Cultural Differences Global Negotiation Who negotiates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Cultural Differences Global Negotiation Who negotiates

Description:

Cultural Differences Global Negotiation Who negotiates better? Different nationalities negotiating within national boundaries Similar outcomes across nations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:679
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: staffUiA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cultural Differences Global Negotiation Who negotiates


1
Cultural DifferencesGlobal Negotiation
2
Who negotiates better?
  • Different nationalities negotiating within
    national boundaries
  • Similar outcomes across nations
  • Different processes (Americans increase profits
    by making opponent uncomfortable, Japanese
    opposite is true Brazilians increase profit by
    power and deception tactics Chinese ask more
    questions, say no less, interrupt more
  • True cross-cultural negotiations
  • Poorer outcomes for Japanese and English-Canadian
  • No harm for American (more satis.) or
    French-Canadian (more coop)

Little is really known
3
American negotiators from an international
perspective
  • STRENGTHS
  • Preparedness
  • Pragmatism
  • Candor, honesty, friendliness
  • Cooperative and fair
  • Win-win orientation
  • Willingness to make concessions
  • WEAKNESSES
  • Cultural insensitivity
  • Impatience
  • Lack of unified constituencies
  • Poor listening skills
  • Too quick to concede
  • Dont understand small talk

4
What are some shared American values?
What are some assumptions underlying American
culture?
How would these affect how we negotiate with
other cultures and how others view us?
5
Levels of cultural understanding
  • Observable behavior
  • Can learn a lot, but likely to focus on dos and
    donts
  • Often leads to superficial understanding
  • Shared values
  • Requires inferences from observed behavior and
    learning about a culture
  • More powerful, because values drive (partially)
    behavior
  • Shared assumptions
  • Very abstract these drive our values but are
    very hard to determine
  • Very powerful, helps truly understand a culture

6
Hofstedes Dimensions and Negotiation
  • Power Distance
  • extent to which power differentials are expected
    and honored
  • Low Anglo/Germanic/Scandanavian
  • High Developing Nations, particularly Pacific
    Rim
  • Effect As power distance increases, more
    approval from higher ups and less involvement
    from lower levels. Also, can expect more
    formality in Ns with people from high PD
    cultures, and they may be upset if you do not
    appear to be of sufficient status.
  • Individualism/Collectivism
  • extent to which society is organized by
    individuals vs. groups
  • Ind. Western European - based societies
  • Coll. Latin America, Pacific Rim
  • Generally, wealthier societies tend to be more
    individualist
  • Effect Relationship stability over time
    emphases, individual negotiators vs. group of
    negotiators, importance of consensus, value
    placed on individual winner, emphasis on group
    vs. individual goals, rewards, communication in
    Ns, etc.

7
Hofstedes Dimensions and Negotiation 2
  • Masculinity/Feminity
  • extent to which values fit traditional
    gender-based stereotypes
  • M Japan, Anglo/Germanic
  • F Scandinavia.
  • Effect Masculinity associated with
    competitiveness vs. empathy compromise should
    expect strong relationships with distributive vs.
    integrative styles.
  • Uncertainty Avoidance
  • degree of discomfort with unstructured situations
  • High no strong pattern, but many Hispanic
    nations
  • Low no strong pattern, but Anglo/Scandinavia
  • Effect High prefers stable rules and procedures,
    less adaptive. High also tends to be more
    risk-averse risk aversion has played into many
    N. dynamics. High tends to do business
    ritualistically formally.

8
Other cultural variables
  • Time
  • present vs. future vs. past orientation
  • Time as linear vs. time as circular
  • Can affect timing/urgency of Ns, and also what
    sorts of time-related objectives (short-term vs.
    long-term) are valued more
  • Americans often seen obsessed with time.
  • Universalism vs. particularism
  • Can ideas/practices be applied everywhere every
    time, or do circumstances dictate application?
  • Use of precedent vs. adapting styles/processes/agr
    eements to situations
  • Emotionality
  • Great potential for misunderstandings here!!!
  • Achievement vs. ascription
  • Is status conferred by what youve done or who
    you are?
  • How will a person be viewed in a N situation?

9
Some communication differences
  • Verbal communication
  • Is message conveyed in context, or is it
    explicitly what is stated?
  • Americans often believed to be blunt, even to
    point of rudeness.
  • Non-verbal
  • Handshakes
  • Conversational distance
  • Facial bodily expressiveness animation,
    gestures, etc.
  • Very difficult to interpret because subtle and
    great differences across cultures
  • Look for patterns in order to interpret
  • The concept of face

10
Example of communication patterns
11
Negotiation process/timing for Americans in
domestic vs. international negotiations
Domestic 1 2
3 4 5 6
International 1
2 3 4
5 6
Key 1- orientation fact-finding 2-
resistance 3- reformulation of strategies
4- hard bargaining decision-making 5-
agreement 6- follow-up
12
Negotiating Strategies in Other Countries
  • Opening offer
  • Close to final settlement where haggling is not
    customary (e.g. Australia, Sweden)
  • Expect lots o haggling in some nations (e.g.
    Russia, Egypt, China)
  • Rule of thumb (that wont always work, so apply
    with caution) if a culture has a long history of
    bartering bargaining, expect to haggle.
  • Detail vs. big-picture in presentation
  • Detail where culture emphasizes formality, logic,
    data, organization (e.g. Germany, UK, Swiss,
    Japan)
  • Broad concepts preferred in some other areas
    (e.g. Latin America, Middle East)

13
More Negotiation Strategies in Other Countries
  • Dealing With Disagreement
  • Subtle, quiet vs. demonstrative
  • In Pacific Rim, no is almost a dirty word
  • In Middle East, histrionics (to our eyes ears)
    are normal
  • Patterns of concessions
  • In some nations, given grudgingly (US, S.Afr.,
    Brazil, e.g.)
  • In others, declining pattern is norm (Australia,
    NZ, Taiwan, Thailand, e.g.)
  • Escalating in others (Indonesia, Philippines,
    India, Kenya, e.g)
  • Calling other on dirty tricks
  • Be EXTREMELY cautious where face is important
    (Pacific Rim, Middle East)

14
Cultural Differences affecting other Negotiation
Processes
  • Relationships orientation
  • Lack of trust across cultural differences ? trust
    building essential
  • Some cultures are standoffish (e.g. British,
    Germanic), so get down to business before too
    long
  • Emotional Aspects
  • Sensitivity is low for US, high for Latin America
  • Loyalty to self in US, to organization in many
    other cultures
  • Decision Making Frame
  • In US change is acceptable, even encouraged,
    decisions made quickly
  • In many other nations, status quo is the normal
    frame of reference
  • US is relatively prone to using agendas, may be
    restrictive to some others

15
More Cultural Differences
  • Contracts
  • Advisable to use more paper, since cultural
    misunderstandings more likely
  • Bureaucracy
  • You think US businesses/organizations are
    bureaucratic?
  • Womens issues
  • US is relatively progressive regarding womens
    roles
  • Rule of thumb less developed nations, greater
    disparity
  • Women negotiating in these countries should be
    introduced by a very high-status person
  • Because you look different than local women, you
    may be viewed as executive
  • Demonstrations of expertise critical
  • Women can and do often perform well even where
    cultures do not give women status

16
Negotiating in Specific Regions
  • The next 4 slides are FYI only and far from
    complete
  • There are important differences across nations
    within regions (e.g., Israel vs. Iran in Middle
    East)
  • Remember you are negotiating with an
    individual(s) who may or may not fit cultural
    norms to a T!!!

Source How to Negotiate Anything with Anyone
Anywhere in the World, Frank Acuff
17
Negotiating in Western Europe
  • Timing punctual, relatively fast-paced
  • Individualistic, status-conscious,
    slow-developing friendships, emphasis on
    initiative achievement
  • Loyalty hard work are valued
  • Greater hierarchy than in US
  • Speakers s/b articulate intellectual, formal,
    logical, and subtle
  • Low emotionality, reserved
  • Moderate initial demands, issues sequentially
    processed, slow concessions

18
Negotiating in the Middle East/North Africa
  • Bargaining is a way of life Youre
    supposed to haggle! Monty Python
  • Time not punctual or planning-oriented (too
    much attempt to control the future invites
    trouble). Ramadan is especially slow for
    business.
  • Group oriented, and very deferential to those of
    status
  • Much time upfront spent in developing
    relationships
  • Masculine Arabs read poetry, use intuition, and
    are emotional. Feminine Arab qualities are
    coolness and pragmatism.
  • Israelis are direct, Arabs indirect, vague
    expressive, often to point of exaggeration
    filled with fantastic metaphors
  • No is uncommon look for a hesitant yes
    instead white lies common form of courtesy
  • Saying I dont know ? you are of little account
  • Strong eye contact, close personal space, touchy
  • High initial demands, slow concessions, issues
    sequential, extreme face orientation, truth is
    revealed very slowly because it is considered
    dangerous

19
Negotiating in the Pacific Rim
  • Old cultures, socially stratified, Confucian
    ethic
  • Courtesy rituals, formality, politeness, modesty,
    loyalty to group and deference to elderly,
    non-confrontational
  • Negotiations slow, relationship orientation
    group negotiation style with team consensus
    critical implementation usually quick, though
  • Very collectivist
  • Words mean little, conversation very indirect
  • he who speaks doesnt know, he who knows doesnt
    speak
  • No uncommon might get a well study this
    further instead
  • Reserved body language, average-to-close personal
    space, not touchy
  • Sensitivity valued but not overstated
  • Moderate-high initial offers, multiple issues
    presented at once, slow concessions, logical
    decisions
  • Face is critical

20
Doing as the Romans do
  • This is common advice when negotiating
    internationally
  • BUT
  • Negotiators may not be able to modify their
    approach effectively
  • Other side may also try to modify
  • Knowing how a given nationality negotiates with
    its peers may be misleading for your negotiations
    with them
  • SO
  • Moderate adaptation may be better
  • May be able to adapt completely or transcend
    culture entirely when very familiar with a
    country
  • Consider cultural brokers when very unfamiliar
    with a country
  • Articulate the cultural difference, agree in
    advance to work through it.
  • BEST ADVICE
  • Prepare, prepare, prepare.

21
BOOZE NEGOTIATION
  • Avoid when
  • wanting to use impression management
  • professional boundaries are important
  • social pressure is a big concern
  • negotiation involves many issues
  • negotiation involves calculations
  • diplomacy, tact, and careful communication are
    crucial
  • interpersonal conflict is likely to escalate
  • May be OK when
  • social norms favor drinking
  • opportunities for social exchange gt alcohols
    risks
  • value of developing bonds gt alcohols risks
  • focus is long-term relationship
  • appealing to emotional criteria
  • learning information about the other party is
    crucial
  • your relative tolerance level is high

Note There are important cultural aspects to
this, too!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com