Title: An application for incorporating pattern recognition into the lake effect snow forecasting process a
1An application for incorporating pattern
recognition into the lake effect snow forecasting
process at WFO Binghamton, NY.
2Outline
- Lake effect snow band types in central NY.
- Modeling lake effect snow.
- Combining model output with pattern recognition.
- A pattern recognition improvement application.
- November 30th and December 1st, 2007.
3WFO BGM County Warning Area
4Single Bands
5Multi-bands
6Multi-bands
7Modeling
- Large single bands can be modeled realistically
using models with resolutions of 5 to 20 km
(Ballentine 1998, Niziol 2003). - Smaller multi-bands require higher resolution
(Watson et. al. 1998).
820 km NAM February 5, 2007
9Smaller multi-bands from a 2.5 km MM5 (Watson
et. al. 1998)
1012 km NAM vs. 6 km WRF
11Modeling Summary
- Medium resolution models can model lake effect
snow bands. - Small multi-bands best modeled at resolutions of
5 km or less. - Placement / intensity errors still occur.
12Given that high resolution models are not
perfect, the following forecast methodology has
been developed
- Examine low-resolution models to forecast the
meso-scale environment (flow direction, moisture
depth, inversion height, ect). - Use pattern recognition / experience to develop a
set of expectations on outcomes. - Use high resolution models to test expectations.
- Final forecast utilizes a combination of pattern
recognition and explicit output from high
resolution models.
13Experience / pattern recognition
- Forecasters have a wide range of experience.
- Forecasters have a range of abilities regarding
recall of previous similar events (pattern
recognition). - The best forecasters use utilize a vast wealth of
experience to develop expectations and modify
explicit model output.
14An application to make anyone a pattern
recognition expert
- Application grabs current 12 km NAM forecast
soundings from user selectable points. - Compares forecast data with data from a large
historical sounding data base. - Runs an algorithm to determine the most similar
historical soundings at each hour. - Provides users with information on these
historical events.
15More on the application
- At each hour radar data, model soundings, and
snowfall can be displayed. - Data from the top 5 similar events can be
displayed a range of possibilities.
16Example November 30, 2007
17Most similar events - hourly
18Example December 1, 2007
19Most similar events - hourly
20Summary the BGM LES pattern recognition
application
- Analyzes a current meso-scale forecast compares
to a large historical data base. - Returns data from the most similar historical
cases. - Anyone can be a pattern recognition expert.
- A range of possible outcomes is displayed.
- Output from high resolution models can be
examined critically.
21Now available online
- http//www.lightecho.net/les/
- http//www.lightecho.net/lesBGM/ (under
development)
22References
- Ballentine R. J., A. J. Stamm, E. E. Chermack,
G. P. Byrd, and D. Schleede 1998 Mesoscale Model
Simulation of the 45 January 1995 Lake-Effect
Snowstorm Wea. Forecasting,13, 893920. - Niziol, T., 2003 An analysis of
satellite-derived Great Lakes surface
temperatures in regards to model simulations of
lake effect snow. Preprints, 10th Conference on
Mesoscale Processes, Portland Or, June 2003,
Amer. Meteor., Soc., CD-ROM, P1.9. - Watson, J.S., Jurewicz, M.L, Ballentine, R.J.,
Colucci, S.J. and Waldstreicher, J.S.,1998 High
resolution numerical simulations of finger lakes
snow bands.. Preprints, 16th Conference on
Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Phoenix, Az.,
January 1998, Amer. Meteor., Soc. 308-310..