bone density seminar

1

• Bone Density Division Of Available Bone In
  Implant Dentistry

Guided By - Dr. Amit Jagtap
Presented By - Dr. Dinesh Chavan
2
Contents

• Introduction
• Bone density
• Biology Of Bone
• Clinical evidence documents influence of bone
  density on success rate
• Etiology of variable bone density
• Bone classification
• Bone density location
• Radiographic bone density

3

• Available bone
• Review of literature
• Available Bone Height
• Available Bone Width
• Available Bone Length
• Available Bone Angulations
• Crown Height
• Divisions Of Available Bone
• Conclusion
• References

4
Introduction
5
Biology Of Bone
BONE - is highly specialized connective tissue
with a mineralized extracellular matrix that
function to provide support for the human
skeleton
6
Biology Of Bone
Bone
Compact bone i.e. cortical bone
Spongy bone i.e. cancellous bone
7
Clinical evidence documents influence of bone
density on success rate
8
Clinical evidence documents influence of bone
density on success rate
Bone density
9
Clinical evidence documents influence of bone
density on success rate

• Jaffin Berman
• 35 implant loss in
  any region of mouth when bone density was poor

10
Etiology of variable bone density

• Bone volume

11
Etiology of variable bone density

• Wolff s statement
• Every change in the form and function of bone or
  of its
• function alone is followed by certain definite
  changes in
• the internal architecture, and equally definite
  changes in
• external conformation, in accordance with
  mechanical
• laws.

12
Etiology of variable bone density

• Cortical and trabecular bone are modified by
  modeling and remodeling.
• Modeling
• Remodeling

13
Etiology of variable bone density

• MacMillan and Parfitt
• Bone is most dense around the teeth (cribriform
  plate) and more dense at the crest than at the
  apex
• Bone density decreases with tooth loss.

14
Etiology of variable bone density

• Decrease in density depends on
• Time of edentulousness
• Original density of bone
• Muscle attachments
• Flexure and torsion of mandible
• Parafunction before and after tooth loss
• Hormonal influences
• Systemic conditions

15
Etiology of variable bone density

• Frost reported a model of four zones
• Pathologic overload zone
• Mild overload zone
• Adapted window
• Acute disuse window

16
Etiology of variable bone density

• Acute disuse window
• Modeling inhibited
• Remodeling is stimulated

17
Etiology of variable bone density

• Adapted window (50 to 1500 microstrain)
• - Modeling Remodeling

18
Etiology of variable bone density

• Mild overload zone (1500-3000 microstrain)
• Bone modeling stimulation
• Remodeling inhibition

19
Etiology of variable bone density

• Pathologic overload zone
• Early implant loading

20
Bone classification schemes related to implant
dentistry

• In 1970 Linkow Chercheve
• Class I bone structure
• Class II bone structure
• Class III bone structure

21
Bone classification schemes related to implant
dentistry

• Linkow Chercheve they stated that

22
Bone classification schemes related to implant
dentistry

• In 1985 Lekholm Zarb
• Quality 1
• Quality 2

23
Bone classification schemes related to implant
dentistry

• Quality 3
• Quality 4

24
Mish bone density classification

• In 1988 Misch

25
Mish bone density classification

26
Bone density Tactile Sense
27
Bone density location
28
Bone density location
mental foramen
29
Radiographic bone density

• Bone density computed tomography (CT)
• The Mish bone density classification may be
  evaluated on CT images by correlation to a range
  of Hounsfield units
• D1 - grater than 1250 Hounsfield unit
• D2 - 850-1250 Hounsfield unit
• D3 350-850 Hounsfield unit
• D4 150-350 Hounsfield unit
• D5 less than 150 Hounsfield unit

30
Available bone
31
Review of literature

• Atwood Coy-
• Rate of resorbtion for endentulous mandible -
• posterior 4 times anterior

32
Review of literature

• posterior maxilla bone loses volume faster than
  any other region

Maxillary sinus
33
Review of literature

• Weiss Judy in 1974 Mandibular atrophy its
  influence on sub-periosteal implant therapy
• Kent in 1982 alveolar ridge deficiency
  designed for alloplastic bone agumentation
• Lekholm Zarb in 1985 five stages of jaw
  resorbtion ranging from minimum to extreme

34
Review of literature
bone volume
Number of implant
bone height
crown height
Implant load
35
Review of literature

• In 1985 Mish Judy -

36
Available Bone
37
Available Bone Height
38
Available Bone Height

• More dense bone may accommodate a shot implant
  (i.e. 8mm)
• Least dense, Weaker bone requires a longer
  implant

39
Available Bone Height

• Angles class II patients have shorter mandibular
  height
• Angles class III patient exhibit the greatest
  height

40
Available Bone Width
Facial plate
Lingual plate
41
Available Bone Length

Distal
Mesial
Length
1.5 mm
42
Available Bone Length
Interproximal contact
CEJ
2mm below the CEJ.
43
Available Bone Length

• Maxillary 1st premolar

4mm
5mm
8mm
44
Available Bone Angulations

45
Available Bone Angulations

• The alveolar bone angulations represents the root
  trajectory in relation to the Occlusal plane

46
Available Bone Angulations

• 2nd premolar 10 degrees to horizontal plane
• 1st molar area 15 degree
• 2nd molar area 20 to 25 degree

submandibular fossa
47
Crown Height
48
Divisions Of Available Bone
49
Division A Bone

• More than 5mm width
• Height greater than 12 mm
• Mesiodistal length of bone is grater than 7mm
• Crown height of 15mm or less
• Angulation of load does not exceed 25 degree
  between the Occlusal plane the implant body

50
Division A root form implant advantage

• Greatest surface area
• Improved stress distribution
• Designed for variable bone density
• Greatest range of prosthetic options
• Less fracture of implant components
• More esthetic condition
• More crown cement retention
• One- or -two stage healing design
• Less abutment screw loosening

51
Prosthetic options for Division A

• Mandatory for FP-1
• FP-2
• RP-4 RP-5 may need osteoplasty

52
Prosthodontic classification

• FP-1
• FP-2
• FP-3
• RP-4
• RP-5

53
Division B

• Division B available bone width may be ranges
  from 2.5 to 5 mm
• B 4 to 5mm
• B-w 2.5 to 4mm

54
Division B

• The minimum length of division B ridge is 6mm
• Angle of load should be within 20 degree
• Crown height less than 15mm

55
Division B Treatment Options

• Osteoplasty
• Insert division B implant (Small diameter)
• Augmentation

56
Prosthesis type for Division B

• Grafted ridge FP-1 or FP-3 prosthesis
• Osteoplasty FP-2, FP-3 or FP-4 prosthesis

57
Division C Bone

• Width may be less than 2.5mm
• Bone height less than 12mm
• Crown height more than 15mm
• Angulations grater than 30 degree

58
Division C Bone
59
Division C Bone

• subcategory of division C is C-a
• - Angulation is grater than 3o
  degree

60
Treatment planning for division C bone

• Osteoplasty (C-w bone)
• Root form implants
• Subperiosteal implant
• Augumentation procedure

61
Treatment planning for division C bone

• Disk design implant
• Ramus frame implant (C-h bone)
• Transosteal implant (C-h bone anterior)

62
Prosthetic option Division C bone

• Overdenture RP -4 RP -5
• FP -2 or FP -3
• Partially edentulous or low stress
  condition
• Change bone division (Augumentation)
• Denture (maxilla)

63
Division D Bone

• Severe atrophy
• Basal bone loss
• - Flat maxilla
• - pencil-thin mandible
• gt 20mm crown height

64
Division D bone treatment potion

• Autogenous bone graft

65
Articles

• Effect of Implant Design on Initial Stability of
  Tapered Implants Journal of Oral Implantology
• June 2009
• Implant design is one of the parameters for
  achieving successful primary stability. This
  study aims to examine the effect of a
  self-tapping blades implant design on initial
  stability in tapered implants. Polyurethane
  blocks of different densities were used to
  simulate different bone densities. The two
  different implant designs included one with
  self-tapping blades and one without self-tapping
  blades. Implants were placed at 3 different
  depths apical third, middle third, and fully
  inserted at 3 different densities of polyurethane
  blocks. A resonance frequency (RF) analyzer was
  then used to measure stability of the implants.

66
Cont..

• In conclusion, fully inserted implants without
  self-tapping blades have higher initial stability
  than implants with self-tapping blades. However,
  the association strength between implant design
  and initial stability is less relevant than other
  factors, such as insertion depth and block
  density. Thus, if bone quality and quantity are
  optimal, they may compensate for design
  inadequacy.

67
Variations in bone density at dental implant
sites in different regions of the jawbone Journal
of Oral RehabilitationVolume 37 Issue 5

• The survival rate of dental implants is markedly
  influenced by the quality of the bone into which
  they are placed. The purpose of this study was to
  determine the trabecular bone density at
  potential dental implant sites in different
  regions of the Chinese jawbone using computed
  tomography (CT) images The CT data demonstrate
  that trabecular bone density varies markedly with
  potential implant site in the anterior and
  posterior regions of the maxilla and mandible.
  These findings may provide the clinician with
  guidelines for dental implant surgical procedures
  (i.e., to determine whether a one-stage or a
  two-stage protocol is required).

68
Conclusion
69
References

• Dental implant prosthodontics- Carl E. Misch
• Osseointigration occlusalrehabilitation -
  Sumiya
• 
  Hobo
• Contemporary implant dentistery - 3rd edition
  Misch
• Journal of Oral Implantology June 2009 vol 35
  issue 3 Effect of Implant Design on Initial
  Stability of Tapered Implants
• Journal of Oral RehabilitationVolume 37
  Issue5, Pages 346 - 351Variations in bone density
  at dental implant sites in different regions of
  the jawbone
• Information from Web

70
Thank you