RISK MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE – EMERGING CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CONTEXT. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

RISK MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE – EMERGING CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CONTEXT.

Description:

RISK MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE EMERGING CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CONTEXT. International Conference on Rural Finance Research: Moving results into Policies and Practice. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1360
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: ruralfina
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RISK MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE – EMERGING CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CONTEXT.


1
RISK MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE EMERGING
CHALLENGES IN INDIAN CONTEXT.
International Conference on Rural Finance
Research Moving results into Policies and
Practice. 19th -21st March 2007 at Rome.
  • N.JEYASEELAN,
  • CONSULTANT, INDIA.
  • Vijayjeyaseelan_at_yahoo.co.in

2
SHG BANK LINKAGE PROGRAM
  • NABARD TECHNICAL SUPPORT - REFINANCE
  • BANKS LOAN DELIVERY
  • NGOs PROMOTION OF SHG
  • SHGs-INFORMAL GROUP

3
PROGRESS UNDER MICROFINANCE IN INDIAUpto 31st
March 2006 - in Million US dollars
  • Agency / Cumulative
    No.of persons
  • Program micro credit disbursed
    reached (in Millions)
  • Amount
    share to total
  • NABARD SHG
  • Bank linkage 2590.45 69.2
    164.9
  • SIDBI-MFI 173.14 4.6
    2.6
  • SGSY 893.81
    23.9 3.2
  • Others(RMK 88.10 2.3
    1.1
  • FWWB)
  • Total 3745.50
    100 171.8

4
CUMULATIVE PROGRESS OF SHG BANK LINKAGE PROGRAM.
5
BANK SHG LOAN PORTFOLIO GROWTHin Million US
dollars
6
EMERGING SCENARIO UNDER BASEL - II
  • June 2004- Basel II was put in place.
  • Feb 2005- RBI issued guidelines on Basel II to
    Banks in India.
  • Migration to Basel II by Mar 2008/2009
  • Basel I covered Credit and Market risks
  • Basel II also covers Operational risks
  • Basel II has three pillars viz Capital
    requirements, Supervisory process Review and
    Market discipline.
  • MF assets come under retail category and carry
    75 risk weight.
  • If studies carried out on the default rate and
    proved that MF assets are lesser riskier, then
    lobbying shall be made for Lower risk weight to
    MF assets.

7
RISK MANAGEMENT IN MICROFINANCE
  • Identification of risk
  • Measuring the risk
  • Evolving strategies for risk mitigation
  • Implementing the risk mitigation measures
  • Monitoring the risk level.
  • Major risks Credit Operational risks
  • Credit risk-Possibility of Loss associated with
    diminution in the credit quality of the
    borrowers.
  • Operational risk- Risk of Loss resulting from the
    inadequate or failed internal process or people
    or system or external events.

8
RESEARCH GAP
  • No studies have been carried out so far on how
    the branch managers implementing the SHG Bank
    linkage program perceive the risks in SHGs and
    NGOs.
  • The present study fills this gap.

9
RESEARCH DESIGN
  • Objectives
  • To review the emerging risk management
    scenario in Banks delivering micro finance to
    Self Help Groups and Micro Finance Institutions
    in India.
  • To identify the potential risk factors associated
    with SHG-Bank linkage
  • To analyze the risk perception of the Branch
    Managers on SHG lending
  • To classify the risk factors into High, Medium
    and Low risk categories.
  • To evolve a tool for Credit Risk rating of Self
    Help Groups
  • To offer suggestions for risk mitigation
    measures.

10
RESEARCH DESIGN METHODOLOGY.
  • A descriptive study
  • Purposive sampling to select 68 Branch managers
    implementing SHG program
  • Sample drawn from 5 districts of Tamilnadu
  • Study is more of qualitative nature
  • Ten major Risk factors identified through FGDs
    with stakeholders
  • A 5-point risk rating scale was constructed
  • Based on the Branch managers perception,
  • risk factors were classified as
    High/Medium/Low risk categories.

11
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
  • For each choice in the scale, scores are given
    from one to five.
  • Total scores by all the respondents for each risk
    factor have been summed up and their Mean
    Standard Deviation have been calculated. The
    risk categorization has been done using the mean
    and standard deviation for each factor.

12
FINDINGSSIX MAJOR HIGH RISK FACTORS AS PERCEIVED
BY THE BRANCH MANAGERS.
  • v     Reduction in grants to NGOs for group
    promotion.
  • v     Frequent switch over of NGO field staff
  • v     Maintenance of group accounts by a few
  • v     Loan size not commensurate with the
    capacity of the SHG members.
  • v     Increasing possibility for loan default
    with increase in loan size
  • v  SHGs shouldering too much government
    program responsibilities beyond their capacity.

13
FINDINGSBased on the perception of the Branch
Managers
  • Risk factors such as
  • Lack of monitoring of SHGs by NGOs
  • Dependence on a single SHG leader
  • which are in Medium risk category as of now, also
    have potential to move into the high risk
    category in the near term, if no corrective
    measures are taken in time.

14
SUGGESTIONS FOR RISK MITIGATION -BANK LEVEL.
  • Bank loan not to be shared by all members of the
    group.
  • Loan term be short 6 / 8 / 10 /12 months
  • Repeat loan delivery should be very quick
  • Analyze the need for Restructuring the SHG after
    closure of each cycle of loan
  • Graduating members to individual larger loans
  • Use of Credit risk rating tool to offer risk
    based pricing
  • Banks shall share a part of the cost of group
    promotion by NGOs.

15
SUGGESTIONS FOR RISK MITIGATIONNABARD LEVEL.
  • NABARD to hike the group promotion cost to NGOs.
  • NABARD to pilot a District level Micro credit
    information bureau
  • NABARD to arrange capacity building program on
    risk management to NGOs / CBOs and SHG leaders.

16
SUGGESTIONS FOR RISK MITIGATIONNGO LEVEL.
  • NGOs shall ensure rotation of SHG leaders
  • NGOs shall select their staff from the SHGs to
    avoid the problem of staff turn over
  • NGOs shall form federation of SHGs and shall
    delegate their functions to them
  • NGOs shall ensure auditing of group accounts by
    the internal team as well as by the external
    audit teams.
  • NGOs shall strengthen the SHGs bookkeeping
    skills and ensure financial transparency through
    the IT.

17
SUGGESTIONS FOR RISK MITIGATIONGOVERNMENT LEVEL
  • Government departments should limit the delivery
    responsibilities of the SHGs for selective
    programs only matching with its capability.
  • Government should change the mode from rapid
    growth to consolidation phase so as to ensure a
    growth with stability quality.

18
MOVING RESULTS INTO POLICIES PRACTICE
  • Some results have already been disseminated to
    the branch managers in the field through the
    training programs.
  • Some of the suggestions require policy changes
    and to be addressed by the Policy makers
  • Customized Individual loans for Graduating SHG
    members
  • Banks to offer Risk based pricing of micro loans
  • Micro credit information Bureau at the district
    level
  • Use of Risk rating tools on an ongoing basis
  • Use of IT in financial transparency

19
MOVING RESULTS INTO POLICIES PRACTICE
  • Governments focus to be shifted from rapid
    growth (numbers) to consolidation (quality).
  • NABARD to hike the group promotion grants to NGOs
    and banks shall share a part of the group
    promotion cost.
  • NABARD to organize more Capacity building
    programs on risk management to NGOs /CBOs and SHG
    leaders.
  • Building on the qualitative insights gained
    through this rapid study, a detailed study on MF
    - Risk management covering all the models shall
    be carried out

20
THANK YOU.
  • For further details, Please contact
  • N.Jeyaseelan, Consultant,
  • 7/633-A-Jeevanantham street,
  • Nagamalai Pudukottai, Madurai, 625 019,
  • INDIA.
  • Phone 00-91-452-2456546
  • Mobile 00-91-9344108120
  • Skype vijayjeyaseelan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com