Chapter 3: Attraction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 3: Attraction

Description:

Found that as women have increased access to resources, gender differences in ... partner having sex with another man compared to falling in love with another man. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: dsha98
Learn more at: https://people.wou.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 3: Attraction


1
Chapter 3 Attraction
  • Social Psychology by Tom Gilovich, Dacher
    Keltner, and Richard Nisbett

2
What Influences Attraction?
  • Physical Attractiveness
  • Propinquity
  • Similarity

3
What Do We Find Attractive?
  • Average Faces
  • Composite faces are judged more attractive than
    any individual face that comprises composite.
  • Symmetrical Faces
  • Deviations from symmetry often occur from
    exposure to diseases in uteri.
  • What is your good side?
  • Female waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7
  • Regardless of weight

4
Physical Attractiveness
  • Some important conclusions from research on
    physical attractiveness and attraction
  • Though there are some features that are nearly
    universally-regarded as attractive, there is
    considerable variability in what individuals find
    attractive
  • Though we tend to like those people who are
    physically attractive, the reverse is also true
    We find people we like more attractive than those
    we dont like.
  • Happy couples tend to idealize each others
    physical attractiveness
  • Physical attractiveness is less stable than we
    think some less attractive young people get
    better looking with age, and some great looking
    young people lose their luster with age.

5
Impact of Physical Attractiveness
  • Attractive Individuals as compared to less
    attractive individuals
  • Are more popular with members of opposite sex
  • May be graded easier
  • May earn more money
  • May get help easier
  • Are less likely to be convicted
  • Receive lighter sentences if convicted

6
Early Effects of Physical Attractiveness
  • Attractive infants receive more affection and
    attention from mothers
  • Attractive children are
  • thought to be more intelligent and better behaved
    by teachers
  • Held less accountable for transgressions.
  • Even infants show same preference for
    attractiveness

7
Why Does Physical Attractiveness Have Such Impact?

a. Immediacy b. Prestige Sigall and Landy
(1973) c. Halo Effect Belief that attractive
people also possess a number of other desirable
characteristics
8
Gender and the Impact of Physical Attractiveness
  • Attractiveness plays more important role in
    womens lives than mens lives.
  • Beauty functions as currency for women
  • Allows greater access to
  • Social mobility
  • Popularity
  • Dating prospects
  • Marriage opportunities

9
Evolutionary Theory
  • Primary motive is reproductive success.
  • People who make bad mate choices will have little
    success.
  • Mate preferences should be shaped by natural
    selection.
  • We are instinctively attracted to features
    associated with reproductive success
  • Parental Investment Theory
  • The sex that invests more is more selective.
  • Females look for mate that could
  • Provide resources
  • Was willing to invest resources
  • Protect family
  • Males look for mate that
  • Had good reproductive potential
  • Young and healthy
  • Would be faithful
  • Nuturing

10
Evolution and Long-Term Mate Choice
  • David Buss (1986)
  • Had college students rank 13 traits on how
    desirable they were in a mate.
  • Both attractiveness and earning capacity were
    ranked lower than kindness and intelligence

11
Busss Cross Cultural Study
  • Looked at rankings across 36 countries
  • Men ranked attractiveness higher than women
  • Women ranked good financial prospect higher than
    men
  • Women want to marry an older mate while men want
    to marry younger mate

12
Social Structure Theory (Eagly Wood, 1999)
  • Argue that differences found by Buss can be
    explained by social structure
  • In most countries, mean control financial
    resources
  • Easiest way for women to access these resources
    is marry a man with them
  • Found that as women have increased access to
    resources, gender differences in importance
    ratings decreased.

13
Gender Differences in Jealousy
  • Buss argued that men should be more jealous of
    sexual infidelity than women since it is
    difficult to prove paternity
  • Found that males were more physiologically
    aroused when they imagined partner having sex
    with another man compared to falling in love with
    another man.
  • Christine Harris argued mean are more aroused by
    sex and would show same pattern imagining
    fidelity as infidelity.

14
Gender Differences in Short-Term Mating
  • Males are more interested in short-term mating
    than females.
  • Men and women are equally interested in long-term
    mating.
  • Males are more interested in having more sex
    partners than females.

15
Gender Differences in Short-Term Mating
  • Men do not need to know partner very long to have
    sex.

16
Propinquity
  • 1. Studies of
  • Propinquity and
  • Attraction
  • Westwood West Study
  • (Festinger, Schachter, Back, 1950)
  • --used a Sociometric Survey - a survey that
    attempts to measure the interpersonal
    relationships in a group of people
  • --measured Functional Distance - an
    architectural layouts propensity to encourage or
    inhibit certain activities, like contact between
    people

17
Propinquity
  • Manhattan Housing Project (Nahemow Lawton,
    1975)
  • Zajonc studies
  • 2. Explanations of Propinquity Effects
  • a. Availability and Propinquity
  • b. Anticipating Interaction
  • c. The Mere Exposure Effect

18
Fig. 3.2
19
Fig. 3.3
20
Fig. 3.4
21
Similarity and Attraction
  • B. Similarity
  • 1. Studies of Similarity and Attraction
  • Whyte (1956) study of Chicago suburb layout
  • Newcomb (1956, 1961)
  • Bogus Stranger paradigm

22
Fig. 3.5
23
Similarity and Attraction
  • 2. Dont Opposites Attract? Complementarity
  • Most studies claiming to support
    complementarity have been criticized on
    methodological grounds
  • Similarity appears to be the rule, and
    complementarity, the exception, in attraction
  • 3. Why Does Similarity Promote Attraction?
  • a. Similar Others Validate Our Beliefs and
    Orientations
  • b. Similarity Facilitates Smooth Interactions
  • c. We Expect Similar Others to Like Us
  • d. Similar Others Have Qualities We Like

24
Attraction
  • D. Theoretical Integration
  • 1. The Reward Perspective on Interpersonal
    Attraction
  • 2. The Social Exchange Perspective on
  • Physical Attraction

25
Study Smarter Student Website
  • http//www.wwnorton.com/socialpsych
  • Chapter Reviews
  • Diagnostic Quizzes
  • Vocabulary Flashcards
  • Apply It! Exercises
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com