Linda Mason, Ed'D' Coordinator for Grantwriting and External Funding Technical Assistance Oklahoma S - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Linda Mason, Ed'D' Coordinator for Grantwriting and External Funding Technical Assistance Oklahoma S

Description:

In general terms, responsible conduct in research is simply good citizenship ... ESPECIALLY IN PUI'S IN WHICH RESEARCH IS AN EMERGING FIELD. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: OSR75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linda Mason, Ed'D' Coordinator for Grantwriting and External Funding Technical Assistance Oklahoma S


1
Linda Mason, Ed.D.Coordinator for Grantwriting
and External Funding Technical AssistanceOklahoma
State Regents for Higher Education
  • lmason_at_osrhe.edu
  • www.okhighered.org/grant-opps/
  • IP 164.58.250.178

2
ETHICS IN RESEARCH
  • In general terms, responsible conduct in research
    is simply good citizenship applied to
    professional life.
  • Researchers who report their work
  • Honestly
  • Accurately
  • Efficiently
  • Objectively
  • Irresponsible, or unethical conduct includes
  • Knowingly reporting inaccurate results
  • Wasting funds
  • Allows personal bias to influence scientific
    findings

3
ETHICS IN RESEARCH
  • Principle Investigator
  • Truth in follow-through
  • What are the broader impacts? Are undergraduate
    students involved? Are K-12 students
    involved? K-12 teachers? Are underrepresented
    staff involved? Is your local community involved?
    Are there statewide, national or international
    collaborations?
  • What is the intellectual merit of the proposed
    activity? How important is the proposed activity
    to advancing knowledge and understanding within
    its own field or across different fields? How
    well qualified is the proposer? Does the proposed
    activity suggest and explore creative and
    original concepts? How well conceived and
    organized is the proposed activity? Is there
    sufficient access to resources?

4
ETHICS IN RESEARCH
  • Research is not an organized profession in the
    same way as law or medicines. Researchers learn
    best practices in a number of ways and in
    different settings.
  • Norms vaiy
  • Local, state and Federal regulations

5
  • Shared Values
  • Honesty conveying information truthfully and
    honoring commitments
  • Accuracy reporting findings precisely and
    taking care to avoid errors
  • Efficiency using resources wisely and avoiding
    time waste
  • Objectivity letting the facts speak for
    themselves and avoiding improper bias

6
  • Guidance
  • Not like obtaining a drivers license
  • Some laws and policies
  • Other codes and guidelines
  • Some responsible practices accepted but not
    written mentoring, not monitored or tested
  • Penalties vary

7
  • Guidance
  • Professional codes
  • Government regulations
  • Institutional policies
  • Personal convictions

8
  • Professional Codes
  • Many professional organizations do have a code of
    ethics.
  • Many are general statements about ideals and do
    not contain specific guidance

9
  • Code Resources
  • Sigma Xi. Honor in Science
  • http//www.sigmaxi.org/publications
  • National Academy of Sciences. On Being a
    Scientist Responsible Conduct in Research
  • http//www.nap.edu/redingroom/books/obas/
  • National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for the
    Conduct of Research in the Intramural Research
    Programs at NIK
  • http//www.nih.gov/campus/irnews/guidelines.htm

10
  • Code Resources
  • Institute of Medicine. The Responsible Conduct of
    Research in the Health Sciences
  • http//www.nap.edu/books/0309062373/html/

11
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • The public Chemists have a professional
    responsibility to serve the public interest
    and welfare and to further knowledge of
    science

12
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • The Science of
  • Chemistry Chemists should seek to advance
    chemical science, understand the limitations
    of their knowledge, and respect the truth.

13
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • The Profession
  • Chemists should remain current with developments
    in their field, share ideas and information, keep
    accurate and complete laboratory records,
    maintain integrity in all conduct and
    publications, and give due credit to the
    contributions of others. Conflicts of interest
    and scientific misconduct, such as fabrication,
    falsification, and plagiarism, are incompatible
    with this Code.

14
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • The Employer Chemists should promote and
    protect the legitimate interests of their
    employers, perform work honestly and
    competently, fulfill obligations, and
    safeguard propriety information.

15
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • Employees Chemists, as employers, should
    treat subordinates with respect for their
    professionalism and concern for their
    well-being.

16
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • Students Chemists should regard the tutelage of
    students as a trust conferred by society for
    the promotion of the students learning and
    professional development.

17
  • American Chemical Society
  • The Chemists Code of Conduct, 1994
  • Associates Chemists should treat associates with
    respect, regardless of the level of their
    formal education, encourage them, learn with
    them, share ideas honestly, and give credit for
    their contributions.

18
  • Government Regulations
  • The 1966 Animal Welfare Act (PL 89-544)
  • The 1974 National Research Act (PL 93-348)
  • The 1985 Health Research Extension Act (PL
    99-158)
  • Office of Scientific Integrity Review (OSIR)
  • Federal Administrative Procedure Act (5 USC
    551-702) (establishing new regulations)
    http//wwwgpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html
  • Executive Branch Agencies NIH Training Grant
    Requirement 1989 Required Education in the
    Protection of Human Research Participants 1974
  • Common Rule (45 CFR 46A-D)

19
  • Institutional Policies
  • Required by law to have policies that cover
    various aspect of research programs if they
    accept Federal funds
  • Committees of review
  • Procedures for investigating and reporting
    misconduct
  • Approve and mange all grant budgets
  • Ensure that safety rules are followed
  • Follow established practices for use of hazardous
    substances
  • Provide training for researchers who use animal
    or human participants

20
  • Institutional Policies
  • Website information
  • Copies of institutional research policies written
  • Links to state and Federal policies
  • Required forms and instructions for completion
  • Responsible conduct training programs
  • Lists of key resource personnel

21
  • Institutional Policies
  • Misconduct
  • Establish definitions for misconduct in grant
    projects
  • Outline procedures for reporting and
    investigating misconduct
  • Provide protection for whistleblowers and persons
    accused of misconduct
  • Federal Policy on Misconduct
  • http//www.ostp.gov/html/001207_3.html

22
  • Personal Convictions
  • Written convictions
  • Peer review
  • Subject-matter expert review
  • Personal value expert review

23
  • Ethics should be a regular discussion on
    campuses, in departments, with peers, with
    experts, with a free flow of information
  • ESPECIALLY IN PUIS IN WHICH RESEARCH IS AN
    EMERGING FIELD.

24
  • Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of
    Research
  • By Nicholas H. Steneck
  • Published by Office of Research Integrity, 2004
  • askori_at_osophs.dhhs.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com