Quality in Distance Learning: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality in Distance Learning:

Description:

Rise of Distance Learning. University of Phoenix. Western Governor's University ... Accreditation of Jones International University. Increased Competition ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: johno6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality in Distance Learning:


1
Quality in Distance Learning
  • Principles, Indicators and Practices
  • Dr. John Opper
  • Sarah C. Latham

2
Technological Change?
  • The growth of the network was, in fact, nothing
    short of explosive it grew so fast that it was
    almost impossible to keep track of its size.
  • Newspapers may go out of existence.
  • It provides new ways to cheat, steal, and lie.

3
Technological Change?
  • The growth of the network was, in fact, nothing
    short of explosive it grew so fast that it was
    almost impossible to keep track of its size.
  • Newspapers may go out of existence.
  • It provides new ways to cheat, steal, and lie.
  • Comments concerning the impact of the telegraph
    about 1860.

4
Context for Concerns
  • What is Distance Learning?
  • How has it evolved?
  • 4 generations of technologies
  • How is it delivered?
  • How prevalent is its use?
  • In 1997-98 54,470 different distance education
    courses were offered
  • 8 of all institutions offered complete degree or
    certificate programs solely through distance
    education

5
Context for Concerns
  • Rise of Distance Learning
  • University of Phoenix
  • Western Governors University
  • Harcourt Learning Direct
  • Jones International University
  • A host of corporate and private providers

6
Student Behaviors
  • Who is taking distance learning courses?
  • Approximately 14.6 million enrolled students in
    1997-98. Approximately 86 at the undergraduate
    level.
  • Of all students enrolled in credit courses,
    approximately 11 in distance learning courses.
    (About 9 and 13 of all undergraduate and
    graduate students respectively.

7
Increased Competition
  • Is it possible to accredit entirely on-line
    institutions?
  • Can accreditors determine if on-line institutions
    meet the same basic criteria for quality as
    traditional institutions?
  • Accreditation of Jones International University

8
Increased Competition
  • 3 features which critics maintain are the basis
    for quality in higher education
  • Guarantee of academic freedom
  • Existence of a functioning system of collegial
    governance
  • Group of scholars and students engaged in
    teaching, learning, and expanding the frontiers
    of knowledge

9
Projections Gartner Group
  • Increased competition will push 80 percent of
    traditional higher- education institutions in the
    United States to deliver more than 60 percent of
    undergraduate content through distributed
    learning by 2004 (0.7 probability).
  • By 2004, more than 60 percent of all colleges and
    universities globally will be offering courses
    and programs (anything) to students anytime, from
    anywhere to anyplace (0.8 probability).

10
What is Quality?
  • Through accreditation, the public, employers and
    other institutions have some assurance that a
    minimum standard of competency is being offered
    to and expected of students. (quality)
  • The level of competency can vary within and among
    institutions that are accredited.
  • Quality is a degree of excellence.

11
Quality and Accreditation
  • Cause and effect?
  • Is there a quality issue with distance learning?
  • Is quality a code word for something else?
  • Actual quality or who defines it?
  • Do we really only know it when we see it or can
    it be defined in some standard way?

12
Quality Policy
  • Association statements.
  • Accreditation policies, guidelines or working
    documents.
  • Principles of Good Practice - regional
    cooperatives.
  • Governing and coordinating board policies.

13
SREB Principles of Good Practice
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Institutional Context and Commitment
  • Role and Mission
  • Students and Student Services
  • Faculty Support
  • Resources for Learning
  • Commitment to Support
  • Evaluation and Assessment

14
Western Cooperative for Educational Technology
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Institutional Context and Commitment
  • Role and Mission
  • Faculty Support
  • Resources for Learning
  • Students and Student Services
  • Commitment to Support
  • Evaluation and Assessment

15
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Evaluation and Assessment
  • Library and Learning Resources
  • Student Services

16
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Evaluation and Assessment
  • Library and Learning Resources
  • Student Services
  • Facilities and Finances

17
Northeastern Association of Schools and Colleges
  • Mission and Purposes
  • Planning and Evaluation
  • Programs and Instruction
  • Faculty
  • Student Services
  • Library and Information Resources
  • Physical Resources
  • Financial Resources

18
Northeastern Association of Schools and Colleges
  • Mission and Purposes
  • Planning and Evaluation
  • Programs and Instruction
  • Faculty
  • Student Services
  • Library and Information Resources
  • Physical Resources
  • Financial Resources
  • Organization and Governance
  • Public Disclosure
  • Integrity

19
Western Association of Schools and Colleges
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Evaluation and Assessment
  • Library and Learning Resources
  • Student Services
  • Facilities and Finances

20
Some Similarities?
  • The similarities are considerable!
  • Suggests that the demonstration of quality
    might be done in some common ways.
  • Reasonable or adequate test?

21
Some Differences?
  • The Cooperatives, SREB and WICHE, are almost
    identical.
  • The accrediting agencies have some additional
    focus on
  • Organization and Governance
  • Facilities
  • Planning
  • Finance

22
Integrity!?!?
  • Northeastern Association of Schools and Colleges
  • - ensures integrity of student work and the
    credibility of the degrees, certificates and
    credits it awards.
  • -programs offered through distance education
    fulfill the Commissions Standards for
    Accreditation and its POLICY FOR THE
    ACCREDITATION OF ACADEMIC DEGREE AND CERTIFICATE
    PROGRAMS OFFERED THROUGH DISTANCE EDUCATION.

23
The Heart of the Issue
  • There are some areas in reviews of distance
    learning course and programs that seem to
    continuously emerge as potential problems.
  • In most cases the quality guidelines or
    principles address them?
  • How should we respond?

24
Some Typologies To Avoid
  • The Bolt-On
  • The Student Castaway
  • The Dangling Modifier
  • The Well-Intentioned Designer

25
The Bolt-On
  • Little modification of instructional content.
  • Primarily a mode of delivery change.
  • Cost of instruction is higher!

26
The Student Castaway
  • Student largely left to own devices
  • Learning resources?
  • Advising and tutoring?
  • Interaction with instructor low.
  • Basic institutional services difficult to access.

27
The Dangling Modifier
  • Course modifications made.
  • Unintended consequences and loose ends.
  • Lack off understanding of the student
    instructional experience.
  • Lack of institutional support and training.
  • Do what I say not what I do.

28
The Well-Intentioned Designer
  • Often problems of a new course offering
  • Often feels like a Lone Ranger
  • An incomplete set of tools and/or learning
    experiences for the course.
  • Need for a support structure
  • Listen to the students
  • Look at the data - performance, email,
    submissions.
  • Rely on the experience of others.

29
The Problem Areas!
  • Appropriateness of a technology or delivery mode.
  • Faculty training and support.
  • Interactivity between students and faculty.
  • Student support services.
  • Evaluation of mode of delivery.

30
Appropriateness of Technology
  • Review and approval processes ensure the
    appropriateness of the technology being used to
    meet program or course objectives.
  • (Please discuss why particular technologies or
    modes of delivery were chosen.

31
Faculty Support and Training
  • The program or course provides faculty support
    services specifically related to teaching via an
    electronic system.
  • (Describe the nature of the support services
    offered to faculty.)
  • The institution assures appropriate training for
    faculty who teach using technology.
  • (What types of training is offered to those
    involved in SREC listed courses and programs?)

32
Faculty Support and Training
  • The program or course provides adequate
    equipment, software and communications to faculty
    for interaction with students, institutions, and
    other faculty.
  • (Describe any specific equipment, software and
    communications methods to enhance student faculty
    interaction.)

33
Learner Resources
  • The program or course ensures that appropriate
    learning resources are available to students.
  • (Describe the range of resources such as
    textbooks, readers, tapes, CD's, access to
    digital databases and other library resources and
    how the student acquires them.)
  • The program or evaluates the adequacy of, and the
    cost to students, for access to learning
    resources. It also documents the use of
    electronic resources.
  • (Describe any processes used for evaluation and
    attach any additional costs to the student for
    such access not covered in tuition and regular
    fees.)

34
Interactivity
  • The course provides for appropriate interaction
    between faculty and students and among students.
  • (Describe the nature of the interaction for the
    course. In the case of a degree program describe
    the general nature of the student interactions
    across all of the courses while noting specific
    exceptions when necessary)

35
Same as.
  • Academic standards for all programs or courses
    offered electronically are the same as those for
    other courses delivered at the institution where
    the programs originate.
  • Student learning in programs or courses delivered
    electronically should be comparable to student
    learning in programs offered at the campus where
    the programs originate.
  • (If any research data are available to support
    the nature of the student outcomes, please
    provide a summary or copies if available.)

36
Final Thoughts
  • Quality depends upon who is defining it and the
    audience or constituency involved.
  • Its a case that must be made using persuasive
    actions, processes and data.
  • Motivations and results are important
  • Watch the completion rates!
  • Understand the constituency!
  • Make it your best effort!

37
A New Recommended Resource
  • Putting Principles Into Practice Promoting
    Effective Support Services for Students in
    Distance Learning Programs
  • (WWW.WICHE.EDU/telecom/About/Studentservdocs.htm)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com