CFMU User Forum 09

1
CFMU User Forum 09

• ASM-ATFCM Processes

Anders Hallgren Manager ASM ATM Procedures
Benoit Fonck ASM/ATFCM Programme Manager
2
ASM Improvements Initiative
3
ASM/ATFCM Process
Airspace not used optimally
Impact on performance of Network
After CRAM Level III
Work load intense
Opportunities not used
Network perspective
4
ASM Improvements Initiative
Exploit available capacity
Consistent application of FUA
Safe, efficient and accurate flow of data
5
Enhanced ASM/ATFCM Process
Static frozen D-1 picture
Dynamic periodically updated
Excessive Booking
Accurate Booking
Difficult
User Friendly
Level II Processes on Day of Ops
6
CFMU ASM/ATFCM Activities
7
Activities in 2009
IMPLEMENTATION
CIAM Phase 1 - AUP
MILO Implementation
Light Procedure 15 CDR Segments
Arrangements for AMC outage
DEVELOPMENT
CIAM Phase 2 - UUP
Interoperability CFMU/local tools
eASM data modelling
Support FABs initiatives - Trial
8
Activities in 2010
IMPLEMENTATION
CIAM Phase 2 - UUP
Interoperability with local tools
Integration of ASM in the ATFCM Process
eASM data modelling
FABEC Quick Wins
DEVELOPMENT
Re-routing Proposal Services
Notification Process
Support FABs initiatives - Trial
9
Support to FAB Initiatives
10
FABEC
ASM/ATFCM Pre-tactical process (D-7 to D-1)
Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands,
Switzerland and MUAC
Quick Wins implementation
ASM/ATFCM Function Model definition
11
Rehearsal Objectives

• Develop and assess harmonized procedures between
  the ATFCM/ASM function and CFMU.
• Roles Responsibilities
• Consider common products as result of the
  pre-tactical process level (pre-tactical plan).
• Identify the need for improved tool
  functionalities.

12
FABEC Pre-tactical Plan
Headlines News
PREDICT access
Access to Reports
FABEC Outlook Plan
FABEC ASM Info
FABEC ATFCM Info
Network events
13
Technical Set-up
Germany
Shared printer
STANLY (3)
BE, NL , MUAC
France
20 PCs 40 Screens (24 inches) 7 Servers with 7
traffic samples 40 participants
LARA (4)
COURAGE
14
Rehearsal Execution
3 FABEC Function Positions
15
High Level Outcomes

• Need of harmonised working process (e.g. time
  table)
• Clarify roles and responsibilities (e.g. decision
  making between local and FABEC units)
• Require accurate, reliable data provided in due
  time
• Rely on systems/tools interoperability

16
FABCE

• Strategic phase Joint Civil Military Airspace
  Coordination Body JCMACB
• Ops requirements for ASM/ATFCM pre-tactical
  function
• Phased approach
• National Integrated AMC/FMP
• Lead AMC and Sub-Regional ATFCM coordinator
• Integrated ASM/ATFCM at FABCE level
• FABCE AUP/UUPs
• FABCE sector configuration and capacity plan

Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech
Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia
17
Any Question?
Thank you!