NCMA 41st Annual West Coast Educational Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

NCMA 41st Annual West Coast Educational Conference

Description:

Los Angeles, CA. The Designation of a Human Resources Advisor (HRA) ... Los ... Los Angeles, CA. Cost Comparisons Continued. through the end of the last ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: davidd3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NCMA 41st Annual West Coast Educational Conference


1
LABOR COSTS IN THE A-76 PROCESS
OUTSOURCING PANEL Professor Gilbert J. Ginsburg,
Co-Director, A-76 Institute, LLC Date July
17, 2003 Time 930 1045 a.m.
2
The Designation of a Human Resources Advisor (HRA)
  • Status and qualifications
  • A. The HRA is to be
  • 1. An inherently governmental agency official
  • 2. A human resource expert
  • 3. A participant on the MEO team and
  • 4. Independent of the CO, SSA, PWS team and
    SSEB.

3
Functions
  • To assist the ATO in human resources related
    matters in developing the agency tender
  • During development of the agency tender, the HRA
    will be responsible for
  • (a) scheduling sufficient time in competition
    milestones to accomplish potential human resource
    actions
  • (b) advising the ATO and MEO team on position
    classification restrictions
  • (c) classifying position descriptions, including
    exemptions based on the Fair Labor Standards Act

4
Functions Continued
  • (d) Performing labor market analysis to determine
  • the availability of sufficient labor to staff the
    MEO
  • and implement the phase-in plan
  • (e) Assisting in the development of the agency
    cost
  • estimate by providing annual salaries, wages,
    night
  • differentials, and premium pay
  • (f) Assisting in the development of the timing
    for the phase-in
  • plan based on MEO requirements and
  • (g) Developing an employee transition plan for
    the incumbent
  • agency organization early in the standard
    competition
  • process.

5
Functions Continued
  • 3. To develop and classify new position
    descriptions based on the MEO but the agency
    shall not hire employees to staff these positions
    unless and until the agency is the selected
    provider.
  • 4. To perform employee and labor relations
    functions, including, at a minimum the following
  • (a) interface with directly affected employees
    (and their representatives) from the date of
    public announcement until full implementation of
    the performance decision
  • (b) identify adversely affected employees
  • (c) accomplish employee placement entitlements
    reduction-in-force procedures

6
Functions Continued
  • (d) provide post-employment restrictions to
    employees
  • (e) determine agency priority considerations for
    vacant positions and establish a reemployment
    priority list(s) and
  • (f) provide the CO with a list of the agencys
    adversely affected employees, as soon as possible
    after the performance decision is made, regarding
    the right of first refusal for a private sector
    performance decision.
  • The HRA does not make a determination of whether
    a Federal
  • employee is qualified re right of first
    refusal. This is the
  • contractors decision.

7
Cost Comparisons
  • Contractor Labor
  • 1. As bid in the proposal price.
  • 2. New SCA wage determinations (WDs) go into
    the contract with every option exercise or
    renewal.
  • 3. The initial price and annual labor cost
    increases for service employees controlled by the
    SCA Price Adjustment clause (FAR 52.222-43 or
    -44).
  • 4. For base support contracts, the new
    Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) WDs are required for
    every option exercise or renewal.

8
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • 5. There is no standard FAR clause for measuring
    how a contractor is to be compensated for
    increased wage rates in DBA WDs individual
    agencies or COs are allowed to choose one of four
    ways to handle the increase.
  • 6. The contractors pricing of out year costs
    for DBA covered employees is dependent on the
    DBA escalation clause used in the solicitation.

9
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • B. Government Labor
  • 1. The pricing calculation is governed by
    Attachment C to the Circular. Attachment C
    mandates the use of COMPARE software to develop
    cost estimates.
  • 2. Pay raise assumptions and inflation factors.
    OMB issues a transmittal memorandum in the
    Federal Register to identify changes to the
    federal pay raise assumptions and inflation
    factors (based on the Presidents annual budget).
    These annual pay raise assumptions and inflation
    factors shall be used . . . as follows

10
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • through the end of the last performance period
    for
  • pay and non-pay categories of cost that are not
    subject
  • to an economic price adjustment, and
  • (b) through the end of the first performance
    period for
  • pay and non-pay categories of cost that are
    subject to
  • an economic price adjustment.
  • COMPARE automatically computes inflation on a
    daily basis,
  • which is calculated using 365.25 days per year to
    account for
  • leap year.

11
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • C. Labor calculation
  • 1. Civilian wages and pay. Calculate civilian
    pay and wages
  • for cost estimates using
  • (a) local pay salaries and wages at a rate of
    step 5 for GS and step 4 for FWS, positions
  • (b) the mid-grade, or mid-band and mid-step
    level for pay-banded or demonstration project
    positions
  • (c) the locality pay for the location, or each
    location in a multi-location competition and
  • (d) the length of time in grade for each grade
    in a developmental series, as determined by the
    HRA.

12
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • 2. Fringe Benefits.
  • (a) Full-time and part-time permanent civilian
    positions -- 32.85 of the positions basic pay.
    The 32.85 is the sum of the standard civilian
    position retirement benefit cost factor (24.0),
    insurance and health benefit cost factor (5.7),
    Medicare benefit cost factor (1.45), and
    miscellaneous fringe benefit cost factor (1.7).
  • (b) Retirement cost factors for special class
    civilian
  • positions are 33.0 of basic pay for air
    traffic controllers (27.9 retirement pension
    plus 5.1 for retiree health) and
  • (c) 38.2 of basic pay for law enforcement and
    fire protection (33.1 retirement pension plus
    5.1 for retiree health).

13
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • (d) The full benefit factor is not applied to
    temporary and intermittent civilian positions.
    Use the FICA cost factor for intermittent and
    temporary civilian positions. The FICA cost
    factor is currently 7.65 of salaries or wages
    subject to federal income tax, comprising 6.2
    for Old Age and Survivors benefits and 1.45 for
    Medicare benefits with an annual maximum earnings
    limitation of 87,000 for the Old Age and
    Survivors benefit portion of the FICA tax.
  • Uniformed services labor.
  • Agency and public reimbursable sources may
    include uniformed services labor in tenders, only
    under the following conditions

14
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • (a) uniformed services positions in the tender
    shall not exceed the number of precompetition
    uniformed services positions performing the
    activity and
  • (b) civilian employee positions shall not be
    converted to uniformed services positions.
  • If uniformed services labor is used in a tender,
    the agency or public reimbursable source shall
    develop productive hours for the uniformed
    services position that include annual leave, sick
    leave, administrative leave, training, and other
    nonproductive hours.

15
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • 4. Labor Escalation.
  • An economic price adjustment for services and
    construction labor is determined by the SCA, the
    DBA and FAR Part 22. . . .COMPARE automatically
    computes the applicable inflation costs based on
    the user input selections in accordance with the
    following
  • (a) If a solicitation does not include either
    FAR clause 52.222-43 or 52.222-44, an agency
    shall apply inflation to all civilian positions
    for all performance periods through the end of
    the last performance period stated in the
    solicitation.
  • (b) If a solicitation does include either FAR
    clause 52.222-43 or 52.222-44, agency and public
    reimbursable sources shall inflate labor costs in
    cost estimates as follows

16
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • (e) for civilian positions that are subject to
    an economic price adjustment (i.e., . . . the
    position is nonexempt under the Fair Labor
    Standards Act), inflation is applied only through
    the end of the first period of full performance
    or
  • (f) for civilian positions that are . . .
    exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act,
    inflation is applied for all performance periods
    through the end of the last performance period
    stated in the solicitation.
  • 5. Davis-Bacon Act (DBA).
  • (a) Generally, in base support contracts, there
    is a DBA requirement in addition to the SCA.

17
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • (b) In base support contracts DOL requires that
    a new DBA WD be included with every option
    exercise or renewal.
  • (c) There is no uniform FAR treatment for
    compensating a contractor for annual increases in
    DBA WDs the Government may choose one of four
    ways to measure it.
  • (d) For the agency tender, Attachment C does
    not separately treat escalation for DBA
    increases. The result is that if the
    instructions are followed, COMPARE will escalate
    or not escalate construction labor in the
    situations where the contract would escalate the
    SCA WD increases without regard to the specific
    DBA escalation clause used in private sector
    contracts by the agency.

18
Cost Comparisons Continued
  • 6. Effects of Human Error.
  • The effects of escalating wage figures when
    escalation is not required can be disastrous.
  • In a recent DFAS A-76 procurement, the MEO labor
    costs were escalated when they should not have
    been the effect was a 32 million overstatement
    of the MEOs labor costs.
  • The 32 million error caused a 30.2 million
    cost advantage for the MEO to instead become a
    1.8 million cost advantage for the private
    sector offer.
  • DFAS is facing serious problems in taking
    effective corrective action.

19
Labor strike plans
  • The agency tender is not required to include a
  • labor strike plan.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com