Sept. 11th 2001 Part 2

1
Sept. 11th 2001Part 2

• More unanswered questions about what happened.

2
The mountain of information and dis-information

• Due to the scope of Sept. 11th, only the Pentagon
  strike will be reviewed here.
• This is the 2nd part of a 3 part series.
• This information is available through various
  public means and will hopefully make you question
  the events which took place that fateful day.

3
The Pentagon Strike A quick reminder of what
happened..

• At about 937AM a jetliner, presumably American
  Airlines Flight 77, flew toward the western face
  of the Pentagon and exploded as it smashed
  through the facade, primarily on the first floor.
• Early news reports placed the event anywhere
  between 937 and 945 AM. The 9/11 Commission
  Report pegged the crash at 93746 on the basis
  of the NTSB report "Flight Path Study-American
  Airlines Flight 77," which remains unavailable to
  the public.
• At 1010 AM, a section of the Pentagon's west
  block above the impact zone collapsed.

4
Flight 77 was a Boeing 757

• Lets review the B-757
• Dimensions Length- 155ft (47meters).
• Wing Span- 124ft (38meters).
• Height- 44ft (13meters).
• Weights Normal empty weight- 126000lbs
  (57180kg).
• Maximum Take-off weight- 250000lbs
  (113395kg).
• Power plant Depending on customer options,
  either Rolls-Royce RB211s or Pratt and Whitney
  PW2037, rated at 37000lbs, 41700lbs respectively,
  each engine.
• Accommodation Flight crew of two and nine
  interior arrangements from 178 passengers up to
  239.

5
Pentagon DamageDamage to Pentagon and
Surroundings Prompts Questions About Attack Plane

• The central impact hole has a diameter only
  slightly larger than a 757 fuselage.
• The damage on the right side of the central hole
  is difficult to reconcile with the impact of an
  intact starboard engine of a 757.
• The single hole through to the C-Ring section
  of the building suggests a single-engine attack
  plane. (More on this later)
• The lawn outside the damaged facade showed no
  signs of gouging caused by an aircraft.
• Objects seemingly in the plane's flight path
  outside the building were apparently not
  disturbed.
• The facade shows no impression of the ends of the
  wings or vertical stabilizer of a 757.

6
Pentagon DamageDamage to Pentagon and
Surroundings Prompts Questions About Attack Plane

• The Entry Punctures
• Regions in which the Pentagon's west facade were
  punctured were restricted to the first and second
  floors. The puncture on the second floor was
  about 18 feet wide and extended to the top of the
  second floor, about 26 feet above the ground. The
  region with punctures on the first floor was
  about 96 feet wide.
• Damage Beyond Punctured Region
• Beyond the 90-foot-by-26-foot region within which
  walls were broken away, the facade showed
  abrasion suggesting blast damage, but no
  impression of the profile of a Boeing 757. No
  windows were broken on either side of the 90-foot
  span or above the second floor.

7
Pentagon DamageDamage to Pentagon and
Surroundings Prompts Questions About Attack Plane

• The C-Ring Exit Hole
• The wall of the Pentagon's C-Ring was punctured
  by a nearly circular hole. The hole was
  apparently made by the remains of the plane's
  fuselage, whose apparent impact trajectory lines
  up with the punch-out hole. More on this later..

8
Pentagon DamageDamage to Pentagon and
Surroundings Prompts Questions About Attack Plane

• The final approach of the attack plane was so low
  and fast that the wings clipped lamp-posts on the
  adjacent highway and damaged objects in the
  construction yard in front of the building.
• The crash embedded the plane almost entirely in
  the first floor, wiping out most of the personnel
  in the Office of Naval Intelligence, that had
  recently been moved into the newly renovated
  section. Pilots doubt that even the most skilled
  fighter pilots could have executed such a precise
  surgical strike, particularly with such a large
  plane.
• How was it possible to fly a 757 so low to the
  ground, hit lamp posts but not leave a SINGLE
  MARK in the Pentagon lawn?

• Remember that the engine nacelles hang well below
  the wing on a B757. Yet the initial impact was
  almost at ground level. Good piloting skill? Or
  sheer luck?

9
Pentagon DamageDamage to Pentagon and
Surroundings Prompts Questions About Attack Plane

• More importantly, apart from the lack of any
  gouging in the lawn leading up to the crash-site
  Is the lack of any debris in the front lawn of
  the Pentagon from the crashed airliner.
• Even a truck bomb would leave a crater in the
  ground and wreckage.
• What happened to the wings and engines of the
  B757. Unlike the WTC crashes in which the entire
  aircraft were devoured by the buildings, in the
  Pentagon crash only a small hole was caused in
  the initial impact. Yet ONE engine was found
  INSIDE the Pentagon.

10
Clueless Super-Pilots Jetliner Aerobatics by
Flight School Dropout Who Never Flew a Jet

• None of the hijackers were good pilots. None had
  ever flown jets, let alone large commercial
  jetliners.
• Hani Hanjour, the person accused of flying Flight
  77 into the Pentagon, was failing his courses at
  the Arizona flight school. Hanjour was noted as
  having trouble flying a small Cessna 172.
• According to an employee, "He didn't care about
  the fact that he couldn't get through the
  course." Rick Garza, a flight instructor at
  Sorbi's Flying Club, had this to say about the
  two alleged hijackers originally thought to have
  piloted Flight 77, Khalid al-Mihdar and Nawaq
  al-Hamzi "It was like Dumb and Dumber, I mean,
  they were clueless. It was clear they were never
  going to make it as pilots."

• Supposedly the 757 flew at less then 30ft high in
  excess of 400mph and somehow didnt even touch
  the ground once!
• The plane supposedly hit several lights poles
  along the way..

11
Clueless Super-Pilots Jetliner Aerobatics by
Flight School Dropout Who Never Flew a Jet

• It is doubtful that the best trained fighter
  pilots could have executed the manoeuvre that
  supposedly crashed a 757 into the Pentagon. It
  required making a tight 270-degree turn while
  descending seven thousand feet, then levelling
  out so as to fly low enough over the highway just
  west of the Pentagon to knock down lamp posts.
  After crossing the highway the pilot had to take
  the plane to within inches of the ground so as to
  crash into the Pentagon at the first-floor level
  and at such a shallow angle that an engine
  penetrated three rings of the building, while
  managing to avoid touching the lawn. And he had
  to do all of this while flying over 400 mph!
  Quite a feat for a flight school flunky who had
  never sat in the cockpit of a jet!
• Pictures show B757 and C172 cockpit. The C172
  would be typical of training aircraft used at
  flying schools.

12
Clueless Super-Pilots Targets Near-Empty Wing
of Pentagon

• The attack was at 940, about one and a half
  hours after the attack first started to unfold.
  Yet the Pentagon was left undefended, despite its
  close proximity to Andrews Air Force Base, which
  had two combat-ready fighter wings on duty on
  9/11/01.
• The attack plane approached Washington DC from
  the northwest, but instead of diving into the
  portions of the Pentagon housing the top brass
  like Donald Rumsfeld, the plane executed a
  270-degree spiral dive to approach the vast
  building from the southwest side and strike a
  portion of Wedge One that was undergoing
  renovations. While crashing into other portions
  of the Pentagon would likely have killed
  thousands, the precision manoeuvre limited
  fatalities in the building to under 150.

13
The Firemen who crashed the party

• Two National Airport fire trucks were by sheer
  accident working less then a mile away.
• They arrived within 10mins of hearing the
  explosion and immediately began fire fighting
  operations with 2 trucks.

• They reported that the fire was put out within 7
  to 8 minutes of their arrival.
• Most of the severe fire they encountered was
  actually caused by diesel stored next to a
  generator trailer used for the Pentagon
  renovations.
• They saw no evidence of a plane crash.

14
The Pentagon that burned and burned and burned.

• At approx. 1010am the damaged section collapses.
• According to 9-11 records the Pentagon continued
  to burn and smoulder for 72hrs! Why was it
  allowed to burn for so long?
• Maybe these next few pictures might help.
• What are missing from these two photos? Lets see
  how observant you are

15
The Pentagon that burned and burned and burned.

• Have we worked out whats missing?
• Take another look at these 2 photos.
• Can you see any firemen? Any form of firefighting
  being performed? In these 2 pictures the damaged
  section has collapsed. This means that these
  photos were taken at least 25mins after the
  crash and explosion.
• Yet in these pictures and the previous two
  pictures there is a total lack of people and
  firefighting equipment. More media exposure
  perhaps?

16
Aircraft Debris Mysteriously Appears

• Previous photos showed very little in the way of
  any large aircraft parts of any description.
• Later photos show parts of aircraft being
  scattered all over the place.
• Yet surprisingly no aircraft wings or engine
  parts were discovered outside the Pentagons
  front lawn.
• What is more surprising is the parts found INSIDE
  the building.

17
Aircraft Debris Mystery

• As the initial impact hole was only just larger
  then diameter of the aircrafts fuselage, it would
  be logical to say that the wings would have
  sheered off (along with engines and
  undercarriage, which are mounted on the wings).
  This would mean these parts would be outside the
  Pentagon?
• Why is it then a part of a turbine engine was
  located inside the building? The nose leg part in
  the 2nd picture along with the engine section
  have never been officially identified.

18
Aircraft Debris MysteryWhat caused the C ring
punch out hole?

• Shown in the picture is the supposed path taken
  by aircraft remains through 5 concrete steel
  re-enforced walls. Considering that an aircraft
  is made from mostly alloys, isnt it a bit
  unbelievable that it could do this?
• The most single heaviest part in an airliner is
  the wing-centre section, the under-carriage legs
  and the turbine section of the engine.
• There was no wreckage large enough to cause such
  a hole found nearby.
• So ask your self then. What could cause such a
  hole, but not affect the next wall in its path
  just 30ft away, as if it suddenly stopped moving
  forward?

19
Pentagon Attack Evidence Missing and Surviving
Evidence

• While officials in New York City went about the
  systematic destruction of the vast amounts of
  evidence comprising the remains of the World
  Trade Center, official handlers of the Pentagon
  strike undertook the much smaller task of erasing
  physical evidence that a jetliner crashed into
  the Pentagon.
• The lack of evidence of large aircraft debris in
  post-crash photographs of the Pentagon's
  exterior, combined with the refusal of officials
  to produce evidence supporting the official
  story, led many sceptics to believe that the
  damage was caused by something other than a
  jetliner hitting the building.

20
Pentagon Attack Evidence Missing and Surviving
Evidence

• Columns of people in FBI jackets walked portions
  of the Pentagon lawn and adjacent roads shortly
  after the attack, apparently to pick up crash
  debris. The photographs and videos of these
  activities do not suggest any attempt to
  carefully note and record the positions of any
  debris they may have been finding.
• Why was the apparent clean up of debris so quick?

21
Pentagon Attack Evidence Missing and Surviving
Evidence

• It is striking that there is neither video
  footage nor any photographic evidence in the
  public domain showing a jetliner approaching or
  crashing into the Pentagon. As of May, 2006, the
  only video footage of the crash that has been
  released are clips from two Pentagon security
  cameras north of the crash site, one the source
  of 5 frames leaked in 2002.
• Footage from two cameras that captured portions
  of the attack at 937 on the west side of the
  Pentagon were not of good quality and the camera
  footage was captured at a frame rate of 1frame
  per 1second.
• Poor quality time lapsed cameras in one of the
  most secure Government buildings in the USA?
• At no stage in any of the footage can an airliner
  be seen clearly. A blurry outline of something
  can be see only in one frame along with what
  appears to be smoke trailing the object. This
  object and smoke can be seen in the top left
  frame and extending to the right of the explosion
  in the 2nd frame.

22
Pentagon Attack Evidence Missing and Surviving
Evidence

• Not only has the government refused to release
  footage that would clearly show how the Pentagon
  was attacked, it has also seized footage not
  belonging to the military.
• The FBI confiscated video recordings from several
  private businesses near the Pentagon in the
  immediate aftermath of the attack. Those
  recordings, if they still exist, might provide
  decisive evidence about the attack.

• The FBI visited The Sheraton National Hotel near
  the Pentagon to confiscate film from a security
  camera which some hotel employees had been
  watching in horror shortly after the attack. The
  FBI denied that the footage captured the attack.
  
• The FBI visited the Citgo gas station southwest
  of the Pentagon within minutes of the attack to
  confiscate film that may have captured the
  attack. According to Jose Velasquez, who was
  working at the gas station at the time of the
  attack, the station's security cameras would have
  captured the attack.
• NONE OF THIS FOOTAGE has even been released.

23
Pentagon Attack Evidence Missing and Surviving
Evidence

• Judicial Watch, the public interest group that
  investigates and prosecutes government
  corruption, announced today that it has filed a
  lawsuit and an Application for a Preliminary
  Injunction with the U.S. District Court for the
  District of Columbia against the Federal Bureau
  of Investigation (FBI), to force the release of
  videotapes confiscated by law enforcement from
  areas surrounding the Pentagon on 9/11 (Judicial
  Watch, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation,
  Case No. 06-1135). Judicial Watch also filed a
  formal request for a court hearing on the matter
  to occur on or before July 12, 2006.
• To view the video footage of the Pentagon crash
  visit this site.. (http//judicialwatch.org/)

• Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of
  Information Act request on December 15, 2004
  seeking all records pertaining to September 11,
  2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack
  from the Sheraton National Hotel, the
  Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security
  cameras and the Virginia Department of
  Transportation.  The FBI admitted in a May 22,
  2005 letter that it possessed videotapes
  responsive to Judicial Watchs request.  However,
  the FBI refused to release the videotapes.
   Judicial Watch filed an appeal on April 4,
  2005.  The FBI had until May 3, 2005 to respond,
  but failed to do so, prompting Judicial Watch to
  take action.

24
Pentagon Attack EvidenceWitnesses accounts

• While there was a lot of eye-witness accounts of
  what happened, everyone's account of what they
  saw was different and certainly some stories
  match the 757 crashing into the Pentagon, while
  others say something different.
• The plane was a two-engine turbo prop that flew
  up the river from National. Then it turned back
  toward the Pentagon. We thought it had been waved
  off and then it hit the building, said State
  Department employee Ken Ford.
• Don Perkal Even before stepping outside I could
  smell the cordite. Then I knew explosives had
  been set off somewhere.
• Gilah Goldsmith We saw a huge black cloud of
  smoke, she said, saying it smelled like cordite,
  or gun smoke.
• "It sounded like a missile," DiPaula recalls.
  "There were three loud thump, thump, thumps. You
  could hear the metal cracking and crinkling, and
  the explosion."

• Cleveland, Allen Soon after the crash (Within 30
  seconds of the crash) I witnessed a military
  cargo plane (Possibly a C130) fly over the crash
  site and circle the mushroom cloud. My brother
  in-law also witnessed the same plane following
  the jet while he was on the HOV lanes in
  Springfield. He said that he saw a jetliner
  flying low over the tree tops near Seminary RD in
  Springfield, VA. and soon afterwards a military
  plane was seen flying right behind it.
• Marine Corps officer Mike Dobbs was standing on
  one of the upper levels of the outer ring of the
  Pentagon looking out the window when he saw an
  American Airlines 737 twin-engine airliner strike
  the building. "It seemed to be almost coming in
  slow motion"
• The plane approached the Pentagon about six feet
  off the ground, clipping a light pole, a car
  antenna, a construction trailer and an emergency
  generator before slicing into the building, said
  Lee Evey, the manager of the Pentagon's ongoing
  billion-dollar renovation.

25
Pentagon RenovationRenovation Program Had
Hardened the Facade Attacked on 9/11/01

• The renovation program included the following
  improvements to the building
• Exterior walls reinforced with steel
• Exterior walls backed with Kevlar
• Blast-resistant windows installed
• Fire sprinklers installed
• Automatic fire doors installed
• Building operations and control centre created
• The original windows were replaced with
  blast-resistant windows nearly two inches thick.

• The reinforcements were to be sequentially
  applied to the five wedges of the Pentagon over
  time. Wedge One -- one of five sections of the
  Pentagon -- was the first to be retrofitted, and
  the upgrades to the exterior wall were complete
  by 9/11/01. Wedge Two was apparently yet to be
  retrofitted. The plane crashed into the
  building's exterior entirely within Wedge One.
• Kevlar cloth was stretched between the steel
  columns to provide blast resistance to the short
  spans of brick wall.

• This information leads to more questions..
• Why attack the only part of the Pentagon which
  has been reinforced to withstand any sort of
  terrorist attack?
• At the last minute the aircraft changed its
  attack profile and rammed the almost empty
  section of the Pentagon
• If the façade was reinforced so much, how did a
  section of aircraft punch its way through 5 steel
  reinforced walls and end up in the corridor of
  the C section ring? (Even though no aircraft
  wreckage large enough to cause such a hole was
  never found nearby).

26
Pentagon Explosion Involved More than Jet Fuel
Combustion?

• The Pentagon attack involved an explosive
  detonation. This is documented by eyewitness
  reports of several features of the event that can
  be explained by powerful explosives, but not by
  the impact of a jetliner and combustion of its
  fuel. Those features include
• A shockwave that was strong enough to knock
  people off their feet hundreds of feet from the
  center of the blast.
• The odor of cordite, an explosive compound was
  reported by many witnesses.
• A very bright silvery flash as opposed to an
  orange fireball which is what would normally be
  associated with the burning of Turbine fuel of an
  aircraft.

27
NORAD Stand-Down ?Why did it take so long to
re-act?

• There are several elements involved in domestic
  air defence. The air traffic control system
  continuously monitors air traffic and notifies
  NORAD of any deviations of any aircraft from
  their flight-paths or loss of radio contact.
  NORAD monitors air and space traffic continuously
  and is prepared to react immediately to threats
  and emergencies. It has the authority to order
  units from the Air National Guard, the Air Force,
  or other armed services to scramble fighters in
  pursuit of jetliners in trouble.
• Yet it failed to respond in a timely manner until
  after the attack was over, more than an hour and
  a half after it had started. The official
  timeline describes a series of events and mode of
  response in which the delays are spread out into
  a number of areas. There are failures upon
  failures, in what might be described as a
  strategy of layered failures, or failure in
  depth. The failures can be divided into four
  types.
• Failures to report Based on the official
  timeline, the FAA response times for reporting
  the deviating aircraft were many times longer
  than the prescribed times.
• Failures to scramble NORAD, once notified of the
  off-course aircraft, failed to scramble jets from
  the nearest bases.
• Failures to intercept Once airborne,
  interceptors failed to reach their targets
  because they flew at small fractions of their top
  speeds.
• Failures to redeploy Fighters that were airborne
  and within interception range of the deviating
  aircraft were not redeployed to pursue them.
• No interceptors were scrambled from Andrews Air
  Force Base to protect the capital, at least not
  before the Pentagon was hit. Andrews Air Force
  Base had two squadrons of fighters on alert, and
  is only 10 miles from the Pentagon.
• Andrews Air Force Base, located on the outskirts
  of the capital, is just over 10 miles from the
  Pentagon. One would have expected interceptors to
  be scrambled to protect the capital within a few
  minutes of the 815 loss of contact with Flight
  11. Instead, no fighters from Andrews reached the
  Pentagon until 949, several minutes after the
  assault.

28
National Security prevents the NTSB from doing
its job?

• As in the case of the World Trade Center site,
  the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
  took control of the crime scene and supervised
  the official investigation of it. Also as in
  Manhattan, FEMA officials in Washington appointed
  volunteers from the American Society of Civil
  Engineers (ASCE) to investigate the crime and
  write a report. The team was dubbed the BPS
  (Building Performance Study). The BPS
  investigated the response of the building to the
  crash, not the crash itself, evidence of which
  was not available to them.
• By the time the full Pentagon BPS team visited
  the site, all debris from the aircraft and
  structural collapse had been removed.
• The Pentagon BPS is the only government
  investigation of the crash of Flight 77 that it
  admits to existing, but it was defined as and
  limited to an investigation of the performance of
  the building. There was no investigation into the
  crash by the National Transportation and Safety
  Board (NTSB). The Probable Cause document for
  Flight 77 on the NTSB's website reads
• The terrorist attacks of September
  11, 2001 are under the jurisdiction of the
  Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Safety Board
  provided requested technical assistance to the
  FBI, and any material generated by the NTSB is
  under the control of the FBI. The Safety Board
  does not plan to issue a report or open a public
  docket.
• The NTSB is the responsible body which
  investigates ALL aircraft accidents and incidents
  in the USA, yet the hijackings of Sept.11th were
  never officially investigated by the NTSB. Had
  the NTSB investigated the 4 hijackings, they
  would have been able to identify the aircraft and
  aircraft wreckage.

29
Misinformation Maintaining the Official Story
in the Face of Glaring Contradictions

• Ensuring the success of the official story of
  9/11/01 despite the long sequence of highly
  improbable events it supposes required that
  people not pay too much attention to the details.
  This would be ensured by the "shock and awe" of
  the attack itself combined with an intense
  propaganda campaign to sell the official story.
  Ironically, the vast majority of those who
  created and promoted that propaganda probably did
  so innocently, never questioning the official
  version of events. The idea that the entire
  attack was an inside job was simply too
  unthinkable for most Americans to consider.
• The use of disinformation and diversion to
  manipulate public opinion is a highly developed
  art. It is well understood not only by
  psychological operations experts in the national
  security establishment, but also by marketing and
  public relations wizards.
• On the day of the attack, details about the
  alleged perpetrators emerged with a rapidity that
  is remarkable given the assertions by
  high-ranking administration officials that no one
  had ever considered that an attacker could fly
  planes into buildings. Within hours the
  identities of several of the alleged hijackers
  were known, and Osama bin Laden was being
  presented as the prime suspect. Within two days
  the FBI published the identities of all the
  alleged hijackers. It was being presented as an
  open-and-shut case.
• The mass media were consistent in avoiding asking
  the most obvious questions. Why did the air
  defense network fail to respond? Why did Flight
  77 target the recently-fortified, mostly empty
  portion of the Pentagon? Why was the Ground Zero
  steel removed and destroyed as fast as possible?
  The media shirked their public service obligation
  of acting as watchdogs of the government, and
  instead became cheerleaders for the
  administration's war plans for central Asia.
• The vast body of print reportage about September
  11 attack is notable for an abundance of
  contradictions. The timelines in the Complete
  9-11 Timeline series reveal numerous
  inconsistencies, such as between reported times
  of events. These discrepancies, combined with the
  lack of evidence, discourage investigation of
  facts of the attack. Meanwhile, the impending
  attack on Afghanistan, the alleged Islam-terror
  link, and "homeland security" got the attention.

30
Pentagon Strike Conclusions

• The photographic and eyewitness evidence seem to
  support two conflicting conclusions
• Eyewitness evidence A jetliner with a shape and
  colour matching an American Airlines aircraft
  crashed at the Pentagon.
• Post-crash photographs Whatever object collided
  with the building was not a Boeing 757, but
  something much smaller.
• The incompatibility between these conclusions has
  engendered a long-standing controversy within the
  9/11 Truth Movement between those persuaded by
  the eyewitness reports that the attack plane was
  a jetliner and likely Flight 77, and those
  convinced by analysis of the photographic
  evidence that the attack plane was something else
  entirely.
• The eyewitness evidence does not prove that the
  attack plane was Flight 77, but only that it had
  the appearances of the type of plane that Flight
  77 was. Conversely, the photographs do not prove
  that the attack plane was not Flight 77, but only
  that the damage to the building does not have the
  appearance that most people would expect such a
  crash to produce. Indeed, several of the
  eyewitnesses who were convinced that they saw a
  large jetliner swoop towards the building and
  explode, expressed confusion about what had
  become of the aircraft when the smoke cleared.

31
Ask yourself these questions

• Why would the US Government first say there was
  NO footage of the crash, then a few years later
  provide grainy, blurry images which still do not
  show conclusively what hit the Pentagon? Despite
  the fact that there are literally dozens and
  dozens of cameras surrounding the whole area..
• Why is there no substantial wreckage of the
  aircraft? 60tons of aircraft and over 60 bodies
  which vaporised into thin air..
• Why would a suicidal pilot with little-to-no
  flying skills, skim over the ground at 30ft high
  at 400miles an hour to hit the virtually empty
  section of the Pentagon? Wouldnt it be easier to
  dive into the Pentagon from above to achieve
  maximum damage?
• Why did no air-defence assets manage to arrive
  over the restricted airspace surrounding the
  White House and Pentagon until some 10mins after
  impact of Flight 77? Flight 77 flew for nearly an
  hour after it disappeared from radar..
• For such a large aircraft flying so fast and so
  low to the ground, why was there no reports about
  the damage from the aircrafts wake turbulence or
  jet blast?
• The families of those affected by the events on
  Sept.11th deserve to know the truth.
• Public pressure on the US Government is needed to
  re-open investigations.
• The popular media has failed to ask the hard
  questions. Its time that we did instead..