Innovative Contracting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Innovative Contracting

Description:

Innovative Contracting UDOT Director of Construction and Materials Kris Peterson Innovative Contracting Works to Improve the Process Reduce impact to public Reduce ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: odotStat
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Innovative Contracting


1
Innovative Contracting
  • UDOT
  • Director of Construction and Materials
  • Kris Peterson

2
Innovative Contracting Works to Improve the
Process
  • Reduce impact to public
  • Reduce overall project time
  • Limits Schedule Growth
  • Reduce overall project cost
  • Limits Cost Growth

3
Types of Innovative Contracting
  • Contract Manager / General Contractor (CMGC or
    CM_at_Risk)
  • Design-Build
  • A B Bidding
  • Lane Rental
  • Warranties
  • Incentives
  • Performance-based

4
Timeline Comparison
Design Phase
Construct Phase
5
CMGC Roles
Why Innovative Contracting
6
CMGC Benefits
Lessons Learned
UDOT Controls Design UDOT Selects Innovation
7
Other CMGC Benefits / Risks
Why Innovative Contracting
  • Benefits
  • Reduces design time and design errors
  • Improves constructability
  • Identifies and reduces risk
  • Early procurement
  • Lower cost
  • Risks
  • Sole source contract
  • Bid price needs to be 10 of EE or below
  • Negotiation skills

8
Reduce Risk to Reduce Cost Increase Profit
Contractor Risk
Owner Risk
Risk
DBB
DB
CMGC
9
Selection Strategy
Why Innovative Contracting
  • Select complex projects
  • That benefit from contractor input
  • With third-party risk
  • That need innovation
  • Need early procurement
  • Select projects with a budget emphasis
  • Take time for design

10
CMGC Requires Approval
  • Experimental Process - SEP 14
  • 12 Federal Projects per year
  • 12 State Projects per year
  • Justification required
  • Project Development approves
  • FHWA must also approve federal projects

11
Contracting Process
  • Develop RPF
  • Selection Criteria
  • Price components
  • Advertise
  • Selection team
  • Complex participants
  • Region participants
  • AGC and ACEC representatives
  • Select Award

12
Processing Time
13
Price Benefits
  • Brings cost accountability to the table
  • Brings cost competition to the table
  • Brings cost innovation to the table
  • Provides validation of good price for public trust

14
Price in CMGC RFP
Where are we going?
  • Price
  • Continue to use the average target
  • Most realist cost
  • Approach to Price
  • Emphasize during pre-proposal
  • Change the format

15
(No Transcript)
16
Utah CMGC Projects (State)
Where are we going?
17
Utah CMGC Projects (Federal)
Where are we going?
18
Design Build
Plan
UDOT
Design
Contractor
19
Design-build
  • Benefits
  • Faster Design/Construction
  • Smaller cost growth
  • Smaller schedule growth
  • Innovation (Contractor controlled)
  • Risks
  • Design-build is built for speed
  • Contractor owns the design

20
Design Build Advertising Process
  • Letter of Intent (Interest) LOI
  • RFQ
  • RFP
  • Low-Bid
  • Best-Value

21
Checklists
  • Located on the 2008 Standards / Checklists website

http//www.udot.utah.gov/Inside UDOT/Project
Development/Standards and Specifications /2008
Standards/2008 Project Checklists
22
Selection Committee
23
Reduce Time on Project
  • AB Bidding
  • Contractors bid the time to complete the project
    and a dollar amount for work items
  • Award to lowest combinations of time and cost
  • Lane-Rental
  • Minimize the time lanes are closed
  • Contractors are charged a fee for closing lanes
    and shoulders
  • Focus on time the public is affected

24
A B Bidding
  • Benefits
  • Improved coordination between prime and
    sub-contractors
  • Reduced construction time minimizes impacts to
    users
  • Contractors are required to put together a well
    conceived schedule
  • Drawbacks
  • Contract changes are magnified too many changes
    nullify the advantages of AB
  • Acceleration techniques may require more
    resources for contract administration
  • More hours and over-time budget required from
    Region staff
  • Negotiations for additional work are more
    intense since time is a bigger issue

25
AB Candidates
  • Good
  • Interstate Projects
  • Mill and Overlays
  • Projects with Detours
  • Bridge Painting
  • Intersection upgrades
  • New Construction/Reconstruction
  • Bad
  • Third-party delays
  • Rehabilitations

26
Lane Rental
  • Benefits
  • Better coordination of prime and sub-contractors
  • Minimized impact to traveling public
  • Better public perception due to fewer
    un-utilized lane closures
  • Drawbacks
  • Extra effort by staff to monitor lane rental
  • Negotiating lane rental adjustments can be
    difficult with contract changes
  • Potential added costs to the project

27
Lane Rental Candidates
  • Good
  • Mill and Overlay (2-lane roads with flagging ops.
    or intersection impacts)
  • Safety projects (guardrail/signing/striping/bridge
    painting)
  • Bad
  • New construction
  • Long-term projects

28
Warranties
  • Guarantee all or portions of a construction
    project
  • Free of defects in material
  • Workmanship
  • Time Period
  • Correct deficiencies during warranty period

29
Warranty Pros and Cons
  • Benefits
  • Quality and durability guaranteed
  • Longer acceptance time
  • Less inspection needed
  • Drawbacks
  • Owner must ensure warranty
  • Warranty may not be collectable
  • Staffing to monitor warranty

30
Incentives - Disincentives
  • Paid for early completions
  • Penalized for late completions

31
I D Pros and Cons
  • Benefits
  • Reduced construction time
  • May lower contract admin costs
  • PI benefits
  • Control of project acceleration
  • Drawbacks
  • May require additional funding
  • Contract changes may lead to disputes

32
Pay-for-Performance
  • Pay is dependent upon final outcome
  • Measured against performance criteria
  • Set by contract
  • Pay withheld for poor performance
  • Corrective action required

33
PFP Pros and Cons
  • Benefits
  • Eliminates blame
  • Shifts risk to contractor
  • Higher quality
  • Drawbacks
  • Time to measure performance
  • Long project close-out
  • Monitoring is time- consuming
  • Contractor may have to finance a portion

34
Innovative Web Site
  • www.dot.state.mn.us/const/tools/docments/Guideline
    s.pdf
  • Dec 2005
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com