2130 Personality Psychology Know Thyself - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

2130 Personality Psychology Know Thyself

Description:

2130 Personality Psychology Know Thyself Professor Ian McGregor Research Methods Quiz 2 Written Answer Questions Compare and contrast contemporary research on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: yorkuCaia
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2130 Personality Psychology Know Thyself


1
2130 Personality Psychology Know Thyself
  • Professor Ian McGregor
  • Research Methods

2
Quiz 2 Written Answer Questions
  • Compare and contrast contemporary research on the
    Big-5 to Freuds view of personality development?
    (4 marks two double spaced pages max).
  • Describe four ways that people can come to know
    what isnt so, i.e., hold false beliefs with
    such conviction? (4 marks two double spaced
    pages max)
  • ADVICE Compose your exact answers before test!!!

3
Lecture 4 Outline
  • Traits review and links to goals and
    attitudeshow are traits transmitted?
  • The case of agreeableness and testosterone.
  • How we know what isnt so
  • Research Methods (how to know what is so)
  • Correlational
  • Experimental

4
(No Transcript)
5
Myers Briggs (Based on Jungs Theory)
  • Circle your summary on Table of Types
  • From previous slide
  • Matches vs. mismatches?
  • Correlated with 4 of the Big-5
  • Simple, less pejorative labels appreciating
    Gifts Differing
  • Good for marriages and workplaces!
  • Beyond the golden rule

6
Big-5 (NEOAC) Plato, Galen, Freud, MBTI
  • Brass/Iron, Silver, Gold
  • Choleric, Sanguine, Phlegmatic, Melancholic
  • Oral, Anal, Phallic
  • EI, SN, TF, PJ
  • The role of Mom?

7
Genetics and PersonalityCorrelations of Big-5
Traits Between
  • Adopted kids and parents
  • Adopted siblings
  • Biological kids and parents
  • Biological siblings
  • Non-identical (dz) twins
  • Identical (mz) twins
  • Identical twins raised apart

0 0 .1 .1 .25 .5 .5
8
Heredity Estimate
  • (rmz rdz) x 2 x100 Variance from genes
  • No effect of parents? (stay tuned!)
  • Non-Shared Environment?
  • Harris Where is the Childs Environment?
  • Is it Error? Multiple raters boost genes to 70
  • Culture? People are getting taller, and smarter,
    and more anxious
  • Change is possible, genetic predisposition not
    absolute destiny.
  • Young adulthood is difficult. Neur. goes down!

9
Openness Awed or odd?
  • Openness to Experience
  • Aesthetics
  • Fantasy
  • Values
  • Actions
  • Ideals
  • Feelings

Sex, politics, and religion
Ideal friends and marriage
10
Traits and Divorce
  • What if MZ twin and parents
  • a) got divorced?
  • 80 divorced
  • b) stayed married?
  • 10 divorced
  • Trait Divorce Proneness
  • high E, high O, low C, high N, r.4
  • Traits also predict MZ twins divorce, r.4!

11
Trait Correlations with Major Life GoalsRoberts
Robins, 2000, PSPB
  • success E .3 C .2 O -.3 A -.2
  • Career and graduate school C .2
  • Aesthetic O .4
  • Social Welfare A .3
  • Relationships and Children E .3
  • Political Influence E .3
  • Fun and Excitement E .4
  • Personal Growth O .3
  • Traditional Marriage O -.3

12
Traits and AttitudesOlson et al., 2001, JPSP
  • MZ DZ
  • Crossword puzzles 46 11
  • Immigration 47 20
  • Euthanasia 45 21
  • Racial discrimination 37 0
  • Organized sports 52 10
  • Looking ones best 42 14
  • Abortion 53 28
  • Organized religion 43 21
  • Leading groups 40 08
  • Reading books 55 24

13
How Can Traits be Heritable but Not Run In
Families?
  • 7 rings, fire captains, fashion design etc
  • Son of a Baptist minister and traditional
    religious belief????
  • How can traits and attitudes be genetic but not
    run in families?
  • Emergenesis jigsaw puzzle analogy
  • How do genes translate into traits?
  • E.g., oxytocin, testosterone, agreeableness

14
Disagreeable Forms of Coping(Reinisch, 1981,
Science)
15
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia and Boy
Toys(Berenbaum Hines, 1992, Psychological
Science)
16
Higher or Wider?
17
Longer? Wider?
18
Chase Scene?
19
How We Know What Isnt So
  • 1. Representativeness heuristic
  • 2. Overinterpreting chance Excessive impact of
    vivid confirming information
  • 3. Knowing what we expect
  • 4. Knowing what we want

20
Representativeness Heuruistic
  • Joseph is a very quiet, timid, introverted, and
    organized person. If you had to bet money, would
    you bet that he was
  • Truck driver or librarian?
  • phenomena that resemble each other seem likely to
    be functionally related.

21
WWII Strategic Bombing of London?
22
Psychic Powers?
23
Psychic Powers?
1/10
1/10
24
Seeing What We Expect
  • Is my Father a Baptist Minister?
  • Divide class in half for next exercise, and look
    at image for 5 seconds

25
Gary
26
  • Switch and other half close eyes and other half
    look for 5 seconds.

27
Mary
28
  • What do you see when I flash the next image?

29
(No Transcript)
30
  • Who saw a man in the last slide?
  • Who saw a women

31
TAT What do you see?
32
Try not seeing Spot
33
Believing What They Expected to Believe About
Capital Punishment Polarizing Effect of Exposure
to Mixed Evidence(Idealized pattern of results
from Lord, Ross, Lepper, 1979, JPSP)
34
Believing What They Wanted to Believe about
Extraversion(Idealized pattern of results from
Kunda, 1987, JPSP)
35
Need for Research
  • Correlational
  • Theories and hypotheses
  • Operational definitions of variables
  • Scatter Plots

36
Correlations Vary from -1 to 1
Around r .2
Around r .5
r 1.0
37
Need for Research
  • Correlational
  • Theories, hypotheses, variables
  • Width of scatter and steepness of slope
  • Reliability decreases scatter (error)
  • Problems
  • Confounding third variables
  • Reverse causation
  • External validity but cant get at causes

38
Experiments
  • Random assignment to conditions
  • Manipulation independent variable
  • Experimental control can bottle causal relations
    in the lab
  • Internal validity but limited external validity
    sometimes

39
The Smart Unconscious(Dijksterhuis, Science,
2006)
Correct
Incorrect
40
Transference onto Interaction Partner Who
Resembles Your Own Lover (Anderson, 2004)
Good
1.Good Actions 2. Good Feelings 3. Good Memory
Bad
Interaction Partner Described as Resembling
41
Displaced of Aggression(Idealized pattern of
results from Marcus Newhall, Pedersen, et
al.,2000)
42
Dream Rebound (Idealized from Wegner, et
al.,2004)
Yes
No
43
Participants Asked to Talk about Worst
Moments(Idealized pattern of results from
Weinberger Davidson, 1994)
Also blood pressure and HR up
Also, more Hedges and Qualifications
Slow Here
Slow
Fast
44
Responses of Repressors to Seeing Horrible
Movie(Idealized pattern of results from Boden
Baumeister, 1997)
Slow
Fast
45
Reasons for Personality Science Revival
  • Big-5
  • Experimental Personality Research
  • Trait aggression
  • X situational frustration or priming (press)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com