Lesson Six: Fallacies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lesson Six: Fallacies

Description:

Lesson Six: Fallacies – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:687
Slides: 35
Provided by: Username withheld or not provided
Category:
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lesson Six: Fallacies


1
Lesson 6
  • Are There Any Fallacies in the Reasoning?

2
Review
  • Sought to gain a clear understanding of a
    communicators reasoning by
  • Locating the issue and argument.
  • Clarifying any ambiguous terms or phrases.
  • Identifying the authors assumptions (value and
    descriptive).
  • The object of critical reading and listening is
    to judge the acceptability or worth of an
    argument.
  • We now move on to evaluating the communicators
    reasoning (see flowchart pg. 76).
  • Fallacies.

3
What is a Fallacy?
  • A faulty argument that at first appears to be
    correct.
  • A trick an author/speaker might use while trying
    to convince you to accept their faulty
    conclusion.
  • WARNING!
  • Dont develop an I gotcha attitude!
  • The purpose of identifying fallacies is to help
    all parties sort out stronger arguments from
    weaker arguments.

4
Categories of Fallacies
  • Formal Fallacy
  • Mistaken reasoning in which the form of the
    argument itself is invalid.
  • Some high school dropouts are men. No doctors
    are high school dropouts. Therefore, no doctors
    are men.

5
Categories of Fallacies
  • Informal Fallacy
  • Mistaken reasoning that occurs when an argument
    is emotionally persuasive but logically
    incorrect.
  • Sound good and appeals to emotions, but are not
    true.

6
Examples of Fallacies
7
Ad Hominem Fallacy
  • An attack, or an insult, on the person, rather
    than directly addressing the persons argument.
  • Can take two forms
  • Abusive Directly attacking the persons
    character (pg. 71).
  • Circumstantial We dismiss someones argument or
    accuse them of hypocrisy because of their
    circumstances.

8
Ad Hominem Fallacy
  • Example of Circumstantial
  • A father catches his son smoking and tells him
    that you shouldnt be smoking. Its not good for
    your health. Then the son replies, Look whos
    talking. You smoke at least a pack a day
  • The son has dismissed his fathers argument
    because of the circumstances of his father.
  • The son has ignored the validity of his fathers
    argument.

9
The Slippery Slope Fallacy
  • Making the assumption that a proposed step will
    set off an uncontrollable chain of undesirable
    events, when procedures exist to prevent such a
    chain of events.
  • Assumes that if certain actions are allowed than
    all actions of that type will soon be
    permissible.
  • We commit the slippery slope fallacy when the
    evidence does not support this predicted outcome.

10
The Slippery Slope Fallacy
  • Example 1
  • You should never give in to your child. If you
    do, soon she will have you wrapped around her
    little finger. You need to stay in control.
  • Example 2
  • If we allow any form of human cloning, then
    before we know it there will be armies of clones
    taking over our jobs.

11
The Slippery Slope Fallacy
  • Slippery slope argument is not always a fallacy!
  • If the evidence exists to back up the slippery
    slope argument it is not a fallacy.
  • The fear that a particular action or allowance
    will start you down a dangerous slippery slope is
    valid.
  • To avoid the slippery slope fallacy we
  • should carefully carry out our research and
    familiarize ourselves with the likely outcomes of
    different actions.
  • avoid the tendency to exaggerate.

12
The Perfect Solution Fallacy
  • Assumes that because part of a problem would
    remain after the solution is tried, the solution
    should not be applied.
  • All or nothing fallacy.
  • If we wait for the perfect solution, we would
    often find ourselves stuck.

13
Equivocation Fallacy
  • A key word/phrase is used with two or more
    meanings in an argument.
  • The argument fails to make sense once the shifts
    in meaning are recognized.
  • Most likely to occur when the meaning of a key
    term is ambiguous.
  • Example
  • Ronda Curtis is not a real man. He looked scared
    to death when that drunk at the bar threatened to
    punch him.
  • Ellen If hes not a real man, how do you account
    for those incredibly bulging biceps.

14
Equivocation Fallacy
  • Example
  • Carl Terminally ill patients have a right to
    decide how and when they want to die.
  • Juan Thats not true. There is no right to
    euthanasia in the U.S. law.
  • How do we avoid this?
  • clearly define any ambiguous terms or phrases
    before proceeding with an argument/discussion.
  • try to avoid using relative terms in different
    contexts within the same argument.

15
Appeal to Popularity (Ad Populum)
  • An attempt to justify a claim by appealing to
    sentiments that large groups of people have in
    common.
  • Falsely assumes that anything favored by a large
    group is desirable.
  • An appeal to popular opinion to gain support for
    our conclusion.
  • The bandwagon approach Everyone else is doing
    it or everyone else believes it.

16
Appeal to Popularity(Ad Populum)
  • Example
  • The ban on assault weapons should be extended. A
    recent Gallup Poll found that 68 of Americans
    support having a ban on assault weapons.
  • As critical thinkers we need to remember that a
    position or conclusion is not necessarily right
    because it is popular.
  • Every position or conclusion must be critically
    examined.

17
Appeal To Questionable Authority
  • Supporting a conclusion by citing an authority
    who lacks special expertise on the issue at hand.
  • Looking to an authority in a field other than
    that under investigation.
  • Example
  • My preacher says that genetic engineering is not
    safe. Therefore, all experimentation in this
    field should be stopped

18
Appeal To Questionable Authority
  • Also known as the halo effect
  • Distinguished titles often serve to reinforce the
    mistaken idea that someone who is an expert in
    one field will also be an expert in another.
  • We avoid this fallacy by
  • Checking out an experts credentials in the
    field before using his/her testimony as
    authoritative.

19
Appeals To Emotion
  • The use of emotionally charged language (or
    images) to distract readers/listeners from
    relevant reasons and evidence.
  • Common emotions that are appealed to are fear,
    hope, patriotism, pity, and sympathy.
  • Done by those who hope that our emotional
    reactions will cause us to agree with their
    conclusion.
  • Emotional reactions should not be relevant.

20
Straw Man Fallacy
  • A distortion of our opponents view so that it is
    easy to attack thus we attack a point of view
    that does not exist.
  • How do we avoid this?
  • Look at the argument in question as it was
    originally presented.
  • Has the argument been reworded or oversimplified
    to the point of misrepresentation?
  • Have key parts of the original argument been
    omitted?

21
Either Or (False Dilemma)
  • Assumes that only two alternatives are possible
    when there are really more than two possible
    alternatives.
  • Responses to complex issues are reduced to an
    either/or choice.
  • ExampleAmerica love it or leave it! If you
    dont like U.S. policy, then move somewhere else.

22
Either Or (False Dilemma)
  • Habitual use of this fallacy restricts our
    ability to come up with creative solutions to
    problems.
  • Overcoming personal setbacks requires that we
    use our critical thinking skills to come up with
    a way of overcoming our problems rather than
    getting stuck in erroneous thinking.

23
Either Or (False Dilemma)
  • How do we avoid this fallacy?
  • Watch out for either/or questions that put you on
    the spot.
  • If neither alternative is acceptable, it is best
    to leave the response blank or check I dont
    know.

24
Explaining by Naming
  • Falsely assuming that because you have provided a
    name for some event or behavior, you have also
    adequately explained the event or behavior.
  • Example people commit violent acts because they
    are evil.
  • The naming prevents us from understanding common
    causes of violent acts (not excuses).

25
Glittering Generality
  • The use of vague, emotionally appealing virtue
    words that dispose us to approve something
    without careful examination.
  • Example Page 83.

26
Red Herring Fallacy
  • Occurs when a response is directed toward a
    conclusion that is different from that proposed
    by the original argument.
  • Example
  • I dont see why you get so upset about my
    driving after I have a few drinks. Its not such
    a big deal. Look at all the accidents that are
    caused by people talking on their cell phones
    while driving

27
Red Herring Fallacy
  • Another example
  • Angelo I dont think Mike should have lied to
    Rosetta about what he was doing last night.
  • Bart Oh, I dont know about that. If I had been
    in his situation I would probably have done the
    same thing.
  • We avoid this fallacy by keeping the real issue
    in mind.

28
Begging the Question Fallacy
  • An argument in which the conclusion is assumed in
    the reasoning.
  • The conclusion of an argument is simply a
    rewording of a premise.
  • Also known as circular reasoning.
  • Example
  • Capital punishment is wrong because it is
    immoral to inflict death as a punishment for a
    crime

29
Begging the Question Fallacy
  • If you think an argument contains this fallacy,
    try reversing the conclusion and the premise to
    see if the argument says that same thing (in a
    different way).
  • Back to our example (reversed)
  • It is immoral to inflict death as a punishment
    for a crime , therefore capital punishment is
    wrong.

30
Hasty GeneralizationsStereotypes
  • The use of vague emotionally appealing virtue
    words that dispose us to approve something
    without closely examining the reasons.
  • Making assumptions about a whole group or range
    of cases based on a sample that is inadequate.

31
Hasty GeneralizationsStereotypes
  • How do we avoid this fallacy?
  • Ask ourselves what kind of sample is being used.
  • Are we relying on the opinions or experiences of
    just a few people?
  • Are we relying upon our own experience?
  • Do we need more evidence?
  • Avoid sweeping conclusions.

32
Avoiding Fallacies in Our Writing
  1. Pretend you disagree with the conclusion you are
    defending.
  2. List your main points under each one, list the
    evidence you have for it.
  3. Learn which types of fallacies youre prone to
    and be careful to check for them in your work.
  4. Be aware that broad claims need more proof than
    narrow claims.
  5. Double check your characterizations of others.

33
GROUP WORK
  • Discuss examples from your daily life in which
    you have seen/heard people use fallacies.
  • What did you (or the other person) say, what
    fallacy was used, was the fallacy noticed, and
    did anyone challenge the fallacy?

34
Project Two
12 Angry Men
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com