Concepts and Categories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Concepts and Categories

Description:

Concepts and Categories Concepts and Categories Concept a mental representation Category the set of things picked out by the concept Why do we need them? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: condorDep6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Concepts and Categories


1
Concepts and Categories

2
Concepts and Categories
  • Concept a mental representation
  • Category the set of things picked out by the
    concept
  • Why do we need them?
  • To make predictions
  • To prevent information overload

3
Effects of Categorization
  • 1. categorical perception
  • categorical perception perceiving things in
    discrete categories rather than as points on a
    continuum.
  • Characteristics
  • sharp change in probability of category labeling
    at the category boundary
  • greater between-category than within-category
    discriminability
  • 2. category labels' effect on perception (Tajfel
    Wilkes, 1963)
  • 3. implications stereotypes

4
What is Categorization Based on?
  • Similarity?
  • Similarity as shared features
  • But which features?

5
Semantic Feature Models of Concepts
  • The classical view defining features
  • The probabilistic view
  • prototypes (Rosch, 1977) Coglab demo next
    slide
  • exemplars (Medin Schaffer, 1978 Hintzman,
    1986)
  • Whats the difference? Internal structure
  • Hybrid models defining characteristic features

6
Prototypes Coglab Results
  • Pattern type Reaction time (ms)
  • Prototypes 718.68335
  • Variants 752.62085
  • SOURCE grand mean
  • A N MEAN SD SE
  • 50 752.0379 228.3917 32.2995
  • SOURCE A
  • A N MEAN SD SE
  • Variant 25 778.1483 246.9372 49.3874
  • Prototy 25 725.9275 210.0015 42.0003
  • FACTOR RANDOM A DATA
  • LEVELS 25 2 50
  • TYPE RANDOM WITHIN DATA
  • SOURCE SS df MS
    F p


7
Different kinds of concepts?
  • dog, tree, diamond (natural kind objects, basic
    level)
  • Collie, oak, industrial diamond (natural kinds,
    subordinate level)
  • animal, plant, geographical feature (natural
    kinds, super-ordinate level)
  • hammer, chair, cup (artifact objects)
  • felony, majority, contract (abstract,
    conventionally defined)
  • candy cigarette, dog bed, phone book (non-novel
    noun-noun combinations)
  • apple chair, carpet light, ear filter (novel noun
    combinations)
  • Brazil, Richard Nixon, Jupiter (names)
  • wife, senator, friend (social roles)
  • justice, peace, existence (abstract nouns)
  • bake, eat, explode (verbs)
  • red, hot, large (perceptual adjectives)
  • entropy, genus, photosynthesis (technical terms)

8
Types of Concepts
  • Natural kind concepts
  • Artifacts
  • Conventionally defined
  • Other types?

9
Similarity Re-examined
  • non-reflexivity of similarity
  • non-transitivity of similarity
  • context-dependence of similarity (Tversky, 1977)
  • similarity can not simply equal the number of
    shared features
  • similarity does not always predict categorization
  • Psychological Essentialism (for natural kinds)
  • Ad-hoc categories not defined by similarity

10
Theory Theories of Concepts
  • Organization of concepts is knowledge-based
    rather than similarity-based (Keil, 1986, 1987
    Murphy Medin, 1985).
  • People's intuitive theories are the basis for
    categorization of natural kind objects. This has
    particularly been argued for biological kinds.

11
Conceptual Combination
  • Modification? (brown apple)
  • Separate Prototypes? (big wooden spoon)
  • But sometimes the combination has a prototypical
    feature that is not typical of either noun
    individually (pet birds live in cages, but
    neither pets nor birds do)
  • Extending salient characteristics?
  • When nouns are alignable (zebra horse)
  • But non-alignable nouns are combined using a
    different mechanism (zebra house)

12
Context-Dependence of Conceptual Combination
  • Sit in the apple-sauce chair.
  • Is conceptual combination really about the
    structure of concepts, or is it about the
    pragmatics of language use?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com