The Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts compared. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts compared.

Description:

President Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren (1953-69) ... Republican Senator Arlen Specter, Senate Judiciary Committee. Some limits on the Supreme Court ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:481
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: admi637
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts compared.


1
The Warren, Burger and Rehnquist Courts compared.
Warren
Burger
Rehnquist
2
President Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren
(1953-69) President Nixon appointed Warren
Earl Burger (1969-1986) President Reagan
appointed William Rehnquist (1986-2005)
3
Earl Warren
  • Formerly Governor of California
  • Chief Justice (1953 -1969)
  • A Loose Constructionist
  • Promoted judicial activism
  • (the courts should have a role
  • In shaping government policy
  • especially regarding sensitive
  • social issues)

4
Seen as too liberal by many conservatives, there
were calls to remove Earl Warren from his
post. He also headed the investigation in to
the assassination of President Kennedy which
produced the famous Warren Commission report.
5
Evaluation of the Warren Court
  • Why would conservatives have reacted negatively
    to the overall record of the Warren Court ?
  • Did the Warren court take the concept of judicial
    activism too far or did it address long overdue
    issues of legal reform ?

6
Negative conservative reactions.
  • The Warren Court kick-started the civil rights
    movement in 1954 with Brown vs Board of
    Education.
  • Criticised as protecting the rights of criminals
    at the expense of law enforcement.
  • Maintained a strict separation of church and
    state over religion prayer in public schools.
    Would have alienated conservative Christians.

7
Judicial activism taken too far ?
  • Warren Court made some highly political
    judgements which displeased conservatives but
    pleased liberal reformers.
  • President Nixon promised in the 1968 election to
    appoint more strict constructionists to the court
    to redress the balance.

8
Warren E. Burger
  • Active Republican
  • 1955, President Eisenhower appointed Burger to
    the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
    Columbia.
  • Appointed by Nixon as Chief Justice
  • "He left his mark on every facet of our judicial
    system," said Associate Justice Sandra Day
    O'Connor, who noted he was "kind and considerate"
    to her from her first day on the court, when he
    led her by the arm to face "the battery of
    press."
  • She noted that he wrote more than 250 opinions,
    including landmark decisions that enhanced
    women's rights and strengthened the
    constitutional separation of powers.
  • Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist,
    who succeeded Burger said, "I expected him to be
    stiff and formal, as I expected all chief
    justices were. I could not have been more wrong."

9
The Burger Court
  • Nixon had wanted a more conservative court.
  • The Democrat controlled Senate rejected two of
    his nominees (Haynesworth And Carswell) as too
    conservative.
  • Burger was an active Republican supporter and
    seen as a conservative successor to Warren but he
    did not reverse the direction of the court.

10
Going off the reservation
  • Presidents do not always get the Supreme Court
    justices they expect.
  • The Burger Court passed Roe v Wade with a 7-2
    majority. It also ruled against the death
    penalty in furman v Georgia. Burger was
    conservative on gay rights.
  • The court also upheld affirmative action cases
    (University of California v Baake in 1978)
  • The Court also forced Nixon to hand over the
    Watergate tapes secret phone recordings made by
    Nixon during the Watergate Scandal.

11
  • Which of the Burger Court rulings can be
    characterised as loose constructionist ?
  • Roe v Wade (interpreting the 14th Amendment right
    to privacy)
  • Furman v Georgia (interpreting the 8th Amendment
    ban on cruel and unusual punishments

12
How contradictory was the Burger Court ?
  • How?
  • Showed loose constructionism and judicial
    activism.
  • However it made some conservative rulings.
  • Why the contradiction ?
  • Judges follow judicial reasoning and can set
    aside their political beliefs.
  • The court always looks at past decisions or
    precedent (called stare decisis in Latin) and
    amicus curiae (evidence submitted by interest
    groups)
  • Public opinion shifted to the right in the late
    70s and early 80s. The Supreme Court seems to
    have responded to this.

13
The Rehnquist Court
  • Reagan was determined to mould a truly
    conservative court after the disappointment of
    the Burger Court
  • He appointed Rehnquist after Burgers retirement
    in 1986.
  • Rehnquist is seen as the most conservative
    Justice of recent times.

14
Bush v Gore in 2000
Hanging Chads
15
The Rehnquist Court in 2001
  • Ronald Reagan (R) appointed - 4
  • George Bush (R) Senior appointed 2
  • Gerald Ford (R )appointed 1
  • Bill Clinton (D) appointed 2
  • Since Rehnquists death in 2005 George W Bush (R)
    has appointed 2 (C.J. Roberts and Samuel Alito)
  • See page 154 of Duncan Watts

16
Limits on the Supreme Court
  • The Supreme Court is always influenced by past
    rulings or precedents (as are British courts)
  • These are often referred to by the Latin term
    stare decisis (stand by things decided).
  • A past precedent seen as impossible to ignore is
    called a super-precedent or super stare
    decisis.

17
"when you talk about judges who would change the
right of a woman to choose, overturn Roe vs.
Wade, I think confirmation (to the Supreme Court)
is unlikely. Republican Senator Arlen Specter,
Senate Judiciary Committee
18
Some limits on the Supreme Court
  • The Supreme Court has no enforcement powers of
    its own.
  • The court can only judge cases brought before it.
    It cannot seek out cases of its initiative.
  • It depends on its prestige and moral authority
    for its rulings to be obeyed.
  • A too politically biased court would lose
    respect, credibility and therefore compliance.
  • The Supreme Court in the Brown case was out of
    step with public opinion and the ruling needed
    federal troops to be enforced

19
Comparison of the Warren, Burger, Rehnquist courts
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com