD, OTR

21
Acknowledgements
  • K12 HD055929 National Institutes of Health
    National Center for Medical and Rehabilitation
    Research (NICHD) and National Institute for
    Neurological Disorders Stroke
  • Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence
    Center/UTMB Sealy Center on Aging
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com